
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 30-35.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0016
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-01-15
Revised:2025-05-14
Online:2026-04-15
Published:2026-04-15
WU Fuhai, ZHANG Yanxia. Effects of Straw Returning and Tillage Methods on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activities and Yield of Winter Wheat[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(4): 30-35.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0016
| 处理 | pH | 电导率/(mS/cm) | 容重/(g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 7.76±0.0056c | 12.54±0.0076a | 1.33±0.050a |
| XH | 7.78±0.0071b | 12.43±0.093a | 1.26±0.027ab |
| SH | 7.83±0.011a | 12.23±0.051b | 1.19±0.060bc |
| XH+F | 7.83±0.0075a | 12.03±0.16c | 1.15±0.049c |
| SH+F | 7.85±0.0098a | 11.90±0.018c | 1.13±0.055c |
| 处理 | pH | 电导率/(mS/cm) | 容重/(g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 7.76±0.0056c | 12.54±0.0076a | 1.33±0.050a |
| XH | 7.78±0.0071b | 12.43±0.093a | 1.26±0.027ab |
| SH | 7.83±0.011a | 12.23±0.051b | 1.19±0.060bc |
| XH+F | 7.83±0.0075a | 12.03±0.16c | 1.15±0.049c |
| SH+F | 7.85±0.0098a | 11.90±0.018c | 1.13±0.055c |
| 处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 13.74±0.12c | 1.61±0.021c | 77.80±1.18c | 22.98±0.30ab | 171.91±1.23c |
| XH | 13.79±0.031bc | 1.64±0.02bc | 78.22±1.52bc | 23.36±0.34ab | 173.58±1.13c |
| SH | 13.78±0.085bc | 1.67±0.02b | 80.68±1.71ab | 23.70±0.84a | 175.00±1.72c |
| XH+F | 13.92±0.045ab | 1.61±0.046c | 81.21±1.51a | 22.79±0.10b | 178.62±1.72b |
| SH+F | 13.97±0.095a | 1.73±0.017a | 82.47±0.75a | 22.84±0.015b | 198.82±2.51a |
| 处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 13.74±0.12c | 1.61±0.021c | 77.80±1.18c | 22.98±0.30ab | 171.91±1.23c |
| XH | 13.79±0.031bc | 1.64±0.02bc | 78.22±1.52bc | 23.36±0.34ab | 173.58±1.13c |
| SH | 13.78±0.085bc | 1.67±0.02b | 80.68±1.71ab | 23.70±0.84a | 175.00±1.72c |
| XH+F | 13.92±0.045ab | 1.61±0.046c | 81.21±1.51a | 22.79±0.10b | 178.62±1.72b |
| SH+F | 13.97±0.095a | 1.73±0.017a | 82.47±0.75a | 22.84±0.015b | 198.82±2.51a |
| 处理 | 脲酶/(μg MH3-N/g) | 过氧化氢酶/(μmol KMnO4/g) | 脱氢酶/(μg/g) | 碱性磷酸酶/(μmol酚/g) | 蔗糖酶/(μg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.94±0.059d | 12.92±0.35c | 1.32±0.035c | 18.50±0.79c | 16.07±0.45c |
| XH | 1.02±0.040c | 13.22±0.34bc | 1.33±0.025c | 19.24±0.23bc | 16.21±0.27bc |
| SH | 1.07±0.045bc | 13.72±0.40ab | 1.39±0.010b | 19.92±0.15b | 16.56±0.19ab |
| XH+F | 1.11±0.030b | 14.13±0.45a | 1.42±0.015b | 20.95±0.86a | 16.67±0.08ab |
| SH+F | 1.18±0.006a | 14.31±0.35a | 1.47±0.025a | 21.43±0.074a | 16.83±0.04a |
| 处理 | 脲酶/(μg MH3-N/g) | 过氧化氢酶/(μmol KMnO4/g) | 脱氢酶/(μg/g) | 碱性磷酸酶/(μmol酚/g) | 蔗糖酶/(μg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.94±0.059d | 12.92±0.35c | 1.32±0.035c | 18.50±0.79c | 16.07±0.45c |
| XH | 1.02±0.040c | 13.22±0.34bc | 1.33±0.025c | 19.24±0.23bc | 16.21±0.27bc |
| SH | 1.07±0.045bc | 13.72±0.40ab | 1.39±0.010b | 19.92±0.15b | 16.56±0.19ab |
| XH+F | 1.11±0.030b | 14.13±0.45a | 1.42±0.015b | 20.95±0.86a | 16.67±0.08ab |
| SH+F | 1.18±0.006a | 14.31±0.35a | 1.47±0.025a | 21.43±0.074a | 16.83±0.04a |
| 处理 | 穗数/(万/hm2) | 穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 千粒重/g | 理论产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 610.09±0.40c | 35.59±0.30c | 40.03±0.31c | 7347.07±76.29d |
| XH | 613.94±4.49c | 36.09±0.32bc | 40.52±0.18b | 7630.54±73.45c |
| SH | 620.21±0.31b | 36.25±0.27ab | 40.86±0.08ab | 7809.13±46.66bc |
| XH+F | 623.91±3.00ab | 36.42±0.64ab | 41.15±0.23a | 7946.57±156.79ab |
| SH+F | 627.31±1.47a | 36.90±0.30a | 41.32±0.35a | 8131.15±139.69a |
| 处理 | 穗数/(万/hm2) | 穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 千粒重/g | 理论产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 610.09±0.40c | 35.59±0.30c | 40.03±0.31c | 7347.07±76.29d |
| XH | 613.94±4.49c | 36.09±0.32bc | 40.52±0.18b | 7630.54±73.45c |
| SH | 620.21±0.31b | 36.25±0.27ab | 40.86±0.08ab | 7809.13±46.66bc |
| XH+F | 623.91±3.00ab | 36.42±0.64ab | 41.15±0.23a | 7946.57±156.79ab |
| SH+F | 627.31±1.47a | 36.90±0.30a | 41.32±0.35a | 8131.15±139.69a |
| pH | 电导 率 | 容重 | 有机 质 | 全氮 | 碱解 氮 | 有效 磷 | 速效钾 | 脲酶 | 过氧化 氢酶 | 脱氢酶 | 碱性磷 酸酶 | 蔗糖 酶 | 穗数 | 穗粒 数 | 千粒 重 | 产量 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 电导率 | -0.952* | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 容重 | -0.978** | 0.971** | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 有机质 | 0.800 | -0.943* | -0.869 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 全氮 | 0.667 | -0.611 | -0.586 | 0.527 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 碱解氮 | 0.985** | -0.980** | -0.965** | 0.864 | 0.667 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 有效磷 | -0.108 | 0.395 | 0.201 | -0.622 | 0.070 | -0.265 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 速效钾 | 0.727 | -0.827 | -0.716 | 0.860 | 0.836 | 0.802 | -0.474 | 1 | |||||||||
| 脲酶 | 0.955* | -0.978** | -0.976** | 0.916* | 0.711 | 0.961** | -0.266 | 0.843 | 1 | ||||||||
| 过氧化氢酶 | 0.967** | -0.995** | -0.988** | 0.917* | 0.578 | 0.981** | -0.333 | 0.773 | 0.975** | 1 | |||||||
| 脱氢酶 | 0.953* | -0.989** | -0.945* | 0.916* | 0.686 | 0.989** | -0.377 | 0.870 | 0.966** | 0.977** | 1 | ||||||
| 碱性磷酸酶 | 0.941* | -0.996** | -0.977** | 0.953* | 0.590 | 0.964** | -0.394 | 0.811 | 0.982** | 0.994** | 0.974** | 1 | |||||
| 蔗糖酶 | 0.990** | -0.985** | -0.985** | 0.874 | 0.645 | 0.996** | -0.245 | 0.780 | 0.974** | 0.992** | 0.982** | 0.977** | 1 | ||||
| 穗数 | 0.978** | -0.994** | -0.989** | 0.907* | 0.634 | 0.988** | -0.294 | 0.797 | 0.985** | 0.997** | 0.983** | 0.991** | 0.997** | 1 | |||
| 穗粒数 | 0.924* | -0.951* | -0.947* | 0.908* | 0.763 | 0.928* | -0.249 | 0.871 | 0.993** | 0.943* | 0.943* | 0.959** | 0.943* | 0.958* | 1 | ||
| 千粒重 | 0.966** | -0.974** | -0.997** | 0.893* | 0.605 | 0.957* | -0.230 | 0.746 | 0.986** | 0.986** | 0.945* | 0.983** | 0.979** | 0.988** | 0.964** | 1 | |
| 产量 | 0.963** | -0.977** | -0.987** | 0.905* | 0.678 | 0.960** | -0.239 | 0.805 | 0.998** | 0.980** | 0.958* | 0.983** | 0.978** | 0.988** | 0.986** | 0.995** | 1 |
| pH | 电导 率 | 容重 | 有机 质 | 全氮 | 碱解 氮 | 有效 磷 | 速效钾 | 脲酶 | 过氧化 氢酶 | 脱氢酶 | 碱性磷 酸酶 | 蔗糖 酶 | 穗数 | 穗粒 数 | 千粒 重 | 产量 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 电导率 | -0.952* | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 容重 | -0.978** | 0.971** | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 有机质 | 0.800 | -0.943* | -0.869 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 全氮 | 0.667 | -0.611 | -0.586 | 0.527 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 碱解氮 | 0.985** | -0.980** | -0.965** | 0.864 | 0.667 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 有效磷 | -0.108 | 0.395 | 0.201 | -0.622 | 0.070 | -0.265 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 速效钾 | 0.727 | -0.827 | -0.716 | 0.860 | 0.836 | 0.802 | -0.474 | 1 | |||||||||
| 脲酶 | 0.955* | -0.978** | -0.976** | 0.916* | 0.711 | 0.961** | -0.266 | 0.843 | 1 | ||||||||
| 过氧化氢酶 | 0.967** | -0.995** | -0.988** | 0.917* | 0.578 | 0.981** | -0.333 | 0.773 | 0.975** | 1 | |||||||
| 脱氢酶 | 0.953* | -0.989** | -0.945* | 0.916* | 0.686 | 0.989** | -0.377 | 0.870 | 0.966** | 0.977** | 1 | ||||||
| 碱性磷酸酶 | 0.941* | -0.996** | -0.977** | 0.953* | 0.590 | 0.964** | -0.394 | 0.811 | 0.982** | 0.994** | 0.974** | 1 | |||||
| 蔗糖酶 | 0.990** | -0.985** | -0.985** | 0.874 | 0.645 | 0.996** | -0.245 | 0.780 | 0.974** | 0.992** | 0.982** | 0.977** | 1 | ||||
| 穗数 | 0.978** | -0.994** | -0.989** | 0.907* | 0.634 | 0.988** | -0.294 | 0.797 | 0.985** | 0.997** | 0.983** | 0.991** | 0.997** | 1 | |||
| 穗粒数 | 0.924* | -0.951* | -0.947* | 0.908* | 0.763 | 0.928* | -0.249 | 0.871 | 0.993** | 0.943* | 0.943* | 0.959** | 0.943* | 0.958* | 1 | ||
| 千粒重 | 0.966** | -0.974** | -0.997** | 0.893* | 0.605 | 0.957* | -0.230 | 0.746 | 0.986** | 0.986** | 0.945* | 0.983** | 0.979** | 0.988** | 0.964** | 1 | |
| 产量 | 0.963** | -0.977** | -0.987** | 0.905* | 0.678 | 0.960** | -0.239 | 0.805 | 0.998** | 0.980** | 0.958* | 0.983** | 0.978** | 0.988** | 0.986** | 0.995** | 1 |
| [1] |
王承, 艾亥麦提·艾麦尔江, 肖金讯, 等. 秸秆还田配施腐熟剂对夏玉米生长和产量及品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 47(3):262-267.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
陈士更, 宋以玲, 于建, 等. 玉米秸秆还田及腐熟剂对小麦产量、土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 31(2):25-31.
|
| [4] |
曾辉, 孟自力. 减氮条件下耕作方式和施用秸秆腐熟剂对麦田土壤结构及产量的影响[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2021, 41(12):76-77,80.
|
| [5] |
doi: 10.1007/s00374-014-0921-z URL |
| [6] |
姜珊珊, 李光艳, 吴斌, 等. 有机物料腐熟剂对玉米秸秆降解及小麦生长的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(12):63-66.
|
| [7] |
王时聪. 外源腐杆菌对还田秸秆降解的影响及作用机制[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021.
|
| [8] |
温美娟, 杨思存, 王成宝, 等. 不同耕作和秸秆还田方式对灰钙土土壤理化性状、酶活性及玉米产量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(3):903-911.
|
| [9] |
萨如拉, 杨恒山, 范富, 等. 秸秆还田量和腐熟剂对秸秆降解率和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(9):56-61.
|
| [10] |
朱敏, 于和平, 涂国良, 等. 秸秆腐熟剂对玉米秸秆腐熟及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2021, 52(12):14-21.
|
| [11] |
魏龙雪, 裴艳婷, 张书良, 等. 玉米秸秆还田配施腐熟剂对冬小麦生长和产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(6):25-27.
|
| [12] |
唐卓磊, 唐金刚, 闵江艳, 等. 秸秆还田配施腐熟剂对水芹生长、产量及土壤养分的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种,1-9[2026-04-09]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20241129.1731.033.
|
| [13] |
郭新送, 刘同信, 洪丕征, 等. 施用有机物料腐熟剂对秸秆还田小麦产量和土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2025, 66(1):44-50.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230979 |
| [14] |
陈忠焕. 土壤肥料学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1993.
|
| [15] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社. 2000.
|
| [16] |
关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1986.
|
| [17] |
刘继培, 张扬, 崔广禄, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤理化性质及小麦产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 21(6):44-49.
|
| [18] |
张子璇, 牛蓓蓓, 李新举. 不同改良模式对滨海盐渍土土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(2):275-284.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.02.008 |
| [19] |
刘宇娟, 谢迎新, 董成, 等. 秸秆生物炭对潮土区小麦产量及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(3):232-238.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2018.03.034 |
| [20] |
宋晓, 黄晨晨, 黄绍敏, 等. 不同耕作和有机肥措施对土壤理化性质及小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(3):102-108.
|
| [21] |
宋建宇, 张书红, 周群生, 等. 秸秆还田配施腐熟剂对小麦生长发育及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 肥料与健康, 2024, 51(1):18-22.
|
| [22] |
韩潇杰. 不同耕作方式对土壤理化特性、微生物群落及小麦产量的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2024.
|
| [23] |
高日平, 刘小月, 潘遵天, 等. 生物菌剂对玉米秸秆堆沤过程水热状况及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(2):174-181.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0651 |
| [24] |
王宁, 张仁政, 刘振, 等. 长期深松耕作结合秸秆还田对土壤团聚体固碳能力与无机稳定机制的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(28):83-93.
|
| [25] |
张常仁, 杨雅丽, 程全国, 等. 不同耕作模式对东北黑土微生物群落结构和酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2020, 29(4):335-347.
|
| [26] |
张莹莹, 曹惠英. 秸秆腐熟剂对玉米秸秆腐解及下茬小麦生长的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2019, 35(5):57-59.
|
| [27] |
田平, 姜英, 孙悦, 等. 不同还田方式对玉米秸秆腐解及土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(1):100-108.
|
| [1] | JIANG Qi, CHEN Shaojie, WU Xiaojun, HE Bingqing, WU Jiangxing, CHEN Jianghua. Population Characteristics of ‘Yongyou’ Series of Late Indica-Japonica Hybrid Rice at Different Yield Levels in Double-Cropping Rice Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(4): 1-5. |
| [2] | GUO Pengfei, WANG Xiaorong, SUN Xijun, WANG Wan, GAO Ying, ZHANG Bo, HUANG Tao, WANG Xin, WANG Haiyin, ZHAO Yaping, WANG Yan. Effects of Microbial Agents on Facility Soil Properties and Celery Growth [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(4): 25-29. |
| [3] | YAO Xiaoying, ZHANG Bei, WANG Jinsong, WANG Ying, LI Tong. Variation Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Dry Farming Area in Upper Reaches of Weihe River in Gansu and Its Influence on Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(4): 36-45. |
| [4] | LI Yuan, MA Qiang, PENG Bo, WU Lianxia, XIA Weixin, LI Qingjun. Effects of Different Irrigation Frequencies on Growth, Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato in Sandy Soil of Southern Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(4): 46-51. |
| [5] | JIA Wenhong. Effects of Concentrations of Fish Protein Fertilizer on Growth, Quality and Yield of Small Fruit Watermelon [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(4): 66-70. |
| [6] | HU Yu, ZHANG Yijuan, HANG Shulian, ZHAO Yuanlin, LIU Meng, CAO Zhengdengyuan, LIN Quan. Breeding of a Hybrid Rape Variety ‘Yiyou 46’ with High Yield, Low Erucic Acid and Low Glucosinolates [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(3): 10-15. |
| [7] | CHEN Ruiying. The Impact of Green Manure Intercropping on the Yield, Quality of Citrus Pomelo and Soil Fertility [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(3): 28-32. |
| [8] | YANG Hongtao, YANG Yanlin, HE Jiawei, YANG Zhengsong, SU Zechun, YU Ying. Correlation and Path Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits in Blueberry Hybrid F1 Generation [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(3): 33-39. |
| [9] | WANG Yinghong, LI Xiaohang, LI Yongzhen, MA Huaping, DONG Yun. Effects of Planting Density and Sowing Date on Yield and Agronomic Characteristics of Strong Gluten Wheat Variety ‘Xinmai 58’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(2): 1-8. |
| [10] | GE Lijiao, QIU Liang, CHENG Yujing, WANG Xiaoqiu, ZHAI Caijiao, WANG Xiaolong. Effects of Plant and Row Spacing on Main Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of ‘Bairizi’ Radish [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(2): 16-22. |
| [11] | LI Zhe, LI Guang, ZHOU Chenli, ZHANG Hengjia. Research Progress on Regulated Deficit Irrigation of Potatoes Under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(2): 54-58. |
| [12] | ZHU Xiaocui, LI Jun, HU Bo, ZHANG Shengning, ZHENG Jian. Countermeasures for Promoting Development of Fenghua Juicy Peach Industry with Meteorological New Quality Productive Forces [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(2): 79-86. |
| [13] | LIU Kaiji, WANG Ruiping, LIU Jianping, LI Yazhen, XIONG Wen, HAN Depeng, CHENG Yewei, ZHENG Wei, XIAO Guobin. Effect of Furrowing Methods of Rapeseed for Three-cropping System on Growth and Yield of Rapeseed [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(2): 9-15. |
| [14] | ZHAO Jiatao, GUO Mianyan, LIU Mengdao, FU Zhengbo. Effects of Mowing Periods on Yield and Quality of Barley Forage [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(1): 1-6. |
| [15] | JI Hairui, SHAO Yingnan, WANG Qiyao, ZHANG Hedong, YAN Siyu, ZHANG Donglai. Characteristics of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activities in Different Degraded Grasslands in Songnen Plain [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(1): 17-23. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
