
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 6-10.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2021-0078
Previous Articles Next Articles
					
													SONG  Min( ), WU  Cuixia, ZHANG  Yong, MA  Chong, ZHANG  Tiantian, ZHOU  Chao, YANG  Lina
), WU  Cuixia, ZHANG  Yong, MA  Chong, ZHANG  Tiantian, ZHOU  Chao, YANG  Lina
												  
						
						
						
					
				
Received:2021-04-28
															
							
																	Revised:2022-10-27
															
							
															
							
																	Online:2023-01-20
															
							
																	Published:2023-01-31
															
						SONG Min, WU Cuixia, ZHANG Yong, MA Chong, ZHANG Tiantian, ZHOU Chao, YANG Lina. Efficacy of Metalaxyl-M·Fludioxonil·Azoxystrobin on Controlling Soil-borne Fungal Diseases of Peanut Seedlings[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(1): 6-10.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2021-0078
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 冠腐病试验田 | 茎腐病试验田 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 出苗时间/d | 出苗率/% | 出苗时间/d | 出苗率/% | |||
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 12 | 95.00ab | 12 | 93.63 a | |
| 300 | 12 | 94.88ab | 12 | 95.25 a | ||
| 400 | 12 | 95.75a | 12 | 95.13 a | ||
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵ES | 40 | 12 | 94.00ab | 12 | 93.88 a | |
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 12 | 94.75ab | 12 | 93.38 a | |
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 12 | 93.38b | 12 | 92.63 a | |
| CK | — | 12 | 93.13b | 12 | 92.75 a | |
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 冠腐病试验田 | 茎腐病试验田 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 出苗时间/d | 出苗率/% | 出苗时间/d | 出苗率/% | |||
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 12 | 95.00ab | 12 | 93.63 a | |
| 300 | 12 | 94.88ab | 12 | 95.25 a | ||
| 400 | 12 | 95.75a | 12 | 95.13 a | ||
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵ES | 40 | 12 | 94.00ab | 12 | 93.88 a | |
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 12 | 94.75ab | 12 | 93.38 a | |
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 12 | 93.38b | 12 | 92.63 a | |
| CK | — | 12 | 93.13b | 12 | 92.75 a | |
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 病株率/% | 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 14.83cde | 4.09c | 81.92b | 
| 300 | 12.50de | 2.50cd | 88.87a | |
| 400 | 11.83e | 1.80d | 92.20a | |
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵ES | 40 | 19.17b | 6.94b | 69.60c | 
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 15.00cd | 3.89cd | 82.93b | 
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 16.17bc | 6.17b | 72.19c | 
| CK | — | 43.33a | 23.15a | — | 
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 病株率/% | 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 14.83cde | 4.09c | 81.92b | 
| 300 | 12.50de | 2.50cd | 88.87a | |
| 400 | 11.83e | 1.80d | 92.20a | |
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵ES | 40 | 19.17b | 6.94b | 69.60c | 
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 15.00cd | 3.89cd | 82.93b | 
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 16.17bc | 6.17b | 72.19c | 
| CK | — | 43.33a | 23.15a | — | 
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 病株率/% | 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 10.67bc | 3.05bcd | 76.36c | 
| 300 | 8.67c | 2.24d | 82.50b | |
| 400 | 7.50c | 1.74d | 86.10a | |
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵ES | 40 | 13.67b | 4.48b | 65.34e | 
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 10.50bc | 2.88cd | 77.77c | 
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 11.33bc | 3.81bc | 70.81d | 
| CK | — | 26.83a | 12.88a | — | 
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 病株率/% | 病情指数 | 防治效果/% | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 10.67bc | 3.05bcd | 76.36c | 
| 300 | 8.67c | 2.24d | 82.50b | |
| 400 | 7.50c | 1.74d | 86.10a | |
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵ES | 40 | 13.67b | 4.48b | 65.34e | 
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 10.50bc | 2.88cd | 77.77c | 
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 11.33bc | 3.81bc | 70.81d | 
| CK | — | 26.83a | 12.88a | — | 
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 冠腐病试验田 | 茎腐病试验田 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 荚果产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | 荚果产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | |||
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 4440.75c | 5.78b | 4133.50abc | 5.99ab | |
| 300 | 4614.25b | 9.91a | 4160.00ab | 6.67ab | ||
| 400 | 4750.00a | 13.14a | 4227.50a | 8.40a | ||
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵FS | 40 | 4415.25c | 5.17b | 3985.00cd | 2.18c | |
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 4466.75c | 6.40b | 4125.25abc | 5.78ab | |
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 4358.50c | 3.82b | 4043.25bcd | 3.67bc | |
| CK | — | 4198.25d | — | 3900.00d | — | |
| 处理 | 药剂用量(g a.i./100 kg种子) | 冠腐病试验田 | 茎腐病试验田 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 荚果产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | 荚果产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | |||
| 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯FS | 200 | 4440.75c | 5.78b | 4133.50abc | 5.99ab | |
| 300 | 4614.25b | 9.91a | 4160.00ab | 6.67ab | ||
| 400 | 4750.00a | 13.14a | 4227.50a | 8.40a | ||
| 350 g/L精甲霜灵FS | 40 | 4415.25c | 5.17b | 3985.00cd | 2.18c | |
| 25 g/L咯菌腈FS | 600 | 4466.75c | 6.40b | 4125.25abc | 5.78ab | |
| 10%嘧菌酯FS | 250 | 4358.50c | 3.82b | 4043.25bcd | 3.67bc | |
| CK | — | 4198.25d | — | 3900.00d | — | |
| [1] | 李杨. 拌种防治花生冠腐病及蛴螬安全药剂筛选[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2012. | 
| [2] | 李杨, 高志山, 李建涛, 等. 戊唑醇等四种杀菌剂防治花生冠腐病应用研究[J]. 花生学报, 2012, 41(2):13-19. | 
| [3] | 丁献坤, 朱旭, 毛继伟, 等. 南阳市夏花生冠腐病发生规律及综合防治技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2010(6):191-192. | 
| [4] | 马金娜. 花生茎腐病的发病规律、危害症状及综合防治技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2018(10):245-246. | 
| [5] | 郭洪参, 张悦丽, 齐军山, 等. 山东花生茎腐病病原菌研究[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2014, 36(4):524-528. | 
| [6] | 管磊, 郭贝贝, 王晓坤, 等. 苯醚甲环唑等杀菌剂包衣种子防治花生冠腐病和根腐病[J]. 植物保护学报, 2016, 43(5):842-849. | 
| [7] | 袁虹霞, 李洪连, 汤丰收, 等. 药剂处理种子对花生茎腐病防治效果[J]. 植物保护, 2006, 32(2):73-75. | 
| [8] | 中国农药信息网,农药登记数据[DB/OL]. http://www.chinapesticide.org.cn/hysj/index.jhtml. 2022-11-02. | 
| [9] | 刘长令, 杨吉春. 现代农药手册[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2018. | 
| [10] | 饶镭, 邱蝶, 李保同. 11%精甲·咯·嘧菌悬浮种衣剂防治水稻立枯病和恶苗病效果研究[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(6):254-258. | 
| [11] | 刘煜财, 王义山, 郭冬梅, 等. 11%精甲霜灵·咯菌腈·嘧菌酯悬浮种衣剂防治玉米丝黑穗病试验[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2014, 39(3):56-58. | 
| [12] | 郭洪参, 李林, 齐军山, 等. 山东花生茎腐病发生规律及防治研究初报[J]. 山东农业科学, 2009, 8:83-85. | 
| [13] | 谢明惠, 林璐璐, 陈浩梁, 等. 药剂拌种对花生苗期的影响及田间蛴螬防效评价[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(2):275-283. | 
| [14] | 徐秀娟. 中国花生病虫草鼠害[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009. | 
| [15] | pmid: 18005030 | 
| [16] | doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.06.008 URL | 
| [17] | 丁献坤, 朱旭, 毛继伟, 等. 南阳市夏花生冠腐病发生规律及综合防治技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2010(6):191-192. | 
| [18] | 穆敏, 何党军, 毕锦暇. 花生苗期病害探究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2010(2):104-105. | 
| [19] | 李金华. 花生主要病害的发生与防治[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(3):97-98. | 
| [20] | 李林, 孙玉桃, 张武汉, 等. 种衣剂拌种和地膜覆盖对花生成苗与产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2003, 25(2):36-38. | 
| [21] | 蒋莹, 赵婷婷, 谢吉先, 等. 噻呋酰胺对花生茎腐病和白绢病的防治效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(7):1394-1396. | 
| [1] | XING Maode, LIU Xiao, GENG Jun, YU Kejian, MIAO Zhongqin. Peanut Industry in Zibo: Development Status, Existing Problems and Countermeasures [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(1): 73-78. | 
| [2] | CHEN Kang, LIN Qian, WANG Yongli, WANG Tingli, CHEN Hong. Interaction Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Plant and Yield Traits of Single Seeding Peanut [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 42-46. | 
| [3] | LI Guoqing, LI Guoyu, CONG Xinjun, LI Ni. Intermission Seeding Under Millet and Peanut Intercropping: Effects on the Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(3): 6-10. | 
| [4] | XU Yongju, YE Xiao, HOU Rui, LI Shuang, ZHANG Xiaojun, YUE Fuliang, ZHANG Xiangqiong, LIU Xing, LI Wenjun, ZHANG Xiaohong. High-oleic Peanut Varieties in Sichuan: Introduction Trial [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(1): 6-11. | 
| [5] | Wen Saiqun, Yuan Guang, Zhang Zhimeng, Zhang Guanchu, Ci Dunwei, Ding Hong, Xu Yang, Jiang Changsong, Dai Liangxiang. Salt Tolerance of Peanut Varieties at Seedling Stage: Assessment and Screening [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(6): 29-35. | 
| [6] | Qi Yonghong, Li Minquan, Cao Sufang, Jiang Jingjing, Li Xueping, Li Qingqing, Xu Meirong, Li Jiping. Identification of Codonopsis pilosula Crown Rot Disease and Its Sensitivity to Fungicides [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(2): 74-78. | 
| [7] | YANG Guang, LI Hangyu, CHEN Long, SHI Shoushe, YU Minghui. Identification and Evaluation of Peanut Germplasm Resistance to Bacterial Wilt [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(12): 44-47. | 
| [8] | Si Xianzong, Zhang Xiang, Suo Yanyan, Mao Jiawei, Li Liang, Yu Qiong, Li Guoping, Yu Hui, Guo Yuting. Peanut Varieties in Fluvo-aquic Soil Area: Dry Matter Accumulation and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Requirement [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(6): 40-45. | 
| [9] | Chen Jinrui, Zhang Leilei, Du Shanshan, , Hong Mei. Introduction and Screening of Peanut in Xinjiang by Weighted Improved Grey Correlation Degree Analysis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2020, 10(5): 42-47. | 
| [10] | . Degradable Plastic Film: Effects on Growth and Development of Peanut and Its Residues [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(9): 36-39. | 
| [11] | . Prevention and Control of Two Newly-Invasive Diseases of Sweet Potato [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(2): 18-23. | 
| [12] | . Oyster Shell Soil Conditioner: Effects on Peanut Yield and Acidified Soil Amendment in Yellow Clayey Field [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2019, 9(11): 17-20. | 
| [13] | . Planting Density Under the Mode of Single-seed Precision Sowing: Effect on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation of Peanut [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2018, 8(11): 9-15. | 
| [14] | . Breeding of a New Peanut Variety‘Quanhua 27’with Resistance to Bacterial Wilt [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2017, 7(8): 25-28. | 
| [15] | . Research Progress of Disease Resistance Genes in Peanut [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2017, 7(4): 5-9. | 
| Viewed | ||||||
| Full text |  | |||||
| Abstract |  | |||||