Journal of Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 23-29.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20191200296
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Jiamin(), Wang Yang, Niu Jincan, Zhang Zhiru, Liu Zhibin, Zhu Qiuhui, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang()
Received:
2019-12-07
Revised:
2020-04-29
Online:
2021-02-20
Published:
2021-02-24
Contact:
Huang Yufang
E-mail:3030398322@qq.com;503593726@qq.com
CLC Number:
Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Niu Jincan, Zhang Zhiru, Liu Zhibin, Zhu Qiuhui, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Densification on Corn Yield and Lodging Resistance Under Different Nitrogen Levels[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2): 23-29.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20191200296
处理 | 北青340 | 登海605 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
百粒重/g | 穗粒数/个 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 百粒重/g | 穗粒数/个 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | |||
LD | N0 | 30.7c | 554.3a | 7599.9d | 30.1a | 580.7a | 7821.3cd | |
N180 | 34.5a | 592.6a | 9096.4bc | 30.0a | 601.1a | 8034.3bcd | ||
N360 | 32.7b | 598.7a | 8732.0cd | 26.7c | 600.3a | 7162.1d | ||
均值 | 32.6 | 581.9 | 8476.1 | 28.9 | 594.4 | 7672.4 | ||
HD | N0 | 31.2bc | 550.1a | 10949.8a | 29.1ab | 494.3b | 9194.2ab | |
N180 | 31.2bc | 564.5a | 11240.5a | 30.6a | 521.0b | 10178.5a | ||
N360 | 30.2c | 539.8a | 10406.0ab | 27.3bc | 496.3b | 8646.3bc | ||
均值 | 30.9 | 551.5 | 10865.5 | 29.0 | 504.2 | 9339.7 |
处理 | 北青340 | 登海605 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
百粒重/g | 穗粒数/个 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 百粒重/g | 穗粒数/个 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | |||
LD | N0 | 30.7c | 554.3a | 7599.9d | 30.1a | 580.7a | 7821.3cd | |
N180 | 34.5a | 592.6a | 9096.4bc | 30.0a | 601.1a | 8034.3bcd | ||
N360 | 32.7b | 598.7a | 8732.0cd | 26.7c | 600.3a | 7162.1d | ||
均值 | 32.6 | 581.9 | 8476.1 | 28.9 | 594.4 | 7672.4 | ||
HD | N0 | 31.2bc | 550.1a | 10949.8a | 29.1ab | 494.3b | 9194.2ab | |
N180 | 31.2bc | 564.5a | 11240.5a | 30.6a | 521.0b | 10178.5a | ||
N360 | 30.2c | 539.8a | 10406.0ab | 27.3bc | 496.3b | 8646.3bc | ||
均值 | 30.9 | 551.5 | 10865.5 | 29.0 | 504.2 | 9339.7 |
品种 | 密度 | 氮水平 | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力/(kg/kg) | 氮素收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
北青340 | LD | N0 | - | - | 80.2a |
N180 | 7.6ab | 49.8b | 75.2abc | ||
N360 | 4.1b | 25.2d | 69.3bc | ||
HD | N0 | - | - | 77.8ab | |
N180 | 9.0a | 62.5a | 66.6c | ||
N360 | 3.1b | 29.8c | 65.4c | ||
登海605 | LD | N0 | - | - | 85.6a |
N180 | 3.0ab | 44.6b | 83.2ab | ||
N360 | 0.0bc | 20.8d | 80.9ab | ||
HD | N0 | - | - | 78.5b | |
N180 | 5.5a | 56.6a | 70.0c | ||
N360 | -1.5c | 24.0c | 65.4c |
品种 | 密度 | 氮水平 | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力/(kg/kg) | 氮素收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
北青340 | LD | N0 | - | - | 80.2a |
N180 | 7.6ab | 49.8b | 75.2abc | ||
N360 | 4.1b | 25.2d | 69.3bc | ||
HD | N0 | - | - | 77.8ab | |
N180 | 9.0a | 62.5a | 66.6c | ||
N360 | 3.1b | 29.8c | 65.4c | ||
登海605 | LD | N0 | - | - | 85.6a |
N180 | 3.0ab | 44.6b | 83.2ab | ||
N360 | 0.0bc | 20.8d | 80.9ab | ||
HD | N0 | - | - | 78.5b | |
N180 | 5.5a | 56.6a | 70.0c | ||
N360 | -1.5c | 24.0c | 65.4c |
品种 | 密度 | 氮水平 | 产值 | 肥料成本 | 种子成本 | 其他生产成本 | 经济效益 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北青340 | LD | N0 | 1.37 | 0.10 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
N180 | 1.61 | 0.18 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.91 | ||
N360 | 1.63 | 0.26 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.85 | ||
HD | N0 | 1.73 | 0.10 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.08 | |
N180 | 2.02 | 0.18 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.29 | ||
N360 | 1.93 | 0.26 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.12 | ||
登海605 | LD | N0 | 1.35 | 0.10 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.73 |
N180 | 1.45 | 0.18 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.75 | ||
N360 | 1.35 | 0.26 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.57 | ||
HD | N0 | 1.65 | 0.10 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.00 | |
N180 | 1.83 | 0.18 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.10 | ||
N360 | 1.56 | 0.26 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
品种 | 密度 | 氮水平 | 产值 | 肥料成本 | 种子成本 | 其他生产成本 | 经济效益 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北青340 | LD | N0 | 1.37 | 0.10 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
N180 | 1.61 | 0.18 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.91 | ||
N360 | 1.63 | 0.26 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.85 | ||
HD | N0 | 1.73 | 0.10 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.08 | |
N180 | 2.02 | 0.18 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.29 | ||
N360 | 1.93 | 0.26 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.12 | ||
登海605 | LD | N0 | 1.35 | 0.10 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.73 |
N180 | 1.45 | 0.18 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.75 | ||
N360 | 1.35 | 0.26 | 0.069 | 0.45 | 0.57 | ||
HD | N0 | 1.65 | 0.10 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.00 | |
N180 | 1.83 | 0.18 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 1.10 | ||
N360 | 1.56 | 0.26 | 0.098 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
品种 | 密度 | 氮水平 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 穗位高/cm | 茎粗系数/% | 穗位高系数/% | 重心高度/m | 抗折力/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北青340 | LD | N0 | 305.7b | 5.8d | 112.0b | 1.9d | 36.7b | 107.0ab | 277.0e |
N180 | 315.3ab | 8.0a | 115.3b | 2.5a | 36.6b | 109.3ab | 582.4a | ||
N360 | 327.0a | 7.3ab | 122.3ab | 2.2b | 37.4ab | 112.0a | 468.9b | ||
HD | N0 | 316.3ab | 6.2cd | 130.3a | 2.0cd | 41.2a | 112.0a | 316.3d | |
N180 | 314.3ab | 7.3ab | 111.7b | 2.3ab | 35.5b | 107.0ab | 343.6c | ||
N360 | 315.3ab | 6.9bc | 115.0b | 2.2bc | 36.5b | 102.7b | 312.3d | ||
登海605 | LD | N0 | 285.3ab | 5.7bc | 114.7ab | 2.0b | 40.2ab | 109.0a | 301.3b |
N180 | 288.3ab | 6.2b | 116.7ab | 2.1ab | 38.4b | 103.0bc | 315.9a | ||
N360 | 284.0ab | 6.1bc | 112.7b | 2.1ab | 39.6b | 101.7bc | 275.6c | ||
HD | N0 | 282.3b | 5.5c | 123.3a | 1.9b | 43.7a | 106.3ab | 243.6d | |
N180 | 292.0a | 6.8a | 120.3ab | 2.3a | 38.9b | 102.7bc | 301.3b | ||
N360 | 292.3a | 6.2b | 115.0ab | 2.1ab | 42.8ab | 98.7c | 242.1d |
品种 | 密度 | 氮水平 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 穗位高/cm | 茎粗系数/% | 穗位高系数/% | 重心高度/m | 抗折力/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北青340 | LD | N0 | 305.7b | 5.8d | 112.0b | 1.9d | 36.7b | 107.0ab | 277.0e |
N180 | 315.3ab | 8.0a | 115.3b | 2.5a | 36.6b | 109.3ab | 582.4a | ||
N360 | 327.0a | 7.3ab | 122.3ab | 2.2b | 37.4ab | 112.0a | 468.9b | ||
HD | N0 | 316.3ab | 6.2cd | 130.3a | 2.0cd | 41.2a | 112.0a | 316.3d | |
N180 | 314.3ab | 7.3ab | 111.7b | 2.3ab | 35.5b | 107.0ab | 343.6c | ||
N360 | 315.3ab | 6.9bc | 115.0b | 2.2bc | 36.5b | 102.7b | 312.3d | ||
登海605 | LD | N0 | 285.3ab | 5.7bc | 114.7ab | 2.0b | 40.2ab | 109.0a | 301.3b |
N180 | 288.3ab | 6.2b | 116.7ab | 2.1ab | 38.4b | 103.0bc | 315.9a | ||
N360 | 284.0ab | 6.1bc | 112.7b | 2.1ab | 39.6b | 101.7bc | 275.6c | ||
HD | N0 | 282.3b | 5.5c | 123.3a | 1.9b | 43.7a | 106.3ab | 243.6d | |
N180 | 292.0a | 6.8a | 120.3ab | 2.3a | 38.9b | 102.7bc | 301.3b | ||
N360 | 292.3a | 6.2b | 115.0ab | 2.1ab | 42.8ab | 98.7c | 242.1d |
项目 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 穗位高/cm | 茎粗系数/% | 穗位高系数/% | 重心高度/m | 抗折力/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.421* | 0.450** | 0.196 | 0.314 | -0.056 | 0.057 | 0.374* |
株高/cm | 0.613** | 0.063 | 0.221 | -0.483** | 0.375* | 0.650** | |
茎粗/cm | -0.138 | 0.888** | -0.467** | 0.157 | 0.752** | ||
穗位高/cm | -0.195 | 0.809** | 0.163 | -0.098 | |||
茎粗系数/% | -0.309 | -0.026 | 0.553** | ||||
穗位高系数/% | -0.110 | -0.483** | |||||
重心高度/cm | 0.494** |
项目 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 穗位高/cm | 茎粗系数/% | 穗位高系数/% | 重心高度/m | 抗折力/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量/(kg/hm2) | 0.421* | 0.450** | 0.196 | 0.314 | -0.056 | 0.057 | 0.374* |
株高/cm | 0.613** | 0.063 | 0.221 | -0.483** | 0.375* | 0.650** | |
茎粗/cm | -0.138 | 0.888** | -0.467** | 0.157 | 0.752** | ||
穗位高/cm | -0.195 | 0.809** | 0.163 | -0.098 | |||
茎粗系数/% | -0.309 | -0.026 | 0.553** | ||||
穗位高系数/% | -0.110 | -0.483** | |||||
重心高度/cm | 0.494** |
[1] | 河南省统计局. 河南统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2015. |
[2] | 臧贺藏, 王言景, 张杰, 等. 不同密氮模式下高产玉米品种籽粒产量与氮素利用特性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2017,32(3):196-200. |
[3] | 刘晨峰, 王正宁, 贺康宁, 等. 黄土半干旱区几张人工林的土壤水分、光照变化及其对林分的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2004,33(3):34-41. |
[4] | 况福虹, 朱波, 徐泰平, 等. 川中丘陵区施肥制度对夏玉米生物性状和产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2006,19(1):90-95. |
[5] | 唐保军, 丁勇, 等. 种植密度对玉米产量及主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 中国种业, 2008,10(14):35-37. |
[6] | 徐田军, 吕天放, 陈传永, 等. 种植密度和植物生长调节剂对玉米茎秆性状的影响及调控[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(4):56-65. |
[7] | 陆景陵, 植物营养学(上册)[M]. 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 273. |
[8] |
Dudley J W. Selection for rind puncture resistance in two maize population[J]. Crop Science, 1994,34(6):1458-1460.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400060007x URL |
[9] | 易镇邪, 王璞, 陈平平, 等. 氮肥类型对夏玉米氮素吸收和利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14(2):472-478. |
[10] | 肖焱波, 段宗颜, 苏凡, 等. 玉米不同种植方式氮肥合理施用研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2002,10(1):78-80. |
[11] | 张福锁, 马文奇. 肥料投入水平与养分资源高效利用的关系[J]. 土壤与环境, 2000(2):154-157. |
[12] | 李强, 马晓君, 程秋博, 等. 氮肥对不同耐低氮性玉米品种干物质及氮素积累与分配的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报:农学与生命科学版, 2015,41(5):527-536. |
[13] |
张经廷, 刘云鹏, 李旭辉, 等. 夏玉米各器官氮素积累与分配动态及其对氮肥的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2013,39(3):506-514.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00506 URL |
[14] | 马兴林. 种植密度对3个玉米杂交种产量及品质的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2005,3(3):84-86. |
[15] | 梁书荣, 赵会杰, 李洪歧, 等. 密度、种植方式和品种对夏玉米群体发育特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(7):1927-1931. |
[16] | 张丽琼. 调节施氮量和种植密度,优化冬小麦抗倒性能获得高产[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2016. |
[17] | 张倩, 张明才, 刘明, 等. 氮肥-生长调节剂对寒地春玉米植株形态及产量的互作效应研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2014,19(5):29-37. |
[18] | 赵松岭, 李凤民, 张大勇, 等. 作物生产是一个种群过程[J]. 生态学报, 1997,17(1):100-104. |
[19] | 张子军, 杜新东, 范玉宝, 等. 不同种植密度与施氮量对玉米产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2016(7):13-14. |
[20] |
吕丽华, 陶洪斌, 夏来坤, 等. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2008,34(3):447-455.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00447 URL |
[21] | 尤艳华, 吕秋实, 杨继峰, 等. 玉米新品种兴玉1号在兴安盟地区适宜种植密度与施氮量[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017(4):21-23. |
[22] | 舒中兵, 黎礼谦, 段明禹, 等. 密度、施氮量和播种期对贵农玉008号玉米产量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2013,41(7):1001-3601. |
[23] | 魏淑丽, 王志刚, 于晓芳, 等. 施氮量和密度互作对玉米产量和氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(3):382-391. |
[24] |
曹胜彪, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 等. 施氮量和种植密度对高产夏玉米产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(6):1343-1353.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.12135 URL |
[25] | 曹玉军, 窦金刚, 高玉山, 等. 施氮对不同种植密度玉米产量和子粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2015,23(6):136-141. |
[26] |
蔡红光, 袁静超, 刘剑钊, 等. 高密度种植条件下春玉米氮素的需求规律与适宜施氮量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):1995-2005.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.005 URL |
[27] |
Flint-Garcia S A, Darrah L L, Mcmullen M D, et al. Phenotypic versus marker-assisted selection for stalk strength and second-generation European corn borer resistance in maize[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003,107(7):1331-1336.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1387-9 URL |
[28] |
Peiffer J A, Flint-Garcia S A, De Leon N, et al. The genetic architecture of maize stalk strength[J]. PloS one, 2013,8(6):e67066.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067066 URL pmid: 23840585 |
[29] | 杨青华, 冉午玲, 李蕾蕾, 等. 玉米茎秆性状与倒伏的相关性及其通径分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2016,50(2):167-170. |
[30] | 邓妍, 王创云, 赵丽, 等. 群体密度对玉米茎秆性状、土壤水分的影响及其与产量、倒伏率的关系[J]. 华北农学报, 2017,32(5):216-223. |
[1] | HE Mi, LI Xiaobo, HUANG Jing, HUANG Guangfu. The Relationship Between Leaf Area Index and Yield of Rice: Research Progress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 1-5. |
[2] | MENG Yanyu, JING Yanjie, ZHOU Yinfu. Nitrogen Application Rate: Effects on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Grain Filling Characteristics of Maize [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 10-15. |
[3] | LIN Tuanrong, WANG Yufeng, WANG Zhen, FAN Longqiu, ZHANG Zhicheng, WANG Wei, HUANG Wenjuan, JIAO Xinlei, WANG Yiqian, XING Jin, YIN Yuhe. Regional Trials of Mid-Late Maturing Potato Varieties in the North China Group 2019-2020 [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 16-21. |
[4] | NIU Liya, YU Liang, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Weiwei. Correlation Degree Between Water Stress and Wheat Yield Traits and Grain Bulk Density [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 6-9. |
[5] | GUO Shanhu, ZHOU Zonggui, LIU Min, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Lifang, ZHAO Xuetong, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei. Effects of Soil Improvement Materials on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 62-67. |
[6] | LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, LIU Yang, WEN Zhiqiang, QIU Chunren, ZHANG Haixia, MA Zhuwen. Selection and Suitability Evaluation of Eight Introduced Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Shaoguan Ecological Tobacco Areas [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 38-44. |
[7] | YAN Yu, WANG Weijian, YAO Yutian, CHEN Chen, QIU Jun, ZHANG Xiaowei, CHEN Xijun. Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 5-11. |
[8] | LIU Xingzhou, LI Meng, ZHANG Jian, CHEN Ruiji, FU Hua, MA Guimei, ZHOU Yanhu, ZHUAG Xiaolin. The Dehydration and Mechanical-harvesting of Maize Grain: Research Progress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 64-68. |
[9] | WANG Xiaodan, WANG Yaliang, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, CHEN Huizhe. Nitrogen Application: Effect on Yield and Quality of Machine Transplanted Large Panicle Single Cropping Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 1-4. |
[10] | SUN Bin, ZHANG Jiajia, SONG Yujiao, HAI Fei, WANG Lei. 5% Prohexadione Calcium EA: Effects on Lodging Resistance, Yield and Its Related Factors of Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 14-17. |
[11] | CHEN Jun, ZHANG Haijun, HAN Mingming, JIANG Fangshan. Row Spacing Configuration with Water-soluble Amino Acid Fertilizer and Betaine Affect the Physiological Effect and Harvest Index of Mechanical Harvesting Summer Maize Cultivars [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 18-23. |
[12] | JIN Wu, HE Qi, DU Xingwei, ZHU Xinyan, WEN Haibo, MA Xueyan, HE Yijin, BING Xuwen. Prediction of Crab Yield by BP Neural Network Based on Meteorological Factors of Crab Producing Areas in Jiangsu [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 50-54. |
[13] | ZHAO Jiatao, FU Zhengbo, YANG Xianghong, LIU Mengdao. Reducing Quantity and Increasing Efficiency of Chemical Fertilizer for ‘Baodamai 20’: A Preliminary Study [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 29-32. |
[14] | SUN Yingying, WANG Chao, WANG Ruixia, MU Qiuhuan, MI Yong, LV Guangde, QI Xiaolei, SUN Xianyin, CHEN Yongjun, QIAN Zhaoguo, WU Ke. Wheat Lodging: Cause and Mechanism and Its Effect on Wheat Yield and Quality [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 1-5. |
[15] | ZOU Yijing, JIANG Jianhong, WANG Guangfeng, HUANG Kaimei, LIANG Dagang, YAN Shaobing. Effects of Calabash Rootstock Grafting on Growth, Fruit Traits and Yield of Watermelon [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 50-54. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||