福建烟区烤烟主要化学成分特征分析

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

分析福建烟区烤烟主要化学成分特征,为烟叶生产技术方案制定、生产布局优化和卷烟工业企业烟叶原料采购提供参考。测定福建3个烟叶产区2013—2019年度3个主栽烤烟品种烟叶样品的总糖、还原糖、总氮、总植物碱、淀粉、钾、氯的含量,计算氮碱比、糖碱比、钾氯比、两糖差等衍生值,分析比较主要化学成分年度变化规律、品种、部位及产区差异情况。实验结果显示,福建烟区烟叶总糖(32.9%)、还原糖(23.1%)、钾(3.37%)、淀粉(7.09%)含量较高,氯离子(0.20%)含量相对较低。年度间变化特征为,总氮和糖含量的变异系数均小于20%,氯含量变异系数71.5%。品种间变化特征为,‘K326’的总糖和还原含量最低,‘云烟87’的还原糖含量最高,‘CB-1’的烟碱显著低于‘K326’和‘云烟87’;3个品种氯含量差距最为显著,钾和淀粉含量无差异。部位间变化特征为,除氯含量外各指标差异显著。产区间变化特征为,龙岩烟区烟叶表现最高还原糖含量和最低淀粉含量,南平烟区烟叶呈现最高的氯含量和最低的钾含量,3个产区总糖、烟碱含量、氮碱比和糖碱比无显著差异。综上,福建烟叶呈现高糖钾淀粉、适氮碱、低氯的特点,总氮和糖的含量年度间稳定性较好,氯含量波动较大;品种间、产区间烟叶主要化学成分存在一定差异,部位间烟叶主要化学成分差异显著。

关键词: 福建烟区, 烤烟, 化学成分, 特征, 比较分析

Abstract:

The paper analyzed the characteristics of main chemical components of flue-cured tobacco leaves in Fujian tobacco-growing area, so as to provide references for production technology plan design, distribution optimization, and raw material purchase by cigarette corporations. The contents of total sugar, reducing sugar, total nitrogen, nicotine, starch, potassium, chlorine in tobacco leaf samples collected from 3 main tobacco-growing areas in Fujian from 2013 to 2019 were determined, the derivative values of the nitrogen/alkali ratio, sugar/alkali ratio, potassium/chlorine ratio, the difference of total sugar and reducing sugar were calculated, and finally a comparative analysis on annual change rules, cultivars, parts and regional characteristics of main chemical components of flue-cured tobacco leaves was conducted. The results showed that the contents of total sugar (32.9%), reducing sugar (23.1%), potassium (3.37%), starch (7.09%) were relatively high, while the content of chloride (0.20%) was relatively low. On annual changing characteristics, the variation coefficients of total nitrogen and sugar were less than 20%, and the variation coefficient of chlorine was 71.5%. There were significant differences in chlorine in tobacco leaves, but there was no significant difference in potassium and starch among different cultivars. ‘K326’ had least total sugar and reducing sugar, ‘Yunyan 87’ had the highest reducing sugar content. ‘CB-1’ had significantly less nicotine than both ‘K326’ and ‘Yunyan 87’. On producing area characteristics, tobacco leaves from Longyan showed the highest reducing sugar and the least starch contents, and tobacco leaves from Nanping showed the highest chlorine and the least potassium contents. There was no significant difference in total sugar, nicotine, nitrogen/alkali ratio and sugar/alkali ratio among the three producing areas. In summary, flue-cured tobacco leaves in Fujian showed relatively high contents of total sugar, reducing sugar, potassium, starch, appropriate contents of total nitrogen and nicotine, and relatively low content of chloride. The content of total nitrogen and sugar in the flue-cured tobacco leaves showed great stability and the content of chlorine had more volatility; main chemical components in tobacco leaves were quite different among the cultivars and producing areas, and significant differences were observed in different parts of tobacco leaves.

Key words: Fujian Tobacco-growing Area, Flue-cured Tobacco, Chemical Components, Characteristic, Comparative Analysis

中图分类号:

S131.3

张志灵, 房权祥, 林祖斌, 林海滨, 陈庆文, 林隆, 陈星峰. 福建烟区烤烟主要化学成分特征分析[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(7): 60-64.

Zhang Zhiling, Fang Quanxiang, Lin Zubin, Lin Haibin, Chen Qingwen, Lin Long, Chen Xingfeng. Characteristics of Main Chemical Components of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves in Fujian Tobacco-growing Area[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(7): 60-64.

图/表 5

参考文献 31

[1]	杜文, 谭新良, 易建华, 等. 用烟叶化学成分进行烟叶质量评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2007(3):25-31.
[2]	蒋佳磊, 陆扬, 苏燕, 等. 我国主要烟叶产区烤烟化学成分特征与可用性评价[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2017, 23(2):13-27.
[3]	褚旭, 王珂清, 魏建荣, 等. 基于综合赋权法的烤烟烟叶质量评价[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(10):28-36.
[4]	陈征, 任志广, 范艺宽, 等. 基于灰色关联分析模型的烟叶化学成分评价研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(5):129-137.
[5]	张清明, 叶建如, 靖军领, 等. 翠碧1号烟叶烘烤过程中色素降解及化学成分变化[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2014, 35(2):122-125.
[6]	危阜斌, 徐茜, 陈志厚, 等. 烟叶烘烤期的淀粉转化规律及烤后烟叶的化学成分含量[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(10):124-128.
[7]	靖军领, 黄本荣, 林伟杰, 等. 不同干筋温度对翠碧1号烟叶烘烤质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(13):80-84.
[8]	初晓鹏, 张鑫, 杨斌, 等. 福建烟区初烤烟叶硫含量与烟叶质量的关系[J]. 福建农林大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 45(5):496-500.
[9]	夏玉珍, 王毅, 牟定荣, 等. 福建和云南烤烟香韵风格特征差异及与化学成分的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2015, 48(6):68-72.
[10]	管仕栓, 刘仕民, 张新龙, 等. 福建云烟87中部片烟常规指标与感官质量的关系研究[J]. 广东化工, 2015, 42(16):84-85.
[11]	周翔, 梁洪波, 董建新, 等. 山东烟区烤烟化学成分含量变化及聚类分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(6):13-17.
[12]	刘春奎, 贾琳, 王小东, 等. 基于河南烤烟常规化学成分的适宜性评价及其聚类分析[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2015, 37(4):440-446.
[13]	聂鑫, 李枝桦, 罗华元, 等. 云南烟区烤烟化学成分含量变化与聚类分析[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2016(4):80-82,86.
[14]	窦玉青, 张伟峰, 刘新民, 等. 全国初烤烟叶常规化学成分年度间变化[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(2):26-31.
[15]	胡溶容, 周冀衡, 张一扬, 等. 烤烟糖含量的空间变异特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007(11):1804-1810.
[16]	徐安传, 李佛琳, 王超. 氯素对烤烟生长发育和品质的影响研究进展[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2007(2):6-9.
[17]	王红刚, 董维杰, 窦玉青, 等. 烤烟烟叶淀粉含量与其感官质量的相关性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(7):1533-1537.
[18]	董维杰. 烤烟烟叶淀粉含量与其质量关系研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2016:22-25.
[19]	高玉珍, 李伟, 王运锋, 等. 影响烤烟烟叶糖和淀粉含量的因素研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006(6):70-75.
[20]	李明. “泰山”品牌福建基地烟叶质量评价[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2013:31-36.
[21]	吴兴富, 宋春满, 邓建华, 等. 云南烟区烤烟糖含量特点[J]. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 36(3):289-294.
[22]	徐茜, 吴平, 陈志厚, 等. 南平烟区烟叶钾含量与烟叶质量的关系研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(2):85-89.
[23]	王亚平. 福建烟区不同品种烟叶质量分析评价[J]. 作物研究, 2016, 30(1):30-32.
[24]	陈胜利, 张玉林, 张占军, 等. 烤烟主产区烟叶糖碱比的变异分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2012(10):73-76.
[25]	李强, 周冀衡, 何伟, 等. 中国主要烟区烤烟氯含量区域特征研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(2):49-54.
[26]	张国建. 福建烟区烤烟主要化学成分变异分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(2):833-834,900.
[27]	李晓婷, 亚平, 何元胜, 等. 云南省临沧烟区烤烟化学成分特征及空间分布[J]. 烟草科技, 2013(1):53-57.
[28]	陈伟, 唐远驹. 烤烟烟碱含量与土壤养分的关联分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(5):1-5.
[29]	莫静静. 打顶时期对烤烟新陈代谢及产质量的影响[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2009:3-12.
[30]	张建波. 温度和水分对烟草非结构性碳水化合物代谢的影响[D]. 昆明:云南师范大学, 2015:69-90.
[31]	陈朝阳, 陈志厚, 吴平. 南平烟区植烟土壤氯的烤烟适宜指标研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(4):89-97.

年份	总糖/%	还原糖/%	烟碱/%	总氮/%	氯/%	钾/%	淀粉/%	氮碱比	糖碱比	钾氯比	两糖差/%
2013	32.8±4.4bc	22.9±4.3a	2.26±0.80ab	1.84±0.19c	0.15±0.11cd	3.52±0.76ab	4.89±2.72b	0.91±0.33b	11.7±5.7abc	32.0±15.4bc	9.9±5.0abc
2014	31.2±4.4c	22.5±4.2ab	2.62±0.86a	1.96±0.19ab	0.21±0.15bc	3.62±0.74a	8.04±3.31a	0.82±0.25bc	9.6±3.8bc	23.6±10.8cd	8.7±3.7c
2015	32.0±5.7bc	23.0±3.7a	2.62±0.95a	2.01±0.23a	0.29±0.19a	3.32±0.67abc	7.68±3.20a	0.86±0.28bc	10.5±5.5bc	16.2±9.3cd	9.0±3.7bc
2016	33.0±4.6bc	24.0±3.4a	2.04±0.86b	1.86±0.17bc	0.12±0.08d	3.29±0.76abc	7.38±2.55a	1.06±0.41a	13.8±5.7a	39.3±28.3b	9.0±3.8bc
2017	35.6±5.3a	24.1±3.5a	2.69±0.93a	1.87±0.25bc	0.15±0.11cd	3.03±0.58c	7.06±2.18a	0.75±0.19c	10.3±4.4bc	61.9±73.3a	11.5±3.4a
2018	31.7±4.7c	20.9±3.9b	2.58±0.77a	1.87±0.27bc	0.23±0.14ab	3.61±0.57a	7.21±1.67a	0.76±0.16bc	9.1±3.9c	21.3±13cd	10.8±3.4ab
2019	34.4±3.7ab	24.4±2.6a	2.48±0.95a	1.86±0.19bc	0.27±0.13ab	3.24±0.60bc	6.99±1.92a	0.86±0.34bc	11.8±5.6ab	14.8±7.2d	9.9±3.3abc
平均值	32.9±4.9	23.1±3.8	2.47±0.89	1.90±0.22	0.20±0.15	3.37±0.69	7.09±2.69	0.86±0.30	11.0±5.1	29.8±34.8	9.8±3.8
CV/%	14.9	16.5	36.2	11.7	71.5	20.6	37.9	35.2	46.8	116.7	39.2

年份	总糖/%	还原糖/%	烟碱/%	总氮/%	氯/%	钾/%	淀粉/%	氮碱比	糖碱比	钾氯比	两糖差/%
2013	32.8±4.4bc	22.9±4.3a	2.26±0.80ab	1.84±0.19c	0.15±0.11cd	3.52±0.76ab	4.89±2.72b	0.91±0.33b	11.7±5.7abc	32.0±15.4bc	9.9±5.0abc
2014	31.2±4.4c	22.5±4.2ab	2.62±0.86a	1.96±0.19ab	0.21±0.15bc	3.62±0.74a	8.04±3.31a	0.82±0.25bc	9.6±3.8bc	23.6±10.8cd	8.7±3.7c
2015	32.0±5.7bc	23.0±3.7a	2.62±0.95a	2.01±0.23a	0.29±0.19a	3.32±0.67abc	7.68±3.20a	0.86±0.28bc	10.5±5.5bc	16.2±9.3cd	9.0±3.7bc
2016	33.0±4.6bc	24.0±3.4a	2.04±0.86b	1.86±0.17bc	0.12±0.08d	3.29±0.76abc	7.38±2.55a	1.06±0.41a	13.8±5.7a	39.3±28.3b	9.0±3.8bc
2017	35.6±5.3a	24.1±3.5a	2.69±0.93a	1.87±0.25bc	0.15±0.11cd	3.03±0.58c	7.06±2.18a	0.75±0.19c	10.3±4.4bc	61.9±73.3a	11.5±3.4a
2018	31.7±4.7c	20.9±3.9b	2.58±0.77a	1.87±0.27bc	0.23±0.14ab	3.61±0.57a	7.21±1.67a	0.76±0.16bc	9.1±3.9c	21.3±13cd	10.8±3.4ab
2019	34.4±3.7ab	24.4±2.6a	2.48±0.95a	1.86±0.19bc	0.27±0.13ab	3.24±0.60bc	6.99±1.92a	0.86±0.34bc	11.8±5.6ab	14.8±7.2d	9.9±3.3abc
平均值	32.9±4.9	23.1±3.8	2.47±0.89	1.90±0.22	0.20±0.15	3.37±0.69	7.09±2.69	0.86±0.30	11.0±5.1	29.8±34.8	9.8±3.8
CV/%	14.9	16.5	36.2	11.7	71.5	20.6	37.9	35.2	46.8	116.7	39.2

品种	总糖/%	还原糖/%	烟碱/%	总氮/%	氯/%	钾/%	淀粉/%	氮碱比	糖碱比	钾氯比	两糖差/%
CB-1	33.6±5.4a	22.6±3.9b	2.30±0.99b	1.84±0.26b	0.14±0.11c	3.27±0.81a	7.01±3.19a	0.93±0.36a	12.1±6.1a	39.7±44.7a	11.0±4.4a
K326	31.7±4.7b	21.7±3.1b	2.52±0.83ab	1.93±0.19a	0.28±0.16a	3.37±0.61a	7.35±2.56a	0.85±0.29ab	9.9±4.3b	18.3±15.8b	10.0±3.4a
云烟87	33.2±4.5ab	24.6±3.7a	2.61±0.82a	1.93±0.20a	0.21±0.14b	3.47±0.62a	6.97±2.24a	0.81±0.25b	10.6±4.5ab	28.8±31.5b	8.6±3.3b

品种	总糖/%	还原糖/%	烟碱/%	总氮/%	氯/%	钾/%	淀粉/%	氮碱比	糖碱比	钾氯比	两糖差/%
CB-1	33.6±5.4a	22.6±3.9b	2.30±0.99b	1.84±0.26b	0.14±0.11c	3.27±0.81a	7.01±3.19a	0.93±0.36a	12.1±6.1a	39.7±44.7a	11.0±4.4a
K326	31.7±4.7b	21.7±3.1b	2.52±0.83ab	1.93±0.19a	0.28±0.16a	3.37±0.61a	7.35±2.56a	0.85±0.29ab	9.9±4.3b	18.3±15.8b	10.0±3.4a
云烟87	33.2±4.5ab	24.6±3.7a	2.61±0.82a	1.93±0.20a	0.21±0.14b	3.47±0.62a	6.97±2.24a	0.81±0.25b	10.6±4.5ab	28.8±31.5b	8.6±3.3b

部位	总糖/%	还原糖/%	烟碱/%	总氮/%	氯/%	钾%	淀粉/%	氮碱比	糖碱比	钾氯比	两糖差/%
X2F	34.6±4.6a	23.4±3.7a	1.69±0.45c	1.82±0.20b	0.21±0.15a	4.02±0.53a	5.47±2.37c	1.15±0.31a	15.0±5.3a	34.2±37.0a	11.2±3.8a
C3F	35.0±3.7a	24.2±3.3a	2.34±0.58b	1.82±0.19b	0.18±0.14a	3.36±0.43b	7.46±2.30b	0.81±0.16b	11.1±3.5b	34.8±39.9a	10.8±3.8a
B2F	29.2±4.0b	21.7±3.9b	3.39±0.62a	2.05±0.19a	0.22±0.14a	2.74±0.41c	8.33±2.58a	0.62±0.10c	6.8±2.3c	20.5±23.9b	7.4±2.8b