欢迎访问《农学学报》,

农学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 35-40.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18080011

所属专题: 水产渔业

• 畜牧 兽医 水产 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)测定 中华绒螯蟹中重金属镉的残留量

董欣悦, 宋超, 汪倩, 张聪, 陈家长   

  1. 江苏省无锡市滨湖区山水东路9号,中国水产科学研究院淡水渔业研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-15 修回日期:2018-09-20 接受日期:2018-10-09 出版日期:2019-01-18 发布日期:2019-01-18
  • 通讯作者: 陈家长 E-mail:519881786@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国水产科学研究院基本科研业务费“南方地区稻蟹综合种养模式下典型危害物污染特征、归趋与富集效应及防控技术研究”(2018HYZD0605); 国家水产品质量安全风险评估(GJFP201800903)。

Determination of Cadmium Residues in Eriocheir sinensis by ICP-MS

  • Received:2018-08-15 Revised:2018-09-20 Accepted:2018-10-09 Online:2019-01-18 Published:2019-01-18

摘要: 为建立一种简单、高效检测中华绒螯蟹中重金属镉残留量方法,采用湿法消解及微波消解2 种前处理方法,利用ICP-MS测定性腺(G)、肌肉(M)及其两者混合的全部可食部分(B)中的重金属镉残留量,并依据回收率对方法的可靠性进行检验和优化。实验结果表明,在利用湿法消解进行前处理时,G、M、B 中镉的检出限范围是0.0025~0.0045 μg/g,回收率分别为96.24%±2.13%、99.93%±3.50%和94.74%±1.42%,M的回收率显著高于G和B(P<0.05);同样地,在利用微波消解进行前处理时,G、M、B中镉的检出限范围是0.0012~0.0027 μg/g,回收率分别为04.76%±7.40%、92.38%±10.26%和91.850%±4.25%,G的回收率显著高于M和B(P<0.05)。前处理方式影响基质的回收率,不同的前处理适用于处理不同的基质,在处理蟹肉时,最好选择湿法消解法;在处理性腺时,最好选择微波消解法;而处理整个可食部位时,两者都可以。考虑到回收率都能接受,而微波消解法具有用时短、操作简单快速、试剂消耗小等特点,在实际操作时应选择微波消解法进行前处理。

关键词: 种养结合, 种养结合, 粪污处理, 典型模式, 循环农业, 面源污染

Abstract: The paper aims to establish a simple and effective detection method for heavy metal cadmium residues in Eriocheir sinensis by using wet and microwave digestion methods. The two pre-treatment methods were tested, using ICP-MS determination of cadmium within the gonads (G), muscles (M) and all edible parts of the animal (B), and their recovery rates were used to compare each method’s reliability. Experimental results from the wet digestion method showed that, for pre-treatment, the detection limit of cadmium in G, M and B was between 0.0025-0.0045 μg/g, the recycling rate was 96.24%±2.13%, 99.93%±3.50% and 94.74%± 1.42%, respectively, and the recovery rate of M was significantly higher than that of G and B (P<0.05). Results from the microwave digestion method revealed that, for pre-treatment, the detection limit of cadmium in G, M and B was between 0.0012- 0.0027 μg/g, the recycling rate was 104.76% ± 7.40% , 92.38% ± 10.26% and 91.850%±4.25%, respectively, the recovery rate of gonad samples (G) was significantly higher than that of M and B (P<0.05). That the pre-treatment method affected the recovery rate of matrix, and the different pretreatment methods were applicable to different substrates. In handling crab muscle, the best choice was the wet digestion method; while the microwave digestion method was better for gonadal studies. When dealing with the entire edible part, both methods could be reliable. Considering that the recovery rates were acceptable, the microwave digestion method had characteristics of simple, rapid and short operation time, plus less reagent consumption. Therefore, the microwave digestion method should be selected as the pre- reatment method in practical operation.