Distribution of Soil Available Zinc Content and Influencing Factors in Hanzhong City

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0002

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim was to solve the problem of the improper fertilization measures in agricultural production in Hanzhong City, which led to the imbalance of the supply capacity of soil trace elements in some places, and restricted the increase of rice, corn and other grain crops. In this study, 6142 soil samples were collected from 11 counties and districts in Hanzhong. The content and distribution of available zinc in soil were analyzed by DTPA extraction atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The results showed that the available zinc content of soil in Hanzhong City was mainly distributed between 0.51-1.0 mg/kg and 1.01-1.5 mg/kg, accounting for 34.80% and 30.80% of the total amount. Soil samples with available zinc content less than 1.5 mg/kg accounted for 78.3% of the total amount, that is, 78.3% of the available zinc content of soil in Hanzhong was below the middle level, and 47.4% of the available zinc content of soil was at a low and very low level. The average effective zinc content in the soil of rice and corn producing areas was 1.11 mg/kg, with 1.15 mg/kg in rice cultivation areas and 1.07 mg/kg in corn cultivation areas. The effective zinc content in the soil of rice cultivation areas was higher than that of corn cultivation areas, slightly higher than the average value. The content of available zinc in soil was negatively correlated with soil pH, soil organic matter and available phosphorus. To sum up, available zinc in cultivated soil in Hanzhong could generally meet the needs of crop growth, but in some zinc deficient areas, it was recommended to strengthen the application of zinc fertilizer and manure to reduce the impact of zinc deficiency in soil on crops.

Key words: soil available zinc, content distribution, influencing factors, Hanzhong, rice, corn

GAO Peng, YU Zhengjun, YANG Xiaomin, WANG Tao, LI Danni. Distribution of Soil Available Zinc Content and Influencing Factors in Hanzhong City[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(2): 36-41.

Figures/Tables 11

References 22

[1]	严连香, 黄标, 邵学新, 等. 长江三角洲典型地区土壤有效铜和锌的时空变化及其影响因素研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2007(5):971-977.
[2]	王振林, 沈成国, 余松烈. 小麦供锌状况对叶片结构及叶绿体超微结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 1993(6):553-557,579-580.
[3]	GULIEV N M, SM BAIRAMOV D A-Aliev. Functional organization of carbonic anhydrase in higher plants[J]. Soviet plant physiology, 1992, 39(4):537-544.
[4]	AHMAD W, WATTS M J, IMTIAZ M, et al. Zinc deficiency in soils, crops and humans: A review[J]. Agrochimica, 2012, 56(2):65-97.
[5]	CAKMAK I. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification?[J]. Plant and soil, 2008, 302(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9466-3 URL
[6]	刘铮. 我国土壤中锌含量的分布规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 1994(1):30-37.
[7]	王子腾, 耿元波, 梁涛. 中国农田土壤的有效锌含量及影响因素分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(6):55-63.
[8]	张俊侠, 张文凯, 吴淑华. 亳州市耕地土壤有效锌含量状况及补锌措施[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008, 14(3):50,94.
[9]	张世昌. 福建主要耕作土壤有效锌含量分布及影响因素分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(9):148-154.
[10]	潘学萍, 耿顺军, 赵芳, 等. 昭鲁坝区植烟土壤有效锌含量及其影响因素分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(12):82-85.
[11]	HACISALIHOGLU G, KOCHIAN LV. New phytologist-2003-hacisalihoglu-how do some plants tolerate low levels of soil zinc mechanisms of zinc efficiency[J]. New phytologist, 2003, 159:341-350. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00826.x URL
[12]	刘艳, 姚延梼, 许建卿. 襄垣县韩村大棚土壤有效钙、有效锌含量分析与评价[J]. 山西农业科学, 2014, 42(7):714-716,724.
[13]	邢飞, 付行政, 彭良志, 等. 赣南脐橙园土壤有效锌含量状况研究[J]. 果树学报, 2013, 30(4):597-601.
[14]	杨苏, 戴林建, 周田, 等. 江永县植烟土壤有效锌含量分布及其影响因素[J]. 江西农业学报, 2016, 28(8):32-35.
[15]	王新中, 樊在斗, 李再光, 等. 大理州植烟土壤有效锌分布特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2015, 48(8):11-14.
[16]	NY/T 1121.6—2006,土壤检测.第6部分:土壤有机质的测定[S].
[17]	NY/T 1377—2007,土壤pH的测定[S].
[18]	NY/T 890—2004,土壤有效态锌、锰、铁、铜含量的测定二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)浸提法[S].
[19]	RAM H, RASHID A, ZHANG W, et al. Biofortification of wheat, rice and common bean by applying foliar zinc fertilizer along with pesticides in seven countries[J]. Plant and soil, 2016, 403(1-2):389-401. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2815-3 URL
[20]	PRASAD R, SHIVAY Y S, KUMAR D. Agronomic biofortification of cereal grains with iron and zinc[M]. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press Inc, 2014.
[21]	CAKMAK I. Zinc Deficiency in wheat in Turkey[M]. Berlin Germany: Springer Netherlands, 2008.
[22]	KHOSHGOFTARMANESH A H, SCHULIN R, CHANEY RL, et al. Micronutrient-efficient genotypes for crop yield and nutritional quality in sustainable agriculture. A review[J]. Agronomy for sustainable development, 2010, 30(1):83-107. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009017 URL

评价等级	DTPA溶液评价标准	评价等级	1.1 mol/L HCL溶液评价标准
很低	<0.5 mg/kg	很低	<1.0 mg/kg
低	0.51~1.0 mg/kg	低	1.01~1.5 mg/kg
中等	1.01~2.0 mg/kg	中等	1.51~3.0 mg/kg
高	2.01~4.0 mg/kg	高	3.01~5.0 mg/kg
很高	>4.0 mg/kg	很高	>5.0 mg/kg

评价等级	DTPA溶液评价标准	评价等级	1.1 mol/L HCL溶液评价标准
很低	<0.5 mg/kg	很低	<1.0 mg/kg
低	0.51~1.0 mg/kg	低	1.01~1.5 mg/kg
中等	1.01~2.0 mg/kg	中等	1.51~3.0 mg/kg
高	2.01~4.0 mg/kg	高	3.01~5.0 mg/kg
很高	>4.0 mg/kg	很高	>5.0 mg/kg

化验样品总量/个	产区	样品数/个	比例/%
6142	水稻耕作区	4089	66.6
6142	玉米耕作区	2053	33.4

化验样品总量/个	产区	样品数/个	比例/%
6142	水稻耕作区	4089	66.6
6142	玉米耕作区	2053	33.4

县区分布	县区	样品数/个	比例/%
平川县	勉县	967	15.7
	洋县	685	11.2
	南郑区	595	9.7
	城固县	726	11.8
	西乡县	593	9.7
	汉台区	523	8.5
山区县	镇巴县	552	9.0
	宁强县	434	7.1
	略阳县	391	6.4
	留坝县	321	5.2
	佛坪县	355	5.8