欢迎访问《农学学报》，
农学学报

农学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 72-81.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0027

• 农业工程 农业机械 生物技术 食品科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国蜂蜜出口现状及国内外蜂蜜中农兽药残留限量标准对比分析研究

贺强1,2(), 胡文俊1,2, 李炯1,2, 陈晚元1,2, 陈丹1,2, 冯露1,2, 吴江1,2()   

  1. 1 咸宁市公共检验检测中心，湖北咸宁 437100
    2 湖北省桂花产品质量检验检测中心，湖北咸宁 437100
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-19 修回日期:2024-05-10 出版日期:2025-03-20 发布日期:2025-03-18
  • 通讯作者:
    吴江，男，1965年出生，硕士，研究方向：标准化研究。通信地址：437000 湖北省咸宁市咸安区锦龙路28号 咸宁市公共检验检测中心，Tel：0715-8890025，E-mail：。
  • 作者简介:

    贺强，男，1988年出生，硕士，工程师，研究方向：食品检验检测分析与研究。通信地址：437000 湖北省咸宁市咸安区锦龙路28号 咸宁市公共检验检测中心，Tel：0715-8890025，E-mail：。

  • 基金资助:
    湖北省咸宁市社发研发科技项目(2023SFYF095)

Current Status of Honey Export Trade in China and Comparative Analysis of Pesticide and Veterinary Residue Limit Standards at Home and Abroad

HE Qiang1,2(), HU Wenjun1,2, LI Jiong1,2, CHEN Wanyuan1,2, CHEN Dan1,2, FENG Lu1,2, WU Jiang1,2()   

  1. 1 Xianning Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xianning Hubei 437100
    2 Hubei Osmanthus Fragrans Product Quality Inspection and Testing Center, Xianning Hubei 437100
  • Received:2024-02-19 Revised:2024-05-10 Online:2025-03-20 Published:2025-03-18

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

55

摘要：

为研究农兽药最大残留限量(Maximum Residue Limit, MRL)标准对中国蜂蜜出口贸易的影响，对中国、欧盟、美国、日本以及澳大利亚现行的农兽药残留限量法规及蜂蜜中最大残留限量标准进行了概述，并将中国与上述各国及地区相关限量法规标准进行了比对分析。结果发现，中国仅在国家标准中对蜂蜜的6项农兽药作了限量规定，而欧盟、日本、澳大利亚、美国分别在其国家标准法规中规定了538、79、4、3项农兽药MRL值，中国行业标准规定了13项农兽药MRL指标，在一定程度上修正和补充了国家标准，但与发达国家的标准体系相比，中国蜂蜜农兽药残留限量标准相对薄弱。此外，中国与欧盟等其他国家和地区在蜂蜜的农兽药MRL标准中种类及数量均存在差异，但符合中国实际国情。为了避免蜂蜜出口受阻，可以参考与中国有蜂蜜贸易往来的其他国家和地区的标准，为中国在修订蜂蜜的农兽药MRL标准提供技术支持。

关键词: 蜂蜜, 农兽药残留, 限量标准, 欧盟, 日本, 澳大利亚, 美国

Abstract:

In order to study the impact of maximum residue limit standards for agricultural and veterinary drugs on China honey export trade, this article provides an overview of the current agricultural and veterinary drug residue limit regulations and standards in China, the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Australia, as well as the maximum residue limit standards in honey. It also compares and analyzes the relevant limit regulations and standards in China with the aforementioned countries and regions. As a result, China only has limited regulations on 6 pesticides and veterinary drugs in honey in national standards, whereas the European Union, Japan, Australia, and the United States have respectively established limits for 538, 79, 4, and 3 pesticides and veterinary drugs in their respective national standards and regulations. China industry standards have 13 MRL standards for pesticides and veterinary drugs, which have revised and supplemented the National Standard to some extent. However, compared with the standard systems of developed countries, standards for the limit of pesticide and veterinary drug residues in honey are relatively weak in China. Furthermore，There are differences in the types and quantities of MRL standards for agricultural and veterinary drugs in honey between China and other countries and regions such as the European Union, but China's standards are in line with its actual national conditions. In order to avoid the obstruction of honey export, we can refer to the standards of other countries and regions with China honey trade, and provide technical support for the revision of MRL standards for agricultural and veterinary drugs in China.

Key words: honey, pesticide residues, limited standards, the European Union, Japan, Australia, the United States