欢迎访问《农学学报》,

农学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (12): 62-67.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18050006

所属专题: 园艺

• 林学 园艺 园林 食用菌 • 上一篇    下一篇

套餐肥对设施番茄产量及品质的影响

孙喜军,吕 爽,王 安,王小荣,孟 菁,高 莹,李 静,郝红艳   

  1. 西安市农业技术推广中心,西安市农业技术推广中心,西安市农业技术推广中心,西安市农业技术推广中心,西安市农业技术推广中心,咸阳职业技术学院,西安市长安区农业技术推广中心,西安市长安区农业技术推广中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-04 修回日期:2018-07-10 接受日期:2018-07-17 出版日期:2018-12-17 发布日期:2018-12-17
  • 通讯作者: 吕 爽 E-mail:jlusxj@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    西安市科技局设施农业新技术研究项目“果蔬水肥一体化控肥节水技术研究”(NC1504)。

Effect of Package Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato

  • Received:2018-05-04 Revised:2018-07-10 Accepted:2018-07-17 Online:2018-12-17 Published:2018-12-17

摘要: [目的]以设施番茄为例,旨在探讨不同套餐肥肥效,以期能为西安市设施番茄优质高效生产提供一定的理论依据。[方法]试验采用田间试验方法,设置T1(施用济邦牌番茄套餐肥)、T2(施用欣金谷牌番茄套餐肥)和T3(CK,即常规施肥对照,施用元丰牌复合肥)3个试验处理,研究了不同处理对番茄产量、品质及经济效益的影响。[结果]结果表明:(1)经过一季番茄栽培后,处理T1、T2、T3对土壤有机质含量影响不明显,但处理T1、T2有助于降低设施碱性土壤的pH和电导率;(2)处理T3的番茄植株株高、径粗、株幅及茎叶干重等指标均高于处理T1、T2,但番茄单果重、产量、可溶性固形物和维生素C含量以及经济效益却低于处理T1、T2。[结论]总体而言,施用两种套餐肥均优于常规施肥,但施用济邦套餐肥肥料成本更低,经济效益更高,能更好实现节本增效和增收目的。

关键词: 水稻, 水稻, 耐水成膜剂, 嘧菌酯, 高效液相色谱, 应用效果

Abstract: Effects of different package fertilizers on tomato in facility were studied to provide references for high quality and high efficient production of tomato in Xi’an. Gibon package fertilizers (T1), Jingu package fertilizers (T2) and Yuanfeng compound fertilizers (T3, CK, namely the conventional fertilization) were used to set up three fertilization treatments. The results showed that: (1) as to soil organic matters, there was no obvious difference among the treatments after one season cultivation, however, compared with T3, T1 and T2 lowered the soil pH value and electrical conductivity; (2) the plant height, stem diameter, plant width and dry weight of stem and leaf of T3 were higher than those of T1 and T2, but tomato fruit weight, yield, soluble solid, vitamin C content and economic benefit of T3 were lower than those of T1 and T2, respectively. In general, the effect of Gibon package fertilizers and Jingu package fertilizers are superior to that of the conventional fertilization, however, the Gibon package fertilizers has lower cost and a higher economic benefit compared with Jingu package fertilizers, and could better attain the goal of cost-efficiency.

中图分类号: