Journal of Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (8): 89-95.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0202
Previous Articles Next Articles
NI Chao1(), LI Xinjiang1, WU Siying2, XIANG Tao1, XU Dong1, ZHUO Chao1, LUAN Song1, GUO Zhi1
Received:
2023-09-15
Revised:
2024-04-16
Online:
2024-08-20
Published:
2024-08-16
NI Chao, LI Xinjiang, WU Siying, XIANG Tao, XU Dong, ZHUO Chao, LUAN Song, GUO Zhi. Suitability Evaluation of Tuber Mustard Cultivation in Fuling Based on Grey Relation and Principal Component Analysis[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(8): 89-95.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0202
生物气候 | 村社 | 涪陵 | 敦仁街道 | 崇义街道 | 荔枝街道 | 鹅颈关村 | … | 鸿鹤村 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 421 | ||
年均温/℃ | bio1 | 17.98 | 17.98 | 18.14 | 17.98 | 17.38 | 17.11 | |
昼夜温差均值 | bio2 | 7.18 | 7.18 | 7.23 | 7.18 | 7.07 | 6.78 | |
昼夜温差与年温差比值 | bio3 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.09 | 25.00 | 24.80 | 24.23 | |
温度变化反差 | bio4 | 770.60 | 770.60 | 770.40 | 770.60 | 765.29 | 758.12 | |
极端高温/℃ | bio5 | 33.1 | 33.1 | 33.4 | 33.1 | 32.4 | 31.9 | |
极端低温/℃ | bio6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.9 | |
年温度变化较差 | bio7 | 28.7 | 28.7 | 28.8 | 28.7 | 28.5 | 28 | |
最湿季均温/℃ | bio8 | 25.07 | 25.07 | 25.22 | 25.07 | 24.42 | 24.08 | |
最干季均温/℃ | bio9 | 8.17 | 8.17 | 8.33 | 8.17 | 7.63 | 7.48 | |
最热季均温/℃ | bio10 | 27.30 | 27.30 | 27.45 | 27.30 | 26.63 | 26.32 | |
最冷季均温/℃ | bio11 | 8.17 | 8.17 | 8.33 | 8.17 | 7.63 | 7.48 | |
年均降水/mm | bio12 | 1111 | 1111 | 1108 | 1111 | 1135 | 1133 | |
最湿月降水/mm | bio13 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 178 | 177 | |
最干月降水/mm | bio14 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 19 | |
降水变化方差 | bio15 | 62.97 | 62.97 | 62.95 | 62.97 | 62.45 | 62.69 | |
最湿季均降水/mm | bio16 | 490 | 490 | 489 | 490 | 495 | 493 | |
最干季均降水/mm | bio17 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 62 | 64 | |
最热季均降水/mm | bio18 | 438 | 438 | 437 | 438 | 447 | 457 | |
最冷季均降水/mm | bio19 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 62 | 64 |
生物气候 | 村社 | 涪陵 | 敦仁街道 | 崇义街道 | 荔枝街道 | 鹅颈关村 | … | 鸿鹤村 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 421 | ||
年均温/℃ | bio1 | 17.98 | 17.98 | 18.14 | 17.98 | 17.38 | 17.11 | |
昼夜温差均值 | bio2 | 7.18 | 7.18 | 7.23 | 7.18 | 7.07 | 6.78 | |
昼夜温差与年温差比值 | bio3 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.09 | 25.00 | 24.80 | 24.23 | |
温度变化反差 | bio4 | 770.60 | 770.60 | 770.40 | 770.60 | 765.29 | 758.12 | |
极端高温/℃ | bio5 | 33.1 | 33.1 | 33.4 | 33.1 | 32.4 | 31.9 | |
极端低温/℃ | bio6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.9 | |
年温度变化较差 | bio7 | 28.7 | 28.7 | 28.8 | 28.7 | 28.5 | 28 | |
最湿季均温/℃ | bio8 | 25.07 | 25.07 | 25.22 | 25.07 | 24.42 | 24.08 | |
最干季均温/℃ | bio9 | 8.17 | 8.17 | 8.33 | 8.17 | 7.63 | 7.48 | |
最热季均温/℃ | bio10 | 27.30 | 27.30 | 27.45 | 27.30 | 26.63 | 26.32 | |
最冷季均温/℃ | bio11 | 8.17 | 8.17 | 8.33 | 8.17 | 7.63 | 7.48 | |
年均降水/mm | bio12 | 1111 | 1111 | 1108 | 1111 | 1135 | 1133 | |
最湿月降水/mm | bio13 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 178 | 177 | |
最干月降水/mm | bio14 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 19 | |
降水变化方差 | bio15 | 62.97 | 62.97 | 62.95 | 62.97 | 62.45 | 62.69 | |
最湿季均降水/mm | bio16 | 490 | 490 | 489 | 490 | 495 | 493 | |
最干季均降水/mm | bio17 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 62 | 64 | |
最热季均降水/mm | bio18 | 438 | 438 | 437 | 438 | 447 | 457 | |
最冷季均降水/mm | bio19 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 62 | 64 |
关联 系数 | 涪陵 | 敦仁 街道 | 崇义 街道 | 荔枝 街道 | 鹅颈 关村 | … | 鸿鹤村 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 421 | ||
k1 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.77 | |
k2 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.56 | |
k3 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.56 | |
k4 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.62 | |
k5 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.74 | |
k6 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.82 | |
k7 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.60 | |
k8 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.75 | |
k9 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.79 | |
k10 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.76 | |
k11 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.79 | |
k12 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.91 | |
k13 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.88 | |
k14 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.77 | |
k15 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.96 | |
k16 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 | |
k17 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.81 | |
k18 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.83 | |
k19 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.81 | |
δ | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.77 | |
排序 | 68 | 68 | 32 | 68 | 152 | 219 |
关联 系数 | 涪陵 | 敦仁 街道 | 崇义 街道 | 荔枝 街道 | 鹅颈 关村 | … | 鸿鹤村 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 421 | ||
k1 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.77 | |
k2 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.56 | |
k3 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.56 | |
k4 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.62 | |
k5 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.74 | |
k6 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.82 | |
k7 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.60 | |
k8 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.75 | |
k9 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.79 | |
k10 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.76 | |
k11 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.79 | |
k12 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.91 | |
k13 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.88 | |
k14 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.77 | |
k15 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.96 | |
k16 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.95 | |
k17 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.81 | |
k18 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.83 | |
k19 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.81 | |
δ | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.77 | |
排序 | 68 | 68 | 32 | 68 | 152 | 219 |
生物气候 | 主成分 | ||
---|---|---|---|
PC1(Y1) | PC2(Y2) | PC3(Y3) | |
bio1 | 0.2502 | -0.0102 | -0.0029 |
bio2 | 0.1883 | 0.4453 | -0.1899 |
bio3 | 0.1222 | 0.5893 | -0.1603 |
bio4 | 0.2376 | 0.1916 | -0.1057 |
bio5 | 0.2500 | 0.0199 | -0.0332 |
bio6 | 0.2484 | -0.0734 | 0.0310 |
bio7 | 0.2254 | 0.2588 | -0.1954 |
bio8 | 0.2503 | 0.0080 | -0.0131 |
bio9 | 0.2498 | -0.0371 | 0.0103 |
bio10 | 0.2502 | -0.0044 | -0.0075 |
bio11 | 0.2498 | -0.0371 | 0.0103 |
bio12 | -0.2363 | 0.2090 | -0.1292 |
bio13 | -0.0176 | 0.4077 | 0.8854 |
bio14 | -0.2471 | -0.0026 | -0.0563 |
bio15 | 0.2306 | -0.1887 | 0.2681 |
bio16 | -0.2302 | 0.2664 | -0.0817 |
bio17 | -0.2475 | 0.0707 | -0.0015 |
bio18 | -0.2441 | 0.1248 | -0.0640 |
bio19 | -0.2475 | 0.0707 | -0.0015 |
特征值 | 15.90 | 2.04 | 0.83 |
方差贡献率/% | 83.67 | 10.76 | 4.38 |
累计贡献率/% | 83.67 | 94.42 | 98.81 |
生物气候 | 主成分 | ||
---|---|---|---|
PC1(Y1) | PC2(Y2) | PC3(Y3) | |
bio1 | 0.2502 | -0.0102 | -0.0029 |
bio2 | 0.1883 | 0.4453 | -0.1899 |
bio3 | 0.1222 | 0.5893 | -0.1603 |
bio4 | 0.2376 | 0.1916 | -0.1057 |
bio5 | 0.2500 | 0.0199 | -0.0332 |
bio6 | 0.2484 | -0.0734 | 0.0310 |
bio7 | 0.2254 | 0.2588 | -0.1954 |
bio8 | 0.2503 | 0.0080 | -0.0131 |
bio9 | 0.2498 | -0.0371 | 0.0103 |
bio10 | 0.2502 | -0.0044 | -0.0075 |
bio11 | 0.2498 | -0.0371 | 0.0103 |
bio12 | -0.2363 | 0.2090 | -0.1292 |
bio13 | -0.0176 | 0.4077 | 0.8854 |
bio14 | -0.2471 | -0.0026 | -0.0563 |
bio15 | 0.2306 | -0.1887 | 0.2681 |
bio16 | -0.2302 | 0.2664 | -0.0817 |
bio17 | -0.2475 | 0.0707 | -0.0015 |
bio18 | -0.2441 | 0.1248 | -0.0640 |
bio19 | -0.2475 | 0.0707 | -0.0015 |
特征值 | 15.90 | 2.04 | 0.83 |
方差贡献率/% | 83.67 | 10.76 | 4.38 |
累计贡献率/% | 83.67 | 94.42 | 98.81 |
村社 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | λ | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
涪陵 | 0.888 | 1.475 | 1.077 | 0.949 | 103 |
敦仁街道 | 0.888 | 1.475 | 1.077 | 0.949 | 103 |
崇义街道 | 0.918 | 1.521 | 1.080 | 0.979 | 54 |
荔枝街道 | 0.888 | 1.475 | 1.077 | 0.949 | 103 |
鹅颈关村委会 | 0.795 | 1.404 | 1.161 | 0.867 | 157 |
… | |||||
新大田村委会 | 0.753 | 1.188 | 1.072 | 0.805 | 242 |
村社 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | λ | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
涪陵 | 0.888 | 1.475 | 1.077 | 0.949 | 103 |
敦仁街道 | 0.888 | 1.475 | 1.077 | 0.949 | 103 |
崇义街道 | 0.918 | 1.521 | 1.080 | 0.979 | 54 |
荔枝街道 | 0.888 | 1.475 | 1.077 | 0.949 | 103 |
鹅颈关村委会 | 0.795 | 1.404 | 1.161 | 0.867 | 157 |
… | |||||
新大田村委会 | 0.753 | 1.188 | 1.072 | 0.805 | 242 |
[1] |
张琴, 宋经元, 邵飞, 等. 防风固沙优良树种欧李的潜在适生区及生态特征简[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(3):9.
|
[2] |
季显权, 刘君泽. 四川茎瘤芥主要种植土壤的肥料效应研究[J]. 土壤农化通报, 1992, 7(3):79-90.
|
[3] |
刘义华, 张召荣, 冷蓉, 等. 茎瘤芥(榨菜)产量性状的基因效应研究[J]. 西南大学学报, 2009, 31(12):58-62.
|
[4] |
张红, 张召荣, 范永红, 等. 播期、施氮量对茎瘤芥(榨菜)先期抽苔及腋芽抽生影响研究[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2011(2):29-31.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
李正积, 付平都, 庞在详, 等. 涪陵榨菜头品质与地质背景关系的研究[J]. 四川地质学报, 1994, 14(2):149-160.
|
[7] |
李宏群, 刘晓莉, 汪建华, 等. 未来气候变化对重庆榨菜种植适宜区的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8):7.
|
[8] |
范立张, 朱勇, 王树会. 灰色关联度在云南烤烟种植适宜性分析中的应用[J]. 气象科技, 2006, 34(4):4.
|
[9] |
余龙江, 孙友平, 程华, 等. 玛咖引种气候适宜区域的选择[J]. 生命科学研究, 2004, 8(3):250.
|
[10] |
冯海萍, 王春良, 谢华, 等. 应用灰色关联法探讨玛咖在宁夏地区适宜的引种区域[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2015, 56(10):58.
|
[11] |
赵菊, 苏泽春, 杨丽云, 等. 灰色理论在金铁锁引种适宜区选择中的应用[J]. 江西农业学报, 2016, 28(4):15.
|
[12] |
田兵, 冉雪琴, 薛红, 等. 贵州42种野生牧草营养价值灰色关联度分析[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1):92.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20140112 |
[13] |
李玉平, 周生辉, 马玉莲, 等. 应用灰色关联度理论对宁夏引黄灌区引种的苜蓿进行综合评析[J]. 黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报, 2006, 19(5):5.
|
[14] |
贺顺禄. 涪陵较高海拔地区茎瘤芥栽培技术研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(4):138-141.
|
[15] |
胡代文, 高明泉, 张红, 等. 涪陵中海拔区茎瘤芥高产栽培技术研究Ⅲ播期对主要性状及产量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2006(4):20-22.
|
[16] |
张召荣, 胡代文, 高明泉, 等. 茎瘤芥不同品种在涪陵高海拔地区适应性鉴定[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2006(7):51-52.
|
[17] |
孙浩元, 续九如, 王玉柱, 等. 应用灰色聚类和灰色关联分析对台湾青枣引种适宜区的选择[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006(4):143-146.
|
[1] | YANG Meili, WANG Bangtai, LU Hongwei, CHENG Jianmei, SU Yujie, ZHAO Shuzheng, ZHANG Xiaochun, CHENG Cui, QIN Guiwen. Effects of Planting Density on Grain Filling Characteristics and Dry Matter Accumulation of Maize [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(8): 1-8. |
[2] | ZONG Zhaohui, WANG Han, LI Jincheng, ZHAO Weicai, DENG Wenjun, WANG Wei, YU Chunqiang, WANG Jun. Responses of Light Energy and Nitrogen Spatial Distribution, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Accumulation to Increased Planting Density of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(8): 16-23. |
[3] | WANG Feng, ZHANG Ting, YU Shuoqi, LI Wenbo, ZHU Shijun, JIN Shuquan. Improvement and Substitution Effects of Park Planting Soil in Ningbo Urban Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(6): 24-30. |
[4] | CHEN Runfeng, ZHANG Yan, GAO Qiang, XU Lin, YAN Qingqing, ZENG Jun. Comparison of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Production Performance of Different Varieties of Eucommia ulmoides in Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(6): 39-47. |
[5] | CHENG Mingwei, HAN Wenyan, LUO Xumei. Selection of Excellent Single Plant and Comprehensive Evaluation of Economic Traits of Yulania denudate ‘Hailuo’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(5): 54-59. |
[6] | WEI Jingnan, BAI Yuhang. The Influence of Agricultural Planting Structure Adjustment on Agricultural Mechanization in Guangxi [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(2): 76-82. |
[7] | WU Hao, WEN Yi, LIN Yunhong, XIONG Qian, XU Wei, YANG Maosong, ZHOU Youhai, WANG Ge, DU Yu, BAI Yuxiang, WANG NA, ZHOU Peng. Effects of Density and Leaves Left on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco ‘NC297’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(1): 15-21. |
[8] | ZHAO Kaiqin, ZHANG Yusong, YAN Linxiang, LI Genze, LI Qinggang, LUO Yanqing. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Growth and Yield of Rapeseed [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(1): 22-28. |
[9] | LI Ling, YANG Qingsong, CHEN Ding, PENG Cuixian, SUN Hongwei, ZHAO Dawei, TAO Yonghong. Quality Grading Standard of Malania oleifera Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(1): 59-64. |
[10] | LI Guoqing, CONG Xinjun, ZHANG Dajian, ZHAO Na, LI Guoyu. Effects of Different Previous Crops and Planting Densities on Agronomic Characters of Garlic [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(9): 63-66. |
[11] | CHEN Jun, ZHANG Haijun, LI Xiaoyu, LI Wenqian. Effect of Density and Growth Regulator Interaction on Yield and Lodging Resistance of Summer Maize ‘Zidan11’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 12-19. |
[12] | WANG Xiaoguang, SHI Guiqing, LIU Chunge, WU Peng, WANG Ronghuan, SHAN Hong, FENG Peiyu, CHENG Guanglei. Present Situation and Development Trend of Silage Corn Industry in China [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 20-24. |
[13] | JIANG Shengxiu, ZHAO Peng, ZHU Shujuan. Effects of Different Planting Methods on Seedling Growth and Yield of Cyperus esculentus [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 32-37. |
[14] | ZHENG Mingjie, YU Hongwei, CHEN Zhiliang, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Topographic Positions and Plantation Time on Soil Properties of Hilly Red Soil Orchards [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 48-55. |
[15] | BIAN Lei, LI Yan, GE Ruiting, ZHANG Guiqin, Sun Lili. Effects of Meteorological Conditions During Transplanting on Greenhouse Strawberries [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(6): 60-64. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||