Journal of Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2): 1-6.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190700133
Special Issue: 水稻
Chen Piao1, Li Jiawen2(), Huang Binxiang1, Hu Liting1, Tan Ying3, Pan Xuebiao1
Received:
2019-07-23
Revised:
2019-08-21
Online:
2020-02-24
Published:
2020-02-24
Contact:
Jiawen Li
E-mail:lzlijiawen@126.com
CLC Number:
Chen Piao, Li Jiawen, Huang Binxiang, Hu Liting, Tan Ying, Pan Xuebiao. Rice Yield in Typical Areas of Guangxi: Components Analysis[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(2): 1-6.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190700133
品种编号 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 有效穗/(万/hm2) | 总粒数/穗 | 实粒数/穗 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅱ | 539.2a | 15.6c | 167.5a | 150.2a | 89.9a | 24.5b |
Ⅰ | 521.8ab | 19.3a | 143.0b | 114.3c | 79.9bc | 24.8b |
Ⅵ | 514.7ab | 17.7ab | 136.1b | 114.4c | 85.0ab | 24.8b |
Ⅲ | 477.4bc | 16.4bc | 168.7a | 132.0b | 78.3bc | 25.5b |
Ⅴ | 477.9c | 16.9bc | 174.4a | 131.8b | 76.3c | 24.8b |
Ⅳ | 471.0c | 18.3ab | 132.4b | 95.8d | 72.9c | 29.3a |
品种编号 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 有效穗/(万/hm2) | 总粒数/穗 | 实粒数/穗 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅱ | 539.2a | 15.6c | 167.5a | 150.2a | 89.9a | 24.5b |
Ⅰ | 521.8ab | 19.3a | 143.0b | 114.3c | 79.9bc | 24.8b |
Ⅵ | 514.7ab | 17.7ab | 136.1b | 114.4c | 85.0ab | 24.8b |
Ⅲ | 477.4bc | 16.4bc | 168.7a | 132.0b | 78.3bc | 25.5b |
Ⅴ | 477.9c | 16.9bc | 174.4a | 131.8b | 76.3c | 24.8b |
Ⅳ | 471.0c | 18.3ab | 132.4b | 95.8d | 72.9c | 29.3a |
数据类别 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 有效穗/(万/hm2) | 总粒数/穗 | 实粒数/穗 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 | 500.4 | 17.4 | 153.7 | 123.1 | 80.4 | 25.6 |
标准差 | 26.04 | 1.22 | 16.94 | 17.26 | 5.61 | 1.67 |
变化范围 | 471.0~539.2 | 15.6~19.3 | 132.4~174.4 | 95.8~150.2 | 72.9~89.9 | 24.5~29.3 |
变异系数/% | 5.20 | 7.05 | 11.02 | 14.02 | 6.98 | 6.54 |
数据类别 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 有效穗/(万/hm2) | 总粒数/穗 | 实粒数/穗 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 | 500.4 | 17.4 | 153.7 | 123.1 | 80.4 | 25.6 |
标准差 | 26.04 | 1.22 | 16.94 | 17.26 | 5.61 | 1.67 |
变化范围 | 471.0~539.2 | 15.6~19.3 | 132.4~174.4 | 95.8~150.2 | 72.9~89.9 | 24.5~29.3 |
变异系数/% | 5.20 | 7.05 | 11.02 | 14.02 | 6.98 | 6.54 |
组别 | X0 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 1.492762 | -1.44301 | 0.815603 | 1.570946 | 1.695049 | -0.66677 |
Ⅱ | 0.824476 | 1.579145 | -0.63064 | -0.50884 | -0.08609 | -0.48764 |
Ⅲ | 0.551784 | 0.272266 | -1.03795 | -0.50305 | 0.822292 | -0.48764 |
Ⅳ | -0.88081 | -0.78957 | 0.88644 | 0.516568 | -0.37107 | -0.06966 |
Ⅴ | -0.8616 | -0.38117 | 1.222913 | 0.504981 | -0.7273 | -0.48764 |
Ⅵ | -1.12661 | 0.762346 | -1.25636 | -1.5806 | -1.33288 | 2.199359 |
组别 | X0 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 1.492762 | -1.44301 | 0.815603 | 1.570946 | 1.695049 | -0.66677 |
Ⅱ | 0.824476 | 1.579145 | -0.63064 | -0.50884 | -0.08609 | -0.48764 |
Ⅲ | 0.551784 | 0.272266 | -1.03795 | -0.50305 | 0.822292 | -0.48764 |
Ⅳ | -0.88081 | -0.78957 | 0.88644 | 0.516568 | -0.37107 | -0.06966 |
Ⅴ | -0.8616 | -0.38117 | 1.222913 | 0.504981 | -0.7273 | -0.48764 |
Ⅵ | -1.12661 | 0.762346 | -1.25636 | -1.5806 | -1.33288 | 2.199359 |
编号 | ΔX1 | ΔX2 | ΔX3 | ΔX4 | ΔX5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 2.936 | 0.677 | 0.078 | 0.202 | 2.160 |
Ⅱ | 0.755 | 1.455 | 1.333 | 0.911 | 1.312 |
Ⅲ | 0.280 | 1.590 | 1.055 | 0.271 | 1.039 |
Ⅳ | 0.091 | 1.767 | 1.397 | 0.510 | 0.811 |
Ⅴ | 0.480 | 2.085 | 1.367 | 0.134 | 0.374 |
Ⅵ | 1.889 | 0.130 | 0.454 | 0.206 | 3.326 |
编号 | ΔX1 | ΔX2 | ΔX3 | ΔX4 | ΔX5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 2.936 | 0.677 | 0.078 | 0.202 | 2.160 |
Ⅱ | 0.755 | 1.455 | 1.333 | 0.911 | 1.312 |
Ⅲ | 0.280 | 1.590 | 1.055 | 0.271 | 1.039 |
Ⅳ | 0.091 | 1.767 | 1.397 | 0.510 | 0.811 |
Ⅴ | 0.480 | 2.085 | 1.367 | 0.134 | 0.374 |
Ⅵ | 1.889 | 0.130 | 0.454 | 0.206 | 3.326 |
编号 | ΔX1 | ΔX2 | ΔX3 | ΔX4 | ΔX5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 0.3814 | 0.7495 | 1.0074 | 0.9403 | 0.4589 |
Ⅱ | 0.7255 | 0.5625 | 0.5854 | 0.6815 | 0.5896 |
Ⅲ | 0.9030 | 0.5392 | 0.6454 | 0.9072 | 0.6490 |
Ⅳ | 0.9999 | 0.5113 | 0.5731 | 0.8073 | 0.7089 |
Ⅴ | 0.8183 | 0.4680 | 0.5790 | 0.9759 | 0.8611 |
Ⅵ | 0.4938 | 0.9784 | 0.8285 | 0.9383 | 0.3516 |
编号 | ΔX1 | ΔX2 | ΔX3 | ΔX4 | ΔX5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 0.3814 | 0.7495 | 1.0074 | 0.9403 | 0.4589 |
Ⅱ | 0.7255 | 0.5625 | 0.5854 | 0.6815 | 0.5896 |
Ⅲ | 0.9030 | 0.5392 | 0.6454 | 0.9072 | 0.6490 |
Ⅳ | 0.9999 | 0.5113 | 0.5731 | 0.8073 | 0.7089 |
Ⅴ | 0.8183 | 0.4680 | 0.5790 | 0.9759 | 0.8611 |
Ⅵ | 0.4938 | 0.9784 | 0.8285 | 0.9383 | 0.3516 |
指标 | 相关系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 | 有效穗 | 总粒数 | 实粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | |
产量 | 1.000 | 0.002 | 0.091 | 0.332** | 0.384** | -0.253* |
有效穗 | 1.000 | -0.594** | -0.764** | -0.304* | 0.042 | |
每穗总粒数 | 1.000 | 0.790** | -0.259* | -0.198 | ||
实粒数 | 1.000 | 0.378** | -0.317** | |||
结实率 | 1.000 | -0.217 | ||||
千粒重 | 1.000 |
指标 | 相关系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 | 有效穗 | 总粒数 | 实粒数 | 结实率 | 千粒重 | |
产量 | 1.000 | 0.002 | 0.091 | 0.332** | 0.384** | -0.253* |
有效穗 | 1.000 | -0.594** | -0.764** | -0.304* | 0.042 | |
每穗总粒数 | 1.000 | 0.790** | -0.259* | -0.198 | ||
实粒数 | 1.000 | 0.378** | -0.317** | |||
结实率 | 1.000 | -0.217 | ||||
千粒重 | 1.000 |
产量构成要素 | 直接通径系数 | 间接通径系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | 合计 | ||
X1 | 0.630 | 0.1443 | -0.7250 | -0.0474 | 0.0003 | -0.6278 | |
X2 | -0.243 | -0.3742 | 0.7497 | -0.0404 | -0.0016 | 0.3335 | |
X3 | 0.949 | -0.4813 | -0.1920 | 0.0590 | -0.0025 | -0.6169 | |
X4 | 0.156 | -0.1915 | 0.0629 | 0.3587 | -0.0017 | 0.2284 | |
X5 | 0.008 | 0.0265 | 0.0481 | -0.3008 | -0.0338 | -0.2601 |
产量构成要素 | 直接通径系数 | 间接通径系数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | 合计 | ||
X1 | 0.630 | 0.1443 | -0.7250 | -0.0474 | 0.0003 | -0.6278 | |
X2 | -0.243 | -0.3742 | 0.7497 | -0.0404 | -0.0016 | 0.3335 | |
X3 | 0.949 | -0.4813 | -0.1920 | 0.0590 | -0.0025 | -0.6169 | |
X4 | 0.156 | -0.1915 | 0.0629 | 0.3587 | -0.0017 | 0.2284 | |
X5 | 0.008 | 0.0265 | 0.0481 | -0.3008 | -0.0338 | -0.2601 |
[1] | 王飞, 彭少兵 . 水稻绿色高产栽培技术研究进展[J]. 生命科学, 2018,30(10):1129-1136. |
[2] | 钟洁 . 浅谈广西水稻生产发展[J]. 广西农学报, 2013,28(05):44-47. |
[3] |
朱德峰, 张玉屏, 陈惠哲 , 等. 中国水稻高产栽培技术创新与实践[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(17):3404-3414.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.17.008 URL |
[4] | 隋明, 史国宏, 李刚 , 等. 北方杂交粳稻产量和产量结构分析[J]. 北方水稻, 2014,44(04):12-14. |
[5] | 张建成, 张弘旭, 张汇娟 , 等. 春小麦主要产量构成因素间的灰色关联度分析[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2008(03):25-26. |
[6] | 邵慧, 夏中华, 金彦刚 , 等. 江苏淮北地区13个主导小麦品种产量构成因素分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015,43(08):91-93. |
[7] |
Huang Min, Zou Yingbin, Jiang Peng . Relationship between grain yield and yield components in super hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2011,10(10):1537-1544.
doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60149-1 URL |
[8] | 高良艳, 周鸿飞 . 水稻产量构成因素与产量的分析[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2007(1):26-28. |
[9] | 乔有明 . 通径分析与灰色关联分析的比较[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 1997(4):22-25. |
[10] | 白雪梅, 赵松山 . 关于相关分析与回归分析的比较研究[J]. 统计科学与实践, 1999(9):8-10. |
[11] | 刘华招 . 寒地水稻产量及构成要素关系研究[J]. 北方水稻, 2008,38(06):33-35. |
[12] | 王海潮, 肖红旭, 王小红 , 等. 陕南杂交水稻产量和产量构成因素的灰色关联度分析[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2009,55(06):20-22. |
[13] | 甘涛, 陈大超 . 水稻产量与构成因素间的相关性研究[J]. 南方农业, 2008(03):17-20. |
[14] | 谢晓金, 李秉柏, 李映雪 , 等. 抽穗期高温胁迫对水稻产量构成要素和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2010,31(3):411-415. |
[15] | 曲红岩, 张欣, 崔中秋 , 等. 不同时期节水灌溉对水稻农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2016,23(2):15-20. |
[16] | 刘丽, 蔡迪花, 苏军锋 , 等. 甘肃武都核桃物候期和产量构成要素变化及其对气候要素的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(16):100-105. |
[17] | 李卫国 . 钾肥对水稻产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 山西大学学报:自然科学版, 2002,25(3):263-264. |
[18] | 全国农业技术推广服务中心. 中国水稻新品种试验:2009年南方稻区国家水稻品种试验汇总报告[M]. 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2010. |
[19] | 敬艳辉, 邢留伟 . 通径分析及其应用[J]. 统计教育, 2006(2):24-26. |
[20] | 张绍良, 张国良 . 灰色关联度计算方法比较及其存在问题分析[J]. 系统工程, 1996(3):45-49. |
[21] | 周秀文 . 灰色关联度的研究与应用[D]. 吉林:吉林大学, 2007. |
[22] | 唐进, 吉剑, 林昌明 , 等. 苏中地区小麦产量构成因素分析及高产栽培途径[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013,19(13):46-47. |
[1] | HE Mi, LI Xiaobo, HUANG Jing, HUANG Guangfu. The Relationship Between Leaf Area Index and Yield of Rice: Research Progress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 1-5. |
[2] | LIN Tuanrong, WANG Yufeng, WANG Zhen, FAN Longqiu, ZHANG Zhicheng, WANG Wei, HUANG Wenjuan, JIAO Xinlei, WANG Yiqian, XING Jin, YIN Yuhe. Regional Trials of Mid-Late Maturing Potato Varieties in the North China Group 2019-2020 [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 16-21. |
[3] | NIU Liya, YU Liang, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Weiwei. Correlation Degree Between Water Stress and Wheat Yield Traits and Grain Bulk Density [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 6-9. |
[4] | GUO Shanhu, ZHOU Zonggui, LIU Min, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Lifang, ZHAO Xuetong, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei. Effects of Soil Improvement Materials on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 62-67. |
[5] | LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, LIU Yang, WEN Zhiqiang, QIU Chunren, ZHANG Haixia, MA Zhuwen. Selection and Suitability Evaluation of Eight Introduced Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Shaoguan Ecological Tobacco Areas [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 38-44. |
[6] | YAN Yu, WANG Weijian, YAO Yutian, CHEN Chen, QIU Jun, ZHANG Xiaowei, CHEN Xijun. Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 5-11. |
[7] | WANG Xiaodan, WANG Yaliang, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, CHEN Huizhe. Nitrogen Application: Effect on Yield and Quality of Machine Transplanted Large Panicle Single Cropping Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 1-4. |
[8] | SUN Bin, ZHANG Jiajia, SONG Yujiao, HAI Fei, WANG Lei. 5% Prohexadione Calcium EA: Effects on Lodging Resistance, Yield and Its Related Factors of Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 14-17. |
[9] | JIN Wu, HE Qi, DU Xingwei, ZHU Xinyan, WEN Haibo, MA Xueyan, HE Yijin, BING Xuwen. Prediction of Crab Yield by BP Neural Network Based on Meteorological Factors of Crab Producing Areas in Jiangsu [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 50-54. |
[10] | ZHAO Jiatao, FU Zhengbo, YANG Xianghong, LIU Mengdao. Reducing Quantity and Increasing Efficiency of Chemical Fertilizer for ‘Baodamai 20’: A Preliminary Study [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 29-32. |
[11] | TIAN Tian, HAN Yu, FU Shan. The Impact of Human Capital Investment on Agricultural Development from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization: An Empirical Study [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 96-100. |
[12] | ZOU Yijing, JIANG Jianhong, WANG Guangfeng, HUANG Kaimei, LIANG Dagang, YAN Shaobing. Effects of Calabash Rootstock Grafting on Growth, Fruit Traits and Yield of Watermelon [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 50-54. |
[13] | AN Li, ZHANG Zhishan, MENG Qinglei, DONG Xuesa, ZHU Shuren, ZHU Yong’an. Morphological Characteristics and Parameters of 1-year-old Micropterus salmoides [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 59-64. |
[14] | LI Guoqing, LI Guoyu, CONG Xinjun, LI Ni. Intermission Seeding Under Millet and Peanut Intercropping: Effects on the Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 6-10. |
[15] | QUAN Ruilan, FU Ding, MA Hanyun, HUO Erwei, SHEN Guanghui, GUO Guiying, WANG Qinglin. Yield Traits of High-quality and High-yield Conventional Indica Glutinous Rice ‘Zhenzhunuo’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 1-7. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||