Journal of Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 5-12.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0240
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZU Qingxue(), HUANG Ning, FENG Yuyang, ZHANG Yifei, KANG Yaowen, QIN Min, WANG Yikun()
Received:
2023-11-12
Revised:
2023-12-22
Online:
2024-06-19
Published:
2024-06-19
ZU Qingxue, HUANG Ning, FENG Yuyang, ZHANG Yifei, KANG Yaowen, QIN Min, WANG Yikun. Identification of Physiological Race and Mating Type of Pathogen of Tobacco Black Shank Disease and Screening of Drug Control in Guiyang[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(6): 5-12.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0240
编号 | 采集时间(年.月.日) | 采集地点 | 交配型 |
---|---|---|---|
YM-33 | 2021.7.28 | 流长镇流长村 | A1 |
YM-63 | 2021.8.1 | 龙岗镇二村 | A1 |
YM-124 | 2021.8.5 | 龙水乡龙江村 | A1 |
YM-125 | 2021.8.12 | 花梨镇十字村 | A1 |
YM-126 | 2021.8.16 | 六桶镇关寨村 | A1 |
编号 | 采集时间(年.月.日) | 采集地点 | 交配型 |
---|---|---|---|
YM-33 | 2021.7.28 | 流长镇流长村 | A1 |
YM-63 | 2021.8.1 | 龙岗镇二村 | A1 |
YM-124 | 2021.8.5 | 龙水乡龙江村 | A1 |
YM-125 | 2021.8.12 | 花梨镇十字村 | A1 |
YM-126 | 2021.8.16 | 六桶镇关寨村 | A1 |
菌株 | L8 | F301 | XHJ1025 | 生理小种 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病指 | 类型 | 病指 | 类型 | 病指 | 类型 | ||||
YM-33 | 4.51 | R | 47.21 | MR | 85.24 | S | 0号 | ||
YM-63 | 12.73 | R | 49.56 | MR | 80.78 | S | 0号 | ||
YM-124 | 97.36 | S | 42.11 | MR | 90.49 | S | 1号 | ||
YM-125 | 97.75 | S | 46.75 | MR | 98.55 | S | 1号 | ||
YM-126 | 95.39 | S | 45.89 | MR | 95.58 | S | 1号 |
菌株 | L8 | F301 | XHJ1025 | 生理小种 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病指 | 类型 | 病指 | 类型 | 病指 | 类型 | ||||
YM-33 | 4.51 | R | 47.21 | MR | 85.24 | S | 0号 | ||
YM-63 | 12.73 | R | 49.56 | MR | 80.78 | S | 0号 | ||
YM-124 | 97.36 | S | 42.11 | MR | 90.49 | S | 1号 | ||
YM-125 | 97.75 | S | 46.75 | MR | 98.55 | S | 1号 | ||
YM-126 | 95.39 | S | 45.89 | MR | 95.58 | S | 1号 |
处理 | 发病率/% | 病情指数 | 相对防治率/% |
---|---|---|---|
80%代森锰锌 | 39.15±0.27 | 21.93±1.01 | 56.43±0.77b |
50%烯酰吗啉 | 34.74±0.42 | 20.64±0.54 | 58.99±0.17b |
28%精甲霜灵 | 48.67±0.42 | 27.89±0.57 | 44.59±0.39c |
687.5/g氟菌·霜霉威 | 50.12±0.17 | 26.49±0.48 | 47.37±0.55c |
99%壳聚糖 | 61.39±0.20 | 27.36±0.32 | 45.64±0.24c |
25%乙蒜素·松脂酸铜 | 33.63±0.55 | 16.69±0.29 | 66.84±0.35a |
CK | 73.68±0.34 | 50.33±0.33 | — |
处理 | 发病率/% | 病情指数 | 相对防治率/% |
---|---|---|---|
80%代森锰锌 | 39.15±0.27 | 21.93±1.01 | 56.43±0.77b |
50%烯酰吗啉 | 34.74±0.42 | 20.64±0.54 | 58.99±0.17b |
28%精甲霜灵 | 48.67±0.42 | 27.89±0.57 | 44.59±0.39c |
687.5/g氟菌·霜霉威 | 50.12±0.17 | 26.49±0.48 | 47.37±0.55c |
99%壳聚糖 | 61.39±0.20 | 27.36±0.32 | 45.64±0.24c |
25%乙蒜素·松脂酸铜 | 33.63±0.55 | 16.69±0.29 | 66.84±0.35a |
CK | 73.68±0.34 | 50.33±0.33 | — |
药剂处理 | 株高/cm | 最大叶长/cm | 节距/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 茎围/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80%代森锰锌 | 94.33±0.62a | 64.67±1.05a | 5.97±0.16a | 25.37±0.52b | 7.97±0.10a |
50%烯酰吗啉 | 94.23±0.66a | 64.77±1.02a | 6.13±0.04a | 25.17±0.16b | 8.10±0.07a |
28%精甲霜灵 | 87.20±0.18c | 60.43±0.59c | 5.61±0.04c | 24.87±0.41c | 8.07±0.10a |
687.5/g氟菌·霜霉威 | 85.03±0.17c | 64.37±0.57a | 5.93±0.07a | 25.1±0.11b | 8.13±0.06a |
99%壳聚糖 | 90.11±0.14b | 62.89±0.22b | 5.87±0.05b | 25.12±0.15b | 8.08±0.09a |
25%乙蒜素·松脂酸铜 | 94.37±0.22a | 64.47±0.17a | 6.11±0.11a | 25.98±0.21b | 8.26±0.14a |
CK | 90.57±0.51b | 63.62±0.44a | 5.60±0.12c | 26.90±0.14a | 8.00±0.09a |
药剂处理 | 株高/cm | 最大叶长/cm | 节距/cm | 最大叶宽/cm | 茎围/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
80%代森锰锌 | 94.33±0.62a | 64.67±1.05a | 5.97±0.16a | 25.37±0.52b | 7.97±0.10a |
50%烯酰吗啉 | 94.23±0.66a | 64.77±1.02a | 6.13±0.04a | 25.17±0.16b | 8.10±0.07a |
28%精甲霜灵 | 87.20±0.18c | 60.43±0.59c | 5.61±0.04c | 24.87±0.41c | 8.07±0.10a |
687.5/g氟菌·霜霉威 | 85.03±0.17c | 64.37±0.57a | 5.93±0.07a | 25.1±0.11b | 8.13±0.06a |
99%壳聚糖 | 90.11±0.14b | 62.89±0.22b | 5.87±0.05b | 25.12±0.15b | 8.08±0.09a |
25%乙蒜素·松脂酸铜 | 94.37±0.22a | 64.47±0.17a | 6.11±0.11a | 25.98±0.21b | 8.26±0.14a |
CK | 90.57±0.51b | 63.62±0.44a | 5.60±0.12c | 26.90±0.14a | 8.00±0.09a |
[1] |
方中达. 植病研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,1998:179-203.
|
[2] |
牟文君, 奚家勤, 薛超群, 等.烟草疫霉对六种杀菌剂的敏感性测定[A]. 中国植物病理学会2015年学术年会论文集[C]. 2015:163.
|
[3] |
尚志强. 烟草黑胫病病原、发生规律及综合防治研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2007, 9(2):73-76.
|
[4] |
何明川, 王志江, 谢永辉, 等. 烟草黑胫病拮抗菌的筛选、鉴定及发酵条件优[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(2):428-439.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2022.02.013 |
[5] |
王凤龙, 周义和, 任广伟. 中国烟草病害图鉴[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2019:32-35.
|
[6] |
王文静, 王晓强, 许永幸, 等. 烟草黑胫病菌分子生物学研究进展[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(3):90-94.
|
[7] |
宋晓妍, 孙彩云, 陈秀兰, 等. 木霉生防作用机制的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2006, 8(6):20-25.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
董瑜. 防治烟草黑胫病缓释型杀菌剂研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2015(1):1-57.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
李梅云. 云南省烟草疫霉生理小种的初步鉴定[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(5):54-59.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
强遥, 广业兰, 秦双林, 等. 南昌市辣椒疫病病原鉴定[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(11):39-42.
|
[14] |
曹继芬, 霍超, 户艳霞, 等. 云南省大理州烟草疫霉交配型及甲霜灵敏感性研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(6):49-54.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
朱桂宁, 贤小勇, 黄福新, 等. 广西烟草黑胫病菌对甲霜灵的敏感性检测[J]. 南方农业学报, 2011, 42(6):623-626.
|
[18] |
广东省农科院作物研究所. YC/T 142—1998,烟草农艺性状调查方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,1998:1-44.
|
[19] |
白建保. 烟草病虫害防治图说[M]. 郑州: 河南人民出版社,2010:181-188
|
[20] |
王智发, 刘延荣, 谢成颂, 等. 我国烟草黑胫病菌生理小种鉴定[J]. 山东农业大学学报, 1987, 18(1):1-8.
|
[21] |
李斌, 杨益芬, 龚国淑. 四川省烟草黑胫病菌生理小种的分离鉴定[J]. 烟草科技, 2012(10):81-84.
|
[22] |
刘铭, 尹福强, 张文友, 等. 凉山州烟草黑胫病菌生理小种的鉴定[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(18):71-75.
|
[23] |
刘芳, 奚家勤, 董洪旭, 等. 河南植烟区烟草黑胫病菌生理小种的鉴定及遗传多样性分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2016, 49(6):15-21.
|
[24] |
苗圃, 王海涛, 李淑君, 等. 河南省烟草黑胫病菌生理小种鉴定[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(10):204-207.
|
[25] |
廖春燕, 马国瑞, 郑海龙, 等. 壳聚糖诱导植物抗病机制研究进展[J]. 东海海洋, 2001, 19(2):24-32.
|
[26] |
陈兴江, 邱雪柏, 陆宁, 等. 几种植物诱抗剂对烟草农艺性状及抗病性的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2012, 40(12):111-113.
|
[27] |
孟建玉, 汪汉成, 贾蒙骜, 等. 贵州省烟草黑胫病菌对甲霜灵的抗药性[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(5):168-171.
|
[28] |
占徊旭, 温娜娜, 罗定棋, 等. 泸州烟草黑胫病病原生理小种组成及对甲霜灵和烯酰吗啉的敏感性[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6):178-184.
|
[29] |
张蕊蕊, 胡伟群, 朱卫刚. 精甲霜灵与代森锰锌混配防治烟草黑胫病的增效作用[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(5):823-825.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20170531 |
[30] |
|
[31] |
沈国娟, 李范珠, 金海强, 等. 农废热解液与氟菌·霜霉威混用对辣椒疫病的防治作用[J]. 农药, 2016, 55(2):138-140.
|
[32] |
苏凯, 桑维钧, 张新强, 等. 贵州省烟草黑胫病菌对烯酰吗啉的敏感性[J]. 植物保护, 2013, 39(1):154-158.
|
[33] |
胡燕, 王开运, 许学明, 等. 烯酰吗啉对我国烟草黑胫病菌的毒力研究[J]. 农药学学报, 2006, 8(4):339-343.
|
[34] |
马国胜, 高智谋, 陈娟. 烟草黑胫病菌研究进展(Ⅲ)[J]. 烟草科技, 2004(2):44-48.
|
[1] | YANG Bin, ZHENG Jiacheng, YAN Xiongfei. Laboratory Toxicity and Field Efficacy of Five Insecticides Against Apolygus lucorum [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(2): 23-29. |
[2] | ZHANG Huachong, ZHAO Shuqi, YAN Zhenhua, DAI Baosheng, HUANG Xiaoli, ZHANG Xin, LI Wei. Control Effect and Safety of Different Soil-applied Herbicides in Cotton Field [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(1): 34-38. |
[3] | SONG Min, WU Cuixia, ZHANG Yong, MA Chong, ZHANG Tiantian, ZHOU Chao, YANG Lina. Efficacy of Metalaxyl-M·Fludioxonil·Azoxystrobin on Controlling Soil-borne Fungal Diseases of Peanut Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(1): 6-10. |
[4] | YAN Yu, WANG Weijian, YAO Yutian, CHEN Chen, QIU Jun, ZHANG Xiaowei, CHEN Xijun. Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 5-11. |
[5] | ZHANG Xinfeng, ZHANG Guo, YU Julong, FANG Jichao, LUO Guanghua, ZHU Feng, SHU Zhaolin. Pymetrozine Compound Insecticides: Control Effect on Rice Planthopper and Safety for Spiders [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 33-38. |
[6] | Wang Xiaolin, Zhu Chenggang, Wu Jie, Huang Jiexue, Ji Muxiang. The Control Effect of Three Fungicides and Their Combinations on Grape Downy Mildew: A Preliminary Report [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(9): 15-19. |
[7] | Yao Kebing, Yu Julong, Zhang Guo, Zhao Laicheng, Miao Kang, Shu Zhaolin, Yang Hongfu, Xu Chao, Zhu Feng. Rice Sheath Blight: Control Effect and Safety Evaluation Under Different Thifluzamide Seed Treatments [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(7): 13-17. |
[8] | Fu Yuhang, Ma Hui, Cai Junsong, Peng Furong, Bi Chaowei. Screening and Evaluation of Fungicides for Control of Rice False Smut Caused by Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(5): 18-21. |
[9] | Bian Kangya, Wang Fengliang, Shen Tianhui, Zhu Zhanfei, Wei Yunhe, Gu Huan, Cui Jiahua, Che Jinying, Zhang Yu, Zhang Haibo, Chen Hua, Zhu Jiaping. Resistance to Registered Herbicides: Gramineae Weeds in Wheat Field in the Coastal Areas of Jiangsu [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(3): 1-6. |
[10] | Wu Haibin, Jiang Lili, Gong Yi, Gong Qingtao, Fan Kun, Fu Li, Dong Fang. Control Effect of Three Insecticides Against Cherry Drosophila [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2): 35-38. |
[11] | Xiang Deming, Tian Minghui, Zhang Mingfa, Chen Qianfeng, Zhang Sheng, Chen Minggang. Control Effect of Three Herbicides on Dryland Weeds and Growth of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(12): 42-48. |
[12] | Luo Zhiming, Yin Jiong, Li Jun, Wang Xiaoyan, Zhang Rongyue, Shan Hongli, Cang Xiaoyan, Li Jie. The Control Effect on Cyperus rotundus L. in Sugarcane Field and Safety Evaluation: Three Kinds of Herbicides [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(11): 7-10. |
[13] | . Control Effect of Several Herbicides on Broadleaf Weeds in Dryland Flax Field [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(5): 24-27. |
[14] | . Integrated Chemical Control Technologies of Summer Maize Pests and Diseases in the Eastern Henan Plain [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(5): 15-19. |
[15] | . Control effects and Application Technology of 10% triflumezopyrim SC on rice planthoppers [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(4): 32-38. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||