Abstract:

In response to the strategic planning of accelerating the building of a strong agricultural country and urgent need for the transformation of scientific and technological (sci-tech for short) achievements, this study focuses on the existing shortcomings in the third-party evaluation system for agricultural sci-tech achievements, including the absence of multi-dimensional value consideration, outdated evaluation models, limited function andeffect. By tracing the source of its evolutionary history and analyzing characteristics and bottlenecks, the research identifies that the current evaluation system has obvious weaknesses in guiding scientific research orientation, supporting achievement commercialization, and serving enterprise as the principal role of innovation, and the systematic reform is urgently needed to improve the evaluation quality. To address these issues, based on practical needs, the study establishes an evaluation framework covering multi-dimensional value elements and proposes four upgrading pathways. First, a differentiated evaluation indicator systems hould be refined to enhance the integration of diverse values; second, dynamic evaluation methods should be innovated to transcend the limitations of traditional paradigms; third, a full life-cycle evaluation mechanism should be established to achieve process-effect synergy; fourth, the achievement transformation service chains hould be extended to facilitate precise supply-demand matching. Additionally, strategies for transforming and upgrading the evaluation system are explored from different perspectives including evaluation theory innovation, digital platform construction, resource integration and sharing mechanisms, and innovation ecosystem cultivation. The research demonstrates that the integration of institutional innovation with technological empowerment can effectively activate the core role of third-party evaluation in accelerating the transformation of sci-tech achievements into real productivity force and promoting high-quality development of agricultural technology, thereby providing theoretical support and practical reference for improving the agricultural sci-tech governance system.

Key words: agricultural science and technology achievements, multi-dimensional evaluation, pluralistic values, evaluation mechanisms, transformation of sci-tech achievements