Journal of Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (9): 45-51.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0185
Special Issue: 园艺
Previous Articles Next Articles
Chen Yuanzhen1(), Chen Ailing2, Li Baofu3()
Received:
2020-08-25
Revised:
2020-11-11
Online:
2021-09-20
Published:
2021-09-30
Contact:
Li Baofu
E-mail:249709293@qq.com;2003libaofu@163.com
CLC Number:
Chen Yuanzhen, Chen Ailing, Li Baofu. The Effect of Multi-element Formula Fertilization in the Third-generation Seed Orchard of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(9): 45-51.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0185
试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | N2P0K2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | N2P3K2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | N2P2K3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | N1P2K1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | N2P1K2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | N2P2K0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | N3P2K2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | N2P1K1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | N2P2K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | N2P2K1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | N1P1K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K | 试验编号 | 处理 | N | P | K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | N2P0K2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | N2P3K2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | N2P2K3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | N1P2K1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | N2P1K2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | N2P2K0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | N3P2K2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | N2P1K1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | N2P2K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | N2P2K1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | N1P1K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
试验 编号 | NPK配方试验 | 试验 编号 | 钙镁硼配方试验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 氯化钾 | 钼酸铵 | 处理 | 石灰 | 硫酸镁 | 硼砂 | ||
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Ca0Mg0B0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 2 | Ca0Mg2B2 | 0 | 100 | 50 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 50 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 3 | Ca1Mg2B2 | 50 | 100 | 50 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 4 | Ca2Mg0B2 | 100 | 0 | 50 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 100 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 5 | Ca2Mg1B2 | 100 | 50 | 50 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 6 | Ca2Mg2B2 | 100 | 100 | 50 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 100 | 900 | 100 | 0 | 7 | Ca2Mg3B2 | 100 | 150 | 50 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 100 | 600 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Ca2Mg2B0 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 100 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 9 | Ca2Mg2B1 | 100 | 100 | 25 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 100 | 600 | 150 | 0 | 10 | Ca2Mg2B3 | 100 | 100 | 75 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 150 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 11 | Ca3Mg2B2 | 150 | 100 | 50 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 50 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 12 | Ca1Mg1B2 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 50 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 13 | Ca1Mg2B1 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 100 | 300 | 50 | 0 | 14 | Ca2Mg1B1 | 100 | 50 | 25 |
15 | N2P2K2Mo10 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 10 | |||||
16 | N2P2K2Mo30 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 30 |
试验 编号 | NPK配方试验 | 试验 编号 | 钙镁硼配方试验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 氯化钾 | 钼酸铵 | 处理 | 石灰 | 硫酸镁 | 硼砂 | ||
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Ca0Mg0B0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 2 | Ca0Mg2B2 | 0 | 100 | 50 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 50 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 3 | Ca1Mg2B2 | 50 | 100 | 50 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 4 | Ca2Mg0B2 | 100 | 0 | 50 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 100 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 5 | Ca2Mg1B2 | 100 | 50 | 50 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 6 | Ca2Mg2B2 | 100 | 100 | 50 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 100 | 900 | 100 | 0 | 7 | Ca2Mg3B2 | 100 | 150 | 50 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 100 | 600 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Ca2Mg2B0 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 100 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 9 | Ca2Mg2B1 | 100 | 100 | 25 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 100 | 600 | 150 | 0 | 10 | Ca2Mg2B3 | 100 | 100 | 75 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 150 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 11 | Ca3Mg2B2 | 150 | 100 | 50 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 50 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 12 | Ca1Mg1B2 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 50 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 13 | Ca1Mg2B1 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 100 | 300 | 50 | 0 | 14 | Ca2Mg1B1 | 100 | 50 | 25 |
15 | N2P2K2Mo10 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 10 | |||||
16 | N2P2K2Mo30 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 30 |
试验编号 | 处理 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 氯化钾 | 钼酸铵 | 种子产量/(g/株) | 球果产量/(g/株) | 单粒果重/(g/株) | 出籽率/% | 球果数量/(粒/株) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.71 | 139.26 | 2.11 | 4.10 | 66 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 12.27 | 313.02 | 4.23 | 3.92 | 74 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 50 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 19.95 | 475.08 | 4.28 | 4.20 | 111 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 10.62 | 255.36 | 2.66 | 4.16 | 96 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 100 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 16.35 | 385.56 | 3.78 | 4.24 | 102 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 22.66 | 399.02 | 5.62 | 5.68 | 71 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 100 | 900 | 100 | 0 | 36.81 | 621.76 | 4.64 | 5.92 | 134 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 100 | 600 | 0 | 0 | 14.65 | 256.06 | 4.13 | 5.72 | 62 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 100 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 7.49 | 158.73 | 4.07 | 4.72 | 39 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 100 | 600 | 150 | 0 | 39.68 | 511.28 | 6.64 | 7.76 | 77 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 150 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 32.54 | 528.28 | 5.62 | 6.16 | 94 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 50 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 29.44 | 758.88 | 4.08 | 3.88 | 186 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 50 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 30.82 | 472.72 | 6.22 | 6.52 | 76 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 100 | 300 | 50 | 0 | 15.52 | 349.46 | 3.46 | 4.44 | 101 |
15 | N2P2K2Mo10 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 10 | 25.26 | 415.38 | 6.02 | 6.08 | 69 |
16 | N2P2K2Mo30 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 30 | 18.60 | 325.2 | 5.42 | 5.72 | 60 |
平均值 | 21.15 | 397.82 | 4.56 | 5.20 | 88.63 | |||||
标准误差 | 2.60 | 40.91 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 8.70 |
试验编号 | 处理 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 氯化钾 | 钼酸铵 | 种子产量/(g/株) | 球果产量/(g/株) | 单粒果重/(g/株) | 出籽率/% | 球果数量/(粒/株) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.71 | 139.26 | 2.11 | 4.10 | 66 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 12.27 | 313.02 | 4.23 | 3.92 | 74 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 50 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 19.95 | 475.08 | 4.28 | 4.20 | 111 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 10.62 | 255.36 | 2.66 | 4.16 | 96 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 100 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 16.35 | 385.56 | 3.78 | 4.24 | 102 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 22.66 | 399.02 | 5.62 | 5.68 | 71 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 100 | 900 | 100 | 0 | 36.81 | 621.76 | 4.64 | 5.92 | 134 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 100 | 600 | 0 | 0 | 14.65 | 256.06 | 4.13 | 5.72 | 62 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 100 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 7.49 | 158.73 | 4.07 | 4.72 | 39 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 100 | 600 | 150 | 0 | 39.68 | 511.28 | 6.64 | 7.76 | 77 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 150 | 600 | 100 | 0 | 32.54 | 528.28 | 5.62 | 6.16 | 94 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 50 | 300 | 100 | 0 | 29.44 | 758.88 | 4.08 | 3.88 | 186 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 50 | 600 | 50 | 0 | 30.82 | 472.72 | 6.22 | 6.52 | 76 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 100 | 300 | 50 | 0 | 15.52 | 349.46 | 3.46 | 4.44 | 101 |
15 | N2P2K2Mo10 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 10 | 25.26 | 415.38 | 6.02 | 6.08 | 69 |
16 | N2P2K2Mo30 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 30 | 18.60 | 325.2 | 5.42 | 5.72 | 60 |
平均值 | 21.15 | 397.82 | 4.56 | 5.20 | 88.63 | |||||
标准误差 | 2.60 | 40.91 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 8.70 |
试验编号 | 处理 | 石灰 | 硫酸镁 | 硼砂 | 种子产量/(g/株) | 球果产量/(g/株) | 单粒果重/(g/株) | 出籽率/% | 球果数量/(粒/株) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ca0Mg0B0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.30 | 192.01 | 2.11 | 3.80 | 91 |
2 | Ca0Mg2B2 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 16.75 | 427.23 | 4.23 | 3.92 | 101 |
3 | Ca1Mg2B2 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 20.85 | 496.48 | 4.28 | 4.20 | 116 |
4 | Ca2Mg0B2 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 15.05 | 361.76 | 2.66 | 4.16 | 136 |
5 | Ca2Mg1B2 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 15.39 | 362.88 | 3.78 | 4.24 | 96 |
6 | Ca2Mg2B2 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 27.13 | 477.7 | 5.62 | 5.68 | 85 |
7 | Ca2Mg3B2 | 100 | 150 | 50 | 25.27 | 426.88 | 4.64 | 5.92 | 92 |
8 | Ca2Mg2B0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 22.44 | 392.35 | 4.13 | 5.72 | 95 |
9 | Ca2Mg2B1 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 14.60 | 309.32 | 4.07 | 4.72 | 76 |
10 | Ca2Mg2B3 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 66.98 | 863.2 | 6.64 | 7.76 | 130 |
11 | Ca3Mg2B2 | 150 | 100 | 50 | 59.55 | 966.64 | 5.62 | 6.16 | 172 |
12 | Ca1Mg1B2 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 21.37 | 550.8 | 4.08 | 3.88 | 135 |
13 | Ca1Mg2B1 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 28.17 | 634.44 | 6.22 | 4.44 | 102 |
14 | Ca2Mg1B1 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 13.23 | 324.36 | 3.06 | 4.08 | 106 |
平均值 | 25.29 | 484.72 | 4.37 | 4.91 | 109.50 | ||||
标准误差 | 4.58 | 56.93 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 6.88 |
试验编号 | 处理 | 石灰 | 硫酸镁 | 硼砂 | 种子产量/(g/株) | 球果产量/(g/株) | 单粒果重/(g/株) | 出籽率/% | 球果数量/(粒/株) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ca0Mg0B0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.30 | 192.01 | 2.11 | 3.80 | 91 |
2 | Ca0Mg2B2 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 16.75 | 427.23 | 4.23 | 3.92 | 101 |
3 | Ca1Mg2B2 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 20.85 | 496.48 | 4.28 | 4.20 | 116 |
4 | Ca2Mg0B2 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 15.05 | 361.76 | 2.66 | 4.16 | 136 |
5 | Ca2Mg1B2 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 15.39 | 362.88 | 3.78 | 4.24 | 96 |
6 | Ca2Mg2B2 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 27.13 | 477.7 | 5.62 | 5.68 | 85 |
7 | Ca2Mg3B2 | 100 | 150 | 50 | 25.27 | 426.88 | 4.64 | 5.92 | 92 |
8 | Ca2Mg2B0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 22.44 | 392.35 | 4.13 | 5.72 | 95 |
9 | Ca2Mg2B1 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 14.60 | 309.32 | 4.07 | 4.72 | 76 |
10 | Ca2Mg2B3 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 66.98 | 863.2 | 6.64 | 7.76 | 130 |
11 | Ca3Mg2B2 | 150 | 100 | 50 | 59.55 | 966.64 | 5.62 | 6.16 | 172 |
12 | Ca1Mg1B2 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 21.37 | 550.8 | 4.08 | 3.88 | 135 |
13 | Ca1Mg2B1 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 28.17 | 634.44 | 6.22 | 4.44 | 102 |
14 | Ca2Mg1B1 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 13.23 | 324.36 | 3.06 | 4.08 | 106 |
平均值 | 25.29 | 484.72 | 4.37 | 4.91 | 109.50 | ||||
标准误差 | 4.58 | 56.93 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 6.88 |
因子 | 偏相关 | t检验值 | 显著水平 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y1,X1)= | 0.4212 | 1.39321 | 0.019375 |
r(y1,X2)= | 0.48209 | 1.65079 | 0.012979 |
r(y1,X2X2)= | -0.24987 | 0.77415 | 0.045675 |
r(y1,X1X3)= | 0.67568 | 2.74966 | 0.02049 |
r(y2,X2)= | 0.38827 | 1.33236 | 0.020968 |
r(y2,X2X2)= | -0.26984 | 0.88618 | 0.039448 |
r(y2,X1X3)= | 0.71229 | 3.20918 | 0.00832 |
因子 | 偏相关 | t检验值 | 显著水平 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y1,X1)= | 0.4212 | 1.39321 | 0.019375 |
r(y1,X2)= | 0.48209 | 1.65079 | 0.012979 |
r(y1,X2X2)= | -0.24987 | 0.77415 | 0.045675 |
r(y1,X1X3)= | 0.67568 | 2.74966 | 0.02049 |
r(y2,X2)= | 0.38827 | 1.33236 | 0.020968 |
r(y2,X2X2)= | -0.26984 | 0.88618 | 0.039448 |
r(y2,X1X3)= | 0.71229 | 3.20918 | 0.00832 |
[1] | 陈平留, 刘健, 郑德祥, 等. 速生丰产优质杉木林经济效益分析及伐期确定[J]. 林业科学, 2001, 37(z1):47-51. |
[2] | 王兵, 马向前, 郭浩, 等. 中国杉木林的生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(4):124-130. |
[3] | 丘进清. 杉木种子园技术综述[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 30(5):103-106. |
[4] | 胡德活, 林军, 王润辉, 等. 杉木第二代改良种子园营建技术及应用成效[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2019, 35(1):23-28. |
[5] | 谢汝根. 杉木第三代种子园营建技术初探[J]. 林业科技开发, 2010, 24(1):16-118. |
[6] | 林同龙. 影响杉木种子园种子产量质量的主要因素[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2000, 20(4):345-348. |
[7] | 郑仁华, 施季森, 苏顺德, 等. 杉木第3代种子园营建技术及应用[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2018, 38(4):406-413. |
[8] | 许鲁平. 杉木种子园高产、稳产研究概述[J]. 南昌工程学院学报, 2011, 30(6):49-53,61. |
[9] | 刘欢. 不同施肥处理对杉木无性系幼苗生长及养分积累的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2017. |
[10] | 赵敏冲, 赵华, 刘建忠, 等. 磷肥对杉木低产林幼林生长的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(6):105-108. |
[11] | 杨桦, 詹有生, 李勇, 等. 杉木近熟林施肥试验研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2005, 27(2):187-190. |
[12] | 俞元春. 杉木林土壤肥力变化和长期生产力维持研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 1999年. |
[13] | 葛艺早, 刘文飞, 吴建平, 等. 不同施肥处理对杉木种子园种子品质的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2016, 36(4).442-448. |
[14] | 许鲁平. 第三代杉木种子园平衡施肥技术探讨[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020, 31(7):82-83. |
[15] | 房焕英, 刘文飞, 袁颖红, 等. 杉木第3代种子园母树和土壤营养元素分析[J]. 福建林业科技, 2013, 40(1):70-74. |
[16] | 刘文飞, 李燕燕, 吴建平, 等. 杉木第3代种子园种子产量和养分因子分析[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2013, 33(4):345-350. |
[17] | 陈海艳, 李宝福, 甘振栋, 等. 闽北杉木二代种子园土壤营养特性研究[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2012, 31(6):519-524. |
[18] | 刘正渭. 马尾松种子园配方施肥试验研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2015, 648(10):154-156. |
[19] | 严平勇. 生物素在马尾松种子园的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2015(3):151-152. |
[20] | 陆梅, 李宝福. 闽北马尾松二代种子园配方施肥试验研究[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2019, 38(1):43-47,73. |
[21] | 龙光生, 徐刚标, 廖在君. 杉木种子园母树叶中营养元素变化规律初探[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2004, 31(6):21-22,44. |
[22] | 福建省林业科学研究院. 一种杉木和马尾松种子园平衡施肥的实验方法[P]. 中国专利:201410157607.0, 2014-04-16. |
[23] | 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924. |
[24] | 奚旺, 刘勇, 马履一, 等. 不同氮磷钾配比缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(5):26-30. |
[25] | 测土配方施肥技术规范(2011年修订版)[S]. 农业部, 2011.9.15. |
[26] | 左志林. 邢台县冬小麦—夏玉米轮作合理施肥量研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学. 2013. |
[27] | 潘桂颖, 石媛媛, 余春和, 等. 林地土壤肥力评价及配方施肥系统设计与实现[J]. 福建林业科技, 2018, 45(4):52-55,66. |
[28] | 段爱国, 黄健韬, 章允清, 等. 闽北山地不同世代杉木种子园球花产量调查[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2010, 30(1):39-44. |
[29] | 李宝福, 朱炜, 李莹. 红锥幼树配方施肥效应分析[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2016, 35(1):23-28. |
[1] | JIANG Tailing, LUO Xin, BAI Lina, DUAN Chunfang, ZHOU Yingchun, LIU Qian, YAN Wei, XIAO Mingkun, LI Linhong, LIU Guanghua. Research on Agricultural Green Production in Longyang District [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 74-78. |
[2] | LIU Fan, GAO Meng, LIU Yan, LV Yang. The Impact of Meteorological Conditions on Agricultural Production of Xianyang in the Winter of 2020/2021 [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(5): 65-69. |
[3] | TIAN Tian, HAN Yu, FU Shan. The Impact of Human Capital Investment on Agricultural Development from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization: An Empirical Study [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 96-100. |
[4] | TIAN Gang, LI Huixia, WANG Yuwen, LIU Xin, LIU Hong. Herbicide Resistant Millet Hybrid Variety ‘Changzagu 466’: Breeding and Matching Techniques [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(10): 1-5. |
[5] | LI Guoyu, CONG Xinjun, ZHAO Na, LI Guoqing. Development Status and Prospect of Sorghum Industry in Shandong Province [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(10): 77-81. |
[6] | MAO Zhaoqing, LI Liang, CHEN Liangzheng, WANG Xuejiao. The Regional Comparative Advantages of Vegetable Production in Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(1): 90-100. |
[7] | Li Shouhua, Guo Hong, Wang Caixia. Fertigation Technology: Application in Ginger Production [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(8): 76-79. |
[8] | Wang Lin, Liu Guilian, Zhu Jiubao, Wang Wei, Tang Li. Research Progress on the Application of Essential Oils in Animals [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(8): 85-89. |
[9] | Zhang Rui, Zhu Chunyan, Liu Chang, Xu Shipu. Design and Implementation of Digital Fruit Industry Integrated Information Management Platform: Based on Coral Component Architecture [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(8): 90-97. |
[10] | Gu Gang, Lai Rongquan, Zhou Ting, Bai Jingjing, Wu Xiaoting. Host Suitable for Myzus persicae (Sulzer) Population Growth and Reproduction: Selection in Fujian Tobacco Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(3): 7-11. |
[11] | Liu Meng, Liu Fei, Zhao Yu, Xia Xueyan, Li Shunguo. Miscellaneous Grain in Hebei Province: Production Status and Production Layout Outlook [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(3): 93-100. |
[12] | Li Xue. Research on the Implementation Strategy of Technology Transfer in Agricultural Research Institutions——Taking the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences as an Example [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2): 92-95. |
[13] | SONG Limin, ZHANG Wei, LIU Xiaolian, XU Xiaoli, JIANG Jufeng, JIAO Wanming, KAN Zheng, YANG Wenying, WU Huimin. Experimental Rearing Effects of a New Breed of Hybrid Yellow Catfish: An Evaluation [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(12): 100-104. |
[14] | WEN Yancheng, ZHANG Shufen, HE Junping, CAI Dongfang, ZHU Jiacheng, WANG Jianping, CAO Jinhua, HU Kun, ZHAO Lei, WANG Dongguo. Hybrid Seed Production of Brassica napus L.: Isolation Effect Comparisons of Different-density Nets [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(12): 68-73. |
[15] | Zou Guihua, Zheng Xueqiang, Lv Xuegao, Liu Heqin, Liu Xiuhui, Chen Heyun. Status and Countermeasures of Sorghum Industry in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(10): 120-124. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||