欢迎访问《农学学报》，
农学学报

农学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (12): 103-108.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0056

• 三农问题研究 农村产业结构 • 上一篇    

农业科技成果多维度评价工作机制浅析

杜勇(), 王艺洁, 冯桂真, 周宪龙()   

  1. 农业农村部人力资源开发中心/中国农学会， 北京 100125
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-13 修回日期:2025-03-20 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2025-12-16
  • 通讯作者:
    周宪龙，男，1973年出生，山东烟台人，博士研究生，研究方向：农作制度研究、农业科技评价和成果转化服务。通信地址：100125 北京市朝阳区麦子店街22号楼612，Tel：010-59194490，E-mail：。
  • 作者简介:

    杜勇，男，1991年出生，山东平邑人，硕士研究生，研究方向：农业科技成果评价、农业科技服务。通信地址：100125 北京市朝阳区麦子店街22号楼612，Tel：010-59194708，E-mail：。

  • 基金资助:
    农业农村部农业“火花技术”征集、评估与推荐项目(A160806)

A Brief Analysis of Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Mechanism for Agricultural Scientific and Technological Achievements

DU Yong(), WANG Yijie, FENG Guizhen, ZHOU Xianlong()   

  1. Human Resources Development Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/China Association of Agricultural Science Societies, Beijing 100125
  • Received:2025-03-13 Revised:2025-03-20 Online:2025-12-20 Published:2025-12-16

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

1

摘要：

为响应加快建设农业强国的战略部署及科技成果转化迫切需求，本研究聚焦第三方农业科技成果评价体系的现存短板——多元价值考量缺失、评价模式滞后、功能效果受限等问题展开深入探讨。通过溯源发展历程、剖析特征与瓶颈，研究发现现行评价体系在科研导向引领、成果转化支撑和企业创新主体服务等方面存在显著薄弱环节，亟需系统性改革以提升评价质量。为此，研究立足实践需求，构建了涵盖多维价值要素的评价框架，并提出四项升级路径：一是完善差异化评价指标体系，强化多元价值融合；二是创新动态化评价方法，突破传统范式局限；三是建立覆盖成果全生命周期的评价机制，实现过程-效果协同；四是延伸成果转化服务链条，促进供需精准对接。此外，从评价理论革新、数字化平台建设、资源整合共享机制及创新生态培育等维度，探索评价体系的转型升级策略。研究表明，通过制度创新与技术赋能相结合，可有效激活第三方评价在加速科技成果向现实生产力转化、驱动农业科技高质量发展中的核心枢纽作用，为完善农业科技治理体系提供理论支撑与实践参考。

关键词: 农业科技成果, 多维度评价, 多元价值, 工作机制, 科技成果转化

Abstract:

In response to the strategic planning of accelerating the building of a strong agricultural country and urgent need for the transformation of scientific and technological (sci-tech for short) achievements, this study focuses on the existing shortcomings in the third-party evaluation system for agricultural sci-tech achievements, including the absence of multi-dimensional value consideration, outdated evaluation models, limited function andeffect. By tracing the source of its evolutionary history and analyzing characteristics and bottlenecks, the research identifies that the current evaluation system has obvious weaknesses in guiding scientific research orientation, supporting achievement commercialization, and serving enterprise as the principal role of innovation, and the systematic reform is urgently needed to improve the evaluation quality. To address these issues, based on practical needs, the study establishes an evaluation framework covering multi-dimensional value elements and proposes four upgrading pathways. First, a differentiated evaluation indicator systems hould be refined to enhance the integration of diverse values; second, dynamic evaluation methods should be innovated to transcend the limitations of traditional paradigms; third, a full life-cycle evaluation mechanism should be established to achieve process-effect synergy; fourth, the achievement transformation service chains hould be extended to facilitate precise supply-demand matching. Additionally, strategies for transforming and upgrading the evaluation system are explored from different perspectives including evaluation theory innovation, digital platform construction, resource integration and sharing mechanisms, and innovation ecosystem cultivation. The research demonstrates that the integration of institutional innovation with technological empowerment can effectively activate the core role of third-party evaluation in accelerating the transformation of sci-tech achievements into real productivity force and promoting high-quality development of agricultural technology, thereby providing theoretical support and practical reference for improving the agricultural sci-tech governance system.

Key words: agricultural science and technology achievements, multi-dimensional evaluation, pluralistic values, evaluation mechanisms, transformation of sci-tech achievements