欢迎访问《农学学报》,
畜牧 兽医 水产

不同饵料及投喂方式对中间球海胆生长及性腺发育的影响

展开
  • 大连海洋大学,大连海洋大学,大连海洋大学,大连海洋大学,大连海洋大学

收稿日期: 2014-02-20

  修回日期: 2014-02-20

  录用日期: 2014-04-29

  网络出版日期: 2014-12-05

基金资助

国家自然科学基金“海胆性腺脂肪酸相关基因克隆与表达”(30972269);辽宁省科技计划“海胆高效增养殖及食品安全保障技术研究”(2007203004);国家“863”计划“高值海珍品良种培育”(2012AA10A412)。

Effects of Different Feeding Models and Feeding Ways on Growth, Gonad Development ofthe Sea Urchins (Strongylocentrotus intermedius)

Expand

Received date: 2014-02-20

  Revised date: 2014-02-20

  Accepted date: 2014-04-29

  Online published: 2014-12-05

摘要

为研究不同饵料模式及投喂方式对中间球海胆(Strongylocentrotus intermedius)生长及性腺发育的影响。采用不同饵料模式(M1:海带、M2:海带+贻贝、M3:南瓜、M4:胡萝卜)和不同投喂方式(RM1:饲喂南瓜75 天后饲喂海带75 天;RM2:饲喂胡萝卜75 天后饲喂海带75 天)两种实验方案,以M1模式为对照组,对中间球海胆生长指标及性腺性状进行测量并分析,实验周期150 天。结果显示:不同饵料模式下,M1(57.84±3.25) mm、(72.58±11.07)g 和M2(56.60±2.66) mm、(69.62±8.94)g 模式的海胆壳径及活体重差异不显著(P>0.05),二者极显著(P<0.01)高于M3(53.10±2.28) mm、(57.31±8.18) g 和M4(50.12±1.70) mm、(50.45±4.27) g 模式;M2模式下雌、雄海胆的性腺指数(31.22±3.31)%、(30.92±2.76)%均极显著(P<0.01)高于其他3 种饵料模式;M2模式下雄海胆的亮橙黄色差ΔE1和亮黄色差ΔE2均显著(P<0.05)优于对照组(M1模式),雌海胆ΔE1、ΔE2则与对照组差异不显著(P>0.05),表明:添加动物性蛋白(M2模式)对促进海胆性腺指数、性腺品质的提升效果显著(P<0.05),但对其生长影响不显著(P>0.05)。不同投喂方式下,RM1(55.46±2.19) mm模式的海胆壳径显著低于对照组(57.84±3.25) mm (P<0.05),活体重(68.63±7.39) g 与对照组(72.58±11.07) g 差异不显著(P>0.05),RM1 和RM2 模式下海胆在75~150 天的壳径增长率(12.55±0.22)%、(12.68±1.78)%和增重率(29.60±4.20)%、(30.53±2.09)%均显著高于对照组(9.79±0.97)%、(19.86±4.86)%(P<0.05);海胆性腺指数在不同性别不同模式间均差异不显著(P>0.05);RM1和RM2模式下海胆的亮橙黄色差ΔE1和亮黄色差ΔE2均差异不显著(P>0.05),二者显著(P<0.05)优于对照组且在性别间表现一致,表明:饲喂南瓜75 天后饲喂海带75 天的投喂方式不会显著(P>0.05)影响海胆活体重的增加,且对海胆性腺指数及性腺品质的提升有一定的促进作用。本研究以期找到提高海胆生长及性腺品质的饵料投喂模式,为海胆工厂化养殖环节中替代饵料及投喂方式的选择提供参考。

本文引用格式

丁玉龙,丁君,常亚青,丁文君,张伟杰 . 不同饵料及投喂方式对中间球海胆生长及性腺发育的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2014 , 4(11) : 85 -91 . DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.2014-xb0144

Abstract

In order to study the effects of different feeding models and feeding ways on growth, gonad development ofS.intermedius , the growth targets and gonad traits ofS.intermedius were measured and analyzed in the experiment under different feeding models (M1: kelp, M2: kelp mussel, M3: pumpkin, M4: carrot) and different feeding ways (RM1: feed kelp after feeding pumpkin for 75 days, RM2: feed kelp after feeding carrot for 75 days). The results showed that on conditions of the different feeding models, there’s no significant difference between M1(57.84±3.25) mm, (72.58±11.07) g and M2 (56.60±2.66) mm, (69.62±8.94) g on test diameter and weight of sea urchin(P >0.05), both of them were significantly different with M3 (53.10±2.28) mm, (57.31±8.18) g and M4(50.12±1.70) mm, (50.45±4.27) g models (P <0.01); the GI of M2(♀ :31.22±3.31)%, (♂:30.92±2.76)% model was significantly higher than the other three models (P <0.01); the light orange-yellow ΔE1 and lightyellow ΔE 2 of femaleS.intermedius under M2 model were significantly better(P <0.05) than control group(M1 model), which was not significantly different with control group in male S.intermedius (P >0.05). The results suggested that: the bait added with animal protein has obvious promoting effects on the gonad index and the quality of the gonad (P <0.05). On conditions of the different feeding ways, the test diameter of control group (57.84 ± 3.25)mm was significantly higher than RM1 (55.46 ± 2.19) mm model, and there’s no significant difference (P >0.05) between RM1 (68.63±7.39) g model and control group(72.58±11.07)g on weight, the growth rate of diameter (12.55±0.22)%, (12.68±1.78)% and weight (29.60±4.20)%, (30.53±2.09)% under RM1 and RM2 models were significantly higher (P <0.05)than control group (9.79±0.97)%, (19.86±4.86)% during 75 days to 150day. There’s no significant difference (P >0.05)with the GI in different gender and feeding ways. There’s no significant difference in ΔE 1 and ΔE 2 of RM1 and RM2 models (P >0.05), both of them were significantly better (P <0.05) than control group. The results suggested that: the feeding ways of feed kelp after feeding pumpkin for 75days could not significantly affect the weight of sea urchin, but also had obvious promoting effects on the gonad index and the quality of the gonad. This experiment aims to find suitable feeding models and feeding ways which can improve the growth and gonad quality of S. intermedius and provide certain reference for the selections of feeding models and feeding ways in the link of sea urchin cultivation.

参考文献

[1]董金和,陈恩友,袁晓初,等.2012中国渔业统计年鉴[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2012,5.
[2] Phillips K,Hamid N,Silcock P, et a1. Effect of manufactured diets on the yield, biochemical composition and sensory quality of Evechinus chloroticus sea urchin gonads[J]. Aquaculture,2010,308:49–59.
[3] Chang Y Q,Lawerence J M,Cao X B, eta1.Food consumption,absorption,assimilation and growth of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius fed a prepared feed and the alga Laminaria japonica[J].Journal of the world Aquaculture Society.2005,36(1):68-75.
[4] Pearce C M, Daggett T L, Robinson S. Effect of urchin size and diet on gonad yield and quality in the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) [J]. Aquaculture. 2004,233(1-4):337- 367.
[5]常亚青,王子臣,王国江.温度和藻类饵料对中间球海胆摄食及生长的影响[J].水产学报,1999,23(1):69-75.
[6]邱东,孔泳滔,王琦,等.饵料对中间球海胆品质的影响[J].水产科学,2005,24(7):32-34.
[7]周海森,常亚青,罗世滨,等.3种饵料模式对中间球海胆生长、性腺产量和性腺品质的影响[J].水产学报,2013,37(7):1050-1057.
[8] Gibbs V K,Watts S A,Lawrence A L, et al. Dietary phosphor-lipids affect growth and production of juvenile sea urchin Lytechinus variegates[J].Aquaculture,2009,292:95-103
[9] Senaratna M,Evance L H,Southam L,et al.Effect of different feed formulation on feed efficiency,gonad yield and gonad quality in the purple sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma[J].Aquaculture Nutrition.2005,11(3):199-207.
[10] Azad A K,Pearce C M,McKinley R S. Effects of diet and temperature on ingestion, absorption, assimilation, gonad yield and gonad quality of the purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) [J]. Aquaculture,2011,317,187-196.
[11] Siikavuopio S I ,James P,Mortensen A,et a1.Effects of restricted feeding regimes on growth and feed conversion on juvenile green sea urchin,Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis[J]. Aquaculture Research, 2012,43,1515-1519.
[12] McCarron E,Burnell G,Mouzakitis G.Growth assessment on three size classes of the purple sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus using continuous and intermittent feeding regimes[J]. Aquaculture 2009,288,83–91.
[13] Goebel N, Barker M F. Artificial diets supplemented with carotenoid pigments as feeds for sea urchins. In: Mooi, R., Telford, M. (Eds.), Echinoderms [J].Balkema, San Francisco. 1998, 667-672.
[14] Robinson S M C, Castell J S, Kennedy E J. Developing suitable colour in the gonads of cultured green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) [J]. Aquaculture. 2002, 206: 289-303.
[15] McBride S C, Pinnix W D, Lawrence J M , et al.The effect of temperature on production of gonads by the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus fed natural and prepared diets [J]. J. World Aquac. Soc. 1997, 28, 357-365.
[16] Woods C M.C,James P J ,Moss G A, et al. A comparison of the effect of urchin size and diet on gonad yield and quality in the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus Valenciennes[J]. Aquacult Int,2008,16,49-68.
[17] Suckling C C,Symonds R C,Kelly M S, et al.The effect of arti?cial diets on gonad colour and biomass in the edible sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris[J]. Aquaculture, 2011,318:335–342.
[18] Sharma G, Wu W C, Dalal E N .The CIEDE2000 Color-Difference Formual: Implementation Notes, Supplementary Test Date, and Mathematical Observations[J]. Submitted to Color Research and Application. 2004, 9(2):1-24.
[19]Lawrence J M,Chang Y Q,Cao X B,et al.Potential for Production of Uni by Strongylocentrotus intermedius Using Dry Formulated Feeds[J].Journal of the world Aquaculture society.2011,42(2):253-260.
[20] Eddy S D, Brown N P, Kling A L, et al. Growth of Juvenile Green Sea Urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, Fed Formulated Feeds with Varying Protein Levels Compared with a Macroalgal Diet and a Commercial Abalone Feed[J]. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society.2012, 43(2):159- 173.
[21] Kennedy E.J., Robinson S M C.Effect of Protein Source and Concentration on Somatic Growth of Juvenile Green Sea Urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis[J]. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 2005, 36(3): 320- 335.
[22]刘襄河,叶继丹,王子甲,等.饲料中豆粕替代鱼粉比例对牙鲆生长性能及生化指标的影响[J].水产学报,2010,34(3):450-458.
[23]向枭,周兴华,陈建,等.饲料中豆粕蛋白替代鱼粉蛋白对齐口裂腹鱼幼鱼生长性能、体成分及血液生化指标的影响[J].水产学报,2012,36(5):723-731.
[24]赵金柱,艾庆辉,麦康森,等.微粒饲料替代生物饵料对大黄鱼稚鱼生长、存活和消化酶活力的影响[J].水产学报,2008,32(1):91-97.
[25] He?in L E,Gibbs V K,Powell M L, eta1. Effect of dietary protein and carbohydrate levels on weight gain and gonad production in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegates[J]. Aquaculture,2012,253-261
[26] Symonds R C,Kelly M S,Caris-Veyrat C, et al.Carotenoids in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus: Occurrence of 9’-cis-echinenone as the dominant carotenoid in gonad colour determination[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part B 2007,148, 432-444.
文章导航

/