欢迎访问《农学学报》,
土壤肥料 资源环境 生态

秸秆还田技术对大豆产量及农艺性状的影响

展开
  • 黑龙江省农业科学院佳木斯分院

收稿日期: 2014-01-11

  修回日期: 2014-01-11

  录用日期: 2014-04-29

  网络出版日期: 2014-12-05

基金资助

国家科技支撑项目“东北平原瘠薄盐碱中低产田改良技术集成示范”(2012BAD05B01);黑龙江省农业科技创新工程院级科研青年基金项目“基于TRPF三江平原主要作物施肥技术研究”(2012QN006)

Effects of Straw Returning Technology on Agronomic Characters and Yield of Soybean

Expand

Received date: 2014-01-11

  Revised date: 2014-01-11

  Accepted date: 2014-04-29

  Online published: 2014-12-05

摘要

为了达到良好的还田效果,应采取合理的秸秆还田措施。通过秸秆还田的不同处理方式,对大豆农艺性状和产量进行方差分析和多重比较,结果表明:与普通翻地处理比较,秸秆覆盖还田、秸秆心土还田、秸秆焚烧处理在大豆植株株高、单株节数、单株荚数、单株粒数及公顷产量上均得到增加,秸秆心土还田处理的大豆单株节数、荚数、粒数和产量表现最好,与普通翻地处理间存在着显著性差异。并且与普通翻地比较秸秆心土还田增产32.31%,秸秆覆盖还田增产22.50%,秸秆焚烧增产13.65%,由于秸秆心土还田腐熟效果最好,促进土壤肥力增加,大豆吸收的土壤养分比较充分,所以大豆的产量较高。

本文引用格式

王囡囡 . 秸秆还田技术对大豆产量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2014 , 4(11) : 41 -44 . DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.2014-xb0042

Abstract

In order to reach a good effect on straw returning, reasonable measure of should be taken of straw returning. By different processing methods of straw returning, the article made analysis on variance and multiple comparison with agronomic characters and yield of soybean, the results showed that the plant height,single node number, pod number, grain number and yield of those three treatments were on the increasecomparing with the common ground treatments, those three treatments were the straw mulching, soil returning,and the burning of straw. The straw soil returning treatment was the best, and the different between them reached significant or highly significant. The yield of straw soil returning was more than 32.31% compared with common ground, the yield of straw mulching was more than 22.50%, the yield of burning of straw was more than 13.65%. The yield of straw soil returning was the best, because of the good effect on well-composted, it would promote an increase in soil fertilizers, and absorb the nutrients fully for soybean.

参考文献

[1] 周怀平, 杨治平, 李红梅, 关春林. 秸秆还田和秋施肥对旱地玉米生长发育及水肥效应的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004,15(7):1231-1235
[2] 霍竹, 付晋锋, 王璞. 秸秆还田和氮肥施用对夏玉米氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2005, 37(2):202-204.
[3] 金海洋, 姚政, 徐四新, 等. 纤维素分解菌剂对水稻秸秆田间降解效果的研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 2004, 20(4):83-85.
[4] 李孝勇,武际,朱宏斌,王允青.秸秆还田对作物产量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2003, 31(5): 870-871.
[5] 杨振兴, 周怀平, 关春林, 等. 秸秆腐熟剂在玉米还田中的效果[J]. 山西农业科学, 2013, 41(4):354-357.
[6] 徐国伟. 种植方式、秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对水稻产量与品质的影响及其生理的研究[D].扬州:扬州大学, 2007.
[7] 刘世平,聂新涛,张洪程,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲稻. 麦两熟条件下不同土壤耕作方式与秸秆还田效用分析[J].农业工程学报, 2006, 22(7):48-51.
[8] 吴婕,朱钟麟,郑家国,姜心禄. 秸秆覆盖还田对土壤理化性质及作物产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2006, 19(2):192-195.
[9] 陈尚洪, 朱钟麟, 吴婕, 刘定辉, 王昌全. 紫色土丘陵区秸秆还田的腐解特征及对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(6): 141-144.
[10] 姚宗路, 赵立欣, 田宜水, 等. Utilization status and medium and long-term forecast of crop straw resource in Heilongjiang Province[J].农业工程学报, 2009,25(11):288-292.
文章导航

/