欢迎访问《农学学报》，
农学学报

农学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (10): 32-36.

• 林学 园艺 园林 食用菌 • 上一篇    下一篇

武夷山风景名胜区景观美学评价及感知差异研究

郑华敏 熊居华 郑郁善   

  • 收稿日期:2012-07-25 修回日期:2012-08-25 出版日期:2012-10-20 发布日期:2012-10-20
  • 基金资助:

    武夷山风景名胜区景观美学评价及优化设计研究;武夷山风景名胜区景观美学评价及优化设计研究

Landscape Aesthetic Assessment and Perception Difference of Wuyishan Scenery District

  • Received:2012-07-25 Revised:2012-08-25 Online:2012-10-20 Published:2012-10-20

PDF (PC)

1794

摘要：

以武夷山风景名胜区核心景观区为研究对象，通过65个样地典型样本照片，采用美景度评判法（SBE法）计算景观美景度值，并进行方差分析。结果表明：3个景观类型美景度为人工景观＞文化景观＞自然景观，三者间不存在显著差异；自然景观类为水体景观＞天象景观＞地形地貌景观＞植物景观，差异极显著；人工景观类为人工建筑小品景观＞道路景观＞服务设施景观，差异极显著；文化景观类为纪念建筑景观＞遗址遗迹景观＞摩崖石刻景观，不存在显著差异；各景观构成要素间为水体景观＞纪念建筑＞遗迹遗址＞天象景观＞人工建筑小品＞地形地貌＞道路景观＞摩崖石刻＞服务设施＞植物景观，要素间差异极显著。

关键词: 烤烟, 烤烟, 有机肥, 品质, 产量, 肥料

Abstract:

Taking the core area of Wuyishan scenery district as the object, the paper obtained scenic beauty estimation values of 65 typical sample photos by SBE method and preference difference by ANOVA. Results showed that the ranking of three types was cultural landscape＞artificial landscape＞natural landscape and there was no significant difference between them; the ranking of natural landscape was waterscape＞sky view＞landform＞plant landscape and There was highly significant difference between them; the ranking of artificial landscape was architectural sketch＞road landscape＞service facilities landscape, and there was highly significant difference between them; the ranking of cultural landscape was memorial building＞relics＞cliff stone, and there was no significant difference between them; the ranking of all elements was waterscape＞memorial building＞relics＞sky view＞architectural sketch landform＞landform＞road landscape＞cliff stone＞service facilities landscape＞plant landscape, and there was highly significant difference between them.

中图分类号: