Journal of Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4): 7-13.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19030023
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhou Haitao1, Zhang Yanyang2, Zhao Mengyuan2, Zhang Xinjun1, Li Tianliang1, Cao Lixia1, Yuan Huifu2()
Received:
2019-03-19
Revised:
2019-04-26
Online:
2020-04-20
Published:
2020-04-20
Contact:
Yuan Huifu
E-mail:nkxyhf@163.com
CLC Number:
Zhou Haitao, Zhang Yanyang, Zhao Mengyuan, Zhang Xinjun, Li Tianliang, Cao Lixia, Yuan Huifu. S-abscisic Acid and Fulvic Acid: Effect on Oat Physiological Characteristics Under Drought Stress[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(4): 7-13.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19030023
生育期 | 水分梯度 | 处理 | 可溶性糖/(mg/g) | 可溶性蛋白/(mg/g) | 脯氨酸/(μg/mg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 | 正常 | W1CK | 7.11±0.25 a | 15.62±0.21a | 0.62±0.05 a |
W1S | 9.62±0.04 a | 22.33±0.11b | 0.85±0.07 ab | ||
W1H | 9.67±0.22 a | 21.51±0.13b | 0.87±0.02 ab | ||
中度 | W2CK | 9.81±0.24 a | 17.49±0.07 ab | 0.86±0.05 ab | |
W2S | 12.74±0.15 a | 20.61±0.09 b | 1.11±0.07 ab | ||
W2H | 13.72±0.11 a | 21.72±0.03 b | 1.25±0.07 b | ||
重度 | W3CK | 13.21±0.31 a | 19.57±0.11 ab | 1.01±0.17 ab | |
W3S | 17.96±0.04 b | 21.35±0.03 b | 1.33±0.05 b | ||
W3H | 17.88±0.06 b | 21.47±0.07 b | 1.31±0.05 b | ||
抽穗期 | 正常 | W1CK | 8.58±1.91 a | 16.36±0.07 a | 1.08±0.91 ab |
W1S | 10.52±8.79 a | 20.76±0.21 b | 1.52±0.79 c | ||
W1H | 12.01±1.13 a | 19.91±0.51 ab | 1.61±1.13 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 11.32±0.27 a | 19.45±0.03 ab | 1.29±0.27 b | |
W2S | 15.22±0.76 ab | 22.83±0.21 b | 1.42±0.76 bc | ||
W2H | 16.82±2.27 ab | 21.41±0.07 b | 1.49±2.27 bc | ||
重度 | W3CK | 15.87±2.04 ab | 22.05±0.16 b | 1.47±1.04 bc | |
W3S | 17.62±0.47 b | 24.49±0.03 c | 1.62±0.47 c | ||
W3H | 17.54±1.11 b | 26.28±0.11 c | 1.64±1.11 c | ||
灌浆期 | 正常 | W1CK | 12.33±0.13 a | 20.45±0.07 b | 1.33±0.13 b |
W1S | 16.51±0.34 ab | 22.86±0.21 b | 1.71±0.34 c | ||
W1H | 15.34±0.08 ab | 22.67±0.51 b | 1.64±0.08 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 16.42±0.32 ab | 21.47±0.03 b | 1.42±0.32 b | |
W2S | 19.19±0.09 b | 21.86±0.21 b | 1.59±0.09 c | ||
W2H | 18.16±0.11 b | 23.42±0.07 b | 1.66±0.11 c | ||
重度 | W3CK | 20.48±0.08 b | 21.63±0.16 b | 1.58±0.08 c | |
W3S | 25.29±0.19 c | 19.48±0.03 ab | 1.69±0.19 c | ||
W3H | 25.19±0.05 c | 20.27±0.11 b | 1.71±0.05 c |
生育期 | 水分梯度 | 处理 | 可溶性糖/(mg/g) | 可溶性蛋白/(mg/g) | 脯氨酸/(μg/mg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 | 正常 | W1CK | 7.11±0.25 a | 15.62±0.21a | 0.62±0.05 a |
W1S | 9.62±0.04 a | 22.33±0.11b | 0.85±0.07 ab | ||
W1H | 9.67±0.22 a | 21.51±0.13b | 0.87±0.02 ab | ||
中度 | W2CK | 9.81±0.24 a | 17.49±0.07 ab | 0.86±0.05 ab | |
W2S | 12.74±0.15 a | 20.61±0.09 b | 1.11±0.07 ab | ||
W2H | 13.72±0.11 a | 21.72±0.03 b | 1.25±0.07 b | ||
重度 | W3CK | 13.21±0.31 a | 19.57±0.11 ab | 1.01±0.17 ab | |
W3S | 17.96±0.04 b | 21.35±0.03 b | 1.33±0.05 b | ||
W3H | 17.88±0.06 b | 21.47±0.07 b | 1.31±0.05 b | ||
抽穗期 | 正常 | W1CK | 8.58±1.91 a | 16.36±0.07 a | 1.08±0.91 ab |
W1S | 10.52±8.79 a | 20.76±0.21 b | 1.52±0.79 c | ||
W1H | 12.01±1.13 a | 19.91±0.51 ab | 1.61±1.13 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 11.32±0.27 a | 19.45±0.03 ab | 1.29±0.27 b | |
W2S | 15.22±0.76 ab | 22.83±0.21 b | 1.42±0.76 bc | ||
W2H | 16.82±2.27 ab | 21.41±0.07 b | 1.49±2.27 bc | ||
重度 | W3CK | 15.87±2.04 ab | 22.05±0.16 b | 1.47±1.04 bc | |
W3S | 17.62±0.47 b | 24.49±0.03 c | 1.62±0.47 c | ||
W3H | 17.54±1.11 b | 26.28±0.11 c | 1.64±1.11 c | ||
灌浆期 | 正常 | W1CK | 12.33±0.13 a | 20.45±0.07 b | 1.33±0.13 b |
W1S | 16.51±0.34 ab | 22.86±0.21 b | 1.71±0.34 c | ||
W1H | 15.34±0.08 ab | 22.67±0.51 b | 1.64±0.08 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 16.42±0.32 ab | 21.47±0.03 b | 1.42±0.32 b | |
W2S | 19.19±0.09 b | 21.86±0.21 b | 1.59±0.09 c | ||
W2H | 18.16±0.11 b | 23.42±0.07 b | 1.66±0.11 c | ||
重度 | W3CK | 20.48±0.08 b | 21.63±0.16 b | 1.58±0.08 c | |
W3S | 25.29±0.19 c | 19.48±0.03 ab | 1.69±0.19 c | ||
W3H | 25.19±0.05 c | 20.27±0.11 b | 1.71±0.05 c |
生育期期 | 水分梯度 | 处理 | SOD/[U/(mg·min)] | POD/[U/(g·min)] | CAT/[U/(g·min)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 | 正常 | W1CK | 4.98±1.07 ab | 5.16±2.07 b | 5.94±3.31 ab |
W1S | 6.45±2.23 bc | 6.24±2.81 c | 7.86±1.22 c | ||
W1H | 7.23±0.73 a | 5.96±1.86 b | 7.68±1.07 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 4.41±0.77 ab | 4.22±1.52 ab | 4.96±1.63 a | |
W2S | 5.03±1.87 b | 5.11±1.02 ab | 6.36±1.97 bc | ||
W2H | 5.13±1.98 b | 5.68±1.17 b | 6.34±0.12 ab | ||
重度 | W3CK | 3.56±0.98 a | 2.42±0.71 a | 3.16±1.45 a | |
W3S | 4.62±0.87 ab | 4.34±1.08 ab | 5.82±1.09 ab | ||
W3H | 5.07±2.76 b | 3.22±1.98 a | 6.08±0.44 bc | ||
抽穗期 | 正常 | W1CK | 5.98±0.87 b | 5.52±1.77 b | 6.02±1.87 bc |
W1S | 6.78±1.89 bc | 7.78±0.91 c | 8.28±1.01 c | ||
W1H | 7.24±1.63 c | 6.08±1.66 bc | 9.56±1.22 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 4.34±2.76 ab | 4.08±0.57 a | 4.98±0.43 a | |
W2S | 5.28±0.98 b | 4.72±1.38 ab | 7.41±1.02 c | ||
W2H | 5.01±0.12 b | 4.91±0.01 a | 8.86±0.23 c | ||
重度 | W3CK | 3.90±1.34 a | 3.78±0.71 a | 3.51±1.51 a | |
W3S | 4.22±0.76 ab | 4.76±1.47 ab | 5.72±1.04 ab | ||
W3H | 4.06±0.77 ab | 3.81±1.89 a | 6.66±7.19 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 正常 | W1CK | 6.21±2.98 bc | 5.86±2.93 b | 7.02±1.87 bc |
W1S | 7.02±1.86 c | 7.89±1.97 c | 9.93±1.43 c | ||
W1H | 6.35±1.98 bc | 7.38±1.78 c | 8.56±0.22 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 5.04±1.77 b | 4.81±1.56 a | 5.66±1.06 ab | |
W2S | 5.38±0.81 b | 5.88±1.42 b | 7.33±1.02 c | ||
W2H | 5.87±1.76 b | 5.48±0.12 ab | 7.86±0.23 c | ||
重度 | W3CK | 4.17±1.12 a | 4.31±1.96 a | 5.51±0.51 ab | |
W3S | 4.81±0.34 ab | 4.84±1.17 ab | 6.65±1.04 bc | ||
W3H | 4.85±2.34 a | 4.48±3.19 a | 6.66±0.19 bc |
生育期期 | 水分梯度 | 处理 | SOD/[U/(mg·min)] | POD/[U/(g·min)] | CAT/[U/(g·min)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 | 正常 | W1CK | 4.98±1.07 ab | 5.16±2.07 b | 5.94±3.31 ab |
W1S | 6.45±2.23 bc | 6.24±2.81 c | 7.86±1.22 c | ||
W1H | 7.23±0.73 a | 5.96±1.86 b | 7.68±1.07 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 4.41±0.77 ab | 4.22±1.52 ab | 4.96±1.63 a | |
W2S | 5.03±1.87 b | 5.11±1.02 ab | 6.36±1.97 bc | ||
W2H | 5.13±1.98 b | 5.68±1.17 b | 6.34±0.12 ab | ||
重度 | W3CK | 3.56±0.98 a | 2.42±0.71 a | 3.16±1.45 a | |
W3S | 4.62±0.87 ab | 4.34±1.08 ab | 5.82±1.09 ab | ||
W3H | 5.07±2.76 b | 3.22±1.98 a | 6.08±0.44 bc | ||
抽穗期 | 正常 | W1CK | 5.98±0.87 b | 5.52±1.77 b | 6.02±1.87 bc |
W1S | 6.78±1.89 bc | 7.78±0.91 c | 8.28±1.01 c | ||
W1H | 7.24±1.63 c | 6.08±1.66 bc | 9.56±1.22 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 4.34±2.76 ab | 4.08±0.57 a | 4.98±0.43 a | |
W2S | 5.28±0.98 b | 4.72±1.38 ab | 7.41±1.02 c | ||
W2H | 5.01±0.12 b | 4.91±0.01 a | 8.86±0.23 c | ||
重度 | W3CK | 3.90±1.34 a | 3.78±0.71 a | 3.51±1.51 a | |
W3S | 4.22±0.76 ab | 4.76±1.47 ab | 5.72±1.04 ab | ||
W3H | 4.06±0.77 ab | 3.81±1.89 a | 6.66±7.19 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 正常 | W1CK | 6.21±2.98 bc | 5.86±2.93 b | 7.02±1.87 bc |
W1S | 7.02±1.86 c | 7.89±1.97 c | 9.93±1.43 c | ||
W1H | 6.35±1.98 bc | 7.38±1.78 c | 8.56±0.22 c | ||
中度 | W2CK | 5.04±1.77 b | 4.81±1.56 a | 5.66±1.06 ab | |
W2S | 5.38±0.81 b | 5.88±1.42 b | 7.33±1.02 c | ||
W2H | 5.87±1.76 b | 5.48±0.12 ab | 7.86±0.23 c | ||
重度 | W3CK | 4.17±1.12 a | 4.31±1.96 a | 5.51±0.51 ab | |
W3S | 4.81±0.34 ab | 4.84±1.17 ab | 6.65±1.04 bc | ||
W3H | 4.85±2.34 a | 4.48±3.19 a | 6.66±0.19 bc |
水分胁迫 | 处理 | 株高 | 干物质 | 叶面积 | SOD | POD | CAT | 产量 | 隶属平均数 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | ||||
正常 | W1CK | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 8 |
W1S | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 3 | |
W1H | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 4 | |
中度 | W2CK | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 9 |
W2S | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 6 | |
W2H | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.64 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 1 | |
重度 | W3CK | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 7 |
W3S | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 5 | |
W3H | 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.64 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.28 | 2 |
水分胁迫 | 处理 | 株高 | 干物质 | 叶面积 | SOD | POD | CAT | 产量 | 隶属平均数 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | ||||
正常 | W1CK | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 8 |
W1S | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 3 | |
W1H | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 4 | |
中度 | W2CK | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 9 |
W2S | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 6 | |
W2H | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.64 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 1 | |
重度 | W3CK | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 7 |
W3S | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 5 | |
W3H | 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.64 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.28 | 2 |
[1] | 田长叶, 张斌 . 燕麦实用技术[J]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2016: 144. |
[2] | 黄相国 . 燕麦(Avena sativa L.)的营养成分与保健价值探讨[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2004,24(4):147-149. |
[3] | 张志芬 . 腐植酸缓解燕麦干旱胁迫伤害的生理机制[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018: 12-13. |
[4] | 胡廷会 . 干旱胁迫下LCO和TH17对燕麦形态、生理指标及根际土壤环境的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2014. |
[5] | 赵海超, 刘景辉, 任永峰 , 等. 水分胁迫对内农大筱1号裸燕麦品种生长指标的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2010(1):73-76. |
[6] | 李思楠, 张超, 马彦龙 , 等. 外源2,4-D对大豆再生过程的影响[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2015,34(6):1324-1332. |
[7] | 刘芳, 袁华招, 沈心杰 , 等. 外源GA3和PP333对甜樱桃新梢生长及赤霉素代谢关键基因表达的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2013,27(3):272-278. |
[8] | 安汶铠 . 喷施2,4-表油菜素内酯(EBR)提高棉花抗旱生理响应性的研究[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2015,34(10):2217-2224. |
[9] | 周莉娜, 孙丽蓉, 毛晖 , 等. 黄腐酸抗旱营养剂对小麦和玉米生长的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012,30(1):154-158. |
[10] | 靳永胜, 仝宝胜, 李鑫 , 等. 腐植酸叶面肥在叶菜上的应用效果[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2010,25(3):5-8. |
[11] | 任学军, 杜彬, 任艳军 , 等. 腐植酸钠对镉胁迫小白菜生物效应的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(30):16888-16890. |
[12] | Gǜngör E B, Bekbölet M . Zinc release by humic and fulvic acid as influenced by pH, complexation and DOC sorption[J]. Geoderma, 2010,159:131-138. |
[13] | 李刚, 张风文, 姚晨涛 , 等. 干旱胁迫下S-诱抗素对玉米幼苗生长及生理作用的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017,53(09):1711-1716. |
[14] | 郭志刚, 郭振营 . 吲哚丁酸·S-诱抗素对苗期小麦生长的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016,44(32):29-30. |
[15] | 郭贵华, 刘海艳, 李刚华 , 等. ABA缓解水稻孕穗期干旱胁迫生理特性的分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(22):4380-4391. |
[16] | 席吉龙, 张建诚, 席凯鹏 , 等. 外源ABA对小麦抗旱性和产量性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2014(3):105-108. |
[17] | 高俊凤 . 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版公司, 2000. |
[18] | 白宝章, 史安国, 赵景阳 , 等. 植物生理学[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2001: 121. |
[19] | 高俊凤 . 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版公司, 2000: 56. |
[20] | 任永峰 . 水分胁迫对燕麦生长发育与产量的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2009: 5. |
[21] | 刘慧军, 刘景辉, 徐胜涛 , 等. 植物生长营养液对燕麦生长和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2012(1):61-6460. |
[22] | 刘伟 . 腐植酸水溶肥料对燕麦抗旱生理特性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2014. |
[23] | 韩文元 . 水分与腐植酸对燕麦抗旱惶、产置形成和品质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2014. |
[1] | LI Jing, LI Shiying, LI Qingsong. Effects of Different Amounts of Fulvic Acid on Tomato Yield and Quality [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 54-59. |
[2] | ZHAO Yubing, ZHANG Jie, LIU Liantao, SUN Donglei. Analysis of Drought Characteristics During Cotton Growing Season in Southern Hebei Province Based on SPEI [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(12): 56-62. |
[3] | Liu Yonghua, Li Xianhua, Cui Fan, Liu Cuiying. PEG Simulating Drought Stress: Effect on Physiological Characteristics of Symphytum officinale Leaves [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(6): 25-28. |
[4] | Qi Yonghong, Zhang Xinrui, Cao Sufang, Li Minquan, Li Qingqing, Li Xueping, Jiang Jingjing, Li Jiping. Ditylenchus destructor: Effects on the Cell Structure and the Physiological Characteristics of Angelica sinensis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(6): 36-41. |
[5] | Yan Yuqian, He Zhaoxiangrui, Zhu Keyun. Winter Wheat in Henan: Drought Index Characteristics and Risk Assessment [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(3): 12-19. |
[6] | Zhou Haitao, Zhang Yanyang, Zhao Mengyuan, Li Tianliang, Cao Lixia, Zhang Xinjun. S-ABA and Fulvic Acid: Effect on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Oats Under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2): 30-34. |
[7] | DAI Maohua, LIU Liying, LIU Xuemei, LI Chenhui, WU Zhenliang. Breeding of ‘Hengmian 1670’: A Cotton Variety with Salt and Drought Tolerance, Good Quality and High Yield [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(12): 40-43. |
[8] | Kang Haiqi, Pan Yinghua, Sun Xiaowen, Han Youxue, Gao Lijun, Cao Yan, Gao Ju, Kang Jiarong, Li Xingyue, Zhang Hong. Gradient Quantitative Evaluation of Water Saving and Drought Resistance Characteristics of Hybrid Rice Combinations [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(10): 1-8. |
[9] | Meng Limei, Yang Ziguang, Sun Junwei, Zhang Ke, Guo Junwei. Drought Resistance Identification of Wheat Varieties in Huanghuai Dryland Group: Comparative Analysis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(8): 6-12. |
[10] | Zhi Xun, Lin Zhongguan, Sha Li, Li Shi, Su Hang. Agricultural Drought Hazard Characteristics in Southern Sichuan During 1989-2019 [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(8): 78-82. |
[11] | Liao Yaoming, Pan Jiangping, Lv Yuan. Climatic Suitability for Camellia oleifera Production in Shaoyang, Hunan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(7): 62-68. |
[12] | Ren Yuanyu, Wei Dongwei, Wang Zhongwei, Zhou Yaping. Total Flavonoids in Maize Seedlings Before and After Drought Stress: Determination with Sodium Nitrite-Aluminum Nitrate Colorimetry [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(5): 15-20. |
[13] | Feng Xiaolei, Shi Gaolei, Zhang Xiaolei, Zhao Zhihai, Wang Xiaoming. Effect of Plant Pattern and Density on Yield of Hybrid Millet 'ZZG 19' in Ordos Region [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(5): 26-30. |
[14] | Wang Yinghong, Cheng Yumin, Zhao Liangjin, Ma Huaping, Ma Xiaohong, Dong Yun. Breeding and Trait Analysis of a New Drought-Resistant Wheat Variety ‘Xinmai 39’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(10): 7-11. |
[15] | . New Winter Wheat Variety‘Changmai 6197’with Drought Resistance and High Yield: Breeding [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(5): 1-4. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||