欢迎访问《农学学报》,
植物保护

山东灰霉病菌对腐霉利的抗药性检测

展开
  • 曲阜师范大学生命科学学院,山东省农业科学院植物保护研究所,山东省农业科学院植物保护研究所,山东省农业科学院植保所,曲阜师范大学,山东省农业科学院植物保护研究所

收稿日期: 2014-03-11

  修回日期: 2014-11-30

  录用日期: 2014-04-29

  网络出版日期: 2014-12-29

基金资助

公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费“保护地果蔬灰霉病绿色防控技术研究与示范”(201303025);山东省现代农业产业技术体系;山东省农业科学院科技创新重点项目(2014CXZ07)。

Resistance Detection for Botrytis cinerea Against Procymidone in Shandong Province

Expand

Received date: 2014-03-11

  Revised date: 2014-11-30

  Accepted date: 2014-04-29

  Online published: 2014-12-29

摘要

为监测灰霉病菌对腐霉利的抗药性,2012 年12 月到2013 年5 月,在山东省内10 个市县,采集灰霉病菌样本150 余份,分离得到灰葡萄孢(Botrytis cinerea)菌株130 株,采用生长速率法对130 株灰霉病菌进行抗药性检测。结果表明,腐霉利对灰霉病菌的EC50的范围为0.1208~12.486 μg/mL,平均EC50为4.03 μg/mL,抗性频率达到67.69%。其中低抗菌株占52.38%,中抗菌株占19.048%,未检测到高抗菌株。本研究可为灰霉病的防治特别是杀菌剂的轮换使用提供依据。

本文引用格式

刘超,张悦丽,张博,李长松,石磊,齐军山 . 山东灰霉病菌对腐霉利的抗药性检测[J]. 农学学报, 2014 , 4(12) : 30 -32 . DOI: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.2014-xb0213

Abstract

In order to monitor procymidone resistance ofBotrytis cinerea , from December of 2012 to May of 2013, manyBotrytis cinerea samples were collected from 10 cities in Shandong, and 130 isolates were purified from them. The resistances of Botrytis cinerea were determined in 130 isolates by measuring the mycelia growth on the fungicide-amended media. The means of the 50% effective concentration values (EC 50) were 4.03 μg/mL. The resistance frequency was 67.69% , 52.38% of Botrytis cinerea was low resistant strains, 19.048% ofBotrytis cinerea was moderate resistant strains; there was no high resistant strain. The resultsprovided a theoretical basis for using fungicides efficiently to prevent and controlbotrytis cinerea in the field.

参考文献

参考文献
[1] Jarvis,W.R,Botryotinia and Botrytis species:taxonomy,physiology and pathogenicity:a guide to the literature[M],Canada:Canada Department of agriculture,1977,1~20.
[2] Joel Davis ,Daozhan Yu,Wendy Evans et al.,Mapping of loci from Solanum lycopersicoides conferring resistance or susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in tomato,Theor Appl Genet (2009) 119:305~314
[3] 王春艳,草莓灰霉病发生危害及防治研究初报[J],植物保护哪一年的,23(3),32~33.
[4] 刘波,叶钟音,刘经芬,周明国,速克灵抗性灰霉病菌菌株性质的研究[J],植物保护学报,1992,19(4),297~301.
[5] 李林,徐作珽,山东省灰霉菌对速克灵、多菌灵田间抗性检测研究初报[J],山东农业科学,1997,3:32~35
[6] 丁中,刘 峰,王会利,吴春先,慕立义,番茄灰霉菌的多重抗药性研究[J],山东农业大学学报,2001,32(4):452~456
[7] Yarden. O. and T. katan, 1993. Mutations leading to substitutions at aminoacids 198 and 200 of beta-tubulin that correlatewith benomyl resistance phenotypes of field strain of Botrytis cinerea. Phyto pathology, 83: 1478-1483.
[8] 韩巨才,闫秀琴,刘慧平,高俊明,张永杰,灰霉病原菌对速克灵的抗药性监测,山西农业大学学报,2003,23(4):299~302.
[9] G.J.Bollen,G.Scholten, Acquired resistance to benomyl and some other systemic fungi cides in a strain of Botrytis cinerea in cyclamen,Neth. J. Pl. Path,1971,77(2):83~90.
[10] Gary W. Moorman,Roxanne J. Lease,Benzimidazole and dicarboximide resistant Botrytis cinerea from Pennsylvania greenhouses [J] ,Plant Disease,1992,76(5):477~480.
[11] L. F. Yourman and S. N. Jeffers,Resistance to benzimidazole and dicarboximide fungicides in greenhouse isolate of Botrytis cinerea [J] ,Plant Disease,1999,83(6):569~575.
[12] J.A. Lamondia and S. M. Douglas,Sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea from onnecticut green houses to benzimidazole and dicarboximide Fungicides [J] ,Plant Disease,1997,81(7):729~732.
文章导航

/