Research Progress of Ginger Plague and Continuous Cropping Obstacle in Ginger

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0181

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper mainly describes the occurrence, causes and prevention and control technology of ginger plague and continuous cropping obstacles, briefly describes the relationship between ginger plague and continuous cropping obstacles, summarizes the research progress of ginger plague and continuous cropping obstacles from the aspects of ginger plague, pathogenic bacteria, control status and technology, and summarizes the effective prevention and control methods of ginger plague and continuous cropping obstacles by improving soil, rotating cultivation and soil fumigation. It is pointed out that there are few researches on pathogenic bacteria, accumulation of self-toxic substances in ginger and rhizosphere microorganisms at present, and relevant suggestions are proposed, in order to provide theoretical support for the prevention and control of ginger plague, slow down the obstacles of continuous cropping, and promote the development of ginger industry and sustainable production.

Key words: ginger plague, continuous cropping obstacles, prevention and control technology, suggestion

GE Liqing, LIAO Liyan, SUN Chunmei, LI Chaolian, ZHANG Qiongxian, HAN Qingli. Research Progress of Ginger Plague and Continuous Cropping Obstacle in Ginger[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(9): 12-16.

References 41

[1]	杨雪. 我国生姜价格波动因素分析及发展建议[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(8):163-166.
[2]	刘铭, 张敏, 戢俊臣, 等. 中国姜瘟病的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005(6):337-340,357.
[3]	魏仲军, 李兴元, 王晓娥, 等. 姜瘟病穴田间分布规律及药剂防治试验[J]. 中国农学通报, 2002(3):106-108.
[4]	何锡文, 卞浩. 姜瘟病的发病因子及防治对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2016(14):118-119.
[5]	FEGAN M, PRIOR P. How complex is the “Ralstonia Solanacearum Species Complex”[J]. Bacterial Wilt the Disease & the Ralstonia Solanacearum Species Complex, 2005(22):449-461.
[6]	REMENANT B, CAMBIAIRE J C, CELLIER G, et al. Ralstonia syzygii, the blood disease bacterium and some Asian R. solanacearum strains form a single genomic species despite divergent lifestyles[J]. PLoS one, 2011, 6(9):e24356.
[7]	PRIOR P, AILLOUD F, DALSING B L, et al. Genomic and proteomic evidence supporting the division of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum into three species[J]. BMC genomics, 2016, 17(1):90.
[8]	姜艳鹏, 胡振华, 张翠静, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌J22拮抗姜瘟阴沟肠杆菌的效果与机理研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(2):125-134.
[9]	国娇娇. 茄科蔬菜青枯病菌的PCR检测及遗传多样性分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2013.
[10]	SAILE E, MCGARVEY J A, SCHELL M A, et al. Role of extracellular polysaccharide and endoglucanase in root invasion and colonization of tomato plants by Ralstonia solanacearum[J]. Phytopathology, 1997, 87:1264-1271.
[11]	TANS-KERSTEN J, HUANG H, ALLEN C. Ralstonia solanacearum needs motility for invasive virulence on tomato[J]. Bacteriol, 2001, 183(12):3597-3605.
[12]	张丹. 演化型Ⅱ青枯菌克服番茄抗性机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2022.
[13]	邹龙运, 张天翔, 林宗铿, 等. 青枯菌的研究进展[J]. 福建热作科技, 2022, 47(3):67-72.
[14]	SUAREZ G, SIERRA J C, SHA J, et al. Molecular characterization of a functional type VI secretion system from a clinical isolate of Aeromonas hydrophila[J]. Microbial pathogenesis, 2008, 44(4):344-361.
[15]	KOIKE T S, GORDON R T, DAUGOVISH O, et al. Recent developments on strawberry plant collapse problems in California caused by Fusarium and Macrophomina[J]. International journal of fruit science, 2013, 13(1-2):76-83.
[16]	BRENNAN R F. Effect of levels of take-all an on the dry matter and grain yield of wheat[J]. Journal of plant nutrition, 1995, 18(6):1159-1170.
[17]	周文杰, 吕德国, 秦嗣军. 植物与根际微生物相互作用关系研究进展[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2016, 38(3):253-260.
[18]	HORBACH R, NAVARRO-QUESADA A R, KNOGGE W, et al. When and how to kill a plant cell: Infection strategies of plant pathogenic fungi[J]. Journal of plant physiology, 2011, 168(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.014 pmid: 20674079
[19]	VIJAYARAGHAVAN R, ABRAHAM K. Selection of potential rhizobacterial isolates from ginger rhizosphere against bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum[J]. International journal of plant protection, 2012, 5(1):20-27.
[20]	朱红惠, 姚青, 李浩华, 等. AM真菌对青枯菌的抑制和对酚类物质的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2004(1):1-5.
[21]	VANITHA S C, UMESHA S. Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated systemic resistance in tomato is driven through an elevated synthesis of defense enzymes[J]. Biolgia plantarum, 2011, 55(2):317-322.
[22]	胡洪涛, 朱志刚, 杨靖钟, 等. 不同处理对高山凤头姜姜瘟病的防效及土壤细菌群落结构和功能的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(6):1763-1775.
[23]	HAN C M, PAN K W, WU N, et al. Allelopathic effect of ginger on seed germination and seedling growth of soybean and chive[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2008, 116(3):330-336.
[24]	韩春梅, 李春龙, 叶少平, 等. 生姜水浸液对生姜幼苗根际土壤酶活性、微生物群落结构及土壤养分的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(2):489-498.
[25]	周宝利, 李燕, 李东, 等. 化感物质松香酸对辣椒种子萌发、幼苗生长及根际微生物的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(5):155-160. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2010.05.032
[26]	邱立友, 戚元成, 王明道, 等. 植物次生代谢物的自毒作用及其与连作障碍的关系[J]. 土壤, 2010, 42(1):1-7.
[27]	尹恩, 王明跃, 武际, 等. 蚯蚓粪+AMF对连作生姜的影响[J]. 韶关学院学报, 2017, 38(9):65-70.
[28]	潘汝浩. 防控生姜土传枯萎病及促生生物有机肥研制[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2013.
[29]	姜莉莉, 王开运, 武玉国, 等. 生姜连作土壤的生态改良及主要病虫害绿色防控技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2017(7):332,341.
[30]	SIEGEL-HERTZ K, EDEL-HERMANN V, CHAPELLE E, et al. Comparative microbiome analysis of a fusarium wilt suppressive soil and a fusarium wilt conducive soil from the Châteaurenard region[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2018, 9:568.
[31]	缪才凌, 朱书兴, 范天宇, 等. 土壤改良措施对连作生姜土壤微生物群落及枯萎病防效的影响[J]. 植物医学, 2022, 1(6):32-41.
[32]	周大云, 雷吟, 丁潮洪, 等. 大棚生姜—茭白轮作栽培技术[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2017(21):41-43.
[33]	张星, 刘勇, 郝兴顺, 等. 汉中市大棚马铃薯—生姜周年轮作绿色高效栽培技术[A].中国作物学会马铃薯专业委员会.马铃薯产业与绿色发展(2021)[C]. 2021:361-364.
[34]	WAGG C, SCHLAEPPI K, BANERJEE S, et al. Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1):4841-4850. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y pmid: 31649246
[35]	阳祥, 李先德, 刘吉龙, 等. 不同轮作模式的土壤真菌群落结构及功能特征分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(4):432-442.
[36]	曹坳程, 方文生, 李园, 等. 我国土壤熏蒸消毒60年回顾[J]. 植物保护学报, 2022, 49(1):325-335.
[37]	任立瑞, 李文静, 李青杰, 等. 不同熏蒸剂复配对生姜田土传病害的防控及产量的影响[J]. 农药, 2022, 61(9):674-678.
[38]	胡洪涛, 朱志刚, 焦忠久, 等. 棉隆土壤消毒对高山甘蓝根肿病的防效及土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2019, 38(3):25-31.
[39]	胡洪涛, 朱志刚, 焦忠久, 等. 棉隆土壤消毒对高山甘蓝根肿病的防效及土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2019, 38(3):25-31.
[40]	王前, 黄斌, 颜冬冬, 等. 氯化苦熏蒸处理对土壤氮素和微量元素转化的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(6):73-77,98.
[41]	燕平梅, 魏爱丽, 乔宏萍, 等. 威百亩熏蒸对土壤反硝化作用及nirS型反硝化细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2019, 46(2):393-400.