The Influence of the Characteristics of Tobacco Field on the Applicability of Agricultural Machinery in Hubei Province

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2022-0109

Abstract

Abstract:

To further clarify the applicability constraints of agricultural machinery for field production in mountainous and hilly tobacco planting areas, we took the agricultural machinery production core demonstration area at Hefeng of Hubei as the study object, classified agricultural machinery with high utilization rate in the area, grouped the production links, identified the field operation path of agricultural machinery, and calculated the characteristic values of tobacco planting plots related to agricultural machinery operation. By analyzing the matching degree of agricultural machinery operation parameters and field operation conditions, the results showed that the primary factor affecting the selection of regional agricultural machinery models was the condition of driving path, followed by the shape and area of field plots, among which the shape of field plot had a greater impact on the agricultural machinery model of the contour parallel movement mode, and the width of the filed plot determined the size of the agricultural machinery model. Under current production conditions, small and mini-agricultural machinery of 3-5 kW or 11-18 kW were more desirable, and the machinery of 37-66 kW was more suitable for regular field plots with driving path and area greater than 2001 m².

Key words: Hubei tobacco planting area, hilly and mountainous region, tobacco field, agricultural machinery configuration, applicability of agricultural machinery

WU Yuanhua, SHEN Guoming, WANG Mian, XU Xiaobo, TAO Dexin, JIANG Fang, LIU Yang, YIN Ganghua. The Influence of the Characteristics of Tobacco Field on the Applicability of Agricultural Machinery in Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(1): 51-60.

Figures/Tables 12

References 19

[1]	高焕文. 高等农业机械化管理学[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1998.
[2]	张伏, 陈天华, 王亚飞, 等. 最优选型配置方法在农业机械中的应用[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2019, 40(5):187-192. doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2019.05.33
[3]	韩正晟. 农业机械选型系统的研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 1993(1):72-76.
[4]	付强, 杨广林, 金菊良, 等. 基于PPC模型的农机选型与优序关系研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2003, 34(1):101-103.
[5]	乔西铭. 基于价值工程下农业机械选型与配套方案的优化[J]. 华南热带农业大学学报, 2007, 13(4):78-80.
[6]	何瑞银, 王耀华. 农场种植业农业机器优化系统研究的回顾与展望[C]. 中国农业机械学会成立40周年庆典,2003年学术年会论文集. 北京: 中国农业机械学会, 2003:307-313.
[7]	曹光乔, 高庆生, 朱梅, 等. 农业机械优化配备方法研究与展望[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2015, 36(1):312-315,327.
[8]	陈陪, 曹光乔, 潘迪, 等. 农业机械系统优化配备研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(35):166-169.
[9]	樊国奇, 张富贵, 高知, 等. 不同生态环境烟叶生产全程机械化农机配置研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2015, 36(4):314-316.
[10]	陈浩, 李云伍, 罗超平, 等. 丘陵山区烟草种植机械配置策略研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 4(18):113-118.
[11]	TIMO O, ARTO V. Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines[J]. Journal of field robotics, 2009, 26(8):651-668. doi: 10.1002/rob.20300 URL
[12]	LIU CH G, YAN X H, LIU CH Y, et al. Dynamic path planning for mobile robot based on improved genetic algorithm[J]. Chinese journal of electronics, 2010, 19(2):245-248.
[13]	TIMO C, ARTO V. Path planning algorithms for agricultural machines[J]. Agricultural engineering international, 2007, 9(7):1-19.
[14]	DIONYSIS B, STAWROS V, YIANIS A, et al. Field operations planning for agricultural vehicles: A hierarchical modeling framework[J]. Agricultural engineering international, 2007, 9(2):1-11
[15]	黄小毛, 丁幼春, 宗望远, 等. 农机作业地头转弯方式及路径生成算法研究[C]// .中国农业工程学会2011年学术年会论文集, 2011:406-411.
[16]	党革荣, 韩冰. 拖拉机地头转弯的最佳路径研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006(10):202-204.
[17]	HAN X ZH, KIM H J, MOON H CH, et al. Development of a path generation and tracking algorithm for a Korean auto-guidance tillage tractor[J]. Journal of biosystems engineering, 2013, 38(1):1-8. doi: 10.5307/JBE.2013.38.1.001 URL
[18]	朱亚坤, 寇子明, 李俊飞. 拖拉机方向平行作业转弯路径规划研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2020:110-113.
[19]	黄小毛, 付正坤, 丁幼春, 等. 矩形边界条件下农机作业方向平行路径的排序优化[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2014, 33(4):130-136.

种植规模/m²	不同种植面积地块数量占比/%	三角形地块数量占比/%	梯形地块数量占比/%	矩形地块数量占比/%
<667	12.6	28.6	21.4	42.9
667~1334	25.2	14.3	53.6	28.6
1334~2001	18.0	5.0	45.0	45.0
2668~3335	27.0	10.0	50.0	43.3
>3335	17.1	5.3	47.4	42.1

种植规模/m²	不同种植面积地块数量占比/%	三角形地块数量占比/%	梯形地块数量占比/%	矩形地块数量占比/%
<667	12.6	28.6	21.4	42.9
667~1334	25.2	14.3	53.6	28.6
1334~2001	18.0	5.0	45.0	45.0
2668~3335	27.0	10.0	50.0	43.3
>3335	17.1	5.3	47.4	42.1

地块面积/m²	矩形地块机耕路占比/%				梯形地块耕路占比/%				三角形地块耕路占比/%
地块面积/m²	0.5 m	1 m	1.5 m	2 m	0.5 m	1 m	1.5 m	2 m	0.5 m	1 m	1.5 m	2 m
<667	1.2	0.0	1.2	2.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.2	1.2	0.0	0.0	2.5
667~1334	3.8	1.2	2.5	1.2	0.0	0.0	3.7	2.5	2.5	2.5	0.0	1.2
1334~2001	3.8	4.9	2.5	0.0	2.5	0.0	3.7	2.5	1.2	0.0	0.0	0.0
2668~3335	0.0	3.7	6.2	1.2	2.5	0.0	3.7	6.2	1.2	0.0	1.2	2.5
>3335	0.0	2.5	1.2	0.0	2.5	2.5	1.2	7.4	0.0	0.0	1.2	1.2

地块面积/m²	矩形地块机耕路占比/%				梯形地块耕路占比/%				三角形地块耕路占比/%
地块面积/m²	0.5 m	1 m	1.5 m	2 m	0.5 m	1 m	1.5 m	2 m	0.5 m	1 m	1.5 m	2 m
<667	1.2	0.0	1.2	2.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.2	1.2	0.0	0.0	2.5
667~1334	3.8	1.2	2.5	1.2	0.0	0.0	3.7	2.5	2.5	2.5	0.0	1.2
1334~2001	3.8	4.9	2.5	0.0	2.5	0.0	3.7	2.5	1.2	0.0	0.0	0.0
2668~3335	0.0	3.7	6.2	1.2	2.5	0.0	3.7	6.2	1.2	0.0	1.2	2.5
>3335	0.0	2.5	1.2	0.0	2.5	2.5	1.2	7.4	0.0	0.0	1.2	1.2

农机类型	不同转弯内角转弯路径长度/m						不同转弯内角地头障碍点直线距离/m						动力配置/kW	转弯半径/m
农机类型	165°	135°	105°	75°	45°	15°	165°	135°	105°	75°	45°	15°	动力配置/kW	转弯半径/m
农机型号Ⅰ	14.97	12.25	9.52	6.8	4.08	1.36	40.00	14.74	8.54	6.55	5.63	5.25	66	4.8~5.2
机型号Ⅱ	12.66	10.36	8.06	5.76	3.45	1.15	33.85	11.38	7.23	5.55	4.76	4.44	51	4.4
农机型号Ⅲ	12.38	10.13	7.88	5.63	3.38	1.13	33.08	11.24	7.06	5.42	4.65	4.34	37	4.3
农机型号Ⅳ	3.17	2.59	2.01	1.44	0.86	0.29	8.46	2.87	1.81	1.39	1.19	1.11	18~26	1.1
农机型号Ⅴ	0.52	0.42	0.33	0.24	0.14	0.05	1.38	0.47	0.30	0.23	0.19	0.18	3~7	0.18