Comparative Study of Physicochemical Characteristics of Different Species of Spent Mushroom Substrate in Compost

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0165

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the physical and chemical characters of self-composting mature compost of different species of mushroom bran and to understand their physicochemical differences is helpful to make a full use of different kinds of mushroom bran resources, turn waste into treasure, and improve the utilization value of mushroom bran. The temperature, pH, conductivity, organic matter and total humic acid of seafood mushroom bran, pleurotus ostreatus mushroom bran and pleurotus geesteranus mushroom bran were investigated every 10 d. When they were composted for 60 d, the composting mature temperature of the three kinds of bran could be increased above 55℃, and the duration of high temperature was 27, 17 and 11 d, respectively. With the exception of pleurotus geesteranus mushroom bran, the EC value of each fungus bran increased gradually with the composting process and met the requirements of composting; the organic matter content decreased gradually by 6.1%, 12.2% and 15.0%, respectively; the total humic acid increased by 70.04%, 95.5% and 24.8%, respectively; the total humic acid of each fungus bran compost was the highest at 40 d, and that of seafood mushroom bran was 356 g/kg. The characteristics of different species of mushroom bran have certain differences, so the utilization of mushroom bran resources should be applied according to its characteristics.

Key words: Spent Mushroom Substrate, Species, Compost, Physicochemical Characteristics

CLC Number:

S141.4

Chen Yizhao. Comparative Study of Physicochemical Characteristics of Different Species of Spent Mushroom Substrate in Compost[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2): 45-49.

Figures/Tables 6

References 39

[1]	于法辉, 袁秀秀, 阳正林, 等. 菇渣有机肥对烟田土壤养分含量及烟草品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2015(11):52-54,59.
[2]	Li F, Kong Q, Zhang Q, et al. Spent mushroom substrates affect soil humus composition,microbial biomass and functional diversity in paddy fields[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020,149:103489. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103489 URL
[3]	侯立娟, 姚方杰, 宋金俤. 菌糠有机肥对辣椒品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2013(6):1293-1297.
[4]	谭新霞, 张云舒. 菇渣等复合基质对番茄育苗效果的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011,20(5):158-160.
[5]	Medina E, Paredes C, Pérez-Murcia M D, et al. Spent mushroom substrates as component of growing media for germination and growth of horticultural plants[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009,100(18):4227-4232. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.055 URL pmid: 19409775
[6]	Meng X, Dai J, Zhang Y, et al. Composted biogas residue and spent mushroom substrate as a growth medium for tomato and pepper seedlings[J]. J Environ Manage, 2018,216:62-69. URL pmid: 28958462
[7]	刘雯雯, 姚拓, 孙丽娜, 等. 菌糠作为微生物肥料载体的研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008,27(2):787-791.
[8]	孙丽范. 利用耐盐碱解磷、解钾、固氮菌发酵菌糠制备菌肥的研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2012.
[9]	张博凡, 熊鑫, 韩卓, 等. 菌糠强化微生物降解石油污染土壤修复研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(3):1139-1146.
[10]	Zhou J, Ge W, Zhang X, et al. Effects of spent mushroom substrate on the dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soil[J]. Chemosphere, 2020,259:127462. URL pmid: 32590177
[11]	Chen G Q, Zeng G M, Xiang T U, et al. A novel biosorbent: characterization of the spent mushroom compost and its application for removal of heavy metals[J]. J Environ Sci, 2005,17(5):756-760.
[12]	Nakajima V M, Soares F E D F, Queiroz J H D. Screening and decolorizing potential of enzymes from spent mushroom composts of six different mushrooms[J]. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 2018,13:58-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2017.11.011 URL
[13]	范文丽, 李天来, 代洋, 等. 杏鲍菇、香菇、金针菇、蛹虫草、滑菇、平菇菌糠营养分析评价[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2013,44(5):673-677.
[14]	刘莹莹, 张坚, 王红兵, 等. 不同菌糠酶活力测定及微生物菌种发酵效果比较[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2010(3):59-60.
[15]	张红娟, 张朝阳, 胡煜. 三种常见食用菌菌糠营养成分分析及其对鸡腿菇菌丝生长的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2014,60(10):11-13.
[16]	王广耀, 李雪, 周昶延, 等. 滑子菇渣与猪粪不同配比对堆肥腐殖质组成的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019,40(6):111-117.
[17]	王楠, 张溪, 刘镔娴, 等. 不同菌糠废料、鸡粪配比对堆肥质量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017,46(4):49-54.
[18]	周祖法, 闫静, 王伟科, 等. 不同配方菌渣堆肥效果比较[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017,58(1):171-173.
[19]	胡清秀, 卫智涛, 王洪媛. 双孢蘑菇菌渣堆肥及其肥效的研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(9):1902-1909.
[20]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[21]	张文河, 穆桂金. 烧失法测定有机质和碳酸盐的精度控制[J]. 干旱区地理, 2007,30(3):455-459.
[22]	周霞萍. 腐植酸质量标准与分析技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015.
[23]	全国畜牧总站, 农业部畜牧环境设施设备质量监督检验测试中心(北京). GB/T 36195—2018畜禽粪便无害化处理技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
[24]	中国农业大学, 全国畜牧总站, 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 等. NY/T 3442—2019畜禽粪便堆肥技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2019.
[25]	冯雯雯, 董永华, 蔡涵冰, 等. 微生物菌剂对畜禽粪便与秸秆混合发酵过程参数影响及腐熟度综合评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020,48(6):265-271.
[26]	王瑞东, 颉建明, 冯致, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对棉秆高温好氧堆肥的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019,54(1):68-73.
[27]	李章海, 韦建玉, 叶江平. 有机肥条垛型堆积发酵技术与应用[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2015.
[28]	陈同斌, 黄启飞, 高定, 等. 城市污泥好氧堆肥过程中积温规律的探讨[J]. 生态学报, 2002,22(6):911-915.
[29]	王艮梅, 黄松杉, 王良桂, 等. 菌渣好氧堆肥过程中腐熟度指标及红外光谱的动态变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(12):2416-2424.
[30]	周海瑛, 邱慧珍, 杨慧珍, 等. C/N比对好氧堆肥中NH₃挥发损失和含氮有机物转化的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020,38(2):69-77.
[31]	刘林培, 管秀琼, 李俊, 等. 食用菌菌渣协同白酒丢糟堆肥效果研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(23):294-298.
[32]	刘青海, 潘虎, 朱兆静, 等. 高效纤维素降解复合菌系M6的构建及堆肥效果初探[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019,48(12):56-62.
[33]	王砚, 李念念, 朱端卫, 等. 水稻秸秆预处理对猪粪高温堆肥过程的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018,37(9):2021-2028.
[34]	Hou N, Wen L, Cao H, et al. Role of psychrotrophic bacteria in organic domestic waste composting in cold regions of China[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2017,236:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.166 URL pmid: 28390273
[35]	李天林, 沈兵, 李红霞. 无土栽培中基质培选料的参考因素与发展趋势[J]. 石河子大学学报:自然科学版, 1999,3(3):250.
[36]	黄国锋, 钟流举, 张振钿, 等. 有机固体废弃物堆肥的物质变化及腐熟度评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(5):813-818.
[37]	杨毓峰, 薛澄泽, 唐新保. 畜禽废弃物堆肥的腐熟指标[J]. 西北农业大学学报, 1999,27(4):62-66.
[38]	国洪艳, 徐凤花, 万书名, 等. 牛粪接种复合发酵剂堆肥对腐植酸变化特征的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008,27(3):1231-1234.
[39]	Hsu J, Lo S. Chemical and spectroscopic analysis of organic matter transformations during composting of pig manure[J]. Environmental pollution (1987), 1999,104(2):189-196. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00193-6 URL