Journal of Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 1-7.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0005
QUAN Ruilan(), FU Ding, MA Hanyun, HUO Erwei, SHEN Guanghui, GUO Guiying, WANG Qinglin()
Received:
2020-04-14
Revised:
2020-07-06
Online:
2022-02-20
Published:
2022-03-16
Contact:
WANG Qinglin
E-mail:qrlhe@163.com;qlw9855@163.com
QUAN Ruilan, FU Ding, MA Hanyun, HUO Erwei, SHEN Guanghui, GUO Guiying, WANG Qinglin. Yield Traits of High-quality and High-yield Conventional Indica Glutinous Rice ‘Zhenzhunuo’[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 1-7.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0005
品种 | 性状 | 极小值 | 极大值 | 均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
珍珠糯 | 全生育期/d | 135.0 | 160.0 | 147.47 | 7.77 | 5.27 |
株高/cm | 106.3 | 139.1 | 119.91 | 8.76 | 7.31 | |
有效穗/(万/hm2) | 175.5 | 292.5 | 232.1 | 29.98 | 12.92 | |
穗长/cm | 19.1 | 28.8 | 23.15 | 2.59 | 11.19 | |
穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 125.5 | 265.7 | 186.51 | 36.81 | 19.74 | |
结实率/% | 61.0 | 96.1 | 79.59 | 8.86 | 11.13 | |
千粒重/g | 22.5 | 34.0 | 26.96 | 2.49 | 9.25 | |
产量/(kg/hm2) | 7015.5 | 9475.1 | 8234.26 | 765.58 | 9.30 | |
Ⅱ优838 | 全生育期/d | 140.0 | 155.0 | 147.65 | 4.33 | 2.93 |
株高/cm | 118.0 | 138.6 | 126.35 | 5.78 | 4.58 | |
有效穗/(万/hm2) | 186.0 | 280.5 | 234.0 | 27.61 | 11.80 | |
穗长/cm | 22.2 | 37.6 | 25.19 | 3.50 | 13.90 | |
穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 94.7 | 241.0 | 168.25 | 37.41 | 22.23 | |
结实率/% | 73.0 | 93.1 | 83.53 | 5.40 | 6.46 | |
千粒重/g | 27.2 | 32.2 | 29.74 | 1.52 | 5.12 | |
产量/(kg/hm2) | 6550.1 | 9362.5 | 8082.78 | 655.68 | 8.11 |
品种 | 性状 | 极小值 | 极大值 | 均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
珍珠糯 | 全生育期/d | 135.0 | 160.0 | 147.47 | 7.77 | 5.27 |
株高/cm | 106.3 | 139.1 | 119.91 | 8.76 | 7.31 | |
有效穗/(万/hm2) | 175.5 | 292.5 | 232.1 | 29.98 | 12.92 | |
穗长/cm | 19.1 | 28.8 | 23.15 | 2.59 | 11.19 | |
穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 125.5 | 265.7 | 186.51 | 36.81 | 19.74 | |
结实率/% | 61.0 | 96.1 | 79.59 | 8.86 | 11.13 | |
千粒重/g | 22.5 | 34.0 | 26.96 | 2.49 | 9.25 | |
产量/(kg/hm2) | 7015.5 | 9475.1 | 8234.26 | 765.58 | 9.30 | |
Ⅱ优838 | 全生育期/d | 140.0 | 155.0 | 147.65 | 4.33 | 2.93 |
株高/cm | 118.0 | 138.6 | 126.35 | 5.78 | 4.58 | |
有效穗/(万/hm2) | 186.0 | 280.5 | 234.0 | 27.61 | 11.80 | |
穗长/cm | 22.2 | 37.6 | 25.19 | 3.50 | 13.90 | |
穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 94.7 | 241.0 | 168.25 | 37.41 | 22.23 | |
结实率/% | 73.0 | 93.1 | 83.53 | 5.40 | 6.46 | |
千粒重/g | 27.2 | 32.2 | 29.74 | 1.52 | 5.12 | |
产量/(kg/hm2) | 6550.1 | 9362.5 | 8082.78 | 655.68 | 8.11 |
x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全生育期(x1) | |||||||
株高(x2) | -0.284 | ||||||
有效穗(x3) | 0.268 | 0.043 | |||||
穗长(x4) | 0.262 | 0.036 | 0.464 | ||||
穗粒数(x5) | 0.262 | 0.352 | 0.341 | 0.553* | |||
结实率(x6) | 0.140 | 0.399 | 0.523* | 0.764** | 0.802** | ||
千粒重(x7) | 0.218 | 0.362 | 0.497* | 0.618** | 0.755** | 0.767** | |
产量(y) | 0.171 | 0.350 | 0.703** | 0.699** | 0.841** | 0.917** | 0.749** |
x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全生育期(x1) | |||||||
株高(x2) | -0.284 | ||||||
有效穗(x3) | 0.268 | 0.043 | |||||
穗长(x4) | 0.262 | 0.036 | 0.464 | ||||
穗粒数(x5) | 0.262 | 0.352 | 0.341 | 0.553* | |||
结实率(x6) | 0.140 | 0.399 | 0.523* | 0.764** | 0.802** | ||
千粒重(x7) | 0.218 | 0.362 | 0.497* | 0.618** | 0.755** | 0.767** | |
产量(y) | 0.171 | 0.350 | 0.703** | 0.699** | 0.841** | 0.917** | 0.749** |
性状 | 偏相关系数 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|
全生育期 | -0.427 | -1.416 | 0.190 |
株高 | 0.163 | 0.495 | 0.633 |
有效穗 | 0.879 | 5.537 | 0.000 |
穗长 | 0.234 | 0.723 | 0.488 |
穗粒数 | 0.822 | 4.328 | 0.002 |
结实率 | 0.622 | 2.383 | 0.041 |
千粒重 | -0.401 | -1.313 | 0.222 |
性状 | 偏相关系数 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|
全生育期 | -0.427 | -1.416 | 0.190 |
株高 | 0.163 | 0.495 | 0.633 |
有效穗 | 0.879 | 5.537 | 0.000 |
穗长 | 0.234 | 0.723 | 0.488 |
穗粒数 | 0.822 | 4.328 | 0.002 |
结实率 | 0.622 | 2.383 | 0.041 |
千粒重 | -0.401 | -1.313 | 0.222 |
性状 | 相关 系数 | 直接通 径系数 | 间接通径系数 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
→x1 | →x2 | →x3 | →x4 | →x5 | →x6 | →x7 | 求和 | |||
全生育期(x1) | 0.171 | -0.095 | 0 | -0.011 | 0.108 | 0.019 | 0.127 | 0.050 | -0.029 | 0.265 |
株高(x2) | 0.350 | 0.037 | 0.027 | 0 | 0.017 | 0.003 | 0.171 | 0.144 | -0.048 | 0.313 |
有效穗(x3) | 0.703 | 0.404 | -0.025 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.034 | 0.166 | 0.188 | -0.066 | 0.299 |
穗长(x4) | 0.699 | 0.074 | -0.025 | 0.001 | 0.187 | 0 | 0.268 | 0.275 | -0.082 | 0.625 |
穗粒数(x5) | 0.841 | 0.485 | -0.025 | 0.013 | 0.138 | 0.041 | 0 | 0.289 | -0.100 | 0.356 |
结实率(x6) | 0.917 | 0.360 | -0.013 | 0.015 | 0.211 | 0.057 | 0.389 | 0 | -0.102 | 0.557 |
千粒重(x7) | 0.749 | -0.133 | -0.021 | 0.014 | 0.201 | 0.046 | 0.366 | 0.276 | 0 | 0.882 |
性状 | 相关 系数 | 直接通 径系数 | 间接通径系数 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
→x1 | →x2 | →x3 | →x4 | →x5 | →x6 | →x7 | 求和 | |||
全生育期(x1) | 0.171 | -0.095 | 0 | -0.011 | 0.108 | 0.019 | 0.127 | 0.050 | -0.029 | 0.265 |
株高(x2) | 0.350 | 0.037 | 0.027 | 0 | 0.017 | 0.003 | 0.171 | 0.144 | -0.048 | 0.313 |
有效穗(x3) | 0.703 | 0.404 | -0.025 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.034 | 0.166 | 0.188 | -0.066 | 0.299 |
穗长(x4) | 0.699 | 0.074 | -0.025 | 0.001 | 0.187 | 0 | 0.268 | 0.275 | -0.082 | 0.625 |
穗粒数(x5) | 0.841 | 0.485 | -0.025 | 0.013 | 0.138 | 0.041 | 0 | 0.289 | -0.100 | 0.356 |
结实率(x6) | 0.917 | 0.360 | -0.013 | 0.015 | 0.211 | 0.057 | 0.389 | 0 | -0.102 | 0.557 |
千粒重(x7) | 0.749 | -0.133 | -0.021 | 0.014 | 0.201 | 0.046 | 0.366 | 0.276 | 0 | 0.882 |
[1] | 刘宇强, 刘晴, 高世伟, 等. 黑龙江省主栽糯稻遗传背景研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(1):22-24. |
[2] | 邓艳, 高发富, 吉勇, 等. 浅谈糯稻加工利用与遗传育种的研究进展[J]. 农业与技术, 2018, 38(24):63. |
[3] | 杨开术, 彭丽, 叶春丽, 等. 潢川县发展糯稻产业的现状及高产栽培技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(4):246-247. |
[4] | 汤圣祥. 中国20世纪80年代以来育成糯稻品种的品质及其优质达标率分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1):12-19. |
[5] | 苏国藩. 籼糯稻产量性状及育种分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(15):10-14. |
[6] | 郝留根, 张宏伟, 甘雨, 等. 杂交糯稻新品种‘黔糯优11’主要农艺性状与产量的相关性[J]. 农技服务, 2018, 35(6):24-26. |
[7] | 兰志斌. 限制籼糯品种高产的内在因素分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2003, 18(4):218-221. |
[8] | 李双盛, 游月华. 高产籼糯与高产籼稻品种性状之比较[J]. 江西农业学报, 2004, 16(2):38-42. |
[9] | 钟干清. 籼糯稻品种特征特性和高产栽培技术研究[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2008, 26(3):4-7. |
[10] | 游月华. 籼糯稻品种的产量构成特征和库源特性研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2006, 18(5):14-16. |
[11] | 王阳青, 李双盛, 游月华. 籼糯稻的产量构成因素和库源结构分析[J]. 福建农业科技, 2005(4):1-3. |
[12] | 杨立帆, 许泽华, 万波, 等. 不同复合肥对水稻产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(11):18-19. |
[13] | 赵锋, 刘凯, 张旅峰, 等. 栽培密度和播期对杂交水稻‘广两优272’产量形成的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(24):5924-5927. |
[14] | 卢凤初, 范富英, 钟卫胜, 等. 不同施N量对杂交糯稻‘嘉糯1优6号’产量的影响[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2015, 33(1):11-13. |
[15] | 蒋鹏, 熊洪, 张林, 等. 施氮量和氮肥运筹模式对糯稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2015, 29(6):595-598. |
[16] | 沈光辉, 郭桂英, 王青林, 等. 超级糯稻新品种珍珠糯的特征特性及高产栽培技术[J]. 吉林农业, 2011(9):96. |
[17] | 马汉云, 王青林, 祁玉良, 等. 珍珠糯的选育及栽培技术要点[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(4):65-66. |
[18] | 杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6. |
[19] | 袁志发, 周静芋, 郭满才, 等. 决策系数-通径分析中的决策指标[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2001, 29(5):131-133. |
[20] | 吕建群, 曾宪平. 四川中籼中熟杂交水稻产量与主要经济性状的分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(10):184-186. |
[21] | 罗来君. 水稻生育性状的遗传相关性及其对产量的贡献[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2006(3):7-11. |
[22] | 明道绪. 田间试验与统计分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005:197-201. |
[23] | 宋小园, 朱仲元, 刘艳伟, 等. 通径分析在SPSS逐步线性回归中的实现[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(1):108-113. |
[24] | 李树杏, 向关伦, 杨占烈, 等. 杂交水稻‘协优385’主要产量构成因子与产量的相关分析和通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(18):15-19. |
[25] | 龚大琨, 黄宗洪, 杨占烈, 等. 杂交水稻‘冈8优785’主要性状与产量的相关分析及增产途径[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2018, 11:100-103. |
[26] | 陈飘, 李家文, 黄彬香, 等. 广西典型地区水稻产量形成要素分析[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(2):1-6. |
[27] | 林太赟, 张胜. 早籼稻中早39超高产群体的产量构成分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(91):510-1512. |
[1] | HE Mi, LI Xiaobo, HUANG Jing, HUANG Guangfu. The Relationship Between Leaf Area Index and Yield of Rice: Research Progress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 1-5. |
[2] | LIN Tuanrong, WANG Yufeng, WANG Zhen, FAN Longqiu, ZHANG Zhicheng, WANG Wei, HUANG Wenjuan, JIAO Xinlei, WANG Yiqian, XING Jin, YIN Yuhe. Regional Trials of Mid-Late Maturing Potato Varieties in the North China Group 2019-2020 [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 16-21. |
[3] | NIU Liya, YU Liang, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Weiwei. Correlation Degree Between Water Stress and Wheat Yield Traits and Grain Bulk Density [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 6-9. |
[4] | GUO Shanhu, ZHOU Zonggui, LIU Min, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Lifang, ZHAO Xuetong, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei. Effects of Soil Improvement Materials on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 62-67. |
[5] | LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, LIU Yang, WEN Zhiqiang, QIU Chunren, ZHANG Haixia, MA Zhuwen. Selection and Suitability Evaluation of Eight Introduced Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Shaoguan Ecological Tobacco Areas [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 38-44. |
[6] | YAN Yu, WANG Weijian, YAO Yutian, CHEN Chen, QIU Jun, ZHANG Xiaowei, CHEN Xijun. Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 5-11. |
[7] | WANG Xiaodan, WANG Yaliang, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, CHEN Huizhe. Nitrogen Application: Effect on Yield and Quality of Machine Transplanted Large Panicle Single Cropping Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 1-4. |
[8] | SUN Bin, ZHANG Jiajia, SONG Yujiao, HAI Fei, WANG Lei. 5% Prohexadione Calcium EA: Effects on Lodging Resistance, Yield and Its Related Factors of Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 14-17. |
[9] | JIN Wu, HE Qi, DU Xingwei, ZHU Xinyan, WEN Haibo, MA Xueyan, HE Yijin, BING Xuwen. Prediction of Crab Yield by BP Neural Network Based on Meteorological Factors of Crab Producing Areas in Jiangsu [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 50-54. |
[10] | ZHAO Jiatao, FU Zhengbo, YANG Xianghong, LIU Mengdao. Reducing Quantity and Increasing Efficiency of Chemical Fertilizer for ‘Baodamai 20’: A Preliminary Study [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 29-32. |
[11] | TIAN Tian, HAN Yu, FU Shan. The Impact of Human Capital Investment on Agricultural Development from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization: An Empirical Study [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 96-100. |
[12] | ZOU Yijing, JIANG Jianhong, WANG Guangfeng, HUANG Kaimei, LIANG Dagang, YAN Shaobing. Effects of Calabash Rootstock Grafting on Growth, Fruit Traits and Yield of Watermelon [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 50-54. |
[13] | AN Li, ZHANG Zhishan, MENG Qinglei, DONG Xuesa, ZHU Shuren, ZHU Yong’an. Morphological Characteristics and Parameters of 1-year-old Micropterus salmoides [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 59-64. |
[14] | LI Guoqing, LI Guoyu, CONG Xinjun, LI Ni. Intermission Seeding Under Millet and Peanut Intercropping: Effects on the Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 6-10. |
[15] | LIU Xiaoqing, CHEN Huatao, ZHANG Hongmei, CUI Xiaoyan, YUAN Xingxing, CHEN Xin. A New Spring Sowing Fresh Soybean Variety ‘Sukui No.3’ with High Yield and SMV Resistance: Breeding and Cultivation Techniques [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 16-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||