Effects of Different Perforated Fully Biodegradable Mulch Films on Growth, Yield and Economic Benefits of Spring Pakchoi

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0184

Abstract

Abstract:

To identify the optimal mulching practice for spring pakchoi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) cultivation in Hangzhou, a field experiment was conducted. Treatments included six types of fully biodegradable films varying in hole spacing (12 cm × 12 cm, 15 cm × 12 cm, 15 cm × 15 cm) and thickness (6 μm, 8 μm). Two control treatments were established as no film mulching with herbicides (CK₁) and no film mulching with manual weeding (CK₂). The effects of these treatments on pakchoi growth, yield, and economic benefits were compared and evaluated. The results indicated that all types of perforated fully biodegradable mulch films demonstrated significant weed control effects and enhanced crop yields to varying degrees. Among these, the treatment using perforated fully biodegradable film mulching with a thickness of 8 μm and hole spacing of 15 cm × 15 cm achieved the most superior weed control efficacy, the weed control effect reached 99.75%, and the converted yield per hectare was 60356 kg, which was significantly increased by 29.31% and 29.64% compared with CK₁ and CK₂, respectively. The comprehensive benefit reached 116737 yuan/hm², which was 25.45 % and 27.85 % higher than CK₁ and CK₂, respectively. At harvest, plants under this treatment exhibited good growth characteristics and high individual plant weight, leading to the highest total yield and economic benefits, which were significantly greater than all other treatments. This study provides technical support for the green and efficient production of pakchoi. In the future, the adaptability research of different seasons and different varieties can be further carried out to promote the large-scale application of this technology.

Key words: fully biodegradable mulch film, perforation, pakchoi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis), yield, weed control

CLC Number:

S641.1

YU Bin, XU Chuchu, ZHU Hanxiao, HUANG Kaimei, SUN Shuni, WANG Huaying. Effects of Different Perforated Fully Biodegradable Mulch Films on Growth, Yield and Economic Benefits of Spring Pakchoi[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(5): 32-36.

Figures/Tables 5

References 25

[1]	汪宽鸿, 张兆辉, 武东东, 等. 速生叶菜类蔬菜全程机械化发展现状与挑战[J]. 蔬菜, 2025(Z2):80-86.
[2]	周佳燕, 王开心, 丁检, 等. 浙江省设施蔬菜产业现状及高质量发展对策建议[J/OL]. 中国蔬菜,1-15[2025-12-14].
[3]	丁检, 周佳燕, 李志坤, 等. 浙江省设施蔬菜现状及高质量发展对策建议[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2023(14):81-84.
[4]	於锋, 胡双燕, 郑巍, 等. 江苏省蔬菜机械化发展现状与挑战[J]. 蔬菜, 2025(Z2):57-66.
[5]	马超, 刘小翠, 班甜甜, 等. 贵州山地叶菜机械化发展现状、存在问题及对策建议[J]. 南方农机, 2025, 56(21):34-36+40.
[6]	郭胡津, 曾小燕, 蔡烈伟, 等. 我国茶园杂草研究进展与展望[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2017, 14(6):8-12.
[7]	金彩华, 金叶华, 汪洁, 等. 不同药剂对机械直播青菜田杂草的防除效果初探[J]. 上海农业科技, 2017(3):131-132.
[8]	裴立民. 油菜铺膜打孔播种机改进设计与试验[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2023.
[9]	杨胜海, 王刚, 吴军. 覆膜打孔栽培模式下地膜类型对马铃薯干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 农技服务, 2023, 40(8):40-42.
[10]	潘岚, 覃金鼓, 蒙懿. 冬作马铃薯不同地膜覆盖与打孔播种效果试验[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2021, 41(3):56-58.
[11]	倪玉琼. 黔东南本地谷子黑膜覆盖打孔直播密度与定植苗数对其产量的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(2):71-74. doi: 10.19754/j.nyyjs.20220130019
[12]	董诗, 常树堂. 大蒜制畦喷药铺膜打孔作业一体机研制[J]. 农业机械, 2022(8):84-87,4.
[13]	宗静, 齐长红, 刘宝文, 等. 草莓园打孔地膜多季使用技术[J]. 果树实用技术与信息, 2019(11):16-17.
[14]	张鹏. 全生物降解地膜研究进展及应用现状[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2024(11):151-153.
[15]	胡美华, 王华英, 胡立军, 等. 浙江省瓜菜栽培应用全生物降解地膜覆盖技术要点[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(5):1124-1128. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230245
[16]	俞斌, 黄凯美, 杜龙岗, 等. 不同生物降解膜对甜加糯型鲜食玉米生长、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2025, 37(7):38-45.
[17]	谷艳蓉, 柯玉广, 张健, 等. 不同类型全生物降解地膜的性能及在北京鲜食玉米生产上的应用[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2023(8):34-39.
[18]	黎坤瑜, 王华英, 许楚楚, 等. 全生物降解地膜对设施鲜食花生产量的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2024(22):57-61.
[19]	周洪, 朱鹏飞, 徐佳, 等. 全生物降解地膜在越冬大白菜上的应用[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(5):1115-1119. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230897
[20]	洪涛, 王保, 陈正洪, 等. 不同颜色全生物降解地膜增温效果及对辣椒产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(9):129-133.
[21]	王建科, 胡立军, 陈永锋, 等. 不同生物降解膜在春甘蓝生产中的应用试验[J]. 蔬菜, 2024(1):12-17.
[22]	杨新鹏. 除草方式对云杉苗圃微环境及苗木生长的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2020, 47(4):56-59.
[23]	罗剑洪, 罗巧, 王冀川, 等. 不同厚度地膜覆盖对棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2019, 42(11):8-10.
[24]	熊丹, 金伟兴, 王琦, 等. 全生物降解地膜对春马铃薯产量和土壤温度的影响[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2025(14):66-70.
[25]	方淑丽, 任国华, 邵玉静, 等. 不同类型火焰枪对小白菜除草防虫效果的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(3):676-679. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230065

处理	全生物降解膜厚度/μm	孔间距	除草
处理	全生物降解膜厚度/μm	横向间距×纵向间距	除草
T₁	6	12 cm×12 cm	否
T₂	6	15 cm×12 cm	否
T₃	6	15 cm×15 cm	否
T₄	8	12 cm×12 cm	否
T₅	8	15 cm×12 cm	否
T₆	8	15 cm×15 cm	否
CK₁	不覆膜	/	药剂除草
CK₂	不覆膜	/	人工除草

处理	全生物降解膜厚度/μm	孔间距	除草
处理	全生物降解膜厚度/μm	横向间距×纵向间距	除草
T₁	6	12 cm×12 cm	否
T₂	6	15 cm×12 cm	否
T₃	6	15 cm×15 cm	否
T₄	8	12 cm×12 cm	否
T₅	8	15 cm×12 cm	否
T₆	8	15 cm×15 cm	否
CK₁	不覆膜	/	药剂除草
CK₂	不覆膜	/	人工除草

处理	杂草/(株/0.25 m²)	株防效/%
T₁	3.33±0.69 c	92.42±1.57 c
T₂	1.78±0.29 c	95.96±0.67 abc
T₃	3.00±1.33 c	93.17±3.03 bc
T₄	0.67±0.19 c	98.49±0.44 ab
T₅	0.67±0.51 c	98.49±1.16 ab
T₆	0.11±0.11 c	99.75±0.25 a
CK₁	37.33±1.20 b	15.15±2.73 d
CK₂	44.00±3.46 a	/

处理	杂草/(株/0.25 m²)	株防效/%
T₁	3.33±0.69 c	92.42±1.57 c
T₂	1.78±0.29 c	95.96±0.67 abc
T₃	3.00±1.33 c	93.17±3.03 bc
T₄	0.67±0.19 c	98.49±0.44 ab
T₅	0.67±0.51 c	98.49±1.16 ab
T₆	0.11±0.11 c	99.75±0.25 a
CK₁	37.33±1.20 b	15.15±2.73 d
CK₂	44.00±3.46 a	/

处理	株高/cm	株幅	最大叶片					单株叶片数/片
处理	株高/cm	长/cm×宽/cm	叶片长/cm	叶片宽/cm	叶柄长/cm	叶柄宽/cm	叶柄厚/mm	单株叶片数/片
T₁	23.19±0.65 bcd	29.89±1.04 c×26.55±0.96 bc	25.45±0.58 b	13.99±0.40 bc	9.87±0.32 bc	4.38±0.30 c	8.84±0.35 ab	12.20±0.49 b
T₂	25.23±0.51 ab	33.81±0.86 ab×29.41±1.24 ab	27.70±0.52 a	14.96±0.57 ab	10.35±0.15 ab	4.92±0.35 ab	8.44±0.56 b	12.80±0.46 ab
T₃	23.6±0.53 bcd	30.90±0.74 c×26.71±0.63 bc	26.02±0.38 b	13.76±0.53 bc	9.56±0.26 c	4.57±0.34 bc	9.50±0.32 ab	12.40±0.42 b
T₄	23.82±0.53 bc	29.84±1.01 c×25.04±1.11 c	25.84±0.50 b	13.37±0.37 c	10.37±0.24 ab	4.31±0.36 c	6.45±0.43 c	12.13±0.46 b
T₅	21.67±0.52 d	30.70±1.09 c×26.27±1.26 bc	24.47±0.38 b	12.92±0.47 c	9.63±0.23 bc	4.49±0.30 bc	8.74±0.29 ab	12.00±0.34 b
T₆	23.03±0.94 cd	31.77±0.66 bc×26.40±1.39 bc	25.77±0.60 b	13.03±0.37 c	9.89±0.27 bc	4.75±0.23 bc	8.93±0.20 ab	12.13±0.31 b
CK₁	23.97±0.85 bc	31.93±0.97 bc×28.43±1.20 abc	27.47±0.48 a	14.77±0.38 ab	10.37±0.18 ab	4.94±0.32 ab	9.18±0.33 ab	12.67±0.32 ab
CK₂	26.30±0.57 a	35.50±0.89 a×31.60±1.00 a	28.04±0.60 a	15.69±0.40 a	10.81±0.26 a	5.31±0.34 a	9.72±0.27 a	13.67±0.35 a