Practical Exploration of Rural Industrial Integration Development in Hetian of Xinjiang Under the Background of Rural Revitalization ——Research Based on Level, Driving Force and Mode

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0082

Abstract

Abstract:

The study explores the practice of integrated development of rural industries, summarizes typical experiences, and promotes new development modes, aiming at further expanding the development space of rural industries, optimizing the structure of rural industries, establishing new forms of rural industry development, and realizing the sustainable prosperity of rural industries. Based on the statistical yearbook data of Hetian region from 2016 to 2020, this paper uses entropy method, entropy weight TOPSIS comprehensive analysis method and grey correlation analysis to calculate the development level and driving factors of rural industrial integration in Hetian region of Xinjiang. The results are as follows. (1) During the study period, the comprehensive score of entropy weight TOPSIS shows an upward trend, indicating that the development of rural industrial integration in Hetian is in an initial development stage, the industrial integration behavior and the effect of industrial integration have achieved initial results. (2) The market demand has the most prominent influence on the integrated development of rural industries; technological innovation and enterprise cooperation have a promoting effect on the integrated development of rural industries; the related industries are closely related to the integrated development of rural industries. (3) The development level of rural industrial integration among counties and cities in Hetian region has a spatial correlation, which is positively correlated with the distance from Hetian City, but it is not the only determinant factor. To sum up, this paper puts forward the industrial integration modes of "primary industry as the foundation, secondary industry connecting two ends", "primary industry connecting tertiary industry, giving full play to multiple functions" and "secondary industry connecting in the middle, and primary and tertiary industry developing together", which provides a reference for Hetian region to achieve effective connection between poverty alleviation consolidation and rural revitalization sustainable development.

Key words: rural revitalization, industrial integration, practical exploration, Hetian, Xinjiang

WANG Debin, WU Wenjie, LIU Shanshan, CHEN Qiao. Practical Exploration of Rural Industrial Integration Development in Hetian of Xinjiang Under the Background of Rural Revitalization ——Research Based on Level, Driving Force and Mode[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(12): 91-100.

Figures/Tables 9

References 30

[1]	张永强, 蒲晨曦, 张晓飞, 等. 供给侧改革背景下推进中国农村一二三产业融合发展——基于日本“六次产业化”发展经验[J]. 世界农业, 2017, 457(5):44-50.
[2]	KENTARO Y. Economic valuation of multifunctional roles of agriculture in hilly mountainous areas in Japan[J]. Journal of political economy, 2001(5):152-174.
[3]	SALTZSTEIN S, ROSENBERG F. Ulceration colitis of the ileum, and regional enteritis of the colon a comparative histologist study.[J]. American journal of clinical pathology, 1963,40.
[4]	BORNKESSEL S, BRING S, OMTA S. Analysis indicators of industry convergence in four robotics innovation value chains[J]. Journal on chain and network science, 2014, 14(3):213-229. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2014.x011 URL
[5]	杨博文, 李红梅. 商贸流通产业融合对区域经济发展的驱动机理分析[J]. 商业经济研究, 2022, 845(10):9-12.
[6]	张琳. 农村产业融合驱动乡村振兴路径研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2020.
[7]	YOUNGJUNG G, MOON K, SUNGJOO L. How industrial convergence happens a taxonomy approach based on empirical evidences[J]. Technological forecasting & social change, 2016, 10(7):112-120.
[8]	贾卫峰, 王朔, 陈子凤, 等. 技术融合视角下的产业融合创新[J]. 西安邮电大学学报, 2020, 25(1):105-110.
[9]	江登斌. 试论农村多元经济融合[J]. 经济问题, 1994, 17(8):10-12.
[10]	姜长云. 推进农村一二三产业融合发展新题应有新解法[J]. 中国发展观察, 2015(2):18-22.
[11]	杨涛. 农村产业融合的实践特征与提升路径[J]. 中州学刊, 2019(5):37-42.
[12]	米吉提·哈得尔, 杨梅. 农村产业融合发展的现实困境与改进策略[J]. 农业经济, 2022(1):55-57.
[13]	赵趁. 城乡融合背景下农村一二三产业融合发展新模式及实现路径[J]. 农业经济, 2019(11):9-11.
[14]	马晓河. 推进农村一二三产业深度融合发展[J]. 中国合作经济, 2015, 334(2):43-44.
[15]	郝华勇. 特色产业引领农村一二三产业融合发展——以湖北恩施州硒产业为例[J]. 江淮论坛, 2018, 33(4):19-24.
[16]	孙学立. 农村一二三产业融合组织模式及其路径创新[J]. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 42(1):57-63.
[17]	李治, 王一杰, 胡志全. 农村一、二、三产业融合评价体系的构建与评价——以北京市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(11):111-120.
[18]	余涛. 农村一二三产业融合发展的评价及分析[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2020(11):76-85.
[19]	田聪华, 韩笑, 苗红萍, 等. 新疆农村一二三产业融合发展综合评价指标体系构建及应用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(3):580-588. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.03.022
[20]	李芸, 陈俊红, 陈慈. 农业产业融合评价指标体系研究及对北京市的应用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(4):55-63.
[21]	陈池波, 李硕, 田云. 中国农村一二三产业融合度与省际比较分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(2):326-334.
[22]	陈盛伟, 冯叶. 基于熵值法和TOPSIS法的农村三产融合发展综合评价研究——以山东省为例[J]. 东岳论丛, 2020, 41(5):78-86.
[23]	陈慈, 陈俊红, 龚晶. 农业产业融合发展的理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2020:13-19.
[24]	王玲. 江苏省农村产业融合水平测度与区域差异分析[J]. 农业经济, 2017(6):21-22.
[25]	张钟允, 朱捷. 农村三产融合评价体系构建及应用——以传统农区山东省为例[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2021, 32(7):42-45.
[26]	谭明交. 农村一二三产业融合发展:理论与实证研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
[27]	杨宾宾, 魏杰, 宗义湘, 等. 乡村产业融合发展水平测算[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(2):125-128.
[28]	陈鹏. 长江经济带旅游高质量发展评价研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.
[29]	田富俊, 储巍巍, 刘彦. 科技创新与文化产业融合发展实证分析——基于灰色关联分析法[J]. 湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 26(1):21-28.
[30]	何刚, 杨静雯, 鲍珂宇, 等. 新型城镇化对区域生态环境质量的空间相关性及效应分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(5):1958-1966.

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标	指标类型	权重
融合行为A₁ 0.4690	农业产业链延伸B₁ 0.2214	X₁农林牧渔总产值	+	0.0568
		X₂农产品销售收入/万元	+	0.0501
		X₃农业新型经营主体数量/个	+	0.0642
		X₄涉农服务业企业数/个	+	0.0503
	农业多功能拓展B₂ 0.2476	X₅休闲农业及旅游业收入/万元	+	0.0564
		X₆粮食总产量/t	+	0.0629
		X₇农林牧渔服务业总产值/万元	+	0.0642
		X₈农民专业合作社数量/个	+	0.0641
融合效果A₂ 0.5313	农民增收B₃ 0.2523	X₉农民纯收入/万元	+	0.0642
		X₁₀农民人均可支配收入/万元	+	0.0642
		X₁₁农民工资性收入所占比重/%	+	0.0597
		X₁₂一产增加值占GDP比重/%	+	0.0642
	农业增效B₄ 0.1146	X₁₃种植业占总产值比重/%	+	0.0504
	农业增效B₄ 0.1146	X₁₄农业机械总动力/kW	+	0.0642
	城乡一体化B₅ 0.1644	X₁₅城乡居民收入比/%	-	0.0500
		X₁₆城乡居民消费比/%	-	0.0501
		X₁₇城镇化率/%	-	0.0643

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标	指标类型	权重
融合行为A₁ 0.4690	农业产业链延伸B₁ 0.2214	X₁农林牧渔总产值	+	0.0568
		X₂农产品销售收入/万元	+	0.0501
		X₃农业新型经营主体数量/个	+	0.0642
		X₄涉农服务业企业数/个	+	0.0503
	农业多功能拓展B₂ 0.2476	X₅休闲农业及旅游业收入/万元	+	0.0564
		X₆粮食总产量/t	+	0.0629
		X₇农林牧渔服务业总产值/万元	+	0.0642
		X₈农民专业合作社数量/个	+	0.0641
融合效果A₂ 0.5313	农民增收B₃ 0.2523	X₉农民纯收入/万元	+	0.0642
		X₁₀农民人均可支配收入/万元	+	0.0642
		X₁₁农民工资性收入所占比重/%	+	0.0597
		X₁₂一产增加值占GDP比重/%	+	0.0642
	农业增效B₄ 0.1146	X₁₃种植业占总产值比重/%	+	0.0504
	农业增效B₄ 0.1146	X₁₄农业机械总动力/kW	+	0.0642
	城乡一体化B₅ 0.1644	X₁₅城乡居民收入比/%	-	0.0500
		X₁₆城乡居民消费比/%	-	0.0501
		X₁₇城镇化率/%	-	0.0643

年份	Moran I指数	z得分	p值
2016	0.151	2.094	0.085
2020	0.582	4.256	0.001

年份	Moran I指数	z得分	p值
2016	0.151	2.094	0.085
2020	0.582	4.256	0.001

指标	因素评价项	关联度	排名	平均关联度	综合排名
关联产业	X₁农林牧渔总产值	0.6443	7	0.5668	4
	X₂休闲农业及旅游业总收入	0.5098	12
	X₃农林牧渔服务业总产值	0.6669	6
	X₄粮食总产量	0.4062	14
技术创新	X₅农业机械总动力	0.6781	5	0.6396	2
	X₆种植业占总产值比重	0.6905	4
	X₇第一产业增加值占GDP比重	0.5501	11
企业合作	X₈农业新型经营主体数量	0.6213	8	0.6100	3
企业合作	X₉涉农服务业企业数	0.5987	10	0.6100	3
市场需求	X₁₀城镇居民可支配收入	0.8209	1	0.7625	1
	X₁₁农牧民纯收入	0.7542	2	0.7625	1
	X₁₂农村居民可支配收入	0.7123	3	0.7625	1
政府政策	X₁₃农林牧渔业固定投资占总固定投资比	0.4402	13	0.5225	5
政府政策	X₁₄农林水事务支出占公共财政预算	0.6048	9	0.5225	5