成土环境、发生学性质和土壤类型对土地利用变化的响应

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0259

农学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 45-50.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0259

• 土壤肥料资源环境生态 • 上一篇下一篇

成土环境、发生学性质和土壤类型对土地利用变化的响应

周萍¹(), 肖华翠², 梁万栋², 罗飞雪², 谢敏³, 盛浩²

¹ 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所，亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室，长沙 410125
² 湖南农业大学资源学院，长沙 410128
³ 浏阳市农产品质量监测中心，湖南浏阳 410399

收稿日期:2023-11-15 修回日期:2024-02-19 出版日期:2025-03-20 发布日期:2025-03-18
作者简介:
周萍，女，1982年出生，江苏滨海人，副研究员，博士，长期从事土壤肥力质量提升与健康保育研究。通信地址：410125 湖南省长沙市芙蓉区远大二路644号中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所，Tel：0731-84619736，E-mail：zhouping@isa.ac.cn。
基金资助:
湖南省重点研发计划项目“变更耕地地力快速提升关键技术研究与应用”(2023NK2026); 国家自然科学基金项目“亚热带丘陵区典型农林用地底土有机碳稳定机理研究”(41571234); 湖南省研究生科研创新项目“热点区土壤微生物多样性及功能对土地利用变化的响应”(CX20230708)

Responses of Soil Forming Environment, Genetic Properties and Soil Type to Land Use Change

ZHOU Ping¹(), XIAO Huacui², LIANG Wandong², LUO Feixue², XIE Min³, SHENG Hao²

¹ Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125
² College of Resources, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128
³ Monitoring Center of Agricultural Product Quality of Liuyang City, Liuyang Hunan 410399

Received:2023-11-15 Revised:2024-02-19 Online:2025-03-20 Published:2025-03-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高强度土地转换及持续的土地利用活动对土壤的发育方向具有双重作用，显著影响土壤多样性。本研究首先概述了土地利用方式对母质来源、局地小气候、微地形、植被类型、管理措施和成土时间的作用；其次，在系统归纳土壤物理、化学和生物学性质对土地利用变化响应规律的基础上，总结了土地变更对土壤发生学属性、形态学特征和诊断特性的影响，进一步综述了土地利用方式转变后，不同等级土壤类型演变规律。最后，指出应加强研究多样化土地利用活动对成土过程、土壤属性的影响，重视土壤发生学性质对土地转换与渐变的动态响应规律，并应用新技术准确高效辨识土地利用方式变更引起的土壤类型变化。

关键词: 土壤分类, 高强度人类活动, 土地转换与渐变, 土壤发生学性质, 成土因素, 土地利用方式, 土壤多样性, 成土过程, 土壤属性

Abstract:

High-intensity land conversion and persistent land use activities exert dual effects on soil development, which can significantly influence pedodiversity. We first reviewed the influences of various types of land use on the source of parent materials, microclimate, microrelief, vegetation cover, management practices and soil age. Then based on our systematical analyses of the effects of land use change on soil physical, chemical, and biological properties, we summarized the effects of land conversions on soil genetic, morphological, and diagnostic characteristics. We also comprehensively evaluated soil type evolution trends in different classification categories in response to land conversions. Finally, we proposed three research priorities: (1) an overall understanding of the effect of diverse land use activities on the soil properties and formation processes; (2) deep exploration of dynamic soil genetic responses to land cover conversions and modifications; (3) and development of new technologies for exact and high-efficiency identification of soil type change with land use change.

Key words: soil classification, high-intensity human activity, land conversion and modification, soil genetic property, soil-forming factor, land use patterns, soil diversity, soil formation processes, soil properties

周萍, 肖华翠, 梁万栋, 罗飞雪, 谢敏, 盛浩. 成土环境、发生学性质和土壤类型对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 农学学报, 2025, 15(3): 45-50.

ZHOU Ping, XIAO Huacui, LIANG Wandong, LUO Feixue, XIE Min, SHENG Hao. Responses of Soil Forming Environment, Genetic Properties and Soil Type to Land Use Change[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(3): 45-50.

图/表 1

参考文献 44

[1]	AMUNDSON R, BERHE A A, HOPMANS J W, et al. Soil and human security in the 21st century[J]. Science, 2015,348:1261071.
[2]	李得成, 张甘霖. 中国土壤系统分类土系描述的难点与对策[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(6):1563-1567.
[3]	GONG Z T, ZHANG GL, LUO G B. Diversity of anthrosols in China[J]. Pedosphere, 2009, 9(3):193-204.
[4]	CAPRA G F, GANGA A, GRILLI E, et al. A review of anthropogenic soils from a worldwide perspective[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2015,15:1602-1618.
[5]	HERRMANN D L, SCHIFMAN L A, SHUSTER W D. Widespread loss of intermediate soil horizons in urban landscapes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018,115:6751-6755.
[6]	Cooperative research group on Chinese soil taxonomy. Chinese soil taxonomy[M]. Beijing: China science Press. 2001.
[7]	NAETH A M, ARCHIBALD H A, NEMIRSKY C L, et al. Proposed classification for human modified soils in Canada: Anthroposolic order[J]. Canadian Journal of soil science, 2012, 92(1):7-18.
[8]	IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps[M]. ^4thedition. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS),Vienna,Austria. 2018.
[9]	GALBRAITH J M. Human-altered and human-transported (HAHT) soils in the U.S. soil classification system[J]. Soil science and plant nutrition, 2018,64:1-10.
[10]	BOIXADERA J, ESTEBAN I, ALBERT R M, et al. Anthropogenic soils from Llanos de Moxos (Bolivia): Soils from pre-Columbian raised fields[J]. Catena, 2019,172:21-39.
[11]	FRASER J, TEIXEIRA W, FALCÃO N, et al. Anthropogenic soils in the Central Amazon: from categories to a continuum[J]. Area, 2011, 43(3):264-273.
[12]	JÜRGEN K, LUISE G, WENCESLAU T, et al. What can we learn from ancient fertile anthropic soil (Amazonian Dark Earths, shell mounds, Plaggen soil) for soil carbon sequestration?[J]. Catena, 2019,172:104-112.
[13]	章明奎, 杨东伟. 南方丘陵地水改旱后土壤发生学性质与类型的变化[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(4):786-792.
[14]	ZENERO M D O, SILVA L F S, CASTILHO S C P, et al. Characterization and classification of soils under forest and pasture in an agroextractivist project in Eastern Amazonia[J]. Revista brasileira de ciência do solo, 2016,40:e0160165.
[15]	SHENG H, ZHOU P, ZHANG Y, et al. Loss of labile organic carbon from subsoil due to land-use changes in subtropical China[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2015,88:148-157.
[16]	JUILLERET J, DONDEYNE S, VANCAMPENHOUT K, et al. Mind the gap: A classification system for integrating the subsolum into soil surveys[J]. Geoderma, 2016,264:332-339.
[17]	XIONG M, SUN R, CHEN L. A global comparison of soil erosion associated with land use and climate type[J]. Geoderma, 2019,343:31-39.
[18]	杨玉盛. 杉木林可持续经营的研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1998.
[19]	陈修颖, 叶华, 李超群. 洞庭湖流域花岗岩地区的水土流失特征及其防治对策[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007(4):72-76+84.
[20]	PIELKE SR R A, ADEGOKE J, BELTRAÁN-PRZEKURAT A, et al. An overview of regional land-use and land-cover impacts on rainfall[J]. Tellus B: chemical and physical meteorology, 2007,59B:587-601.
[21]	SHENG H, YANG Y S, YANG Z J, et al. The dynamic response of soil respiration to land-use changes in subtropical China[J]. Global change biology, 2010, 16(3):1107-1121.
[22]	KLLI R. Influence of land use change on fabric of humus cover (pro Humus form)[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2018,123:737-739.
[23]	AHIRWAL J, MAITI S K. Assessment of soil properties of different land uses generated due to surface coal mining activities in tropical Sal (Shorea robusta) forest, India[J]. Catena, 2016,140:155-163.
[24]	SENCINDIVER J C, AMMONS J T, Barnhisel R I. Minesoil genesis and classification[J]. Agronomy monograph, 2000,41:595-613.
[25]	BARUCK J, NESTROY O, SARTORI G, et al. Soil classification and mapping in the Alps: The current state and future challenges[J]. Geoderma, 2016,264:312-331.
[26]	XIAO H, SHENG H, ZHANG L, et al. How does land-use change alter soil microbial diversity, composition, and network in subtropical China?[J]. Catena, 2023,231:107335.
[27]	DUAN L, SHENG H, CHEN G, et al. Land use conversion and lithology impacts soil aggregate stability in subtropical China[J]. Geoderma, 2021,389:114953.
[28]	张高玲, 谢红霞, 盛浩, 等. 亚热带山区红壤可蚀性对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(2):63-69. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20201073
[29]	KETTERINGS Q M, BIGHAM J M. Soil color as an indicator of slash-and-burn fire severity and soil fertility in Sumatra, Indonesia[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2000, 64(5):1826-1833.
[30]	WANI S A, NAJAR G R, ALI T, et al. Morphology, genesis and classification of pear growing soils of Pulwama district in Lesser Himalayas of temperate Kashmir[J]. Journal of environmental biology, 2016, 37(5):1021-1027.
[31]	潘博, 段良霞, 张凤, 等. 红壤剖面土壤养分对土地利用变化响应的敏感性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(9):2707-2716.
[32]	OLIVEIRA N C, PASCHOAL A R, PAULA R J, et al. Morphological analysis of soil particles at multiple length-scale reveals nutrient stocks of Amazonian Anthrosols[J]. Geoderma, 2018,311:58-66.
[33]	徐晋玲, 朱志锋, 黄传琴, 等. 江汉平原不同利用方式下土壤有机质与粘粒矿物的交互作用[J]. 矿物学报, 2014, 34(1):47-52.
[34]	POPE G A, RUBENSTEIN R. Anthroweathering: Theoretical framework and case study for human-impacted weathering[J]. Geoarchaeology: An international journal, 1999, 14(3):247-264.
[35]	SCHMIDT M J, PY-DANIEL A R, DE PAULA MORAES C, et al. Dark earths and the human built landscape in Amazonia: a widespread pattern of anthrosol formation[J]. Journal of archaeological science, 2014,42:152-165.
[36]	ROSSITER D G. Classification of urban and industrial soils in the world reference base for soil resources[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2007, 7(2):96-100.
[37]	RESÉNDIZ-PAZ M L, GUTIÉRREZ-CASTORENA M C, GUTIÉRREZ-CASTORENA E V, et al. Local soil knowledge and management of Anthrosols: A case study in Teoloyucan, Mexico[J]. Geoderma, 2013,193:41-51.
[38]	PAPA G L, ANTISARI L V, VIANELLO G, et al. Soil interpretation in the context of anthropedogenic transformations and pedotechniques application[J]. Catena, 2018,166:240-248.
[39]	吴克宁, 高晓晨, 查理思, 等. 河南省典型含有人工制品土壤的系统分类研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(5):1091-1101.
[40]	姚玉才, 邱志腾, 陈小梅, 等. 水耕人为土长期改旱后土壤类型演变的探讨[J]. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(5):1029-1035.
[41]	杨东伟, 徐秋桐, 章明奎. 水田改雷竹林后土壤发生学性质和土壤类型的演变[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(4):777-782.
[42]	徐颖菲, 姚玉才, 章明奎. 全年淹水种植茭白对水田土壤性态的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(1):15-21.
[43]	张文凯. 南疆典型土系调查与土地利用[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2017.
[44]	何毓蓉, 崔鹏, 廖超林, 等. 西部山区道路建设毁损土地的退化及其环境效应II.川藏公路典型路段地区的土壤退化与土壤系统分类[J]. 生态环境, 2006, 15(3):555-558.

成土环境、发生学性质和土壤类型对土地利用变化的响应

Responses of Soil Forming Environment, Genetic Properties and Soil Type to Land Use Change

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 44

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	章秀梅, 杨文叶, 张丹, 谢国雄, 袁杭杰. 农地排水中水溶性重金属浓度及其与土壤性状的关系研究[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(8): 42-47.
[2]	张童, 刘宇飞, 隋心, 宋福强. 土地利用方式对黑龙江西部地区土壤理化性质和酶活性的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(5): 33-41.
[3]	黄锦祥. 宁化县不同土地利用方式水土保持措施及效果探讨[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(5): 57-61.