Laboratory Toxicity and Field Efficacy of Five Insecticides Against Apolygus lucorum

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0188

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim of this research is to select high-efficiency, low-toxicity and safe insecticides for the control of Apolygus lucorum, and to provide basic data and scientific basis for the scientific prevention and control of A. lucorum. The laboratory toxicity and field control effect of different insecticides on A. lucorum were studied. In this study, the laboratory toxicity and field control effect of thiamethoxam, abamectin, matrine, rotenone and osthole on A. lucorum were determined by food dipping method and field spraying method. The results of laboratory toxicity test showed that the toxicity of five insecticides to A. lucorum increased with the increase of insecticide concentration. The order of toxicity to A. lucorum was thiamethoxam > abamectin > matrine > rotenone > osthole. The results of field control test showed that 300 mg/L thiamethoxam and 600 mg/L thiamethoxam had the best control effect after 3 days of application in mung bean field, and the field control effect had reached more than 75%. After 7 days of application in mung bean field, the control effect of 600 mg/L thiamethoxam was the best, followed by 300 mg/L thiamethoxam and 1000 mg/L avermectin, and the field control effect was more than 70%. The field control effect of 1600 mg/L matrine was 58.94%, and the field control effect of 1600 mg/L rotenone and 1600 mg/L osthole was about 50%. It was found that five insecticides had certain field control effects on A. lucorum, among which thiamethoxam and abamectin had better control effect on A. lucorum, and they were recommended to be utilized in the field.

Key words: Apolygus lucorum, insecticides, laboratory toxicity, control effect

YANG Bin, ZHENG Jiacheng, YAN Xiongfei. Laboratory Toxicity and Field Efficacy of Five Insecticides Against Apolygus lucorum[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(2): 23-29.

Figures/Tables 4

References 25

[1]	张未仲, 李捷, 周旭凌, 等. 绿盲蝽研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(10):13-18. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17070008
[2]	李丽莉, 门兴元, 于毅, 等. 果园绿盲蝽的识别与绿色防控[J]. 落叶果树, 2022, 54(5):65-67.
[3]	金平涛, 李天娇, 王亚红, 等. 猕猴桃园绿盲蝽发生动态及性诱防控效果初报[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2023, 43(3):58-61.
[4]	ADEL K, AN X K, SHAN S, et al. The microRNAs in the antennae of Apolygus lucorum (Hemiptera: Miridae): Expression properties and targets prediction[J]. Genomics, 2022, 114(5):110447 doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110447 URL
[5]	LU Y H, WU K M, JIANG Y Y, et al. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China[J]. Science, 2010, 328(5982):1151-1154. doi: 10.1126/science.1187881 pmid: 20466880
[6]	WANG X L, SU H, WANG J, et al. Monitoring of insecticide resistance for Apolygus lucorum populations in the apple orchard in China[J]. Crop protection, 2023, 170:106279. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106279 URL
[7]	董丽欣, 梁国军, 施丽丽, 等. 酸枣绿盲蝽的发生规律与防治方法[J]. 河北果树, 2023(2):60-61.
[8]	杨春, 孟泽洪, 李帅, 等. 绿盲蝽取食对茶树营养物质及防御酶活性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(9):159-164.
[9]	丛胜波, 万鹏, 李文静, 等. 10种中草药提取物对棉铃虫、绿盲蝽触杀活性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(1):250-253+310.
[10]	LU Y H, WU K M. Mirid bugs in China: Pest status and management strategies[J]. Out-looks on pest management, 2011, 22(6):248-252.
[11]	王辉, 方彤辉, 薛宏贵, 等. 不同颜色粘虫板及性诱捕器对枣园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(5):647-654.
[12]	张谦, 安静杰, 窦亚楠, 等. 性诱捕器悬挂高度对绿盲蝽、棉铃虫和甜菜夜蛾田间诱集效果的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(1):239-243.
[13]	朱琴, 王辉, 宋鲜梅, 等. 枣园绿盲蝽越冬卵的空间分布及诱集管诱集效率[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(4):273-277.
[14]	罗淑萍, 陆宴辉, 崔艮中, 等. 冬枣园绿盲蝽绿色防控技术体系构建与示范[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 44(1):194-198.
[15]	门兴元, 于毅, 张安盛. 试管药膜法测定10种杀虫剂对绿后丽盲蝽若虫的室内毒力[J]. 植物保护学报, 2011, 37(4):154-157.
[16]	李国平, 封洪强, 黄博, 等. 河南省绿盲蝽对有机磷类杀虫剂的抗药性监测[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2015, 52(3):587-592.
[17]	董松, 李丽莉, 卢增斌, 等. 5种新烟碱类杀虫剂对绿盲蝽的室内毒力测定[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(1):115-117.57.
[18]	李耀发, 高占林, 党志红, 等. 不同类型杀虫剂对绿盲蝽室内毒力及田间药效评价[J]. 河北农业科学, 2008, 12(1):49-50+57.
[19]	王家哲, 洪波, 郝哲, 等. 8种杀虫剂对枣园绿盲蝽的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2022, 50(1):37-39.
[20]	王丽丽, 倪寿山, 栾炳辉, 等. 5种植物源杀虫剂对葡萄园绿盲蝽的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2016, 32(1):46-49. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2016.01.007
[21]	李海强, 王冬梅, 李号宾, 等. 9种杀虫剂对绿盲蝽的毒力效果比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11):2075-2082. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.11.015
[22]	刘佳, 党志红, 安静杰, 等. 不同作用机制杀虫剂对绿盲蝽室内毒力的温度效应[J]. 中国农学通报 2016, 32(29):70-75. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16030190
[23]	张志祥, 徐汉虹, 程东美. EXCEL在毒力回归计算中的应用[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2002, 39(1):67-70.
[24]	尹海辰, 许冬, 杨妮娜, 等. 绿盲蝽、Q型烟粉虱、赤拟谷盗对云木香气味物质的嗅觉反应及其在防治中的应用[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(2):129-136+142.
[25]	YUEYUE T, SUN P, ZHANG X Z, et al. Assessing Artemisia lavandulaefolia as a trap plant for managing Apolygus lucorum in tea plantations[J]. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 2023, 171(3):206-217. doi: 10.1111/eea.v171.3 URL

药剂名称	试验浓度设置
95%噻虫嗪原药	37.5、75、150、300、600
97%阿维菌素原药	62.5、125、250、500、1000
98%苦参碱原药	100、200、400、800、1600
95%鱼藤酮原药	100、200、400、800、1600
98%蛇床子素原药	100、200、400、800、1600

药剂名称	试验浓度设置
95%噻虫嗪原药	37.5、75、150、300、600
97%阿维菌素原药	62.5、125、250、500、1000
98%苦参碱原药	100、200、400、800、1600
95%鱼藤酮原药	100、200、400、800、1600
98%蛇床子素原药	100、200、400、800、1600

药剂	浓度/(mg/L)		24 h				48 h
药剂	浓度/(mg/L)		平均死亡率/%		校正死亡率/%		平均死亡率/%		校正死亡率/%
噻虫嗪	600		98.33±0.96		98.31		99.17±0.83		99.09
	300		90.00±1.36		89.83		97.50±0.83		97.27
	150		49.17±1.59		48.31		69.17±2.10		66.36
	75		17.50±0.83		16.10		36.67±1.36		30.91
	37.5		8.33±0.96		6.78		17.50±0.83		10.00
CK	0		1.67±0.96		0.00		8.33±0.96		0.00
阿维菌素			1000	83.33±4.91		82.91		98.33±0.96		98.20
			500	51.67±0.96		50.43		69.17±3.15		66.67
			250	25.00±0.96		23.08		36.67±1.36		31.53
			125	15.00±0.96		12.82		25.00±0.96		18.92
			62.5	4.17±0.84		1.71		11.67±2.15		4.50
CK		0	2.50±0.83		0.00		7.50±0.83		0.00
苦参碱		1600	87.50±1.60		87.29		95.00±1.67		94.64
		800	47.50±1.60		46.61		63.33±3.04		60.71
		400	30.00±2.36		28.81		41.67±2.89		37.50
		200	15.83±2.10		14.41		22.50±1.60		16.96
		100	7.50±0.83		5.93		12.50±1.60		6.25
CK		0	1.67±0.96		0.00		6.67±1.36		0.00
鱼藤酮		1600	82.50±1.60		82.05		91.67±1.67		90.91
		800	40.83±0.83		39.32		50.00±1.36		45.45
		400	28.33±0.96		26.50		38.33±0.96		32.73
		200	19.17±0.83		17.09		26.67±1.93		20.00
		100	9.17±0.83		6.84		15.83±0.84		8.18
CK		0	2.50±0.83		0.00		8.33±0.96		0.00
蛇床子素		1600	81.67±0.96		81.36		86.67±1.36		85.45
		800	36.67±1.36		35.59		48.33±2.15		43.64
		400	25.00±0.96		23.73		36.67±1.36		30.91
		200	14.17±0.84		12.71		23.33±0.00		16.36
		100	6.67±0.00		5.08		12.50±0.83		4.55
CK		0	1.67±0.96		0.00		8.33±0.96		0.00

药剂	浓度/(mg/L)		24 h				48 h
药剂	浓度/(mg/L)		平均死亡率/%		校正死亡率/%		平均死亡率/%		校正死亡率/%
噻虫嗪	600		98.33±0.96		98.31		99.17±0.83		99.09
	300		90.00±1.36		89.83		97.50±0.83		97.27
	150		49.17±1.59		48.31		69.17±2.10		66.36
	75		17.50±0.83		16.10		36.67±1.36		30.91
	37.5		8.33±0.96		6.78		17.50±0.83		10.00
CK	0		1.67±0.96		0.00		8.33±0.96		0.00
阿维菌素			1000	83.33±4.91		82.91		98.33±0.96		98.20
			500	51.67±0.96		50.43		69.17±3.15		66.67
			250	25.00±0.96		23.08		36.67±1.36		31.53
			125	15.00±0.96		12.82		25.00±0.96		18.92
			62.5	4.17±0.84		1.71		11.67±2.15		4.50
CK		0	2.50±0.83		0.00		7.50±0.83		0.00
苦参碱		1600	87.50±1.60		87.29		95.00±1.67		94.64
		800	47.50±1.60		46.61		63.33±3.04		60.71
		400	30.00±2.36		28.81		41.67±2.89		37.50
		200	15.83±2.10		14.41		22.50±1.60		16.96
		100	7.50±0.83		5.93		12.50±1.60		6.25
CK		0	1.67±0.96		0.00		6.67±1.36		0.00
鱼藤酮		1600	82.50±1.60		82.05		91.67±1.67		90.91
		800	40.83±0.83		39.32		50.00±1.36		45.45
		400	28.33±0.96		26.50		38.33±0.96		32.73
		200	19.17±0.83		17.09		26.67±1.93		20.00
		100	9.17±0.83		6.84		15.83±0.84		8.18
CK		0	2.50±0.83		0.00		8.33±0.96		0.00
蛇床子素		1600	81.67±0.96		81.36		86.67±1.36		85.45
		800	36.67±1.36		35.59		48.33±2.15		43.64
		400	25.00±0.96		23.73		36.67±1.36		30.91
		200	14.17±0.84		12.71		23.33±0.00		16.36
		100	6.67±0.00		5.08		12.50±0.83		4.55
CK		0	1.67±0.96		0.00		8.33±0.96		0.00

供试药剂	时间/h	毒力回归方程	LC₅₀值/(mg/L)		相对系数	LC₅₀值/(mg/L)95置信区间
噻虫嗪	24	Y=3.100X-1.895	167.36		0.976	151.71~184.63
噻虫嗪	48	Y=3.400X-2.311	141.26		0.993	128.96~154.73
阿维菌素	24	Y=2.419X-1.406	444.91		0.992	386.44~512.23
阿维菌素	48	Y=2.955X-2.191	271.50		0.970	245.73~299.98
苦参碱	24	Y=2.119X-0.939	635.01		0.975	548.65~734.97
苦参碱	48	Y=2.497X-1.684	474.42		0.982	423.24~531.79
鱼藤酮	24	Y=1.824X-0.230	737.03		0.962	617.30~879.99
鱼藤酮	48	Y=2.054X-0.637	555.02		0.952	482.45~638.51
蛇床子素	24	Y=1.935X-0.630	810.92	0.964		676.65~971.82
蛇床子素	48	Y=2.097X-0.911	658.89	0.977		567.23~765.35