Effects of High Altitude Environment on the Nutritional Components of Chenopodium quinoa

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2021-0027

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study the effects of plateau environment on the nutritional components of quinoa, the main nutritional components of 8 quinoa varieties (lines) from Wulan County and Delingha City (3000 m, high altitude arid area) in Qaidam Basin in western Qinghai and Datong County (2300 m, high altitude semi-arid area) in eastern Qinghai were determined and analyzed by AMMI model. The results show that: (1) the content of crude fiber, protein, β-glucan, carbohydrate and α-vitamin E are greatly affected by environmental factors, and the total sugar content is affected by both variety and environmental factors, the interaction of variety and environment has a significant effect on the crude fiber content; (2) there are differences in the stability of nutrient components of quinoa varieties (lines). In the cultivation of quinoa on plateau, the environmental advantages should be taken into full consideration, the genotype and environment interaction should be highlighted, and the suitable varieties should be selected according to local conditions.

Key words: Chenopodium quinoa, nutritional components, variety factor, environmental factor, AMMI model

CLC Number:

LI Xiang, LI Xiaofei, WANG Jianbin, ZHU Lili, ZHANG Yemeng, WANG Qicai, MAO Xiaofeng, CHEN Zhiguo. Effects of High Altitude Environment on the Nutritional Components of Chenopodium quinoa[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(10): 56-63.

Figures/Tables 6

References 6

[7]	QUINOA FAO. An ancient crop to contribute to worldfood security[M]. Italy: Food and agriculture organization, 2011.
[8]	崔纪菡, 魏志敏, 刘猛, 等. 不同品系菜用藜麦的品质及产量[J]. 河北农业科学, 2019, 23(3):62-65.
[9]	赵亚东. 青海藜麦资源营养品质评价及功能成分与抗氧化活性研究[D]. 西宁: 青海大学, 2018.
[10]	贡布扎西, 旺姆, 张崇玺猛, 等. 南美藜在西藏的生物学特性表现[J]. 西南农业学报, 1994, 7(3):54-62.
[11]	任贵兴, 杨修仕, 么杨. 中国藜麦产业现状[J]. 作物杂志, 2015(5):1-5.
[12]	刘景丽, 孙长礼, 王春兰, 等. 民和县藜麦种植试验报告[J]. 青海农技推广, 2015(1):59-60.
[13]	李成祖. 格尔木市藜麦引种栽培技术试验研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015(6):94-96.
[14]	叶美金, 卜俊周, 魏建伟, 等. 河北省夏玉米品种基因型与环境互作综合分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(1):72-78.
[15]	王汉霞, 单福华, 田立平, 等. 北部冬麦区冬小麦区试品种(系)的稳定性和适应性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(5):40-44.
[16]	陈霞. 应用AMMI模型分析若干超级稻品种产量性状稳定性[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2013.
[17]	王炜, 王怀昕, 张元琴, 等. 基于AMMI模型的贵州省水稻区试品种稳定性及适应性分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(16):1-2.
[18]	周启龙, 多吉顿珠, 刘云飞, 等. 应用AMMI模型分析饲用燕麦干草产量稳定性和适应[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(06):79-82.
[19]	刘卫星, 贺群岭, 张枫叶, 等. 大粒花生品种区域试验的AMMI模型分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(2):60-64.
[20]	姚金保, 张鹏, 余桂红, 等. 江苏省小麦品种(系)籽粒产量基因型与环境互作分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(2):191-202.
[21]	闫雷, 张远学, 高剑华, 等. 利用AMMI模型分析湖北省区试品种稳定性和适应性[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(9):76-79.
[22]	周秉荣, 韩炳宏, 李世雄, 等. 青海省多年生栽培牧草气候适宜性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3):591-601. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.03.010
[23]	陈奕辰. 双标图在作物品种评价和品种环境互作分析中的应用[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2014.
[24]	董云, 王毅, 漆燕玲, 等. 应用AMMI模型分析评判甘肃省春油菜区试品种的稳定性和适应性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(7):74-78.
[1]	庞春花, 华艳宏, 张永清, 等. 不同磷水平下施加腐植酸对藜麦生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(4):143-150. doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2018.0486
[2]	ANDRés ZURITA-Silva, FRANCISCO Fuentes, PABLO Zamora, et al. Schwember. Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): potential and perspectives[J]. Molecular breeding, 2014, 34(1):13-30. doi: 10.1007/s11032-014-0023-5 URL
[25]	李辛村, 张恩和, 董孔军, 等. 用AMMI双标图分析糜子品种的产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(4):422-426.
[3]	REPO-CARRASCO R, ESPINOZA C, JACOBSEN S E. Nutritional value and use of the Andean Crops Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule)[J]. Food reviews international, 2003, 19:1-2,179-189. doi: 10.1081/FRI-120018863 URL
[4]	JARVIS D E, KOPP O R, JELLEN E N, et al. Simple sequence repeat marker development and genetic mapping in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Journal of genetics, 2008, 87(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s12041-008-0006-6 URL
[5]	NOWAK V, DU J, CHARRONDIère U R. Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Food chemistry, 2016, 193:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.111 URL
[6]	VILCACUNDO R, HERNANDEZLEDESMA B. Nutritional and biological value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Current opinion in food science, 2017, 14:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2016.11.007 URL

品种（系）	来源
青藜1号、三江2号	青海三江沃土生态农业科技有限公司
西宁藜麦、QLM01	青海西宁昆盛农业科技开发有限公司
rell	清华博众生物技术有限公司
614915HX、1591、天马HX	海西海藜农业科技有限公司

品种（系）	来源
青藜1号、三江2号	青海三江沃土生态农业科技有限公司
西宁藜麦、QLM01	青海西宁昆盛农业科技开发有限公司
rell	清华博众生物技术有限公司
614915HX、1591、天马HX	海西海藜农业科技有限公司

品种	灰分/%	脂肪/%	粗纤维/%	总糖/%	蛋白质/%	β-葡聚糖/%	碳水化合物/%	α-维生素E /(mg/100 g)
三江2号	3.167	6.667	2.800	8.727	15.200	1.367	64.800	2.130
rell	3.267	5.967	2.767	10.430	13.833	1.457	66.667	2.030
青藜1号	3.333	6.233	3.167	12.600	15.267	1.437	64.433	2.387
西宁藜麦	3.267	5.733	2.933	8.697	15.533	1.543	65.100	2.330
614915HX	3.833	5.200	2.833	8.233	14.733	1.383	66.000	2.517
1591	3.133	5.867	2.733	9.373	15.333	1.297	65.700	2.560
QLM01	3.167	6.067	2.600	9.843	15.633	1.400	65.100	2.050
天马HX	3.300	6.200	2.533	11.797	15.667	1.310	64.767	2.450
平均值	3.308	5.992	2.796	9.963	15.150	1.399	65.321	2.307
变异系数/%	6.759	7.118	7.027	15.652	4.027	5.740	1.140	9.117

品种	灰分/%	脂肪/%	粗纤维/%	总糖/%	蛋白质/%	β-葡聚糖/%	碳水化合物/%	α-维生素E /(mg/100 g)
三江2号	3.167	6.667	2.800	8.727	15.200	1.367	64.800	2.130
rell	3.267	5.967	2.767	10.430	13.833	1.457	66.667	2.030
青藜1号	3.333	6.233	3.167	12.600	15.267	1.437	64.433	2.387
西宁藜麦	3.267	5.733	2.933	8.697	15.533	1.543	65.100	2.330
614915HX	3.833	5.200	2.833	8.233	14.733	1.383	66.000	2.517
1591	3.133	5.867	2.733	9.373	15.333	1.297	65.700	2.560
QLM01	3.167	6.067	2.600	9.843	15.633	1.400	65.100	2.050
天马HX	3.300	6.200	2.533	11.797	15.667	1.310	64.767	2.450
平均值	3.308	5.992	2.796	9.963	15.150	1.399	65.321	2.307
变异系数/%	6.759	7.118	7.027	15.652	4.027	5.740	1.140	9.117

地区	灰分/%	脂肪/%	粗纤维/%	总糖/%	蛋白质/%	β-葡聚糖/%	碳水化合物/%	α-维生素E/(mg/100 g)
乌兰	3.388	6.025	3.050	11.973	13.813	1.474	65.988	2.165
德令哈	3.438	6.150	2.650	9.463	13.250	1.530	67.138	2.151
大通	3.100	5.800	2.688	8.453	18.388	1.194	62.838	2.604
平均值	3.308	5.992	2.796	9.963	15.150	1.399	65.321	2.307
变异系数/%	5.506	2.960	7.901	18.193	18.600	12.872	3.408	11.158