Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 7-12.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0060
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Yan1(), CHEN Jingdu2(
), XIN Haibin1, LIU Cuilian1, XU Ruiheng1, FAN Xiaokai1, WANG Ying1
Received:
2024-03-22
Revised:
2024-05-24
Online:
2025-04-20
Published:
2025-04-17
ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jingdu, XIN Haibin, LIU Cuilian, XU Ruiheng, FAN Xiaokai, WANG Ying. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer on Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice Under Side Deep Nitrogen Reduction Fertilization[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(4): 7-12.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0060
施肥方式 | 处理 | 总氮量 | 基肥 | 分蘖肥 | 穗肥 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | A1 | 270 | 81 | 81+硅 | 108+硅 |
A2 | 270 | 81 | 81+锌 | 108+锌 | |
A3 | 270 | 81 | 81+硅+锌 | 108+硅+锌 | |
A4 | 270 | 81 | 81 | 108 | |
侧深施肥 | A5 | 243 | 135 | 硅 | 108+硅 |
A6 | 243 | 135 | 锌 | 108+锌 | |
A7 | 243 | 135 | 硅+锌 | 108+硅+锌 | |
A8 | 243 | 135 | — | 108 |
施肥方式 | 处理 | 总氮量 | 基肥 | 分蘖肥 | 穗肥 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规施肥 | A1 | 270 | 81 | 81+硅 | 108+硅 |
A2 | 270 | 81 | 81+锌 | 108+锌 | |
A3 | 270 | 81 | 81+硅+锌 | 108+硅+锌 | |
A4 | 270 | 81 | 81 | 108 | |
侧深施肥 | A5 | 243 | 135 | 硅 | 108+硅 |
A6 | 243 | 135 | 锌 | 108+锌 | |
A7 | 243 | 135 | 硅+锌 | 108+硅+锌 | |
A8 | 243 | 135 | — | 108 |
处理 | 基本苗 /(万/hm2) | 6.24 (月.日) | 7.7 (月.日) | 7.14 (月.日) | 7.20 (月.日) | 8.17 (月.日) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 112.20 | 128.54 | 439.08 | 633.93 | 505.92 | 421.95 |
A2 | 112.05 | 133.79 | 497.09 | 712.64 | 522.66 | 444.90 |
A3 | 112.45 | 131.01 | 472.96 | 664.58 | 514.42 | 401.40 |
A4 | 112.65 | 134.12 | 497.32 | 693.92 | 518.02 | 415.75 |
A5 | 112.35 | 130.55 | 484.63 | 710.05 | 545.97 | 424.25 |
A6 | 112.50 | 129.75 | 562.23 | 783.88 | 575.34 | 446.50 |
A7 | 112.20 | 131.30 | 555.38 | 792.13 | 641.19 | 441.00 |
A8 | 112.35 | 134.29 | 545.64 | 761.96 | 611.22 | 438.90 |
处理 | 基本苗 /(万/hm2) | 6.24 (月.日) | 7.7 (月.日) | 7.14 (月.日) | 7.20 (月.日) | 8.17 (月.日) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 112.20 | 128.54 | 439.08 | 633.93 | 505.92 | 421.95 |
A2 | 112.05 | 133.79 | 497.09 | 712.64 | 522.66 | 444.90 |
A3 | 112.45 | 131.01 | 472.96 | 664.58 | 514.42 | 401.40 |
A4 | 112.65 | 134.12 | 497.32 | 693.92 | 518.02 | 415.75 |
A5 | 112.35 | 130.55 | 484.63 | 710.05 | 545.97 | 424.25 |
A6 | 112.50 | 129.75 | 562.23 | 783.88 | 575.34 | 446.50 |
A7 | 112.20 | 131.30 | 555.38 | 792.13 | 641.19 | 441.00 |
A8 | 112.35 | 134.29 | 545.64 | 761.96 | 611.22 | 438.90 |
处理 | 株高/ cm | 重心高度/ cm | 第一节间 长度/cm | 第一节间 茎宽/mm | 第二节间 长度/cm | 第二节间 茎宽/mm | 第三节间 长度/cm | 第三节间 茎宽/mm | 穗下节长/ cm | 穗长/ cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 92.74b | 39.88b | 4.14b | 4.39c | 7.57ab | 3.83cd | 11.54ab | 3.21cd | 30.72a | 15.11bc |
A2 | 94.00ab | 41.91ab | 4.94ab | 4.17c | 7.67ab | 3.69cd | 12.17a | 3.12cd | 31.04a | 16.00abc |
A3 | 95.25ab | 41.07ab | 6.13a | 4.17c | 8.79a | 3.47d | 13.07a | 3.09cd | 30.32a | 16.60abc |
A4 | 94.56ab | 42.37ab | 4.24b | 4.24c | 7.68ab | 3.61cd | 12.01a | 3.16cd | 30.24a | 15.43abc |
A5 | 95.73ab | 40.83ab | 3.43b | 5.24ab | 7.00b | 4.67ab | 9.40b | 3.96ab | 33.29a | 18.18a |
A6 | 96.17ab | 41.92ab | 3.83b | 4.62bc | 7.20b | 4.14bcd | 11.22ab | 3.63bc | 31.17a | 17.79ab |
A7 | 96.61a | 41.08ab | 4.44b | 5.40a | 7.31ab | 4.90a | 10.72ab | 4.33a | 30.70a | 17.21ab |
A8 | 96.31ab | 43.00a | 4.14b | 5.15ab | 7.31ab | 4.24abc | 11.38ab | 3.90ab | 30.72a | 17.33ab |
处理 | 株高/ cm | 重心高度/ cm | 第一节间 长度/cm | 第一节间 茎宽/mm | 第二节间 长度/cm | 第二节间 茎宽/mm | 第三节间 长度/cm | 第三节间 茎宽/mm | 穗下节长/ cm | 穗长/ cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 92.74b | 39.88b | 4.14b | 4.39c | 7.57ab | 3.83cd | 11.54ab | 3.21cd | 30.72a | 15.11bc |
A2 | 94.00ab | 41.91ab | 4.94ab | 4.17c | 7.67ab | 3.69cd | 12.17a | 3.12cd | 31.04a | 16.00abc |
A3 | 95.25ab | 41.07ab | 6.13a | 4.17c | 8.79a | 3.47d | 13.07a | 3.09cd | 30.32a | 16.60abc |
A4 | 94.56ab | 42.37ab | 4.24b | 4.24c | 7.68ab | 3.61cd | 12.01a | 3.16cd | 30.24a | 15.43abc |
A5 | 95.73ab | 40.83ab | 3.43b | 5.24ab | 7.00b | 4.67ab | 9.40b | 3.96ab | 33.29a | 18.18a |
A6 | 96.17ab | 41.92ab | 3.83b | 4.62bc | 7.20b | 4.14bcd | 11.22ab | 3.63bc | 31.17a | 17.79ab |
A7 | 96.61a | 41.08ab | 4.44b | 5.40a | 7.31ab | 4.90a | 10.72ab | 4.33a | 30.70a | 17.21ab |
A8 | 96.31ab | 43.00a | 4.14b | 5.15ab | 7.31ab | 4.24abc | 11.38ab | 3.90ab | 30.72a | 17.33ab |
处理 | 第一节间 | 第二节间 | 第三节间 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抗折力/N | 弯曲力矩/(cm·g) | 倒伏指数/[(cm·g)/N] | 抗折力/N | 弯曲力矩/(cm·g) | 倒伏指数/[(cm·g)/N] | 抗折力/N | 弯曲力矩/(cm·g) | 倒伏指数/[(cm·g)/N] | |||
A1 | 16.29ab | 8553.84ab | 583.88a | 11.87abc | 1149.48b | 101.34a | 7.62abc | 918.45c | 126.10a | ||
A2 | 14.53ab | 8215.18b | 589.29a | 11.48abc | 1175.76b | 109.39a | 7.57abc | 955.81bc | 136.17a | ||
A3 | 12.89b | 8389.67ab | 666.39a | 9.16c | 1123.74b | 135.54a | 5.79c | 907.98c | 205.72a | ||
A4 | 13.96ab | 8490.23ab | 654.55a | 9.62bc | 1168.24b | 129.58a | 6.98bc | 929.18c | 140.01a | ||
A5 | 20.23a | 8897.53ab | 471.28a | 15.38a | 1507.65a | 106.12a | 11.63a | 1211.39ab | 117.19a | ||
A6 | 19.92a | 8845.45ab | 468.98a | 14.87ab | 1511.97a | 109.04a | 10.71ab | 1308.19a | 123.27a | ||
A7 | 15.78ab | 8855.71ab | 607.25a | 11.94abc | 1319.52ab | 115.10a | 8.37abc | 1071.08abc | 132.84a | ||
A8 | 18.75ab | 9137.33a | 507.42a | 14.45abc | 1576.32a | 109.52a | 10.37ab | 1234.86a | 131.65a |
处理 | 第一节间 | 第二节间 | 第三节间 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抗折力/N | 弯曲力矩/(cm·g) | 倒伏指数/[(cm·g)/N] | 抗折力/N | 弯曲力矩/(cm·g) | 倒伏指数/[(cm·g)/N] | 抗折力/N | 弯曲力矩/(cm·g) | 倒伏指数/[(cm·g)/N] | |||
A1 | 16.29ab | 8553.84ab | 583.88a | 11.87abc | 1149.48b | 101.34a | 7.62abc | 918.45c | 126.10a | ||
A2 | 14.53ab | 8215.18b | 589.29a | 11.48abc | 1175.76b | 109.39a | 7.57abc | 955.81bc | 136.17a | ||
A3 | 12.89b | 8389.67ab | 666.39a | 9.16c | 1123.74b | 135.54a | 5.79c | 907.98c | 205.72a | ||
A4 | 13.96ab | 8490.23ab | 654.55a | 9.62bc | 1168.24b | 129.58a | 6.98bc | 929.18c | 140.01a | ||
A5 | 20.23a | 8897.53ab | 471.28a | 15.38a | 1507.65a | 106.12a | 11.63a | 1211.39ab | 117.19a | ||
A6 | 19.92a | 8845.45ab | 468.98a | 14.87ab | 1511.97a | 109.04a | 10.71ab | 1308.19a | 123.27a | ||
A7 | 15.78ab | 8855.71ab | 607.25a | 11.94abc | 1319.52ab | 115.10a | 8.37abc | 1071.08abc | 132.84a | ||
A8 | 18.75ab | 9137.33a | 507.42a | 14.45abc | 1576.32a | 109.52a | 10.37ab | 1234.86a | 131.65a |
处理 | 实测产量 /(t/hm2) | 有效穗数 /(万/hm2) | 每穗总粒数/粒 | 结实率 /% | 理论产量 /(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 9.61 | 401.77 | 118.61 | 91.12 | 11.29 |
A2 | 9.25 | 407.03 | 110.64 | 91.74 | 10.74 |
A3 | 9.14 | 410.22 | 111.19 | 91.58 | 10.86 |
A4 | 9.02 | 386.48 | 117.68 | 90.29 | 10.68 |
A5 | 9.76 | 402.31 | 119.54 | 90.89 | 11.36 |
A6 | 9.53 | 411.97 | 116.21 | 92.18 | 11.47 |
A7 | 10.03 | 419.52 | 120.87 | 89.58 | 11.81 |
A8 | 9.33 | 409.99 | 119.59 | 87.91 | 11.21 |
处理 | 实测产量 /(t/hm2) | 有效穗数 /(万/hm2) | 每穗总粒数/粒 | 结实率 /% | 理论产量 /(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 9.61 | 401.77 | 118.61 | 91.12 | 11.29 |
A2 | 9.25 | 407.03 | 110.64 | 91.74 | 10.74 |
A3 | 9.14 | 410.22 | 111.19 | 91.58 | 10.86 |
A4 | 9.02 | 386.48 | 117.68 | 90.29 | 10.68 |
A5 | 9.76 | 402.31 | 119.54 | 90.89 | 11.36 |
A6 | 9.53 | 411.97 | 116.21 | 92.18 | 11.47 |
A7 | 10.03 | 419.52 | 120.87 | 89.58 | 11.81 |
A8 | 9.33 | 409.99 | 119.59 | 87.91 | 11.21 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
戴含, 王小卉, 邓莹萍, 等. 不同氮浓度对水稻分蘖期根系形态特征的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2022, 37(1):111-115.
|
[3] |
李亚娟, 董明辉, 江贻, 等. 缓混肥侧深减氮施用对水稻氮肥吸收利用及其产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(36):14-21.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-1041 |
[4] |
|
[5] |
钟雪梅, 黄铁平, 彭建伟, 等. 机插同步一次性精量施肥对双季稻养分累积及利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019,33:436-446.
|
[6] |
张洪程, 胡雅杰, 杨建昌, 等. 中国特色水稻栽培学发展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7):1301-1321.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.001 |
[7] |
黄恒, 姜恒鑫, 刘光明, 等. 侧深施氮对水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11):2232-2249.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02086 |
[8] |
柳林, 李娜, 闫喜东, 等. 侧深施肥对白城市水稻产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农技广, 2022, 38(9):70-73.
|
[9] |
陆雨, 徐南清, 段建设, 等. 机械侧深施肥下水稻产量和肥料利用效率研究[J]. 湖北农业学, 2022, 61(14):19-23,30.
|
[10] |
陈永华, 章银珊, 胡婷婷, 等. 氮肥运筹与硅肥配施对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(16):1-4,11.
|
[11] |
朱薇, 全坚宇, 陈豪, 等. 叶面喷施水溶性硅肥对水稻产量及其物质生产的影响[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2019(3):108-109.
|
[12] |
杨亚云, 陈春英, 胡中泽. 硅肥对优良食味粳稻南粳9108生长及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业, 2023(35):13-15.
|
[13] |
石扬娟, 康勇, 刘玉坤, 等. 硅肥施用量对不同水稻品种植株抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023(19):12-14,18.
|
[14] |
张舒, 胡时友, 郑在武, 等. 不同硅肥施用量对水稻纹枯病发生及产量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(10):99-101.
|
[15] |
万跃明, 王美玲, 严宠红, 等. 糯稻抗病能力、产量及经济效益对硅肥的响应特征[J]. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(8):65-70.
|
[16] |
程方伟, 谢东婕, 杨欣欣, 等. 硅肥对优质稻壮香优白金5稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2023, 37(2):129-134.
|
[17] |
姜沛琦, 柏珺焯, 赵维汉, 等. 钙镁硅肥施用对粳稻天隆优619产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国种业, 2024(1):108-112,118.
|
[18] |
冯绪猛, 郭九信, 王玉雯, 等. 锌肥品种与施用方法对水稻产量和锌含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5):1329-1338.
|
[19] |
李俊丽, 钱干, 李海星, 等. 氮锌配施对水稻生长、产量和养分吸收分配的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(3):159-167.
|
[20] |
魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 等. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3):295-306.
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220805 |
[21] |
瀬古秀生, 佐本啓智, 鈴木嘉一郎. 水稲の倒伏に及ぼす二,三栽培条件の影響(II)[J]. 日本作物学会紀事, 1959, 27(2):173-176.
|
[22] |
丁艳锋, 李刚华, 李伟玮, 等. 水稻机插缓混一次施肥技术的研发与示范[J]. 中国稻米, 2020(5):11-15.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2020.05.002 |
[23] |
李跃飞, 王猛, 李彬. 侧深施肥不同施肥模式对水稻生长指标及产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2024(3):21-23.
|
[24] |
张彦, 范晓凯, 徐瑞衡, 等. 水稻机插侧深施肥减氮增效效应研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(2):253-257.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221268 |
[25] |
陈婷, 胡瑶, 吴凡, 等. 氮磷调控对杂交水稻旌优781抗倒伏性及产量的影响[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(6):1190-1201.
|
[26] |
肖楠, 董立强, 丛琳, 等. 施氮量对旱直播粳稻抗倒伏性及产量的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2017, 48(6):647-653.
|
[27] |
刘洁琪, 郭金伟, 费维, 等. 缓释肥对水稻嘉67产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(10):2362-2365.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230427 |
[28] |
|
[1] | LIU Xiaoyan, LOU Li, ZHANG Nan, LING Zhaoxun, ZHANG Aoqi, ZHANG Wanming, YAN Jiakun. Effect of Silicon on Physiological Characteristics of Licorice Under Long-term Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(4): 13-21. |
[2] | ZHU Yuqing, LI Huazhao. Study on Light-temperature Model of Rice in Yutai and Yield Forecast [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(4): 83-91. |
[3] | ZHANG Hui, YAN Huiyuan, SHI Yaying, ZHAO Nana. Characteristics of Heavy Metal Pollution in Rice Grains and Human Health Risk Assessment in A County of Southern Henan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(2): 22-26. |
[4] | LV Jiajia, CHU Zheng, GUO Lifeng, LI Yuguang, LIU Xu, DING Haijiu, WANG Qiujing, ZHOU Baocai. Evaluation Index of Composite Adversity Disaster Damage of Rainy and Low Light at Rice Flowering Period in Cold Region [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(9): 46-53. |
[5] | YU Yanmin, WU Hongtao, LIU Haiying, XU Zhenhua, WU Licheng, YANG Zhongliang, ZHANG Shuli, GAO Dawei, YAN Ping. Rice Bakanae Disease in Rice Varieties: Resistance Evaluation and Screening [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(7): 1-5. |
[6] | CHEN Shuwei, ZHENG Weicai, LI Yunzhe, LUO Min, WANG Hongchang, MO Jianqiang, ZHENG Zhibo. Variety Selection of Purple-leaf Rice in Application of "Paddy Field Painting" [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(6): 93-100. |
[7] | ZHANG Yongqiang, LI Sijie, LIU Ju, GE Baiyi, TANG Ziqing, PU Xiaoming, LIN Birun, YANG Qiyun, SHEN Huifang, ZHANG Jingxin. Key Factors for Improving Deposition Effects of Pesticide Mixture Sprayed by Plant Protection UAV on Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(5): 16-23. |
[8] | ZHANG Guo, YU Julong, LING Hong, YAO Kebing, YU Xiangyang, CHENG Jinjin, ZHU Feng, ZHOU Chen, SHU Zhaolin, ZHAO Laicheng. Effect on Rice Growth and Yield Increase: Seed Soaking with Iron Chlorin Soluble Powder [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(3): 34-39. |
[9] | LU Feng, HE Jiewang, XIAO Zhipeng, TANG Jianning, MA Mingyun, XIA Fan, LONG Fei, XIAO Mengyu, QIAN Chuanlin. Comparative Study of Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Fraction in Two Types of Paddy Soils under Tobacco-rice Rotation in Central Hunan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(3): 48-52. |
[10] | SUN Caixia, LIU Yuhong, XIA Qile, XU Mingfei, ZHENG Weiran. Oxidase Content Analysis of Wencheng Glutinous Rice Yam [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(3): 68-72. |
[11] | GAO Peng, YU Zhengjun, YANG Xiaomin, WANG Tao, LI Danni. Distribution of Soil Available Zinc Content and Influencing Factors in Hanzhong City [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(2): 36-41. |
[12] | MIU Kang, SHU Zhaolin, ZHANG Fuqiang, ZHANG Guo, YU Julong, XIANG Lirui, XU Chao, ZHAO Laicheng. Effects of Plant Immune Elicitor VDAL on Disease Resistance and Yield of Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(12): 8-13. |
[13] | HU Yang, DUAN Bin, FANG Ling, HE Shijie, LI Huilong, SONG Xiaohua, YU Xinchun, CHANG Xingyuan. Different Concentrations of Paclobutrazol on Seedling Quality and Yield Composition of Japonica Rice in Southern Henan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(9): 1-7. |
[14] | KANG Haiqi, SUN Xiaowen, WANG Shimei, HE Fang, ZENG Yongxuan, QIN Rongmin, HAN Youxue, KANG Jiarong, ZENG Lin, ZHANG Hong. Study on the Construction of a Comprehensive Index Identification and Evaluation of Water Saving and Drought Resistance of Hybrid Rice Combinations [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(8): 1-10. |
[15] | MENG Ruoxi, WANG Xiaoli, DUAN Jianjun, XU Bin, YANG Hongwei, MEI Tingting. Effects of Continuous Straw Returning on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Utilization [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(8): 37-45. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||