
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (10): 65-79.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0155
Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Feng1(
), DONG Yang1, ZHAO Fuyang1, HOU Xiaomin1, LI Qingquan1, SUN Haoyue1, DI Guili2(
)
Received:2024-08-13
Revised:2024-11-13
Online:2025-10-20
Published:2025-10-17
YAN Feng, DONG Yang, ZHAO Fuyang, HOU Xiaomin, LI Qingquan, SUN Haoyue, DI Guili. Effects of Different Additives on Silage Quality of Broomcorn Millet Straw[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(10): 65-79.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0155
| 项目 | 评分标准 | 分数/分 |
|---|---|---|
| 气味 | 无丁酸臭味,有芳香果味或明显的面包香味 | 14 |
| 有微弱的丁酸臭味,或较强的酸味、芳香味弱 | 10 | |
| 丁酸味颇重,或有刺鼻的焦糊臭或霉味 | 4 | |
| 有很强的丁酸嗅,或几乎无酸味 | 2 | |
| 质地 | 茎叶结构保持良好 | 4 |
| 叶子结构保持较差 | 2 | |
| 茎叶结构保存极差或发现有轻度霉菌或轻度污染 | 1 | |
| 茎叶有腐烂或污染严重 | 0 | |
| 色泽 | 与原料相似,烘干后呈淡褐色 | 2 |
| 略有变色,呈淡黄色或带褐色 | 1 | |
| 变色严重,墨绿色或褪色成黄色 | 0 |
| 项目 | 评分标准 | 分数/分 |
|---|---|---|
| 气味 | 无丁酸臭味,有芳香果味或明显的面包香味 | 14 |
| 有微弱的丁酸臭味,或较强的酸味、芳香味弱 | 10 | |
| 丁酸味颇重,或有刺鼻的焦糊臭或霉味 | 4 | |
| 有很强的丁酸嗅,或几乎无酸味 | 2 | |
| 质地 | 茎叶结构保持良好 | 4 |
| 叶子结构保持较差 | 2 | |
| 茎叶结构保存极差或发现有轻度霉菌或轻度污染 | 1 | |
| 茎叶有腐烂或污染严重 | 0 | |
| 色泽 | 与原料相似,烘干后呈淡褐色 | 2 |
| 略有变色,呈淡黄色或带褐色 | 1 | |
| 变色严重,墨绿色或褪色成黄色 | 0 |
| 处理 | DM | CP | ADF | NDF | WSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 33.51±0.46c | 3.19±0.10c | 37.74±1.03a | 65.83±2.70a | 1.85±0.06a |
| T1 | 37.23±0.39a | 3.69±0.08a | 38.20±0.92a | 60.03±2.58c | 1.16±0.10b |
| T2 | 35.19±0.31b | 3.14±0.04c | 38.02±1.84a | 63.46±1.98b | 1.44±0.05bc |
| T3 | 33.85±0.28c | 3.37±0.04b | 37.67±1.94a | 57.73±2.04d | 1.38±0.10bc |
| T4 | 33.87±0.51c | 3.42±0.05b | 37.85±1.50a | 62.99±1.59b | 1.62±0.07c |
| 处理 | DM | CP | ADF | NDF | WSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 33.51±0.46c | 3.19±0.10c | 37.74±1.03a | 65.83±2.70a | 1.85±0.06a |
| T1 | 37.23±0.39a | 3.69±0.08a | 38.20±0.92a | 60.03±2.58c | 1.16±0.10b |
| T2 | 35.19±0.31b | 3.14±0.04c | 38.02±1.84a | 63.46±1.98b | 1.44±0.05bc |
| T3 | 33.85±0.28c | 3.37±0.04b | 37.67±1.94a | 57.73±2.04d | 1.38±0.10bc |
| T4 | 33.87±0.51c | 3.42±0.05b | 37.85±1.50a | 62.99±1.59b | 1.62±0.07c |
| 指标 | 权重/% | CK | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 12.82 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.91 | 0.96 |
| NH3-N | 21.67 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| DM | 5.26 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| CP | 8.18 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.51 |
| ADF | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| NDF | 6.42 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.35 |
| WSC | 21.99 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.67 |
| AS | 22.95 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.59 |
| D值排序 | - | 0.235 | 0.721 | 0.424 | 0.702 | 0.623 |
| 指标 | 权重/% | CK | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 12.82 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.91 | 0.96 |
| NH3-N | 21.67 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| DM | 5.26 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| CP | 8.18 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.51 |
| ADF | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| NDF | 6.42 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.35 |
| WSC | 21.99 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.67 |
| AS | 22.95 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.59 |
| D值排序 | - | 0.235 | 0.721 | 0.424 | 0.702 | 0.623 |
| [1] |
陈国秋. 适宜辽西地区种植的糜子品种研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2008(1):110-113.
|
| [2] |
柴岩, 万富世. 中国小杂粮产业发展报告[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2007.
|
| [3] |
于梅, 王明利, 李长忠. “粮改饲”政策实施成效、问题及建议—以山东省为例[J]. 中国乳业, 2019(4):63-67.
|
| [4] |
吴宝华, 薛淑媛. 干糜子茎叶营养成分及对肉羊营养价值评价研究[J]. 现代农业, 2015(12):64-65.
|
| [5] |
智慧, 牛振刚, 贾冠清, 等. 谷子干草饲用品质性状变异及相关性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(5):800-807.
|
| [6] |
康健, 匡彦蓓, 盛捷. 10种作物秸杆的营养品质分析[J]. 草业科学, 2014, 31(10):191-196.
|
| [7] |
王超, 张永虎, 杨飞雁, 等. 添加糖蜜和植物乳杆菌对糜子茎叶黄贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(3):28-31.
|
| [8] |
殷术鑫, 曲永利, 辛小月, 等. 不同青贮添加剂对全株玉米青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2019, 39(2):24-27.
|
| [9] |
徐炜, 师尚礼, 祁娟, 等. 不同添加剂对夏河县紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(2):414-419.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.02.032 |
| [10] |
郁冯艳, 华金玲, 郭亮, 等. 不同青贮添加剂对甜高粱青贮品质的影响[J]. 安徽科技学院学报, 2018, 32(6):1-6.
|
| [11] |
李元迎, 李万贵, 李瑞影. 谷草青贮注意事项及品质评价[J]. 现代农村科技, 2017(3):95-96.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
甘肃农业大学草原系. 草原生态化学实习实验指导[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1985:48-66.
|
| [14] |
高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
|
| [15] |
孙东雷, 卞能飞, 王幸, 等. 高油酸花生萌发期耐冷性综合评价及种质筛选[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(6):1263-1272.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.06.1263 |
| [16] |
张养东, 杨军香, 王宗伟, 等. 青贮饲料理化品质评定研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2016, 52(12):37-42.
|
| [17] |
甄霆, 邢熙媛, 余晨, 等. 不同添加剂对黑麦草青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2022(3):133-136.
|
| [18] |
汤磊. 添加剂对西藏农作物茎叶与牧草混合青贮发酵品质的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2013:20-21.
|
| [19] |
杜昭昌, 王全, 门艳红, 等. 稻壳和麦鼓对鲜玉米秸杆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7):1549-1554.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.07.022 |
| [20] |
郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 等. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贝品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5):1113-1117.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.029 |
| [21] |
兴丽, 韩鲁佳, 刘贤, 等. 乳酸菌和纤维素酶对个株玉米青贮发酵品质和微生物菌落的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2004(5):38-41.
|
| [22] |
李旭业, 董扬, 尤海洋, 等. 添加剂对全株玉米青贮饲料有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017(11下):187-189.
|
| [23] |
王啸林, 冯冠智, 张城瑞, 等. 乳酸菌和纤维素酶对马铃薯渣与玉米茎叶混合青贮发酵品质、有氧稳定性和体外发酵参数的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(4):201-207.
|
| [24] |
董志浩, 原现军, 闻爱友, 等. 添加乳酸菌和发酵底物对桑叶青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6):167-174.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015416 |
| [25] |
贺婷婷, 王旭哲, 宋磊, 等. 不同添加剂对油莎豆青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7):1767-1775.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.024 |
| [26] |
魏晓斌, 殷国梅, 薛艳林, 等. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(6):86-90.
|
| [27] |
张英, 周汉林, 刘国道, 等. 绿汁发酵液与纤维素酶对王草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(10):1640-1647.
|
| [28] |
赵牧其尔, 王志军, 包健, 等. 不同青贮添加剂对饲用谷子青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4):1021-1026.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.030 |
| [1] | SUN Yuqiang, FANG Zhu, XIAO Hui, ZHANG Jianfa, JIA Ying, LI Danlin, ZHAO Yanna. Quality Evaluation of Cultivated Land and Soil Nutrient Status in Ningjinpo-Daluze Low Plain Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 21-29. |
| [2] | ZHU Li, TAN Yanrong, LIU Donghao, ZHANG Yangdong, CHEN Wenye, XIAO Yunfei, WANG Binjie, BING Danhui. Responses of Different Land Use Types to Ecological and Environmental Quality Changes in Maqu County [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 37-43. |
| [3] | ZHOU Zhongwen, QI Yue, LIU Ying, LEI Jun. Effects of Sowing Schedule Adjustment on Yield and Quality of Spring Maize in Semi-arid Zone of Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 6-13. |
| [4] | WANG Xingfu, YANG Junzhang, YU Zhi, XU Zhangqiang, LUO Ming. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cigar Leaf in Suijiang, Yunnan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 47-52. |
| [5] | BAI Jingjing, LEI Bin, ZHANG Xiang, GAO Rongrong, ZHANG Yanyan, WANG Ning, LI Zhenjiao, LI Hailu, GUO Ai. Introduction and Test Cultivation of Lily in Yulin [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 59-63. |
| [6] | TANG Min, HUANG Jian, LU Weipeng, ZHANG Hong, WANG Zhushi, MA Zhanfeng, YANG Xikun, XIAO Fei. Differences in Color Value and SPAD of Tobacco Leaves with Different Ripeness and Their Effects on Quality of Cured Tobacco Leaves [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 69-76. |
| [7] | WANG Jinxiu, LIU Jiabin, LIN Qi, LIU Yiguo, ZHOU Yuan, DUAN Wenping, GENG Xinghua, LI Lingyan, SHI Changhai. Effects of Sowing Date on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of Quinoa [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 1-7. |
| [8] | ZHANG Xiaojie, CHEN Junling, WANG Shasha, LI Yanchun, LI Zhaowei, WANG Yixiang. Screening and Application of Cellulose Degradation Bacteria: A Review [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(6): 50-56. |
| [9] | SUN Xu, CHEN Yuezhen, CHEN Chen, WANG Lixiang, WEI Yongju, SUN Yuehua, LI Yapeng, LIU Peizhuo, WANG Guanglong, XIONG Aisheng. Comparative Analysis of Agronomic Characters, Photosynthetic Parameters and Quality Characters of Celery in Autumn and Winter in Huai’an Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(6): 65-70. |
| [10] | QIN Huawei, GAO Junjie, WANG Ting, HAN Long, LIU Zhongliang, CHEN Zhen, YAN Weiqiang, GU Duanyin. Effects of N P K Fertilizers Combined Application on Yield and Quality of Chinese Chive [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(6): 71-76. |
| [11] | QU Yang, MA Wen, LIU Xiaoting, XUE Yuying, YU Longhui, YAN Junping, WANG Kezhen. Effects of Sowing Depth and Seed Coating on Seedling Growth, Photosynthetic Performance, Yield and Quality of Summer Soybean [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 1-6. |
| [12] | ZHANG Peng, YANG Xukun, CHEN Lu, WANG Wenzhi, MI Yanhua, LIU Zhenhuan, LI Maoxuan, SU Wen, WANG Xiangquan, YANG Yanxiong, GUO Lujun. Study on Effects of Organic and Conventional Planting Modes on Quality and Economic Benefits of Rice in Yunnan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 12-19. |
| [13] | HOU Yilong, MA Ruiqi, LI Zheng, SHI Wuliang, LI Bin, ZHANG Shengwu, CAO Ning, CUI Jinhu, ZHANG Yubin. Hotspots and Prospect of Minimum Data Set (MDS) in Soil Quality Assessment Based on Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 48-61. |
| [14] | LIU Xiaoyan, LOU Li, ZHANG Nan, LING Zhaoxun, ZHANG Aoqi, ZHANG Wanming, YAN Jiakun. Effect of Silicon on Physiological Characteristics of Licorice Under Long-term Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(4): 13-21. |
| [15] | WANG Ruonan, XU Bing, LIANG Jing, WU Haibing. Impact of Soil Conditioner on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Urban Relocation Sites [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(4): 22-27. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||