欢迎访问《农学学报》,

农学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (8): 59-63.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas16030004

• 农业信息 农业气象 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊影响力量化评价的研究

刘茜   

  1. 中国农业科学院农业信息研究所
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-02 修回日期:2016-04-14 接受日期:2016-04-25 出版日期:2016-08-23 发布日期:2016-08-23
  • 通讯作者: 刘茜 E-mail:liuqian@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:
    社科基金项目"科学数据用户相关性标准与使用模式实证研究”(14BTQ056);”中国农业科学院农业信息研究所科技创新工程项目”(CAAS-ASTIP-2016-AII)。

Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of Science and Technology Journals: A Case Study of Agricultural Outlook

  • Received:2016-03-02 Revised:2016-04-14 Accepted:2016-04-25 Online:2016-08-23 Published:2016-08-23

摘要: 科技期刊影响力体现的是期刊的社会价值、受关注程度,以及学术质量,但如何将其量化评价,仍存在较大分歧。对此,以中国农业核心期刊《农业展望》为例,根据《中国学术期刊综合引证报告》的主要文献计量指标,统计了2005—2015年,中国知网(CNKI)的所有期刊数据,分析期刊论文载文量、下载量、基金论文比例、被引文献比和被引频次等。经分析发现,期刊的以上统计数据均表现为逐年递增的态势,说明期刊发展迅速,具有一定的学术质量和学术影响力,同时,科研人员对期刊的关注程度较高,体现了期刊的使用价值和社会价值。期刊2009—2011年迅猛发展,2012年后保持发展势头并趋于稳定,说明创刊10年来,期刊发展已趋于成熟。但期刊的基金论文比例尚有待提高,仍具有一定的发展空间。因此,量化的统计数据体现了同行专家、学者和读者对期刊的关注程度,反映了期刊的学术质量和学术影响力,具有客观性、公正性和准确性。

关键词: 内在品质、适宜用量、硫素、烤烟、皖南烟区, 内在品质、适宜用量、硫素、烤烟、皖南烟区

Abstract: Science and technology journal impact is reflected in the journal social value, the degree of concern, as well as academic quality. How to quantify the evaluation of science and technology journal impact, there are still considerable differences. So as a Chinese agricultural core journal, we counted all data of Agricultural Outlook on CNKI from 2005 to 2015, according to the bibliometric indicators of CAJCCR, and analyzed its published articles, downloads, the proportion of the fund papers and citation, and times cited. Through analysis, all above statistics of the journal are expressed as a yearly trend. It shows that the journal has developed rapidly, has a certain academic quality and academic influence. At the same time, researchers are very concerned about the journal, it reflects the journal''s value and social value. In 2009-2011, the Journal has developed rapidly, after 2012, maintained a steady pace of development. It shows that in the past 10 years, the journal’s development has matured. But the proportion of funds of the journal have yet to be improved, still has some room for development. Thus, the quantitative statistical data reflects the peer experts, scholars and readers of the journal degree of concern, reflects the quality and academic influence of academic journals. It has the objectivity, fairness and accuracy.

中图分类号: