Research Progress on Biocontrol Microorganisms Against Phytophthora nicotianae

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0041

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper described the research progress of biocontrol microorganisms (bacteria, fungi) and their main mechanisms for the biocontrol of microbial plant pathogens. Meanwhile, this paper also briefly described the symptoms, pathogenesis, and influencing factors of tobacco black shank disease. Based on the current progress of biocontrol microorganisms to prevent and control tobacco black shank disease, this paper suggested future research directions such as broadening the screening scope of biocontrol microorganisms, delving into the molecular mechanisms of biocontrol microorganisms, utilizing genetic engineering technology to enhance biocontrol microorganisms. Moreover, the possibility of combining biocontrol microorganisms with new materials such as nanomaterials was discussed in order to achieve better prevention and control effects.

Key words: tobacco black shank, Phytophthora nicotianae, biological control, biocontrol bacteria, biocontrol fungus

HAO Haohao, ZHANG Yuwei, TANG Peipei, LI Xiang, WU Junlin, LIU Ziqi, MIAO Sen, LU Peng, JIA Wei, DANG Bingjun. Research Progress on Biocontrol Microorganisms Against Phytophthora nicotianae[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 41-47.

Figures/Tables 2

References 50

[1]	DONG L H, WANG P P, ZHAO W S, et al. Surfactin and fengycin contribute differentially to the biological activity of Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 against cotton verticillium wilt[J]. Biological control, 2022, 174:104999.
[2]	SAMPATHKUMAR A, AIYANATHAN K E A, NAKKEERAN S, et al. Multifaceted Bacillus spp. for the management of cotton bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas citri pv. malvacearum[J]. Biological control, 2023, 177:105111.
[3]	LIU R H, LI J Y, ZHANG F R, et al. Biocontrol activity of Bacillus velezensis D4 against apple valsa canker[J]. Biological control, 2021, 163:104760.
[4]	CHEN S F, ZHANG M S, WANG J Y, et al. Biocontrol effects of Brevibacillus laterosporus AMCC100017 on potato common scab and its impact on rhizosphere bacterial communities[J]. Biological control, 2017, 106:89-98.
[5]	CHEN Q Q, QIU Y, YUAN Y Z, et al. Biocontrol activity and action mechanism of Bacillus velezensis strain SDTB038 against fusarium crown and root rot of tomato[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2022, 13:994716.
[6]	MALIK J, MOOSA A, ZULFIQAR F, et al. Biocontrol potential of lipopeptides produced by the novel Bacillus altitudinis strain TM22A against postharvest alternaria rot of tomato[J]. LWT, 2024, 191:115541.
[7]	LUAN P Y, Yi Y J, HUANG Y F, et al. Biocontrol potential and action mechanism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DB2 on Bipolaris sorokiniana[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2023, 14:1149363.
[8]	BERRY C, FERNANDO W G D, LOEWEN P C, et al. Lipopeptides are essential for Pseudomonas sp. DF41 biocontrol of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum[J]. Biological control, 2010, 55(3):211-218.
[9]	KANUGALA S, KUMAR C G, REDDY R H K, et al. Chumacin-1 and Chumacin-2 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain CGK-KS-1 as novel quorum sensing signaling inhibitors for biocontrol of bacterial blight of rice[J]. Microbiological research, 2019, 228:126301.
[10]	WANG C W, WANG Y, WANG L, et al. Biocontrol potential of volatile organic compounds from Pseudomonas chlororaphis ZL3 against postharvest gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea on Chinese cherry[J]. Biological control, 2021, 159:104613.
[11]	XIE Z Y, LI M M, WANG D K, et al. Biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus siamensis LZ88 against brown spot disease of tobacco caused by Alternaria alternata[J]. Biological control, 2021, 154:104508.
[12]	LING L J, JIANG K L, CHENG W T, et al. Biocontrol of volatile organic compounds obtained from Bacillus subtilis CL2 against Aspergillus flavus in peanuts during storage[J]. Biological control, 2022, 176:105094.
[13]	SONI R, RAWAL K, KEHARIA H. Genomics assisted functional characterization of Paenibacillus polymyxa HK4 as a biocontrol and plant growth promoting bacterium[J]. Microbiological research, 2021, 248:126734.
[14]	SANTOS-WILLALOBOS L D S, GUZMAN-ORTIZ A D, GOMEZ-LIM A M, et al. Potential use of Trichoderma asperellum (Samuels, Liechfeldt et Nirenberg) T8a as a biological control agent against anthracnose in mango (Mangifera indica L.)[J]. Biological control, 2013, 64(1):37-44.
[15]	WANG R, YU X L, YIN Y P, et al. Biocontrol of cucumber Fusarium wilt by Trichoderma asperellum FJ035 dependent on antagonism and spatiotemporal competition with Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Biological control, 2023, 186:105334.
[16]	VILLA-RODRIGUEZ E, LUGO-ENRIQUEZ C, FERGUSON S, et al. Trichoderma harzianum sensu lato TSM39: A wheat microbiome fungus that mitigates spot blotch disease of wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana[J]. Biological control, 2022, 175:105055.
[17]	LUO M, CHEN Y M, HE J L, et al. Identification of a new Talaromyces strain DYM25 isolated from the Yap Trench as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium wilt of cucumber[J]. Microbiological research, 2021, 251:126841.
[18]	WU Z H, CUI H C, SUN Z N, et al. Biocontrol mechanism of Myxococcus xanthus B25-I-1 against Phytophthora infestans[J]. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 2021, 175:104832.
[19]	SUJARIT K, PATHOM-AREE W, MORI M, et al. Streptomyces palmae CMU-AB204^T, an antifungal producing-actinomycete, as a potential biocontrol agent to protect palm oil producing trees from basal stem rot disease fungus, Ganoderma boninense[J]. Biological control, 2020, 148:104307.
[20]	黎起秦, 叶云峰, 王涛, 等. 内生枯草芽孢杆菌B47菌株入侵番茄的途径及其定殖部位[J]. 中国生物防治, 2008(2):133-137.
[21]	BACON C W, YATES I E, HINTON D M, et al. Biological control of Fusarium moniliforme in maize[J]. Environmental health perspectives, 2001, 109(S2):325-332.
[22]	高克祥, 刘晓光, 郭润芳, 等. 木霉菌对杨树树皮溃疡病菌拮抗作用的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2001(5):82-86.
[23]	王勇, 王万立, 刘春艳, 等. 绿色木霉Tr9701对多种病原菌的抑制作用及其抑病机理[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008(1):371-374.
[24]	DIMKIC I, JANAKIEV T, PETROVIC M, et al. Plant-associated Bacillus and Pseudomonas antimicrobial activities in plant disease suppression via biological control mechanisms- A review[J]. Physiological and molecular plant pathology, 2022, 117:101754.
[25]	AHMED W, DAI Z L, ZHANG J H, et al. Plant-microbe interaction: mining the impact of native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-10 on tobacco bacterial wilt disease and rhizosphere microbial communities[J]. Microbiology spectrum, 2022, 10(4):e0147122.
[26]	YAN F, LI C H, YE X L, et al. Antifungal activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MG3 against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in loquat fruits[J]. Biological control, 2020, 146:104281.
[27]	ABDALLAH R A B, STEDEL C, GARAGOUNIS C, et al. Involvement of lipopeptide antibiotics and chitinase genes and induction of host defense in suppression of Fusarium wilt by endophytic Bacillus spp. in tomato[J]. Crop protection, 2017, 99:45-58.
[28]	LI N X, WANG W Z, BITAS V, et al. Volatile compounds emitted by diverse Verticillium species enhance plant growth by manipulating auxin signaling[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 2018, 31(10):1021-1031.
[29]	WANG M L, GENG L L, SUN X X, et al. Screening of Bacillus thuringiensis strains to identify new potential biocontrol agents against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Plutella xylostella in Brassica campestris L.[J]. Biological control, 2020, 145:104262.
[30]	JIAO R, MUNIR S, HE P F, et al. Biocontrol potential of the endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens YN201732 against tobacco powdery mildew and its growth promotion[J]. Biological control, 2020, 143:104160.
[31]	XIE Y L, WU L M, ZHU B C, et al. Digital gene expression profiling of the pathogen-resistance mechanism of Oryza sativa 9311 in response to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 induction[J]. Biological control, 2017, 110:89-97.
[32]	JIANG C H, LIAO M J, WANG H K, et al. Bacillus velezensis, a potential and efficient biocontrol agent in control of pepper gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea[J]. Biological Control, 2018, 126:147-157.
[33]	HERRERA-TELLEZ V I, CRUZ-OLMEDO A K, PLASENCIA J, et al. The protective effect of trichoderma asperellum on tomato plants against Fusarium oxysporum and Botrytis cinerea diseases involves inhibition of reactive oxygen species production[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2019, 20(8):2007.
[34]	CHEN S C, REN J J, ZHAO H J, et al. Trichoderma harzianum improves defense against Fusarium oxysporum by regulating ROS and RNS metabolism, redox balance, and energy flow in cucumber roots[J]. Phytopathology, 2019, 109(6):972-982.
[35]	ABDELKHALEK A, AL-ASKAR A A, ARISHI A A, et al. Trichoderma hamatum strain Th23 promotes tomato growth and induces systemic resistance against tobacco mosaic virus[J]. Journal of fungi, 2022, 8(3):228.
[36]	ELAD Y, KAPAT A. The role of Trichoderma harzianum protease in the biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea[J]. European journal of plant pathology, 1999, 105:177-189
[37]	张凯, 谢利丽, 武云杰, 等. 烟草黑胫病的发生及综合防治研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2015, 17(4):62-70.
[38]	赵辉, 王喜英, 刘国权, 等. 烟草黑胫病发生因素及综合防治研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2020(11):99-103.
[39]	王益平, 刘森, 夏木, 等. 烟草黑胫病研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(22):129-131.
[40]	尚志强. 烟草黑胫病病原、发生规律及综合防治研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2007(2):73-76.
[41]	马国胜, 高智谋, 陈娟. 烟草黑胫病菌研究进展(一)[J]. 烟草科技, 2003(4):35-42.
[42]	董国菊, 李文英, 刘翠平, 等. 烟草疫霉拮抗菌株P-72-10的鉴定及其拮抗代谢产物初步分析[J]. 植物病理学报, 2012, 42(3):297-305.
[43]	杨应美, 卢灿华, 罗朝旺, 等. 烟草黑胫病生防菌筛选及对根际土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(4):790-796.
[44]	何明川, 施春兰, 魏聪聪, 等. 烟草黑胫病拮抗细菌的分离、鉴定及发酵条件优化[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(6):1604-1615.
[45]	李苗苗, 王晓强, 王东坤, 等. 生防菌复配对烟草黑胫病的防治效果研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(2):32-38.
[46]	千慧敏, 文艺, 赵辉, 等. 烟草黑胫病和根黑腐病生防假单胞杆菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35(6):940-948. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2019.06.022
[47]	李小杰, 李成军, 姚晨虓, 等. 拮抗烟草疫霉菌的木霉菌株筛选鉴定及防病促生作用研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(3):65-70.
[48]	饶清琳, 钱发聪, 张廷金, 等. 哈茨木霉菌LTR-2对烟草黑胫病的田间防治效果[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2021, 43(3):16-19.
[49]	王海波, 时焦, 雒振宁, 等. 青霉菌QMYCS-2菌株的分离鉴定及其对烟草黑胫病的防治作用[J]. 烟草科技, 2016, 49(2):14-20.
[50]	易龙, 邱妙文, 陈永明, 等. 烟草黑胫病的生物防治研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(25):146-151. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16080033

生防细菌	作用方式	抗菌代谢物	目标病原体	文献
贝莱斯芽孢杆菌D4	抑制菌丝的生长，导致菌丝变形、皱褶和破裂。诱导细胞内ROS的积累	—	苹果黑腐皮壳菌	[3]
贝莱斯芽孢杆菌SDTB038	产生吲哚乙酸，具有稳定的定殖状态；抗真菌	丰原素、杆菌溶素等（全基因组测序分析）	尖孢镰刀菌番茄颈腐根腐病专化型	[5]
高地芽孢杆菌TM22A	抑制菌丝生长、减少孢子萌发、提高防御相关酶的活性	表面活性素、丰原素、伊枯草菌素、溶杆菌素	链格孢菌	[6]
解淀粉芽孢杆菌DB2	破坏菌丝体细胞膜并影响细胞内代谢过程	—	麦根腐平脐蠕孢菌	[7]
假单胞菌DF41	细胞外代谢物抑制植物病害发生	脂肽分子	油菜核盘菌	[8]
铜绿假单胞菌 CGK-KS-1	改变病菌群体感应信号系统，导致细胞膜破坏和毒力的降低	Chumacin-1和 Chumacin-2	水稻白叶枯病菌	[9]
绿针假单胞菌ZL3	产生具有抗真菌活性的挥发性有机化合物	挥发性有机化合物1-十二烯	灰葡萄孢	[10]
暹罗芽孢杆菌LZ88	抑制病原菌菌丝和孢子的产生、诱导宿主抗性	抗真菌代谢物、挥发性有机化合物	链格孢菌	[11]
枯草芽孢杆菌CL2	抑制黄曲霉的菌丝生长和孢子的产生，且对黄曲霉细胞壁和细胞膜有损伤	挥发性有机化合物2,3-丁二酮	黄曲霉	[12]
多粘类芽孢杆菌HK4	分泌水解酶及杀镰孢菌素，提高了寄主植物对生物胁迫的耐受性	杀镰孢菌素	变红镰刀菌、链格孢菌等	[13]

生防细菌	作用方式	抗菌代谢物	目标病原体	文献
贝莱斯芽孢杆菌D4	抑制菌丝的生长，导致菌丝变形、皱褶和破裂。诱导细胞内ROS的积累	—	苹果黑腐皮壳菌	[3]
贝莱斯芽孢杆菌SDTB038	产生吲哚乙酸，具有稳定的定殖状态；抗真菌	丰原素、杆菌溶素等（全基因组测序分析）	尖孢镰刀菌番茄颈腐根腐病专化型	[5]
高地芽孢杆菌TM22A	抑制菌丝生长、减少孢子萌发、提高防御相关酶的活性	表面活性素、丰原素、伊枯草菌素、溶杆菌素	链格孢菌	[6]
解淀粉芽孢杆菌DB2	破坏菌丝体细胞膜并影响细胞内代谢过程	—	麦根腐平脐蠕孢菌	[7]
假单胞菌DF41	细胞外代谢物抑制植物病害发生	脂肽分子	油菜核盘菌	[8]
铜绿假单胞菌 CGK-KS-1	改变病菌群体感应信号系统，导致细胞膜破坏和毒力的降低	Chumacin-1和 Chumacin-2	水稻白叶枯病菌	[9]
绿针假单胞菌ZL3	产生具有抗真菌活性的挥发性有机化合物	挥发性有机化合物1-十二烯	灰葡萄孢	[10]
暹罗芽孢杆菌LZ88	抑制病原菌菌丝和孢子的产生、诱导宿主抗性	抗真菌代谢物、挥发性有机化合物	链格孢菌	[11]
枯草芽孢杆菌CL2	抑制黄曲霉的菌丝生长和孢子的产生，且对黄曲霉细胞壁和细胞膜有损伤	挥发性有机化合物2,3-丁二酮	黄曲霉	[12]
多粘类芽孢杆菌HK4	分泌水解酶及杀镰孢菌素，提高了寄主植物对生物胁迫的耐受性	杀镰孢菌素	变红镰刀菌、链格孢菌等	[13]

生防真菌	作用方式	抗菌代谢物	目标病原体	文献
棘孢木霉FJ035	产生次生代谢物抑制病原菌菌丝生长和孢子萌发	—	尖孢镰刀菌	[15]
哈茨木霉TSM39	通过真菌寄生抑制病原菌，从植物病原体中识别细胞壁低聚物并激活其几丁质溶解系统	—	麦根腐平脐孺孢菌	[16]
篮状菌DYM25	阻止病原真菌的生长，使病原菌丝异常，使其失去侵袭能力	生物碱盐类物质	木贼镰刀菌	[17]
黄粘球菌B25-I-1	降低可溶性蛋白含量和保护酶活性，增加病原菌细胞膜的氧化损伤和通透性	甲基(2R)-2-叠氮基-3-羟基-2-甲基丙酸酯和N-(3-氨基-2-羟丙基)-N-甲基硫酸二酰胺	致病疫霉	[18]
棕榈链霉菌CMU-AB204	产生有抗菌活性的代谢物	来普霉素A	狭长孢灵芝	[19]

生防真菌	作用方式	抗菌代谢物	目标病原体	文献
棘孢木霉FJ035	产生次生代谢物抑制病原菌菌丝生长和孢子萌发	—	尖孢镰刀菌	[15]
哈茨木霉TSM39	通过真菌寄生抑制病原菌，从植物病原体中识别细胞壁低聚物并激活其几丁质溶解系统	—	麦根腐平脐孺孢菌	[16]
篮状菌DYM25	阻止病原真菌的生长，使病原菌丝异常，使其失去侵袭能力	生物碱盐类物质	木贼镰刀菌	[17]
黄粘球菌B25-I-1	降低可溶性蛋白含量和保护酶活性，增加病原菌细胞膜的氧化损伤和通透性	甲基(2R)-2-叠氮基-3-羟基-2-甲基丙酸酯和N-(3-氨基-2-羟丙基)-N-甲基硫酸二酰胺	致病疫霉	[18]
棕榈链霉菌CMU-AB204	产生有抗菌活性的代谢物	来普霉素A	狭长孢灵芝	[19]