Journal of Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (7): 33-37.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20200300063
Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Jianli1(), ZHANG Mingkui2(), WANG Daoze3
Received:
2020-03-12
Revised:
2021-01-20
Online:
2022-07-20
Published:
2022-09-20
Contact:
ZHANG Mingkui
E-mail:yjl7784@163.com;mkzhang@zju.edu.cn
CLC Number:
YAN Jianli, ZHANG Mingkui, WANG Daoze. Improvement Effect of Combined Application of Phosphogypsum and Limestone Powder on Newly Cultivated Red Soil[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 33-37.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20200300063
处理 | pH | 交换性酸/(cmol/kg) | >0.25 mm水稳定性团聚体/% | 容重/(g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 4.81f | 6.14a | 41.66d | 1.39a |
低量石灰石粉 | 5.38bc | 3.69d | 42.32cd | 1.40a |
低量磷石膏 | 5.04e | 4.42b | 43.98c | 1.36b |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 5.16d | 4.12c | 45.14bc | 1.35bc |
中量石灰石粉 | 5.63a | 2.34e | 41.14d | 1.41a |
中量磷石膏 | 5.35c | 3.38d | 47.73a | 1.33c |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 5.48b | 2.84e | 46.74ab | 1.34bc |
处理 | pH | 交换性酸/(cmol/kg) | >0.25 mm水稳定性团聚体/% | 容重/(g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 4.81f | 6.14a | 41.66d | 1.39a |
低量石灰石粉 | 5.38bc | 3.69d | 42.32cd | 1.40a |
低量磷石膏 | 5.04e | 4.42b | 43.98c | 1.36b |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 5.16d | 4.12c | 45.14bc | 1.35bc |
中量石灰石粉 | 5.63a | 2.34e | 41.14d | 1.41a |
中量磷石膏 | 5.35c | 3.38d | 47.73a | 1.33c |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 5.48b | 2.84e | 46.74ab | 1.34bc |
处理 | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (mg/kg) | 交换性镁/ (mg/kg) | 交换性钾/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 有效硅/ (mg/kg) | 有效硫/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 7.58a | 287d | 52.41c | 78.54d | 5.37d | 87.92d | 13.42d |
低量石灰石粉 | 7.36b | 677c | 53.24c | 73.54de | 6.14d | 88.63d | 12.83d |
低量磷石膏 | 7.43ab | 715b | 59.77b | 87.65b | 14.82b | 124.62ab | 41.23c |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 7.49ab | 710b | 58.47b | 84.35c | 11.83c | 115.74c | 38.72c |
中量石灰石粉 | 7.28b | 847a | 52.98c | 71.25e | 5.98d | 85.25d | 11.94d |
中量磷石膏 | 7.54a | 874a | 63.58a | 93.65a | 18.65a | 134.36a | 53.65a |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 7.51a | 868a | 62.87ab | 88.45b | 15.33b | 120.43bc | 47.66b |
处理 | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 交换性钙/ (mg/kg) | 交换性镁/ (mg/kg) | 交换性钾/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 有效硅/ (mg/kg) | 有效硫/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 7.58a | 287d | 52.41c | 78.54d | 5.37d | 87.92d | 13.42d |
低量石灰石粉 | 7.36b | 677c | 53.24c | 73.54de | 6.14d | 88.63d | 12.83d |
低量磷石膏 | 7.43ab | 715b | 59.77b | 87.65b | 14.82b | 124.62ab | 41.23c |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 7.49ab | 710b | 58.47b | 84.35c | 11.83c | 115.74c | 38.72c |
中量石灰石粉 | 7.28b | 847a | 52.98c | 71.25e | 5.98d | 85.25d | 11.94d |
中量磷石膏 | 7.54a | 874a | 63.58a | 93.65a | 18.65a | 134.36a | 53.65a |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 7.51a | 868a | 62.87ab | 88.45b | 15.33b | 120.43bc | 47.66b |
处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | As | Cr | Hg | Pb | Ni |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 28.54a | 76.54a | 0.187a | 13.54b | 58.47a | 0.143a | 23.87a | 33.84a |
低量石灰石粉 | 27.59a | 77.24a | 0.191a | 14.14b | 57.42a | 0.141a | 24.51a | 35.62a |
低量磷石膏 | 28.98a | 74.89a | 0.195a | 14.83ab | 56.98a | 0.149a | 23.74a | 33.25a |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 28.78a | 76.54a | 0.189a | 14.53ab | 57.91a | 0.145a | 24.65a | 34.18a |
中量石灰石粉 | 28.74a | 77.12a | 0.193a | 14.09a | 57.24a | 0.151a | 24.33a | 35.24a |
中量磷石膏 | 29.14a | 78.24a | 0.191a | 15.69a | 56.98a | 0.148a | 23.18a | 33.62a |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 28.94a | 77.96a | 0.198a | 14.87ab | 55.87a | 0.146a | 23.57a | 34.59a |
处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | As | Cr | Hg | Pb | Ni |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 28.54a | 76.54a | 0.187a | 13.54b | 58.47a | 0.143a | 23.87a | 33.84a |
低量石灰石粉 | 27.59a | 77.24a | 0.191a | 14.14b | 57.42a | 0.141a | 24.51a | 35.62a |
低量磷石膏 | 28.98a | 74.89a | 0.195a | 14.83ab | 56.98a | 0.149a | 23.74a | 33.25a |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 28.78a | 76.54a | 0.189a | 14.53ab | 57.91a | 0.145a | 24.65a | 34.18a |
中量石灰石粉 | 28.74a | 77.12a | 0.193a | 14.09a | 57.24a | 0.151a | 24.33a | 35.24a |
中量磷石膏 | 29.14a | 78.24a | 0.191a | 15.69a | 56.98a | 0.148a | 23.18a | 33.62a |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 28.94a | 77.96a | 0.198a | 14.87ab | 55.87a | 0.146a | 23.57a | 34.59a |
处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | As | Cr | Hg | Pb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 8.85 | 16.54 | 0.013 | 0.074 | 0.032 | 0.0024 | 0.049 |
低量石灰石粉 | 9.54 | 15.64 | 0.011 | 0.082 | 0.028 | 0.0023 | 0.041 |
低量磷石膏 | 8.67 | 16.33 | 0.012 | 0.094 | 0.031 | 0.0025 | 0.044 |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 9.15 | 14.98 | 0.012 | 0.094 | 0.030 | 0.0023 | 0.042 |
中量石灰石粉 | 8.26 | 15.67 | 0.009 | 0.099 | 0.024 | 0.0021 | 0.037 |
中量磷石膏 | 8.74 | 15.39 | 0.010 | 0.110 | 0.028 | 0.0024 | 0.042 |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 8.64 | 15.98 | 0.009 | 0.118 | 0.027 | 0.0023 | 0.040 |
农产品安全质量无公害蔬菜要求(GB 18406.1—2001) | <10 | <20 | <0.05 | <0.5 | <0.5 | <0.01 | <0.2 |
处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | As | Cr | Hg | Pb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | 8.85 | 16.54 | 0.013 | 0.074 | 0.032 | 0.0024 | 0.049 |
低量石灰石粉 | 9.54 | 15.64 | 0.011 | 0.082 | 0.028 | 0.0023 | 0.041 |
低量磷石膏 | 8.67 | 16.33 | 0.012 | 0.094 | 0.031 | 0.0025 | 0.044 |
1/2低量石灰石粉+1/2低量磷石膏 | 9.15 | 14.98 | 0.012 | 0.094 | 0.030 | 0.0023 | 0.042 |
中量石灰石粉 | 8.26 | 15.67 | 0.009 | 0.099 | 0.024 | 0.0021 | 0.037 |
中量磷石膏 | 8.74 | 15.39 | 0.010 | 0.110 | 0.028 | 0.0024 | 0.042 |
1/2中量石灰石粉+1/2中量磷石膏 | 8.64 | 15.98 | 0.009 | 0.118 | 0.027 | 0.0023 | 0.040 |
农产品安全质量无公害蔬菜要求(GB 18406.1—2001) | <10 | <20 | <0.05 | <0.5 | <0.5 | <0.01 | <0.2 |
[1] | 赵其国, 黄国勤, 马艳芹. 中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(24):7615-7622. |
[2] | 曾希柏, 李菊梅, 徐明岗, 等. 红壤旱地的肥力现状及施肥和利用方式的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2006, 37(3):434-437. |
[3] | 孙波, 张桃林, 赵其国, 等. 南方红壤丘陵区土壤养分贫瘠化的综合评价[J]. 土壤, 1995, 27(3):119-124. |
[4] | 王伯仁, 徐明岗, 文石林. 长期不同施肥对旱地红壤性质和作物生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(1):97-100. |
[5] | 蔡泽江, 孙楠, 王伯仁, 等. 长期施肥对土壤pH、作物产量及氮、磷、钾养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1):71-78. |
[6] | 孔宏敏, 何圆球, 吴大付, 等. 长期施肥对红壤旱地作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(5):782-786. |
[7] | 柳开楼, 熊华荣, 胡惠文, 等. 特贝钙土壤调理剂对红壤旱地花生产量和阻控土壤酸化的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(5):93-98. |
[8] | 冯兆滨, 刘秀梅, 冀建华, 等. 红壤调理剂的改土培肥及作物增产研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5):122-128. |
[9] | 李育鹏, 胡海燕, 李兆军, 等. 土壤调理剂对红壤pH值及空心菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(6):21-26. |
[10] | 许敬敬, 张乃明. 磷石膏的农业利用研究进展[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2017, 32(9):34-38. |
[11] | 张利珍, 张永兴, 张秀峰, 等. 中国磷石膏资源综合利用研究进展[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2019(4):14-18. |
[12] | 张云, 张相柱. 磷石膏混合法对盐碱地的改良研究[J]. 内蒙古水利, 2018(12):19-20. |
[13] | 焦娟玉, 周成志. 磷石膏改良盐碱地资源化利用技术试验研究[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2018(8):112-113. |
[14] | 翟永胜, 苗红英, 樊秀荣, 等. 内蒙古临河区磷石膏改良盐碱地效果分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(14):98-99. |
[15] | 郭全恩, 车宗贤, 曹诗瑜, 等. 地下水位上升条件下磷石膏改良剂对土壤盐分迁移的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(6):171-176. |
[16] | 杨丹. 糠醛渣和磷石膏对菱镁矿粉尘污染土壤的改良效果研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017, 39(3):295-300 |
[17] | 叶厚专, 范业成. 磷石膏改良红壤的效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1996, 2(2):181-185. |
[18] | 肖厚军, 王正银, 何佳芳, 等. 磷石膏改良强酸性黄壤的效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(6):62-66. |
[19] | 张文安, 徐大地, 肖厚军. 磷石膏改良贵州黄壤及其应用前景[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2002, 30(2):61-63. |
[20] |
SUMNER M E, SHAHANDEN H, BOUTON J, et al. Amelioration of an acid soil profile through deep liming and surface application of gypsum[J]. Soil science society of american journal, 1990, 50:1254-1258.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000050034x URL |
[21] | ALVA A K, SUMNER M E. Amelioration of acid soil infertility by phosphogypsum[J]. Plant and soil, 1990,128,127-134. |
[22] | 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 1978:105-215. |
[23] | 曹志洪, 周建民. 中国土壤质量[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008:30-39. |
[24] | 易杰祥, 吕亮雪, 刘国道. 土壤酸化和酸性土壤改良研究[J]. 华南热带农业大学学报, 2006, 12(1):23-28. |
[25] | 王代长, 胡红青, 李学垣. 酸性土壤上磷矿粉释磷机理与农学效应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(9):242-245. |
[26] | 孟赐福, 傅庆林, 水建国, 等. 浙江中部红壤施用石灰对土壤交换性钙、镁及土壤酸度的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999, 5(2):129-136. |
[27] | 李九玉, 王宁, 徐仁扣. 工业副产品对红壤酸度改良研究[J]. 土壤, 2009, 41(6):932-939. |
[1] | LIU Qiongfeng, ZHOU Junyu, WU Haiyong, GU Yu, LI Mingde, HONG Xi, WU Jinshui, XIAO He’ai. Application Status of Integrated Planting-Breeding Circular Agriculture Mode in China [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 81-88. |
[2] | ZHAO Yanmin, LIANG Yuhong, LIU Qiguang, YANG Shubao, HAN Zhenying, ZHENG Bo, YUE Peng, LI Mingwei. Effects of Biochar-based Organic Fertilizers on Biological Characters, Soil Nutrients and Microbial Communities of Cucurbita pepo [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(1): 39-44. |
[3] | Zhang Hui, Yu Duan, Lu Wencai, Ma Lianjie, Liao Dunxiu. Effects of Different Nitrogen Reduction Fertilization Models on Rice Soil Nutrients and the Number of Cultivable Microorganism [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(9): 33-37. |
[4] | Mao Wei, Li Wenxi, Zhao Yuhan, Chen Ming, Xu Xunyan, Wang Changsong, Wang Juanjuan, Qian Xiaoqing. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substitute for Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Soil Physicochemical Properties [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(8): 32-36. |
[5] | Zhang Xiumei, Yang Wenye, Zhang Dan, Xie Guoxiong, Yuan Hangjie. Concentration of Soluble Heavy Metals in Farmland Drainage and Its Relationship with Soil Properties [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(8): 42-47. |
[6] | Wang Lan, Xia Haiyong, Kong Weilin, Xian Weihua, Ma Guoxing, Wang Zihao, Zhang Rongting, Li Haosheng, Gong Kuijie, Liu Kaichang. Effects of Soil and Foliar Zinc Application on Agronomic Traits, Grain Yield and Grain Zinc, Iron and Selenium Concentration of Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(7): 23-27. |
[7] | Jiang Mingbei, Zhang Mingkui, Yan Jianli, Wang Daoze. Soil Fertility of Red Soil Reclamation Land in Low Hilly Area: Evolution and Maturity Criteria [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(7): 32-36. |
[8] | Wang Nannan, Zhang Chunfeng, Meng Qingying, Zhu Baoguo, Li Yu, Zhang Hongquan, Song Yingbo, Fan Weimin, Li Candong, Jin Xiaochun. Design of Formula Fertilization System Based on Nutrient Balance Fertilization Method [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(7): 92-94. |
[9] | Qi Yonghong, Zhang Xinrui, Cao Sufang, Li Minquan, Li Qingqing, Li Xueping, Jiang Jingjing, Li Jiping. Ditylenchus destructor: Effects on the Cell Structure and the Physiological Characteristics of Angelica sinensis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(6): 36-41. |
[10] | Zhang Fan, Zhou Qijun, Guan Li, Song Zhijun, Yang Chunling. Effects of Wheat-Cotton Cycled Straw Returning on Biomass and Nutrient Uptake of Cotton [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(6): 6-12. |
[11] | Tan Haiyan, Ma Fang, Yang Conglin, Yang Shun'an, Zhang Shaomin, Tong Jiangyun. Effects of Long-term Reducing Fertilization on Soil Nutrient Content in Protected Cultivated Land [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2): 39-44. |
[12] | ZHANG Li, XU Yunfei, YIN Jian, GU Caihua, ZHAO Min, LI Huanhuan, WANG Jing, REN Bin. Planting Patterns: Effects on Soil Quality and Growth Characteristics of Xanthoceras sorbifolia [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(12): 64-67. |
[13] | Du Qian, Wang Bing, Li Bing, Wang Changquan, Xie Yunbo, Chen Yulan. Correlation Between Soil Nutrients and the Chemical Quality of Tobacco Leaves in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(11): 54-60. |
[14] | Zhan Ting, Hu Chengxiao, Zhuang Mulai, Li Xiaobin, Lei Jing, Nie Min, Yang Tao, Zhao Xiaohu. Investigation on Nutrition Status of Guanxi Pomelo Orchards in Pinghe and Fertilization Suggestions [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(10): 83-89. |
[15] | Ma Xueyan, Sun Guangxing, Wang Lin, Xu Dongpo, Jin Wu, Lv Guohua, Xu Pao, Ding Tuqiang, Wen Haibo, Gu Ruobo. Nutrients and Mineral Elements in Solenaia oleivora from Huaihe River: Seasonal Variations [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(10): 90-94. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||