Preliminary Study on Occurrence and Field Control Effects of Invasive Pest Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus in Ningxia

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0068

Abstract

Abstract:

Rice water weevil (Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus) is a quarantine pest that has occurred frequently in Ningxia in recent years, with its harmful area continuing to expand, seriously affecting local rice production and trade. The current focus of research and development is to select Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus control agents that are suitable for local prevention and control, with low toxicity, low residue, and high control efficiency. The study selected several chemical and biological pesticides with excellent pest control effects, and verified their effectiveness in controlling Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus through field experiments. Through field experiments, the results showed that the control effect of chlorantraniliprole was always the highest, reaching 63.98% on the first day after treatment, and 91.6% on the 15th day after treatment. Its rapid and sustained effectiveness were superior to other pesticides. The second most effective fungicide was spinetoram, with a 15 day efficacy of 86.31%. Abamectin and pyrethrin could also achieve a control effect of over 80% after 15 days, and had a certain degree of quick effect. The control effect of Beauveria bassiana on Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus for 15 days was 76.8%, and its control effect continued to increase. The five pesticides, chlorantraniliprole, spinetoram, Beauveria bassiana, pyrethrin, and abamectin, have good control effects on Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus. Moreover, Beauveria bassiana, pyrethrin, and abamectin belong to biopesticides and have high promotion value.

Key words: invasive species, Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus, biopesticides, prevention and control, field efficacy, feeding scars, control effect

LI Zongze, DU Wei, DUAN Xinning, HOU Zeying, SHENG Yubo, WU Ping, SHI Yunyun, LU Zhanjun, ZHOU Xinglong, SUN Yaping, CAO Shujuan. Preliminary Study on Occurrence and Field Control Effects of Invasive Pest Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus in Ningxia[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 36-40.

Figures/Tables 4

References 21

[1]	杨少雄, 杨铭, 唐建祥, 等. 几种药剂对稻水象甲成虫的田间防治效果研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2017, 63(2):33-34+77.
[2]	陆占军, 史云云, 樊世蕊, 等. 5种低毒农药对稻水象甲成虫的田间防效试验[J]. 中国农技推广, 2023, 39(9):81-83.
[3]	中华人民共和国农业部. 农业农村部办公厅关于印发《全国农业植物检疫性有害生物分布行政区名录》的通知农办农〔2023〕26号[EB/OL]. 2023-08-22/ 2023-12-05. http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/ZZYGLS/202309/t20230904_6435699.htm
[4]	代小军, 陈建军, 吕池荣, 等. 几种药剂防治稻水象甲成虫田间药效试验[J]. 湖北植保, 2014(6):40-41+29.
[5]	欧曙光, 刘占山, 李旭君, 等. 稻水象甲危害调查及防治药剂筛选试验[J]. 江西植保, 2008(2):87-89+92
[6]	LEE J H, SHIN K S, SUH S C, et al. Cry IIIA toxin gene expression in transgenic rice confers resistance to rice water weevil[J]. Plant cell tissue& organ culture, 2013, 115(2):243-252.
[7]	徐进, 杨茂发, 师沛琼, 等. 球孢白僵菌YS03菌株对稻水象甲成虫取食的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(20):73-76.
[8]	陈祝安, 冯惠英, 施立聪, 等. 田间施放绿僵菌防治稻水象甲效果评价[J]. 中国生物防治, 2000(2):53-55.
[9]	王小武, 丁新华, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 等. 不同生物药剂对稻水象甲的毒力、拒食活性及防效分析[J]. 生物安全学报, 2017, 26(1):68-74.
[10]	蔡雪涛, 郑永敏, 商晗武, 等. 寄主植物对田间稻水象甲一代成虫取食斑数量与长度关系的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007(3):309-315.
[11]	赵根松, 陈伟国, 张美华, 等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺在水稻、大豆和桑树中的内吸传导作用研究进展[J]. 中国蚕业, 2023, 44(2):39-43.
[12]	陈敏东, 黄德超, 曾玲, 等. 3种药剂对稻水象甲大田防治作用研究[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2012, 33(11):42-44.
[13]	张强, 朱晓敏, 高悦, 等. 白僵菌可湿性粉剂的改良及其对稻水象甲的田间防治效果[J]. 北方水稻, 2020, 50(6):9-12.
[14]	宁夏回族自治区人民政府. 自治区人民政府办公厅关于印发宁夏回族自治区水安全保障“十四五”规划的通知宁政办发〔2021〕82号[EB/OL]. 2021-11-3/ 2023-12-05. http://slt.nx.gov.cn/xxgk_281/fdzdgknr/ghjh/slgh/202111/t20211117_3135903.html
[15]	宁夏回族自治区人民政府. 自治区人民政府办公厅关于印发宁夏回族自治区农业农村现代化发展“十四五”规划的通知宁政办发〔2021〕87号[EB/OL]. 2021-11-9/ 2023-12-05. https://www.nx.gov.cn/zwgk/qzfwj/202111/t20211129_3170674_wap.html
[16]	徐进, 杨茂发, 狄雪塬, 等. 球孢白僵菌YS03菌株对稻水象甲的田间防治效果[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(4):1630-1633.
[17]	刘秀红, 王小武, 丁新华, 等. 新疆主要稻区不同稻水象甲地理种群对常用杀虫剂抗药性测定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10):1847-1853. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2018.10.010
[18]	CORDOVA D, BENNER E A, SACHER M D, et al. Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation[J]. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 2006, 84(3):196-214.
[19]	HANNIG G T, ZIEGLER M, MARCON P G. Feeding cessation effects of chlorantraniliprole, a new anthranilic diamide insecticide, in comparison with several insecticides in distinct chemical classes and mode-of-action groups[J]. Pest management science, 2009, 65(9):969-974. doi: 10.1002/ps.1781 pmid: 19449341
[20]	YAO R, ZHAO D D, ZHANG S, et al. Monitoring and mechanisms of insecticide resistance in Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), with special reference to diamides[J]. Pest management science, 2017, 73(6):1169-1178.
[21]	李增智, 刘令峰, 刘玉珍. 虫生真菌的侵染与马尾松毛虫营养生理及生殖的关系的研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 1996(3):381-391.

处理	药剂名称	生产厂家	药剂用量/hm²
1	400亿孢子/g白僵菌WG	山西绿海农药科技有限公司	450 g
2	1.5%除虫菊素EW	内蒙古清源保生物科技有限公司	1500 mL
3	1.8%阿维菌素EC	桂林集琦生化有限公司	600 mL
4	2%苦参碱AS	天津艾格福农药科技有限公司	750 mL
5	60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC	科迪华农业科技有限责任公司	450 mL
6	5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	深圳诺普信农化股份有限公司	600 mL

处理	药剂名称	生产厂家	药剂用量/hm²
1	400亿孢子/g白僵菌WG	山西绿海农药科技有限公司	450 g
2	1.5%除虫菊素EW	内蒙古清源保生物科技有限公司	1500 mL
3	1.8%阿维菌素EC	桂林集琦生化有限公司	600 mL
4	2%苦参碱AS	天津艾格福农药科技有限公司	750 mL
5	60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC	科迪华农业科技有限责任公司	450 mL
6	5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	深圳诺普信农化股份有限公司	600 mL

处理	药剂名称	1 d	3 d	7 d	15 d
1	白僵菌400亿孢子/g水分散粒剂	13.89 Aa	36.11 Aa	59.34 Aa	76.81 ABab
2	1.5%除虫菊素水乳剂	53.17 BCcd	69.44 Abc	75.40 ABab	82.46 ABab
3	1.8%阿维菌素乳油	22.22 Aab	61.57 Aabc	78.28 ABab	82.01 ABab
4	2%苦参碱水剂	25.00 Aab	47.22 Aab	68.18 ABa	67.02 Aa
5	60 g/L乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂	33.70 ABbc	59.44 Aab	79.90 ABab	86.31 ABb
6	5%氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂	63.98 Cd	80.56 Ac	90.78 Bb	91.60 Bb

处理	药剂名称	1 d	3 d	7 d	15 d
1	白僵菌400亿孢子/g水分散粒剂	13.89 Aa	36.11 Aa	59.34 Aa	76.81 ABab
2	1.5%除虫菊素水乳剂	53.17 BCcd	69.44 Abc	75.40 ABab	82.46 ABab
3	1.8%阿维菌素乳油	22.22 Aab	61.57 Aabc	78.28 ABab	82.01 ABab
4	2%苦参碱水剂	25.00 Aab	47.22 Aab	68.18 ABa	67.02 Aa
5	60 g/L乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂	33.70 ABbc	59.44 Aab	79.90 ABab	86.31 ABb
6	5%氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂	63.98 Cd	80.56 Ac	90.78 Bb	91.60 Bb