Journal of Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (9): 42-46.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2021-0045
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Kang(), LIN Qian, WANG Yongli, WANG Tingli, CHEN Hong
Received:
2021-03-11
Revised:
2021-05-26
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2023-01-11
CLC Number:
CHEN Kang, LIN Qian, WANG Yongli, WANG Tingli, CHEN Hong. Interaction Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Plant and Yield Traits of Single Seeding Peanut[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 42-46.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2021-0045
种植 密度 | 氮肥 水平 | 出苗期 | 苗期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总干重/ (g/株) | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | ||||||
D1 | N0 | 1.09c | 2.24c | 1.15c | 6.57c | 4.33c | 32.56c | 25.99c | 39.68c | 7.12a | ||||
N50 | 1.28b | 2.43c | 1.15c | 7.67b | 5.24b | 36.53b | 28.86b | 43.56b | 7.03a | |||||
N115 | 1.32a | 2.75b | 1.43b | 9.02a | 6.27a | 37.34b | 28.32b | 45.45b | 8.11a | |||||
N180 | 1.41a | 3.23a | 1.82a | 9.47a | 6.24ab | 42.45a | 32.98a | 49.78a | 7.33a | |||||
D2 | N0 | 1.15c | 2.57d | 1.42c | 6.43d | 3.86c | 36.35d | 29.92d | 42.58d | 6.23b | ||||
N50 | 1.29bc | 2.76c | 1.47c | 7.65c | 4.89b | 40.87c | 33.22c | 49.56c | 8.69a | |||||
N115 | 1.33a | 4.06a | 2.73a | 10.45a | 6.39a | 53.64a | 43.19a | 60.15a | 6.51b | |||||
N180 | 1.32ab | 3.64b | 2.32b | 9.27b | 5.63a | 49.16b | 39.89b | 55.36b | 6.20b | |||||
D3 | N0 | 1.11b | 2.11b | 1.00a | 5.57c | 3.46c | 30.78c | 25.21c | 38.48c | 7.70a | ||||
N50 | 1.29a | 2.42a | 1.13a | 7.84b | 5.42b | 33.34c | 25.50b | 41.42c | 8.08a | |||||
N115 | 1.35ab | 2.54a | 1.19a | 8.27b | 5.73b | 35.64b | 27.37b | 44.69b | 9.05a | |||||
N180 | 1.42a | 2.63a | 1.21a | 9.17a | 6.54a | 41.45a | 32.28a | 49.23a | 7.78a |
种植 密度 | 氮肥 水平 | 出苗期 | 苗期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总干重/ (g/株) | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | 总干重/ (g/株) | 阶段增 长率/% | ||||||
D1 | N0 | 1.09c | 2.24c | 1.15c | 6.57c | 4.33c | 32.56c | 25.99c | 39.68c | 7.12a | ||||
N50 | 1.28b | 2.43c | 1.15c | 7.67b | 5.24b | 36.53b | 28.86b | 43.56b | 7.03a | |||||
N115 | 1.32a | 2.75b | 1.43b | 9.02a | 6.27a | 37.34b | 28.32b | 45.45b | 8.11a | |||||
N180 | 1.41a | 3.23a | 1.82a | 9.47a | 6.24ab | 42.45a | 32.98a | 49.78a | 7.33a | |||||
D2 | N0 | 1.15c | 2.57d | 1.42c | 6.43d | 3.86c | 36.35d | 29.92d | 42.58d | 6.23b | ||||
N50 | 1.29bc | 2.76c | 1.47c | 7.65c | 4.89b | 40.87c | 33.22c | 49.56c | 8.69a | |||||
N115 | 1.33a | 4.06a | 2.73a | 10.45a | 6.39a | 53.64a | 43.19a | 60.15a | 6.51b | |||||
N180 | 1.32ab | 3.64b | 2.32b | 9.27b | 5.63a | 49.16b | 39.89b | 55.36b | 6.20b | |||||
D3 | N0 | 1.11b | 2.11b | 1.00a | 5.57c | 3.46c | 30.78c | 25.21c | 38.48c | 7.70a | ||||
N50 | 1.29a | 2.42a | 1.13a | 7.84b | 5.42b | 33.34c | 25.50b | 41.42c | 8.08a | |||||
N115 | 1.35ab | 2.54a | 1.19a | 8.27b | 5.73b | 35.64b | 27.37b | 44.69b | 9.05a | |||||
N180 | 1.42a | 2.63a | 1.21a | 9.17a | 6.54a | 41.45a | 32.28a | 49.23a | 7.78a |
种植 密度 | 氮肥水平 | 主茎叶片数/个 | 侧枝数/条 | 主茎高/cm | 侧枝长/cm | 第一节间粗/mm | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | ||||||
D1 | N0 | 11.5a | 25.0ab | 26.3bc | 21.7a | 22.5a | 26.3a | 18.3a | 43.5a | 50.6a | 21.9b | 50.1b | 57.9ab | 7.8a | — | 13.0a | ||||
N50 | 11.7a | 25.3ab | 30.0a | 24.7a | 25.3cd | 26.8ab | 19.3c | 46.1a | 50.7b | 22.6b | 51.9ab | 58.0a | 7.9a | — | 13.4a | |||||
N115 | 11.6b | 24.0b | 29.3bc | 24.8c | 26.3cd | 26.7cd | 20.0a | 48.3a | 51.1a | 24.6a | 50.1b | 59.1a | 7.9bc | — | 13.6b | |||||
N180 | 11.8a | 25.2b | 29.8b | 24.7a | 26.5a | 27.2a | 21.2a | 48.6a | 52.2a | 25.2a | 50.9b | 59.2b | 8.0a | — | 13.8a | |||||
D2 | N0 | 11.3a | 24.3ab | 23.7c | 15.7b | 22.3cd | 24.0c | 18.6b | 44.5a | 50.2a | 20.2b | 47.6a | 54.1ab | 7.0a | — | 9.9b | ||||
N50 | 11.4b | 25.3ab | 24.7c | 16.8b | 23.0ab | 25.3c | 19.5a | 45.8a | 50.3b | 21.4b | 49.2a | 55.4ab | 7.5a | — | 10.1b | |||||
N115 | 11.8a | 25.5ab | 25.3c | 17.2b | 25.7cd | 26.3b | 20.7b | 47.1a | 52.1a | 23.3a | 50.4a | 57.9ab | 7.7c | — | 10.4a | |||||
N180 | 11.7a | 24.9b | 25.1c | 16.9b | 24.8c | 26.1b | 20.6b | 46.6b | 51.2a | 23.2b | 50.2b | 57.8b | 7.6b | — | 10.3b | |||||
D3 | N0 | 10.0a | 22.0b | 22.3bc | 10.8c | 18.3cd | 18.7c | 17.1a | 43.3a | 41.1a | 19.6a | 40.1b | 52.1a | 5.9bc | — | 8.8b | ||||
N50 | 10.2b | 22.3b | 23.0c | 13.3b | 19.7d | 20.0b | 17.7c | 44.0a | 42.6a | 20.3b | 41.2b | 53.3b | 6.6c | — | 8.9b | |||||
N115 | 10.8a | 22.7ab | 23.0c | 13.2bc | 23.3cd | 22.7d | 18.4a | 45.3a | 43.9a | 20.8b | 43.9a | 57.3a | 6.8ab | — | 9.4b | |||||
N180 | 10.9a | 22.9b | 24.1b | 14.8a | 23.1c | 22.6 | 18.6a | 45.8a | 43.8b | 21.3a | 44.3a | 57.5b | 7.0a | — | 9.6b |
种植 密度 | 氮肥水平 | 主茎叶片数/个 | 侧枝数/条 | 主茎高/cm | 侧枝长/cm | 第一节间粗/mm | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | 花针期 | 结荚期 | 收获期 | ||||||
D1 | N0 | 11.5a | 25.0ab | 26.3bc | 21.7a | 22.5a | 26.3a | 18.3a | 43.5a | 50.6a | 21.9b | 50.1b | 57.9ab | 7.8a | — | 13.0a | ||||
N50 | 11.7a | 25.3ab | 30.0a | 24.7a | 25.3cd | 26.8ab | 19.3c | 46.1a | 50.7b | 22.6b | 51.9ab | 58.0a | 7.9a | — | 13.4a | |||||
N115 | 11.6b | 24.0b | 29.3bc | 24.8c | 26.3cd | 26.7cd | 20.0a | 48.3a | 51.1a | 24.6a | 50.1b | 59.1a | 7.9bc | — | 13.6b | |||||
N180 | 11.8a | 25.2b | 29.8b | 24.7a | 26.5a | 27.2a | 21.2a | 48.6a | 52.2a | 25.2a | 50.9b | 59.2b | 8.0a | — | 13.8a | |||||
D2 | N0 | 11.3a | 24.3ab | 23.7c | 15.7b | 22.3cd | 24.0c | 18.6b | 44.5a | 50.2a | 20.2b | 47.6a | 54.1ab | 7.0a | — | 9.9b | ||||
N50 | 11.4b | 25.3ab | 24.7c | 16.8b | 23.0ab | 25.3c | 19.5a | 45.8a | 50.3b | 21.4b | 49.2a | 55.4ab | 7.5a | — | 10.1b | |||||
N115 | 11.8a | 25.5ab | 25.3c | 17.2b | 25.7cd | 26.3b | 20.7b | 47.1a | 52.1a | 23.3a | 50.4a | 57.9ab | 7.7c | — | 10.4a | |||||
N180 | 11.7a | 24.9b | 25.1c | 16.9b | 24.8c | 26.1b | 20.6b | 46.6b | 51.2a | 23.2b | 50.2b | 57.8b | 7.6b | — | 10.3b | |||||
D3 | N0 | 10.0a | 22.0b | 22.3bc | 10.8c | 18.3cd | 18.7c | 17.1a | 43.3a | 41.1a | 19.6a | 40.1b | 52.1a | 5.9bc | — | 8.8b | ||||
N50 | 10.2b | 22.3b | 23.0c | 13.3b | 19.7d | 20.0b | 17.7c | 44.0a | 42.6a | 20.3b | 41.2b | 53.3b | 6.6c | — | 8.9b | |||||
N115 | 10.8a | 22.7ab | 23.0c | 13.2bc | 23.3cd | 22.7d | 18.4a | 45.3a | 43.9a | 20.8b | 43.9a | 57.3a | 6.8ab | — | 9.4b | |||||
N180 | 10.9a | 22.9b | 24.1b | 14.8a | 23.1c | 22.6 | 18.6a | 45.8a | 43.8b | 21.3a | 44.3a | 57.5b | 7.0a | — | 9.6b |
种植密度 | 氮肥水平 | 单株荚果重/g | 百果重/g | 比对照增加/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照增加/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | N0 | 32.45±0.31c | 187.54±0.65d | 3894.00±1.01c | ||
N50 | 38.95±0.36b | 193.87±0.73c | 3.38 | 4674.00±0.80b | 20.03 | |
N115 | 42.37±0.98a | 196.58±1.32b | 4.82 | 5084.40±1.06a | 30.57 | |
N180 | 43.68±1.03a | 201.42±0.74a | 7.40 | 5241.60±3.03a | 34.61 | |
D2 | N0 | 28.24±0.63d | 185.87±0.95d | 5648.00±0.91d | ||
N50 | 31.75±0.42c | 192.57±0.62c | 3.60 | 6350.00±0.65c | 12.43 | |
N115 | 33.68±0.74a | 218.68±1.45a | 17.65 | 6736.00±1.03a | 19.26 | |
N180 | 32.58±0.65b | 200.78±1.15b | 8.02 | 6516.00±1.17b | 15.37 | |
D3 | N0 | 17.52±0.87d | 178.58±1.23d | 4905.60±1.36d | ||
N50 | 20.51±0.43c | 184.68±1.32c | 3.42 | 5742.80±1.41c | 17.07 | |
N115 | 21.52±1.02b | 190.78±0.74b | 6.83 | 6025.60±0.21b | 22.83 | |
N180 | 23.35±0.92a | 198.36±0.52a | 11.08 | 6538.00±0.66a | 33.28 |
种植密度 | 氮肥水平 | 单株荚果重/g | 百果重/g | 比对照增加/% | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照增加/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | N0 | 32.45±0.31c | 187.54±0.65d | 3894.00±1.01c | ||
N50 | 38.95±0.36b | 193.87±0.73c | 3.38 | 4674.00±0.80b | 20.03 | |
N115 | 42.37±0.98a | 196.58±1.32b | 4.82 | 5084.40±1.06a | 30.57 | |
N180 | 43.68±1.03a | 201.42±0.74a | 7.40 | 5241.60±3.03a | 34.61 | |
D2 | N0 | 28.24±0.63d | 185.87±0.95d | 5648.00±0.91d | ||
N50 | 31.75±0.42c | 192.57±0.62c | 3.60 | 6350.00±0.65c | 12.43 | |
N115 | 33.68±0.74a | 218.68±1.45a | 17.65 | 6736.00±1.03a | 19.26 | |
N180 | 32.58±0.65b | 200.78±1.15b | 8.02 | 6516.00±1.17b | 15.37 | |
D3 | N0 | 17.52±0.87d | 178.58±1.23d | 4905.60±1.36d | ||
N50 | 20.51±0.43c | 184.68±1.32c | 3.42 | 5742.80±1.41c | 17.07 | |
N115 | 21.52±1.02b | 190.78±0.74b | 6.83 | 6025.60±0.21b | 22.83 | |
N180 | 23.35±0.92a | 198.36±0.52a | 11.08 | 6538.00±0.66a | 33.28 |
[1] | 万书波, 张佳蕾. 中国花生产业降本增效新途径探讨[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2019(41):657-662. |
[2] | 王晓娟. 花生2016年市场形势及2017年展望[J]. 农产品市场周刊, 2017(4):33-34. |
[3] | 万书波. 花生优质安全增效栽培理论与技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2009. |
[4] | 邵长亮. 花生单粒精播节种高产理论与技术研究[D]. 烟台: 莱阳农学院, 2005. |
[5] | 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 杨佃卿, 等. 单粒精播对超高产花生群体结构和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015(48):3757-3766. |
[6] | 李安东, 任卫国, 王才斌, 等. 花生单粒精播高产栽培生育特点及配套技术研究[J]. 花生学报, 2004(2):17-22. |
[7] | 郑永美, 王才斌, 万书波, 等. 不同形态氮肥对花生氮代谢及氮积累的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2012, 44(2):57-62. |
[8] | 万书波, 封海胜, 左学青, 等. 不同供氮水平花生的氮素利用效率[J]. 山东农业科学, 2000(1):31-33. |
[9] | 赵秀芬, 房增国. 大豆、花生固氮与施氮关系的研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2005, 11(3):48-49. |
[10] | 张翔, 张新友, 毛家伟, 等. 施氮水平对不同花生品种产量与品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(6):1417-1423. |
[11] |
WANG C B, ZHENG Y M, SHEN P, et al. Determining N supplied sources and N use efficiency for peanut under applications of four forms of N fertilizers labeled by isotope 15N[J]. J Integr agric, 2016, 15:432-439.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61079-6 URL |
[12] | 吴正锋. 花生高产高效氮素养分调控研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2014. |
[13] |
JU X T, KOU C L, ZHANG F S, et al. Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination:Comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain[J]. Environ pollut, 2006, 143:117-125.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005 URL |
[14] |
HECHT V L, TEMPERTON V M, NAGEL K A, et al. Plant density modifies root system architecture in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) through a change in nodal root number[J]. Plant soil, 2019, 439:179-200.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3764-9 URL |
[15] | FARSHBAF-JAFARI S, PIRZAD A, TAJBAKHSH M, et al. Effects of water supply and plant density on leaf characteristics of Amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus L.). 2nd International conference on sustainable environment and agriculture IPCBEE. Singapore: LACSIT Press, 2014:17-20. |
[16] | 司贤宗, 张翔, 毛家伟, 等. 施氮量对花生产质量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(29):91-96. |
[17] |
XU C L, HUANG S B, TIAN B J, et al. Manipulating planting density and nitrogen fertilizer application to improve yield and reduce environmental impact in Chinese maize production[J]. Front plant sci, 2017, 08:1234.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01234 URL |
[18] |
PASLEY H R, CAMBERATO J J, CAIRNS J E, et al. Nitrogen rate impacts on tropical maize nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen depletion in eastern and southern Africa[J]. Nutr cycl agroecosyst, 2020, 116:397-408.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-020-10049-x URL |
[19] |
CIAMPITTI I A, VYN T J. Physiological perspectives of changes over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiencies:A review[J]. Field Crops Res, 2012, 133:48-67.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.008 URL |
[20] |
LESKOVSEK R, DATTA A, SIMONCIC A, et al. Influence of nitrogen and plant density on the growth and seed production of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)[J]. J pest Sci, 2012, 85:527-539.
doi: 10.1007/s10340-012-0433-2 URL |
[21] | 王士红, 杨中旭, 史加亮, 等. 增密减氮对棉花干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020(46):395-407. |
[22] | 张含笑, 林参, 左青松, 等. 种植密度和施肥量对油菜毯状苗生长的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019(45):1691-1698. |
[23] | 左青松, 蒯婕, 杨士芬, 等. 不同氮肥和密度对直播油菜冠层结构及群体特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015(41):758-765. |
[24] |
HILL J O, SIMPSON R J, MOORE 1 A D, et al. Morphology and response of roots of pasture species to phosphorus and nitrogen nutrition[J]. Plant soil, 2006, 286:7-19.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-0014-3 URL |
[25] | 郑亚萍, 王春晓, 郑祖林, 等. 磷对花生根系形态特征的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2019(41):622-628. |
[26] | 郑永美, 王春晓, 刘岐茂, 等. 氮肥对花生根系生长和结瘤能力的调控效应[J]. 核农学报, 2017(31):2418-2425. |
[27] |
ELAZAB A, SERRET M D, ARAUS J L. Interactive effect of water and nitrogen regimes on plant growth,root traits and water status of old and modern durum wheat genotypes[J]. Planta, 2016, 244:125-144.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-016-2500-z URL |
[28] | 丁红, 张智猛, 戴良香, 等. 水氮互作对花生根系生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015(48):872-881. |
[29] | 刘俊华, 吴正锋, 沈浦, 等. 氮肥与密度互作对单粒精播花生根系形态、植株性状及产量的影响[J/OL]. 作物学报:1-14. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1809.S.20200630.1330.004.html [2020-08-22]. |
[30] | 郑亚萍, 王才斌, 成波, 等. 不同品种类型花生精播肥料与密度的产量效应及优化配置研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2007(1):201-205. |
[31] | 张艳艳, 李文金, 陈建生, 等. 麦后直播花生施氮对根瘤生长发育、荚果产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2015, 44(1):18-22. |
[32] | 张翔, 张新友, 张玉亭, 等. 施氮量对不同花生品种生长及干物质积累的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2011, 40(1):23-29. |
[33] | 孙虎, 王月福, 马东辉, 等. 施氮量对不同类型花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2007(3):76-77,84. |
[34] |
杨吉顺, 李尚霞, 张智猛, 等. 施氮对不同花生品种光合特性及干物质积累的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2014, 28(1):154-160.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2014.01.0154 |
[35] | 赵长星, 邵长亮, 王月福, 等. 单粒精播模式下种植密度对花生群体生态特征及产量的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(2):1-5. |
[36] | 修俊杰, 张伯岩. 单粒精播模式下密度对花生产量及干物质积累的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(11):9-15,61. |
[37] | 周录英, 李向东, 汤笑, 等. 氮、磷、钾肥配施对花生生理特性及产量、品质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(6):2707-2714. |
[38] | 周录英, 李向东, 汤笑, 等. 氮、磷、钾肥不同用量对花生生理特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 11:2468-2474. |
[39] | 孙虎, 王月福, 王铭伦, 等. 施氮量对不同类型花生品种衰老特性和产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(10):2671-2677. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||