探究复合菌剂在奶牛粪污处理中的应用进展

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0122

农学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4): 66-71.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0122

• 土壤肥料资源环境生态 • 上一篇下一篇

探究复合菌剂在奶牛粪污处理中的应用进展

韩姗姗¹(), 李忠玲², 张红艳², 戴佳锟¹^,², 窦秉德², 岳淑宁¹()

¹ 陕西省生物农业研究所，西安 710043
² 陕西省酶工程技术研究中心，陕西临潼 710000

收稿日期:2023-05-15 修回日期:2023-10-16 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-17
通讯作者:
岳淑宁，女，1971年生，陕西西安人，副研究员，本科，主要从事奶牛健康养殖关键技术的研究。通信地址：710043 陕西省西安市咸宁中路125号，Tel：029-83825687，E-mail：yuesn@xab.ac.cn。
作者简介:
韩姗姗，女，1983年出生，陕西西安人，助理研究员，博士，主要从事功能饲料添加剂的研究。通信地址：710043 陕西省西安市咸宁中路125号，Tel：029-83825687，E-mail：Hanss@xab.ac.cn。
基金资助:
西安市科技局农业技术研发项目“奶牛粪污无害化处理高效复合生物制剂的研究与应用”(21NYYF0017); 陕西省科学院项目科学研究专项“仔猪无抗饲料产品开发中发酵中药的应用研究”(2021k-11); 陕西省科技厅项目重点研发计划“家禽专用无抗生物饲料添加剂的研究及应用”(2022NY-103); 西安市科技局农业技术研发项目“富含玉米花青素替抗饲料的研究与开发”(22NYYF015)

The Application Progress of Composite Microbial Agent in Cow Manure Treatment

HAN Shanshan¹(), LI Zhongling², ZHANG Hongyan², DAI Jiakun¹^,², DOU Bingde², YUE Shuning¹()

¹ Shaanxi Institute of Biological Agriculture, Xi’an 710043, Shaanxi, China
² Shaanxi Enzyme Engineer Technology Research Center, Lintong 710000, Shaanxi, China

Received:2023-05-15 Revised:2023-10-16 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

奶牛产业是中国重要的农业产业之一。然而，随着奶牛养殖业的快速发展，大量养殖废弃物的排放问题也日益严峻。如何无害化处理奶牛粪污已成为当前亟待解决的问题之一。本研究介绍了复合菌剂在奶牛粪污处理中的应用进展，复合菌剂能够有效降解奶牛粪便中的有机物和氮磷等营养物，减少有害气体的排放，同时回收营养物作为肥料和牛床垫料，具有低成本和简单易操作的优点。复合菌剂的应用效果受多种因素影响，包括菌剂类型、环境条件和外源添加物质等，堆肥的质量是评价复合菌剂应用效果的主要指标。在实际中需要根据不同情况进行调整和优化。研究奶牛粪污问题，对于缓解农村畜禽污染，提升粪污资源化利用率，实现畜禽养殖可持续发展，具有重要意义。高效复合菌剂应用技术作为一种新型的有机物处理方法，在奶牛粪污处理领域具有广阔的应用前景，未来需要进一步研究和探索其在实际生产中的应用效果，并加强与其他技术手段的集成应用，以推动奶牛粪污处理工作向更加环保、高效和可持续的方向发展。

关键词: 奶牛, 粪污, 生物菌剂, 环境污染, 可持续发展

Abstract:

The dairy cattle industry is one of the important agricultural sectors in China. However, with its rapid development, the problem of large-scale discharge of livestock waste has become increasingly severe. How to handle dairy manure harmlessly has become one of the urgent problems to be solved. This article introduces the progress of composite microbial agents in the treatment of cow manure. Composite microbial agents can effectively degrade organic matter and nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients in cow manure, reduce the emission of harmful gases, while recycling nutrients as fertilizers and cow bedding materials, with the advantages of low cost and simple operation. The application effect of composite microbial agents is influenced by many factors, including the type of microbial agent, environmental conditions, and exogenous additives, and the quality of composting is the main indicator for evaluating the application effect of composite microbial agents. Adjustments and optimizations need to be made according to different situations in practice. The study of cow manure problems is of great significance for alleviating rural livestock and poultry pollution, improving the utilization rate of manure resources, and realizing sustainable development of animal husbandry. As a new method of organic matter treatment, efficient composite microbial agent application technology has broad application prospects in the field of cow manure treatment. Further research and exploration on its application effect in practical production is necessary. By integrating with other technical means, it can facilitate the transition towards more sustainable, efficient, and environmentally friendly practices in dairy manure treatment.

Key words: dairy cattle, manure, microbial agents, environmental pollution, sustainable development

韩姗姗, 李忠玲, 张红艳, 戴佳锟, 窦秉德, 岳淑宁. 探究复合菌剂在奶牛粪污处理中的应用进展[J]. 农学学报, 2024, 14(4): 66-71.

HAN Shanshan, LI Zhongling, ZHANG Hongyan, DAI Jiakun, DOU Bingde, YUE Shuning. The Application Progress of Composite Microbial Agent in Cow Manure Treatment[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(4): 66-71.

参考文献 50

[1]	崔华威. 异位发酵床降解奶牛粪污过程中微生物多样性及抗生素抗性基因变化的研究[D]. 湖北: 华中农业大学, 2021.
[2]	TAN M X, HOU Y, ZHANG L, et al. Nutrient use efficiency of intensive dairy farms in China - current situation and analyses of options for improvement[J]. Agricultural systems, 2022, 203(103495):103495. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103495 URL
[3]	CHEN L, CHEN Y N, LI Y P, et al. Improving the humification by additives during composting: A review[J]. Waste management, 2023, 158: 93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.12.040 pmid: 36641825
[4]	SHEHATA E, CHENG D M, MA Q Q, et al. Microbial community dynamics during composting of animal manures contaminated with arsenic, copper, and oxytetracycline[J]. Journal of integrative agriculture, 2021, 20:1649-1659. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63290-7
[5]	武淑霞, 刘宏斌, 黄宏坤, 等. 我国畜禽养殖粪污产生量及其资源化分析[J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(5):103-111.
[6]	LI C Y, QIAO W, ROLAND W M, et al. Patterns of dairy manure management in China[J]. International journal of agricultural and biology engineering, 2017, 10(3):227-236.
[7]	WEI S, ZHU Z P, ZHAO J, et al. Policies and regulations for promoting manure management for sustainable livestock production in China: A review[J]. Frontiers of agricultural science and engineering, 2021, 8(1):45-57. doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2020369
[8]	GOU C L, WANG Y Q, ZHANG X Q, et al. Inoculation with a psychrotrophic-thermophilic complex microbial agent accelerates onset and promotes maturity of dairy manure-rice straw composting under cold climate conditions[J]. Bioresource technology, 2017, 243:339-346. doi: S0960-8524(17)31001-5 pmid: 28683387
[9]	吴浩玮, 小淇, 梁博文, 等. 我国畜禽粪便污染现状及处理与资源化利用分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(6):1167-1176.
[10]	MENG Q X, YANG W, MEN M Q, et al. Microbial community succession and response to environmental variables during cow manure and corn straw composting[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2019, 10:529. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00529 pmid: 30936861
[11]	MARTINS G L, SOUZA A J, MENDES L W, et al. Physicochemical and bacterial changes during composting of vegetable and animal-derived agro-industrial wastes[J]. Bioresource technology, 2023, 376:128842. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128842 URL
[12]	赵恺凝, 赵国柱, 国辉, 等. 园林废弃物堆肥化技术中微生物菌剂的功能与作用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(1):41-48. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2016.01.008
[13]	李恕艳, 李吉进, 张邦喜, 等. 菌剂对鸡粪堆肥腐殖质含量品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(增刊2):268-274.
[14]	RASTOGI M, NANDAL M, KHOSLA B. Microbes as vital additives for solid waste composting[J]. Heliyon, 2020, 6 (2):e03343. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03343 URL
[15]	GREFF B, SZIGETI J, NAGY Á, et al. Influence of microbial inoculants on co-composting of lignocellulosic crop residues with farm animal manure: A review[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2022, 302(Pt B):114088. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114088 URL
[16]	ZHAO L, ZHAO Y, ZHANG W S, et al. Identification of key drivers of the microbial shikimic acid pathway during different materials composting[J]. Bioresource technology, 2022, 360:127579. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127579 URL
[17]	LI F S, GHANIZADEH H, CUI G L, et al. Microbiome - based agents can optimize composting of agricultural wastes by modifying microbial communities[J]. Bioresource technology, 2023, 374:128765. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128765 URL
[18]	李玮琳, 张昕, 马军伟, 等. 抗生素降解菌剂对猪粪堆肥腐熟和细菌群落演替的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(10):4789-4800.
[19]	卢洋洋. 不同菌种组合对牛粪好氧堆肥发酵的影响研究[D]. 内蒙古: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019.
[20]	LI J B, WANG X T, CONG C, et al. Inoculation of cattle manure with microbial agents increases efficiency and promotes maturity in composting[J]. 3 Biotech, 2020, 10(3):128. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-2127-4 pmid: 32154041
[21]	YANG Q, ZHANG S Q, LI XP, et al. Effects of microbial inoculant and additives on pile composting of cow manure[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 13:1084171. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1084171 URL
[22]	ZHAO L, WEI Z, CHEN X M. The remarkable role of shikimic acid pathway in humic acid formation during biochar and montmorillonite addition composting[J]. Bioresource technology, 2021, 342:25985. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125985 pmid: 34852444
[23]	LIU H T, GUO H N, GUO X X, et al. Probing changes in humus chemical characteristics in response to biochar addition and varying bulking agents during composting: A holistic multi-evidence-based approach[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2021, 300:113736. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113736 URL
[24]	高文慧李波, 叶菁, 等. 生物炭添加对猪粪堆肥氮素形态和损失的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(12):1440-1446.
[25]	董春欣, 王玉军. 鸡粪堆肥过程中的挥发性气体控制效果分析[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2014, 36(6):680-684.
[26]	MANSI R, MEENAKSHI N, LATA N. Additive effect of cow dung slurry and cellulolytic bacterial inoculation on humic fractions during composting of municipal solid waste[J]. International journal of recycling of organic waste in agriculture, 2019, 8:325-332. doi: 10.1007/s40093-019-0277-3
[27]	XIONG J P, MA S S, HE X Q, et al. Nitrogen transformation and dynamic changes in related functional genes during functional-membrane covered aerobic composting[J]. Bioresource technology, 2021, 332:125087. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125087 URL
[28]	CRUZ-PAREDES C, TáJMEL D, ROUSK J. Can moisture affect temperature dependences of microbial growth and respiration?[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2021, 156:108223. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108223 URL
[29]	杨红男. 空气搅拌对沼气发酵产气性能和微生物代谢的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020.
[30]	沈玉君, 李国学, 任丽梅, 等. 不同通风速率对堆肥腐熟度和含氮气体排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(9):1814-1819.
[31]	MA S, LIU H. Three-dimensional printed bulking agents reduce antibiotic resistance genes in swine manure aerobic composting by regulating oxygen concentration to alter host microorganisms and mobile genetic elements[J]. Bioresource technology, 2022, 359:127489. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127489 URL
[32]	李季, 王禄山. 堆肥微生物:过去,现在和未来[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(5):1-3.
[33]	XU M Y, YANG M, SUN H S, et al. Role of multistage inoculation on the co-composting of food waste and biogas residue[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 361:127681. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127681 URL
[34]	CAI G J, LI J, J J ZHOU M D, et al. Compost-derived indole-3-acetic-acid-producing bacteria and their effects on enhancing the secondary fermentation of a swine manure-corn stalk composting[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 291(Pt1):132750. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132750 URL
[35]	HU X R, YANG Y C, ZHOU K, et al. Verification of agricultural cleaner production through rice-duck farming system and two-stage aerobic composting of typical organic waste[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2022, 337:130576. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130576 URL
[36]	CZEKAŁA W, NOWAK M, PIECHOTA G. Sustainable management and recycling of anaerobic digestate solid fraction by composting: A review[J]. Bioresource technology, 2023, 375:128813. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128813 URL
[37]	HOLATKO J, BIELSKA L, HAMMERSCHMIEDT T, et al. Cattle manure fermented with biochar and humic substances improve the crop biomass, microbiological properties, and nutrient status of soil[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(2):368. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12020368 URL
[38]	杜云, 王盼柳, 王斌圣, 等. 牛粪再生垫料生产过程中物料特性及致病菌变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(18):197-203.
[39]	向书玉. 水稻生猪产业废弃物三段式厌氧共发酵工艺及其过程中铜锌迁移机理研究[D]. 江西: 南昌大学, 2022.
[40]	MANYI-LOH CE, MAMPHWELI S N, MEYER E L, et al. An overview of the control of bacterial pathogens in cattle manure[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016, 13(9):843 doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090843 URL
[41]	顾亚兰. 不同菌种发酵床对青年牛健康性能及垫料物化指标的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2022.
[42]	何意. 奶牛发酵床垫料的筛选、发酵处理及其在生产中的应用效果[D]. 广东: 广东海洋大学, 2022.
[43]	韩姗姗, 李忠玲, 张强, 等. 奶牛养殖发酵床不同深度菌群结构及其应用效果分析[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(6):39-45.
[44]	王茄灵, 吕青阳, 刘杨, 等. 基于原位控制技术的粪污除臭菌剂研发现状[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2022, 28(5):1357-1366.
[45]	解新宇, 史明子, 齐海石, 等. 堆肥腐殖化:非生物学与生物学调控机制概述[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(5):29-35. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2022-0135
[46]	ZHOU L Y, XIE Y Q, WANG X W, et al. Influence of different microbial inoculants on nitrogen retention and diazotroph community succession during cotton straw composting[J]. Process safety and environmental protection, 2023, 172:882-893. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.063 URL
[47]	KANG D R, JACQUIOD S, HERSCHEND J, et al. Construction of simplified microbial consortia to degrade recalcitrant materials based on enrichment and dilution-to-extinction cultures[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2019, 10:3010. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03010 pmid: 31998278
[48]	薛卫, 胡雪娇, 韦中, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的堆肥腐熟度预测[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(11):1977-1988.
[49]	李雅琳, 李素艳, 孙向阳, 等. 基于人工神经网络算法的2株木质素降解菌固体菌剂的制备[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(2):364-371.
[50]	SKARIYACHAN S, TASKEEN N, KISHORE A P, et al. Novel consortia of Enterobacter and Pseudomonas formulated from cow dung exhibited enhanced biodegradation of polyethylene and polypropylene[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2021, 284(9):112030. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112030 URL

探究复合菌剂在奶牛粪污处理中的应用进展

The Application Progress of Composite Microbial Agent in Cow Manure Treatment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 50

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	孙莉莉. 复合微生物菌剂对西瓜生长及根结线虫防治的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2023, 13(5): 71-75.
[2]	赵玲, 张华. 乡村振兴视角下文物旅游高质量发展的问题与对策[J]. 农学学报, 2023, 13(1): 96-100.
[3]	宋洁, 何洁, 秦怡峰, 李德华, 吴江, 赵晟, 梁译丹, 刘晶晶, 李向阳, 王越茂. 云南烟叶可持续发展规范(STP)推广成效与启示[J]. 农学学报, 2022, 12(8): 68-72.
[4]	何兰, 姜卫兵, 宋居宇. 试论中国重要农业文化遗产的可持续发展[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(2): 79-85.
[5]	靳艳玲, 赵海, 曾凡逵. 甘薯淀粉加工废渣的高值化利用研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(11): 98-103.
[6]	马晶, 杜勇, 陈鹏飞, 魏政, 刘荣志. 黑土地上的农业绿色科技发展[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(1): 93-96.
[7]	宋春丽. 蔬菜废弃物堆肥化技术研究[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(9): 40-44.
[8]	黄国勤. 论生态农场建设与发展[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(4): 95-100.
[9]	黄国勤. 农业可持续发展的研究与实践[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(3): 79-88.
[10]	黄铢玉,方龙香,宋超,范立民,孟顺龙,裘丽萍,陈家长. 抗生素恩诺沙星及其代谢产物在渔业水体中迁移转化规律的研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(11): 57-62.
[11]	李顺国,刘斐,刘猛,刁现民. 新时期我国谷子产业发展技术需求与展望[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(6): 96-100.
[12]	何寿仁,程晨. 南丰县气候变化对甲鱼养殖的影响与建议[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(3): -.
[13]	吴信, 万丹, 印遇龙. 畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用与现代生态养殖模式[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(1): 171-174.
[14]	包军. 中国畜牧业的“动物福利”[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(1): 187-193.
[15]	贺晋瑜,聂磊云,陶玲,王恢. 山西省葡萄酒产业发展现状及可持续发展研究[J]. 农学学报, 2017, 7(8): 97-100.