Journal of Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (10): 76-82.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19040005
Previous Articles Next Articles
Du Qiongyuan1(), Wang Xiaobin2, Hu Yunfeng2, Zhou Rui3(), Deng Min4
Received:
2019-04-03
Revised:
2019-07-11
Online:
2020-10-20
Published:
2020-11-18
Contact:
Zhou Rui
E-mail:1132763418@qq.com;zsrui96187@163.com
CLC Number:
Du Qiongyuan, Wang Xiaobin, Hu Yunfeng, Zhou Rui, Deng Min. Quality Improvement of Fresh Rice Noodles by Salt[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(10): 76-82.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19040005
时间 | 项目 | 设定值 |
---|---|---|
00:00:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
00:00:00 | 搅拌器转速 | 960 r/min |
00:00:10 | 搅拌器转速 | 160 r/min |
00:01:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
00:04:42 | 温度 | 95℃ |
00:07:12 | 温度 | 95℃ |
00:11:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
00:13:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
时间 | 项目 | 设定值 |
---|---|---|
00:00:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
00:00:00 | 搅拌器转速 | 960 r/min |
00:00:10 | 搅拌器转速 | 160 r/min |
00:01:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
00:04:42 | 温度 | 95℃ |
00:07:12 | 温度 | 95℃ |
00:11:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
00:13:00 | 温度 | 50℃ |
评价指标 | 分值/分 | 定义 | 评分标准 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
表现 | 分值 | ||||||
色泽 | 10 | 指鲜湿米线的颜色和亮度 | 淡白色,有光泽 | 8.1~10 | |||
光泽度一般 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
表面发暗,光泽度较差 | 1~6 | ||||||
表观 | 10 | 指鲜湿米线表面均一和光滑程度 | 粗细均匀,表面光滑 | 8.1~10 | |||
表面较光滑、有轻微凹凸 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
表面粗糙、凹凸不平 | 1~6 | ||||||
硬度 | 25 | 指鲜湿米线软硬 | 适中 | 21.1~25 | |||
稍软或稍硬 | 15.1~21 | ||||||
过软或过硬 | 1~15 | ||||||
弹性 | 20 | 指鲜湿米线有劲道 | 弹性较好,有嚼劲 | 17.1~20 | |||
弹性一般 | 10.1~17 | ||||||
弹性较差,容易断裂 | 1~10 | ||||||
粘性 | 10 | 在咀嚼过程中,鲜湿米线的粘牙程度 | 爽口、不粘牙 | 8.1~10 | |||
稍粘牙 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
粘牙 | 1~6 | ||||||
爽滑性 | 10 | 在品尝米线时口感的光滑程度 | 光滑爽口 | 8.1~10 | |||
较光滑 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
口感粗糙,不爽口 | 1~6 | ||||||
咀嚼性 | 10 | 鲜湿米线的耐咀嚼性大小 | 耐咀嚼,口感较好 | 8.1~10 | |||
较耐咀嚼 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
口感软烂,不耐咀嚼 | 1~6 | ||||||
食味 | 5 | 品尝鲜湿米线时的味道 | 具有稻米米香味 | 4.1~5 | |||
基本无异味 | 3.1~4 | ||||||
有其他异味 | 1~3 |
评价指标 | 分值/分 | 定义 | 评分标准 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
表现 | 分值 | ||||||
色泽 | 10 | 指鲜湿米线的颜色和亮度 | 淡白色,有光泽 | 8.1~10 | |||
光泽度一般 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
表面发暗,光泽度较差 | 1~6 | ||||||
表观 | 10 | 指鲜湿米线表面均一和光滑程度 | 粗细均匀,表面光滑 | 8.1~10 | |||
表面较光滑、有轻微凹凸 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
表面粗糙、凹凸不平 | 1~6 | ||||||
硬度 | 25 | 指鲜湿米线软硬 | 适中 | 21.1~25 | |||
稍软或稍硬 | 15.1~21 | ||||||
过软或过硬 | 1~15 | ||||||
弹性 | 20 | 指鲜湿米线有劲道 | 弹性较好,有嚼劲 | 17.1~20 | |||
弹性一般 | 10.1~17 | ||||||
弹性较差,容易断裂 | 1~10 | ||||||
粘性 | 10 | 在咀嚼过程中,鲜湿米线的粘牙程度 | 爽口、不粘牙 | 8.1~10 | |||
稍粘牙 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
粘牙 | 1~6 | ||||||
爽滑性 | 10 | 在品尝米线时口感的光滑程度 | 光滑爽口 | 8.1~10 | |||
较光滑 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
口感粗糙,不爽口 | 1~6 | ||||||
咀嚼性 | 10 | 鲜湿米线的耐咀嚼性大小 | 耐咀嚼,口感较好 | 8.1~10 | |||
较耐咀嚼 | 6.1~8 | ||||||
口感软烂,不耐咀嚼 | 1~6 | ||||||
食味 | 5 | 品尝鲜湿米线时的味道 | 具有稻米米香味 | 4.1~5 | |||
基本无异味 | 3.1~4 | ||||||
有其他异味 | 1~3 |
食盐添加量/% | 蒸煮损失/% | 断条率/% | 透射比 | 碘蓝值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1.051±0.0146a | 10.31±0.128a | 0.551±0.0079a | 0.158±0.0019a |
2 | 0.832±0.0138b | 8.83±0.209b | 0.667±0.0056b | 0.142±0.0016b |
4 | 0.534±0.0151c | 6.22±0.187c | 0.762±0.0072c | 0.115±0.0011c |
6 | 0.726±0.0164d | 7.65±0.146d | 0.683±0.0063d | 0.151±0.0020d |
食盐添加量/% | 蒸煮损失/% | 断条率/% | 透射比 | 碘蓝值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1.051±0.0146a | 10.31±0.128a | 0.551±0.0079a | 0.158±0.0019a |
2 | 0.832±0.0138b | 8.83±0.209b | 0.667±0.0056b | 0.142±0.0016b |
4 | 0.534±0.0151c | 6.22±0.187c | 0.762±0.0072c | 0.115±0.0011c |
6 | 0.726±0.0164d | 7.65±0.146d | 0.683±0.0063d | 0.151±0.0020d |
食盐添加量/% | 硬度/N | 弹性 | 咀嚼性 | 回复性 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 20.342±0.541a | 0.906±0.0089a | 18.312±0.286a | 0.866±0.0071a |
2 | 18.633±0.324b | 0.918±0.0092ab | 17.105±0.318bc | 0.893±0.0056b |
4 | 17.975±0.417b | 0.929±0.0105b | 16.783±0.299b | 0.915±0.0068c |
6 | 19.437±0.213c | 0.907±0.0078a | 17.629±0.407c | 0.907±0.0049c |
食盐添加量/% | 硬度/N | 弹性 | 咀嚼性 | 回复性 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 20.342±0.541a | 0.906±0.0089a | 18.312±0.286a | 0.866±0.0071a |
2 | 18.633±0.324b | 0.918±0.0092ab | 17.105±0.318bc | 0.893±0.0056b |
4 | 17.975±0.417b | 0.929±0.0105b | 16.783±0.299b | 0.915±0.0068c |
6 | 19.437±0.213c | 0.907±0.0078a | 17.629±0.407c | 0.907±0.0049c |
NaCl添加量/% | 色泽/分 | 表观/分 | 硬度/分 | 弹性/分 | 粘性/分 | 爽滑性/分 | 咀嚼性/分 | 食味/分 | 总分/分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 8.5 | 8.9 | 21.5 | 17.1 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 4.5 | 87.4 |
2 | 8.7 | 9.0 | 20.7 | 17.5 | 8.9 | 9.5 | 9.4 | 4.7 | 88.4 |
4 | 9.3 | 9.2 | 20.9 | 18.6 | 9.5 | 9.8 | 9.6 | 4.8 | 91.7 |
6 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 22.2 | 18.0 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 4.7 | 90.6 |
NaCl添加量/% | 色泽/分 | 表观/分 | 硬度/分 | 弹性/分 | 粘性/分 | 爽滑性/分 | 咀嚼性/分 | 食味/分 | 总分/分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 8.5 | 8.9 | 21.5 | 17.1 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 4.5 | 87.4 |
2 | 8.7 | 9.0 | 20.7 | 17.5 | 8.9 | 9.5 | 9.4 | 4.7 | 88.4 |
4 | 9.3 | 9.2 | 20.9 | 18.6 | 9.5 | 9.8 | 9.6 | 4.8 | 91.7 |
6 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 22.2 | 18.0 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 4.7 | 90.6 |
NaCl添加量/% | 峰值粘度/cp | 低谷粘度/cp | 衰减值/cp | 最终粘度/cp | 回生值/cp | 出峰时间/min | 糊化温度/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1252 | 897 | 355 | 1943 | 1046 | 5.80 | 86.35 |
2 | 1230 | 883 | 347 | 1874 | 991 | 5.80 | 85.50 |
4 | 1050 | 921 | 129 | 1652 | 731 | 6.40 | 84.80 |
6 | 1014 | 811 | 203 | 1639 | 828 | 6.07 | 85.60 |
NaCl添加量/% | 峰值粘度/cp | 低谷粘度/cp | 衰减值/cp | 最终粘度/cp | 回生值/cp | 出峰时间/min | 糊化温度/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1252 | 897 | 355 | 1943 | 1046 | 5.80 | 86.35 |
2 | 1230 | 883 | 347 | 1874 | 991 | 5.80 | 85.50 |
4 | 1050 | 921 | 129 | 1652 | 731 | 6.40 | 84.80 |
6 | 1014 | 811 | 203 | 1639 | 828 | 6.07 | 85.60 |
[1] | 方奇林. 大米淀粉米线的研究[D]. 无锡:江南大学, 2005. |
[2] |
Rungarun Hormdok. Hydrothermal treatments of rice starch for improvement of rice noodle quality[J]. LWT, 2007,40(10):1723-1731.
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.12.017 URL |
[3] |
Gallagher E, Gormley T R, Arendt E K. Recent advances in the formulation of gluten-free cereal-based products[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2004,15(3-4):143-152.
doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.012 URL |
[4] | 陈忠明, 陶翔, 潘雅燕. 线状米粉与粉状米粉起源及制作工艺探析[J]. 四川烹饪高等专科学校学报, 2012(1):27-29,35. |
[5] | Brown G M, Rohrer D C, Berking B, et al. The crystal structure of α,α-trehalose dihydrate from three independent X-ray determinations[J]. Acta Crystallographica, 2010,28(11):3145-3158. |
[6] | Harding T S. History of trehalose, its discovery and methods of preparation[J]. Suga, 1923,25:476-478. |
[7] | 岑军健. 薯类及玉米淀粉即食粉丝的开发研究[J]. 食品科技, 2000(3):20-21. |
[8] | 岑军健. 即食水洗米粉的生产技术设备及发展前景[J]. 食品科技, 1998(1):16-17. |
[9] | 岑军健. 米粉、粉丝产业及其技术设备的发展前景[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2007,15(2):4-7. |
[10] | 薛福连. 米粉生产发展趋势[J]. 应用科技, 1998(10):16-17. |
[11] | 许广基, 叶银枝. 米粉生产技术发展趋势[J]. 粮油食品科技, 1997(1):19-21. |
[12] | 郑海燕, 林利忠. 方便米粉的市场发展趋势[J]. 食品科技, 2002(11):22-24. |
[13] | 王维亮. 方便米粉加工及成品品质改良剂研究简报[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 1996(6):35-36. |
[14] | Charutigon C, Jitpupakdree J, Namsree P, et al. Effects of processing conditions and the use of modified starch and monoglyceride on some properties of extruded rice vermicelli[J]. LWT- Food Science and Technology, 2008,41(4):640-651. |
[15] | 孙庆杰, 丁文平, 丁霄霖, 等 米粉(米线)原料标准的研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2004,19(1):12-15. |
[16] | 林叶新. 林润国. 我国南方传统食品--米粉质量安全管理的研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2016,7(9):78-98. |
[17] | 丁文平. 大米淀粉回生及鲜湿米线生产的研究[D]. 无锡:江南大学, 2003. |
[18] | 罗春连. HACCP在保鲜方便米粉生产中的应用[J]. 质量技术监督研究, 2008(6):25-27. |
[19] | 荆鹏, 郑学玲, 丁旋子, 等. 食盐对面絮及面条品质影响研究[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2014,12(9):32-35. |
[20] | 周虹先. 盐对淀粉糊化及老化特性的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2014. |
[21] |
Sangpring Y, Fukuoka M, Ratanasumawong S. The effect of sodium chloride on microstructure, water migration, and texture of rice noodle[J]. LWT- Food Science and Technology, 2015,64(2):1107-1113.
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.035 URL |
[22] | 薛婷. pH、盐、糖、酸对马铃薯淀粉黏度特性的影响[D]. 西安:陕西科技大学, 2014. |
[23] | 陆雨. 干制方便米线品质改良的研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学, 2015. |
[24] | 罗文波. 鲜湿米粉的品质评价、原料适应性及保鲜研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2012. |
[25] | 李刚凤. 米粉老化的影响因素及其机理研究[D]. 郑州:河南工业大学, 2013. |
[1] | GUO Shanhu, ZHOU Zonggui, LIU Min, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Lifang, ZHAO Xuetong, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei. Effects of Soil Improvement Materials on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 62-67. |
[2] | JIANG Lili, SUN Shoumin, YANG Shuai, WU Chong, SUN Ruihong. Antagonistic Bacterium JM-3 Against Strawberry Fusarium Wilt: Identification and Bio-control Efficacy [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 26-32. |
[3] | LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, LIU Yang, WEN Zhiqiang, QIU Chunren, ZHANG Haixia, MA Zhuwen. Selection and Suitability Evaluation of Eight Introduced Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Shaoguan Ecological Tobacco Areas [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 38-44. |
[4] | YAN Yu, WANG Weijian, YAO Yutian, CHEN Chen, QIU Jun, ZHANG Xiaowei, CHEN Xijun. Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 5-11. |
[5] | WANG Xiaodan, WANG Yaliang, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, CHEN Huizhe. Nitrogen Application: Effect on Yield and Quality of Machine Transplanted Large Panicle Single Cropping Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 1-4. |
[6] | LI Xiaoyan. Barrier Analysis of Greenhouse Soil and Effect of Balanced Fertilizer Application [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 39-43. |
[7] | BAI Shijian, HU Jinge, WANG Yong, CAI Junshe, CHEN Guang, ZHAO Ronghua. Effect of Methyl Jasmonate on Coloration and Quality of ‘Crimson Seedless’ Grape [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 44-49. |
[8] | SUN Qin, XU Xuexin, DENG Xiao, ZHU Zixin, ZHANG Yulu, GAO Guolong, GAI Hongmei, ZHAO Changxing. Effects of Salt Stress on Fluorescence Characteristics of Wheat Seedlings and Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 5-13. |
[9] | WANG Yanping, ZHANG Kun, ZHANG Jiaxing, YAO Ye, JIANG Fengyou. Effects of Climatic Conditions at Different Sowing Dates on Main Agronomic Characters and Quality of Soybean in Northeast Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 60-65. |
[10] | HUANG Linnan, TAN Qing. The Cultivation Strategy of High-quality Farmers from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study of Weifang City [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(5): 91-95. |
[11] | YU Yanmin, YAN Ping, WU Hongtao, LIU Haiying, XU Zhenhua, ZHANG Shuli, WU Licheng, YANG Zhongliang. Quality Traits’ Analysis of Newly Approved Rice Varieties of Heilongjiang Province in 2019 [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 1-5. |
[12] | LI Wenqing, ZHENG Chaoyuan, KE Yuqin, CHEN Shunhui, GUO Jinping, LI Chunying. Effects of Magnesium Fertilizer Application on Soil Magnesium Supply and Growth and Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 33-40. |
[13] | XIE Jin, HUANG Hao, GAO Renji, HUANG Lei, GUAN Luohao, LU Chao, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. The Application of Site Precise Direct Allocation Mode in the Process of Tobacco Leaf Allocation [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 41-46. |
[14] | CHU Yue, SUN Mingna, DONG Xu, TONG Zhou, WANG Mei, GAO Tongchun, DENG Yongjin, DUAN Jinsheng. Status of Mulberry Quality and Safety and Countermeasures [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 61-66. |
[15] | DENG Jianwei, JIN Yanzhao. The Optimized Sequence of Leading Crops in Shiyang River Basin Based on Comprehensive Benefits [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 35-39. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||