Lead Enrichment Characteristics in Soil of Different Rice Varieties and the Safety Risk Evaluation

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0005

Abstract

Abstract:

This study aims to explore the lead enrichment characteristics of rice varieties planted in Zhangzhou and the rice quality safety. 15 local main rice varieties were used as the experimental materials, and pot experiments and field experiments of adding lead were adopted. The lead enrichment characteristics of rice were investigated, and the risk of rice quality safety was evaluated. The results showed that the lead content of the 15 rice varieties was in the range of 0.016-0.061 mg/kg, 0.061-0.198 mg/kg and 0.157-0.606 mg/kg, respectively, when the total lead content of pot experiment was 22.4 mg/kg, 103.5 mg/kg and 204.8 mg/kg in light acidic paddy soil (5.5<pH≤6.5). When the total lead content of the field experiment was 23.4 mg/kg, 26.4 mg/kg and 23.5 mg/kg in light acidic paddy soil (5.5<pH≤6.5), the variation scope of lead content of the 15 rice varieties was 0.016-0.056 mg/kg, 0.024-0.069 mg/kg and 0.014-0.056 mg/kg, respectively. The lead content of the same rice variety was positively and linearly correlated with the total lead content in soil (P<0.01). There were significant differences in the enrichment ability of lead among different rice varieties (P<0.05), and the enrichment coefficient of pot experiment and field experiment was 0.059%-0.296% and 0.060%-0.261%, respectively. Cluster analysis indicated that there were 4 rice varieties with high enrichment ability, 6 varieties with medium enrichment ability and 5 varieties with low enrichment ability. According to the limit standard of lead in rice in GB 2762-2017(0.2 mg/kg), for rice varieties with low, medium and high enrichment ability, the critical risk value of cadmium was 204.1-274.7 mg/kg, 113.5 -180.0 mg/kg and 82.7-107.1 mg/kg, respectively, in paddy soil (5.5<pH≤6.5). Overall, the lead enrichment characteristics of the 15 main rice varieties in Zhangzhou are significantly different. Planting in paddy fields where the total lead content is above the critical risk value, the lead content will have a quality safety risk of being higher than 0.2 mg/kg.

Key words: rice variety, rice, lead, enrichment characteristics, quality safety, risk assessment

LIN Xianghua. Lead Enrichment Characteristics in Soil of Different Rice Varieties and the Safety Risk Evaluation[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(12): 39-45.

Figures/Tables 7

References 30

[1]	陈迪云, 谢文彪, 宋刚, 等. 福建沿海地区土壤-水稻重金属转移规律研究[J]. 广州大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 4(9):61-66.
[2]	HOSSAIN M F, KHONDAKER M. Environmental contamination and seasonal variation on heavy metals in rice fields[J]. Research journal of chemistry and environment, 2006, 10(1):8-12.
[3]	环境保护部, 国土资源部·全国土壤污染状况调查公报[R]. 中国: 环境保护部国土资源部, 2014.
[4]	陈志德, 仲维攻, 王军, 等. 胁迫和对照条件下水稻品种铅积累的差异[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(5):967-971.
[5]	陈慧茹, 董亚玲, 王琦, 等. 重金属污染土壤中Cd、Cr、Pb元素向水稻的迁移积累研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(12):236-241. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14100001
[6]	彭楠. 铅与人类健康[J]. 现代预防医学, 2004, 31(1):91-94.
[7]	仲维功, 杨杰, 陈志德, 等水稻品种及其器官对土壤重金属Pb、Cd、Hg、As积累的差异[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2006, 22(4):331-338.
[8]	孙瑞莲, 周启星. 高等植物重金属耐性与超积累特性及其分子机理研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(3):497-504. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0066
[9]	CINTIA G K, MASAAKI N, MICHtMI N. Heavy metal tolerance of transgenic tobacco plants over-expressing cysteine synthase[J]. Biotechnology letters, 2004, 26:153-157. pmid: 15000484
[10]	柯庆明, 梁康迳, 郑履端, 等. 福建省水稻稻谷重金属污染的对应分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(10):1918-1923.
[11]	中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1121.2—2006,土壤检测第2部分:土壤pH的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
[12]	国家环境保护局. GB/T 17141—1997,土壤质量铅、镉的测定石墨炉原子吸收分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1997.
[13]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GB 5009.12—2017食品安全国家标准食品中铅的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[14]	莫争, 王春霞, 陈琴, 等. 重金属Cu、Pb、Zn、Cr、Cd在水稻植株中的富集和分布[J]. 环境化学, 2002, 2I(2):110-116.
[15]	张潮海, 华村章, 邓汉龙, 等. 水稻对污染土壤中镉、铅、铜、锌的富集规律的探讨[J]. 福建农业学报, 2003, 18(3):147-150.
[16]	中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,GB 2762—2017国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品中污染物限量[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[17]	匡少平, 徐仲, 张书圣. 水稻对土壤中环境重金属激素铅的吸收效应及污染防治[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2002, 25(2):32-34.
[18]	韩爱民, 蔡继红, 屠锦河, 等. 水稻重金属含量与土壤质量的关系[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2002, 14(3):27-28,32.
[19]	郑鹤龄, 郑标伟, 陆文龙. 不同污水对土壤重金属、作物产量及品质的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2001, 7(2):17-20.
[20]	余进样, 刘娅菲, 尧娟. 江西省水稻优势产区重金属污染及累计规律[J]. 江西农业学报, 2008, 20(12):57-60.
[21]	白荣辉. 8个水稻品种对土壤重金属的富集特性初探[J]. 中国农技推广, 2021, 37(6):81-84.
[22]	刘建国, 李坤权, 张祖建, 等. 水稻不同品种对铅吸收分配的差异及机理[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(2):291-294.
[23]	LIU J G, LI K Q, XU J K, et al. Lead toxicity, uptake, and translocation in different rice cultivars[J]. Plant science, 2003, I65:793-802.
[24]	ARAO T, AE N. Genotypic variation in cadmium levels of rice grain[J]. Soil science plant nutrition, 2003, 49:473-479. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2003.10410035 URL
[25]	蒋彬, 张慧萍. 水稻精米中铅镉砷含量基因型差异的研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报, 2002, 22(3):37-40.
[26]	钟倩云, 曾敏, 廖柏寒, 李婧菲, 孔晓燕. 碳酸钙对水稻吸收重金属(Ph、Cd、Zn)和As的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(4):1242-1248.
[27]	PATRA M, BHOWMIK N, BANDOPADHYAY B, et al. Comparison of mercury 1ead and arsenic with respect to genotoxic effects on pant system and the development of genetic tolerance[J]. Environmental and experimental bBotany, 2004, 52(3):199-223.
[28]	郭朝晖, 冉洪珍, 封文利, 等. 阻隔主要外源输入重金属对土壤-水稻系统中镉铅累积的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(16):232-237.
[29]	罗芬, 张玉盛, 周亮, 等. 种植制度对水稻籽粒铅、镉含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(7):1470-1478.
[30]	冯光辉, 谷雨, 何凤鹏, 等. 土壤调理剂和复合微生物肥对农田土壤和水稻镉、铅的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2017(3):27-30,34.

pH	重金属含量/(mg/kg)					有机质/ (g/kg)	全氮/ (g/kg)	有效磷/ (mg/kg)	速效钾/ (mg/kg)
pH	铅	镉	铬	砷	汞	有机质/ (g/kg)	全氮/ (g/kg)	有效磷/ (mg/kg)	速效钾/ (mg/kg)
5.94	22.4	0.057	3.22	2.47	0.322	19.3	1.03	143.7	300

pH	重金属含量/(mg/kg)					有机质/ (g/kg)	全氮/ (g/kg)	有效磷/ (mg/kg)	速效钾/ (mg/kg)
pH	铅	镉	铬	砷	汞	有机质/ (g/kg)	全氮/ (g/kg)	有效磷/ (mg/kg)	速效钾/ (mg/kg)
5.94	22.4	0.057	3.22	2.47	0.322	19.3	1.03	143.7	300

测定项目	盆栽试验			大田试验
测定项目	Pot Ⅰ	Pot Ⅱ	Pot Ⅲ	Field Ⅰ	FieldⅡ	Field Ⅲ
pH	5.89	5.58	5.77	5.96	5.90	6.16
铅全量/(mg/kg)	22.4	103.5	204.8	23.4	26.4	23.5

测定项目	盆栽试验			大田试验
测定项目	Pot Ⅰ	Pot Ⅱ	Pot Ⅲ	Field Ⅰ	FieldⅡ	Field Ⅲ
pH	5.89	5.58	5.77	5.96	5.90	6.16
铅全量/(mg/kg)	22.4	103.5	204.8	23.4	26.4	23.5

水稻品种	盆栽试验			大田试验
水稻品种	PotⅠ	PotⅡ	Pot Ⅲ	FieldⅠ	FieldⅡ	Field Ⅲ
R01	0.016	0.061	0.152	0.020	0.024	0.014
R02	0.026	0.19	0.356	0.027	0.029	0.021
R03	0.021	0.113	0.177	0.023	0.037	0.027
R04	0.030	0.085	0.241	0.022	0.030	0.025
R05	0.017	0.075	0.157	0.016	0.025	0.022
R06	0.043	0.177	0.242	0.043	0.052	0.041
R07	0.051	0.157	0.468	0.056	0.057	0.057
R08	0.061	0.189	0.513	0.054	0.069	0.056
R09	0.023	0.151	0.184	0.021	0.024	0.018
R10	0.051	0.198	0.606	0.053	0.069	0.043
R11	0.044	0.187	0.386	0.051	0.047	0.044
R12	0.026	0.113	0.252	0.032	0.042	0.030
R13	0.046	0.120	0.174	0.037	0.048	0.038
R14	0.036	0.187	0.352	0.044	0.056	0.041
R15	0.038	0.158	0.288	0.042	0.055	0.047
含量范围	0.016~0.061	0.061~0.198	0.152~0.606	0.016~0.056	0.024~0.069	0.014~0.056
极差	0.045	0.229	0.454	0.040	0.045	0.042
标准差SD	0.0143	0.0588	0.150	0.0140	0.0156	0.0130
变异系数/%	39.6	38.9	47.9	38.8	35.3	37.7