Journal of Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (10): 12-18.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190700130
Special Issue: 玉米
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Xingzhou(), Li Meng, Chen Ruiji, Fu Hua, Ma Guimei, Zhou Yanhu, Zhang Jian()
Received:
2019-07-22
Revised:
2019-09-30
Online:
2020-10-20
Published:
2020-11-18
Contact:
Zhang Jian
E-mail:lxz8610@163.com;zhangjian061213@aliyun.com
CLC Number:
Liu Xingzhou, Li Meng, Chen Ruiji, Fu Hua, Ma Guimei, Zhou Yanhu, Zhang Jian. Ear Characters of Summer Maize: Response to Planting Density[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(10): 12-18.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190700130
试验点名称 | 中心点经纬度 | 年份 | 海拔高度/ m | 太阳总辐射量/ (KJ/cm2) | 年日照时数/ h | 年≥10℃积温/℃ | 无霜期/ d | 年降雨量/ mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宿州市农业科学院东区基地 | N33.640769 E117.086885 | 2016 | 27 | 5268 | 2354 | 4628 | 210 | 1058.6 |
2017 | 5346 | 2465 | 4598 | 906.5 |
试验点名称 | 中心点经纬度 | 年份 | 海拔高度/ m | 太阳总辐射量/ (KJ/cm2) | 年日照时数/ h | 年≥10℃积温/℃ | 无霜期/ d | 年降雨量/ mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宿州市农业科学院东区基地 | N33.640769 E117.086885 | 2016 | 27 | 5268 | 2354 | 4628 | 210 | 1058.6 |
2017 | 5346 | 2465 | 4598 | 906.5 |
品种 | 密度/(株/hm2) | 穗长/cm | 秃顶长/cm | 穗粗/cm | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 轴粗/cm | 千粒重/g | 出籽率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
弘大216 | D1 | 17.3 | 0.1 | 5.3 | 15.4 | 36.4 | 3.0 | 349 | 89.2 |
D2 | 16.3 | 0.1 | 5.3 | 15.1 | 31.8 | 2.9 | 345 | 89.8 | |
D3 | 16.2 | 0.3 | 5.2 | 14.6 | 30.1 | 2.8 | 340 | 90.8 | |
D4 | 14.7 | 0.2 | 5.3 | 14.5 | 29.8 | 2.8 | 342 | 89.6 | |
D5 | 14.1 | 0.6 | 5.1 | 14.3 | 27.6 | 2.8 | 330 | 89.5 | |
D6 | 13.0 | 0.6 | 4.9 | 14.0 | 24.4 | 2.7 | 318 | 90.3 | |
垦丰101 | D1 | 16.6 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 15.0 | 30.7 | 3.1 | 420 | 89.9 |
D2 | 15.1 | 0.0 | 5.3 | 15.4 | 28.8 | 2.9 | 393 | 89.5 | |
D3 | 14.8 | 0.3 | 5.3 | 15.2 | 27.8 | 3.0 | 389 | 90.1 | |
D4 | 14.7 | 0.6 | 5.3 | 15.0 | 27.6 | 3.0 | 378 | 89.3 | |
D5 | 14.7 | 0.6 | 5.2 | 15.2 | 27.0 | 2.9 | 358 | 90.6 | |
D6 | 14.2 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 15.4 | 26.8 | 3.0 | 356 | 90.2 |
品种 | 密度/(株/hm2) | 穗长/cm | 秃顶长/cm | 穗粗/cm | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 轴粗/cm | 千粒重/g | 出籽率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
弘大216 | D1 | 17.3 | 0.1 | 5.3 | 15.4 | 36.4 | 3.0 | 349 | 89.2 |
D2 | 16.3 | 0.1 | 5.3 | 15.1 | 31.8 | 2.9 | 345 | 89.8 | |
D3 | 16.2 | 0.3 | 5.2 | 14.6 | 30.1 | 2.8 | 340 | 90.8 | |
D4 | 14.7 | 0.2 | 5.3 | 14.5 | 29.8 | 2.8 | 342 | 89.6 | |
D5 | 14.1 | 0.6 | 5.1 | 14.3 | 27.6 | 2.8 | 330 | 89.5 | |
D6 | 13.0 | 0.6 | 4.9 | 14.0 | 24.4 | 2.7 | 318 | 90.3 | |
垦丰101 | D1 | 16.6 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 15.0 | 30.7 | 3.1 | 420 | 89.9 |
D2 | 15.1 | 0.0 | 5.3 | 15.4 | 28.8 | 2.9 | 393 | 89.5 | |
D3 | 14.8 | 0.3 | 5.3 | 15.2 | 27.8 | 3.0 | 389 | 90.1 | |
D4 | 14.7 | 0.6 | 5.3 | 15.0 | 27.6 | 3.0 | 378 | 89.3 | |
D5 | 14.7 | 0.6 | 5.2 | 15.2 | 27.0 | 2.9 | 358 | 90.6 | |
D6 | 14.2 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 15.4 | 26.8 | 3.0 | 356 | 90.2 |
品种 | 相关系数 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 穗长 | 穗粗 | 秃尖长 | 千粒重 | 出籽率 | 密度 | 产量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
弘大216 | 穗行数 | 1 | ||||||||
行粒数 | 0.957** | 1 | ||||||||
穗长 | 0.919** | 0.939** | 1 | |||||||
穗粗 | 0.699** | 0.756** | 0.764** | 1 | ||||||
秃尖长 | -0.869** | -0.837** | -0.826** | -0.701** | 1 | |||||
千粒重 | 0.872** | 0.917** | 0.911** | 0.885** | -0.863** | 1 | ||||
出籽率 | -0.406 | -0.446 | -0.185 | -0.201 | 0.318 | -0.307 | 1 | |||
密度 | -0.972** | -0.965** | -0.981** | -0.765** | 0.883** | -0.919** | 0.275 | 1 | ||
产量 | -0.715** | -0.687** | -0.557* | -0.178 | 0.508* | -0.408 | 0.498* | 0.632** | 1 | |
垦丰101 | 穗行数 | 1 | ||||||||
行粒数 | -0.281 | 1 | ||||||||
穗长 | -0.652** | 0.756** | 1 | |||||||
穗粗 | -0.342 | 0.868** | 0.742** | 1 | ||||||
秃尖长 | -0.166 | -0.826** | -0.323 | -0.653** | 1 | |||||
千粒重 | -0.322 | 0.955** | 0.747** | 0.879** | -0.801** | 1 | ||||
出籽率 | 0.078 | -0.272 | -0.474* | -0.237 | 0.200 | -0.336 | 1 | |||
密度 | 0.241 | -0.926** | -0.681** | -0.884** | 0.842** | -0.972** | 0.350 | 1 | ||
产量 | 0.226 | -0.774** | -0.517* | -0.517* | 0.582* | -0.622** | -0.065 | 0.515* | 1 |
品种 | 相关系数 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 穗长 | 穗粗 | 秃尖长 | 千粒重 | 出籽率 | 密度 | 产量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
弘大216 | 穗行数 | 1 | ||||||||
行粒数 | 0.957** | 1 | ||||||||
穗长 | 0.919** | 0.939** | 1 | |||||||
穗粗 | 0.699** | 0.756** | 0.764** | 1 | ||||||
秃尖长 | -0.869** | -0.837** | -0.826** | -0.701** | 1 | |||||
千粒重 | 0.872** | 0.917** | 0.911** | 0.885** | -0.863** | 1 | ||||
出籽率 | -0.406 | -0.446 | -0.185 | -0.201 | 0.318 | -0.307 | 1 | |||
密度 | -0.972** | -0.965** | -0.981** | -0.765** | 0.883** | -0.919** | 0.275 | 1 | ||
产量 | -0.715** | -0.687** | -0.557* | -0.178 | 0.508* | -0.408 | 0.498* | 0.632** | 1 | |
垦丰101 | 穗行数 | 1 | ||||||||
行粒数 | -0.281 | 1 | ||||||||
穗长 | -0.652** | 0.756** | 1 | |||||||
穗粗 | -0.342 | 0.868** | 0.742** | 1 | ||||||
秃尖长 | -0.166 | -0.826** | -0.323 | -0.653** | 1 | |||||
千粒重 | -0.322 | 0.955** | 0.747** | 0.879** | -0.801** | 1 | ||||
出籽率 | 0.078 | -0.272 | -0.474* | -0.237 | 0.200 | -0.336 | 1 | |||
密度 | 0.241 | -0.926** | -0.681** | -0.884** | 0.842** | -0.972** | 0.350 | 1 | ||
产量 | 0.226 | -0.774** | -0.517* | -0.517* | 0.582* | -0.622** | -0.065 | 0.515* | 1 |
果穗性状 | 品种 | 拟合方程 | 决定系数 |
---|---|---|---|
穗行数 | A1 | Y产量=-458249.901+64634.002X穗行数-2232.345X穗行数2 | R2=0.895** |
A2 | Y产量=-3009.183+793.550X穗行数 | R2=0.051 | |
行粒数 | A1 | Y产量=-14202.995+1682.574X行粒数-29.832X行粒数2 | R2=0.889** |
A2 | Y产量=-197337.850+14785.010X行粒数-264.174X行粒数2 | R2=0.922** | |
穗长 | A1 | Y产量=-50715.419+8243.748X穗长-281.071X穗长2 | R2=0.795** |
A2 | Y产量=-165512.031+23076.529X穗长-760.176X穗长2 | R2=0.580** | |
穗粗 | A1 | Y产量=-184215.244+76662.498X穗粗-7591.834X穗粗2 | R2=0.107 |
A2 | Y产量=-556166.075+217437.098X穗粗--20894.147X穗粗2 | R2=0.642** | |
秃尖长 | A1 | Y产量=7967.985+7348.224X秃尖长-8162.917X秃尖长2 | R2=0.558** |
A2 | Y产量=8418.446+4442.078X秃尖长--4717.284X秃尖长2 | R2=0.416* | |
千粒重 | A1 | Y产量=-554571.251+3414.354X千粒重-5.164X千粒重2 | R2=0.655** |
A2 | Y产量=-150510.577+849.017X千粒重-1.125X千粒重2 | R2=0.938** | |
出籽率 | A1 | Y产量=-47583.071+629.863X出籽率 | R2=0.248 |
A2 | Y产量=16666.681-84.569X出籽率 | R2=0.004 | |
密度 | A1 | Y产量=-8172.326+0.523X密度-3.817E-6X密度2 | R2=0.655** |
A2 | Y产量=-7778.023+0.520X密度-3.851E-6X密度2 | R2=0.844** |
果穗性状 | 品种 | 拟合方程 | 决定系数 |
---|---|---|---|
穗行数 | A1 | Y产量=-458249.901+64634.002X穗行数-2232.345X穗行数2 | R2=0.895** |
A2 | Y产量=-3009.183+793.550X穗行数 | R2=0.051 | |
行粒数 | A1 | Y产量=-14202.995+1682.574X行粒数-29.832X行粒数2 | R2=0.889** |
A2 | Y产量=-197337.850+14785.010X行粒数-264.174X行粒数2 | R2=0.922** | |
穗长 | A1 | Y产量=-50715.419+8243.748X穗长-281.071X穗长2 | R2=0.795** |
A2 | Y产量=-165512.031+23076.529X穗长-760.176X穗长2 | R2=0.580** | |
穗粗 | A1 | Y产量=-184215.244+76662.498X穗粗-7591.834X穗粗2 | R2=0.107 |
A2 | Y产量=-556166.075+217437.098X穗粗--20894.147X穗粗2 | R2=0.642** | |
秃尖长 | A1 | Y产量=7967.985+7348.224X秃尖长-8162.917X秃尖长2 | R2=0.558** |
A2 | Y产量=8418.446+4442.078X秃尖长--4717.284X秃尖长2 | R2=0.416* | |
千粒重 | A1 | Y产量=-554571.251+3414.354X千粒重-5.164X千粒重2 | R2=0.655** |
A2 | Y产量=-150510.577+849.017X千粒重-1.125X千粒重2 | R2=0.938** | |
出籽率 | A1 | Y产量=-47583.071+629.863X出籽率 | R2=0.248 |
A2 | Y产量=16666.681-84.569X出籽率 | R2=0.004 | |
密度 | A1 | Y产量=-8172.326+0.523X密度-3.817E-6X密度2 | R2=0.655** |
A2 | Y产量=-7778.023+0.520X密度-3.851E-6X密度2 | R2=0.844** |
果穗性状 | 品种 | 拟合方程 | 决定系数 |
---|---|---|---|
穗行数 | A1 | Y=18.822-9.729E-5X+4.762E-10X2 | R2=0.964** |
A2 | Y=16.124-3.397E-5X+2.963E-10X2 | R2=0.100 | |
行粒数 | A1 | Y=54.234-4.915E-4X+1.683E-9X2 | R2=0.935** |
A2 | Y=46.318-4.911E-4X+3.101E-9X2 | R2=0.965** | |
穗长 | A1 | Y=19.360-1.157E-5X-7.937E-10X2 | R2=0.969** |
A2 | Y=18.369-5.208E-5X+5.291E-11X2 | R2=0.464** | |
穗粗 | A1 | Y=3.670-1.892E-5X+8.466E-11X2 | R2=0.597** |
A2 | Y=5.910-1.087E-5X+1.058E-11X2 | R2=0.782** | |
秃尖长 | A1 | Y=-0.029-6.429E-6X+1.799E-10X2 | R2=0.792** |
A2 | Y=-3.148+9.540E-5X-6.138E-10X2 | R2=0.819** | |
千粒重 | A1 | Y=301.390+1.996E-3X-2.159E-8X2 | R2=0.926** |
A2 | Y=561.038-4.030E-3X+1.852E-8X2 | R2=0.959** | |
出籽率 | A1 | Y=84.740+1.541E-4X-1.111E-9X2 | R2=0.148 |
A2 | Y=92.489-9.983E-5X+8.995E-10X2 | R2=0.177 |
果穗性状 | 品种 | 拟合方程 | 决定系数 |
---|---|---|---|
穗行数 | A1 | Y=18.822-9.729E-5X+4.762E-10X2 | R2=0.964** |
A2 | Y=16.124-3.397E-5X+2.963E-10X2 | R2=0.100 | |
行粒数 | A1 | Y=54.234-4.915E-4X+1.683E-9X2 | R2=0.935** |
A2 | Y=46.318-4.911E-4X+3.101E-9X2 | R2=0.965** | |
穗长 | A1 | Y=19.360-1.157E-5X-7.937E-10X2 | R2=0.969** |
A2 | Y=18.369-5.208E-5X+5.291E-11X2 | R2=0.464** | |
穗粗 | A1 | Y=3.670-1.892E-5X+8.466E-11X2 | R2=0.597** |
A2 | Y=5.910-1.087E-5X+1.058E-11X2 | R2=0.782** | |
秃尖长 | A1 | Y=-0.029-6.429E-6X+1.799E-10X2 | R2=0.792** |
A2 | Y=-3.148+9.540E-5X-6.138E-10X2 | R2=0.819** | |
千粒重 | A1 | Y=301.390+1.996E-3X-2.159E-8X2 | R2=0.926** |
A2 | Y=561.038-4.030E-3X+1.852E-8X2 | R2=0.959** | |
出籽率 | A1 | Y=84.740+1.541E-4X-1.111E-9X2 | R2=0.148 |
A2 | Y=92.489-9.983E-5X+8.995E-10X2 | R2=0.177 |
[1] | 张召星, 肖春华, 邹楠, 等. 春玉米果穗性状对种植密度的响应研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2017(2):89-95. |
[2] | Tollenaar M, Lee E A. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize[J]. Field Crops Research, 2002(88):161-169. |
[3] | 刘伟. 种植密度对高产夏玉米产量及生理特性影响的研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2011. |
[4] | Abuzar M R, Sadozai G, Baloch M S, et al. Effect of plant population densities on yield of maize[J]. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 2011,21(4):692-695. |
[5] | 刘兴舟, 张建, 李猛, 等. 密度对玉米新品种‘皖玉708’产量及其构成因子的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2017,7(8):1-5. |
[6] | 王向阳, 雷晓兵, 陈润玲, 等. 黄淮海地区夏玉米换代品种洛玉4号适宜种植密度研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010(3):152-156. |
[7] | 周灵芝. 3个不同株型玉米适宜密度的研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012(11):21-23. |
[8] | 赵龙刚. 水肥调控及播种策略与玉米产量形成关系的研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2018. |
[9] | Tollenaar M, Wu J. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance[J]. Crop Science, 1999(39):1587-1604. |
[10] | Echarte L, Luque S, Andrade H H, et al. Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Agentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1993[J]. Field Crops Research, 2000(68):1-8. |
[11] | Bavec F, Bavec M. Effect of maize plant double row spacing on nutrient uptake, leaf area index and yield[J]. Rost Vyroba, 2001(47):135-140. |
[12] | 陈国平, 王荣焕, 赵久然. 玉米高产田的产量结构模式及关键因素分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2009,17(4):89-93. |
[13] | Westgate M E, Lizaso J, Batchelor W. Quantitative relationships between pollen shed density and grain yield in maize[J]. Crop Scient, 2003,43:934-942. |
[14] | Abuzar M R, Sadozai G, Baloch M S, et al. Effect of plant population densities on yield of maize[J]. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 2011,21(4):692-695. |
[15] |
王楷, 王克如, 李少昆, 等. 密度对玉米产量(>15000kg·hm-2)及其产量构成因子的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012(16):3437-3445.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.16.025 URL |
[16] | Ryan J, Roekel V, Coulter J A. Agronoic responses of corn to planting data and plant density[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2011,31(5):1414-1422. |
[17] | 刘兴舟, 李猛, 陈现平, 等. 皖北地区主栽玉米品种密度对产量及其构成因子的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(18):145-150. |
[18] |
Grassini P, Thorburn J, Burr C, et al. High-yield irrigated maize in the Western US cron belt: I. On-farm yield, yield potential, and impact of agronomic practices[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011(120):142-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.012 URL |
[19] | 蒋晓芳, 王秀全, 庞启华, 等. 种植密度对甜玉米农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2016(1):13-14. |
[20] | 于洪彬, 高树仁, 刘利, 王广明. 密度与施肥量对玉米产量及主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2016(8):27-31. |
[1] | HE Mi, LI Xiaobo, HUANG Jing, HUANG Guangfu. The Relationship Between Leaf Area Index and Yield of Rice: Research Progress [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 1-5. |
[2] | LIN Tuanrong, WANG Yufeng, WANG Zhen, FAN Longqiu, ZHANG Zhicheng, WANG Wei, HUANG Wenjuan, JIAO Xinlei, WANG Yiqian, XING Jin, YIN Yuhe. Regional Trials of Mid-Late Maturing Potato Varieties in the North China Group 2019-2020 [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 16-21. |
[3] | NIU Liya, YU Liang, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Weiwei. Correlation Degree Between Water Stress and Wheat Yield Traits and Grain Bulk Density [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 6-9. |
[4] | GUO Shanhu, ZHOU Zonggui, LIU Min, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Lifang, ZHAO Xuetong, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei. Effects of Soil Improvement Materials on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 62-67. |
[5] | LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, LIU Yang, WEN Zhiqiang, QIU Chunren, ZHANG Haixia, MA Zhuwen. Selection and Suitability Evaluation of Eight Introduced Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Shaoguan Ecological Tobacco Areas [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 38-44. |
[6] | YAN Yu, WANG Weijian, YAO Yutian, CHEN Chen, QIU Jun, ZHANG Xiaowei, CHEN Xijun. Effect of Several Biological Agents on Controlling Rice Blast and Improving Yield and Quality of Organic Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 5-11. |
[7] | WANG Xiaodan, WANG Yaliang, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, CHEN Huizhe. Nitrogen Application: Effect on Yield and Quality of Machine Transplanted Large Panicle Single Cropping Rice [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 1-4. |
[8] | SUN Bin, ZHANG Jiajia, SONG Yujiao, HAI Fei, WANG Lei. 5% Prohexadione Calcium EA: Effects on Lodging Resistance, Yield and Its Related Factors of Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 14-17. |
[9] | CHEN Jun, ZHANG Haijun, HAN Mingming, JIANG Fangshan. Row Spacing Configuration with Water-soluble Amino Acid Fertilizer and Betaine Affect the Physiological Effect and Harvest Index of Mechanical Harvesting Summer Maize Cultivars [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 18-23. |
[10] | JIN Wu, HE Qi, DU Xingwei, ZHU Xinyan, WEN Haibo, MA Xueyan, HE Yijin, BING Xuwen. Prediction of Crab Yield by BP Neural Network Based on Meteorological Factors of Crab Producing Areas in Jiangsu [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 50-54. |
[11] | ZHAO Jiatao, FU Zhengbo, YANG Xianghong, LIU Mengdao. Reducing Quantity and Increasing Efficiency of Chemical Fertilizer for ‘Baodamai 20’: A Preliminary Study [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 29-32. |
[12] | ZOU Yijing, JIANG Jianhong, WANG Guangfeng, HUANG Kaimei, LIANG Dagang, YAN Shaobing. Effects of Calabash Rootstock Grafting on Growth, Fruit Traits and Yield of Watermelon [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 50-54. |
[13] | LI Guoqing, LI Guoyu, CONG Xinjun, LI Ni. Intermission Seeding Under Millet and Peanut Intercropping: Effects on the Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 6-10. |
[14] | QUAN Ruilan, FU Ding, MA Hanyun, HUO Erwei, SHEN Guanghui, GUO Guiying, WANG Qinglin. Yield Traits of High-quality and High-yield Conventional Indica Glutinous Rice ‘Zhenzhunuo’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 1-7. |
[15] | LIU Xiaoqing, CHEN Huatao, ZHANG Hongmei, CUI Xiaoyan, YUAN Xingxing, CHEN Xin. A New Spring Sowing Fresh Soybean Variety ‘Sukui No.3’ with High Yield and SMV Resistance: Breeding and Cultivation Techniques [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 16-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||