Effects of Light Quality on Fruit Quality of Blueberry

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0008

Abstract

Abstract:

Using blueberry ‘Eureka’ as experimental material, the effects of five light quality treatment combinations on blueberry fruit quality were studied to provide theoretical basis for scientific production. The results showed that, compared with the control, the single fruit weight, vertical and horizontal diameter, total anthocyanin and total flavonol content of treatment T2 (the light intensity is 28 μmol/(m²·s), and the spectrum is red: blue light=5:1, single power 27 W, length 1220 mm lamp is placed side by side at 30 cm at the top of blueberry plant) were the highest, which were higher than those of the control (no lamp tube), but the difference was not significant. The solid-acid ratio and sugar-acid ratio of treatment T₄ (the light intensity is 21 μmol/(m²·s) and the spectrum is red: blue light=1.4:1, single power 16 W, length 1080 mm lamp is placed side by side at the top 30 cm of blueberry plant) were significantly higher than those of the control, the content of total acid (citric acid, malic acid, shikimic acid) was significantly lower than that of the control, and the hardness and soluble solids content of treatment T₄ were the highest, higher than that of the control, but the difference was not significant. The total sugar content (glucose, fructose, sucrose) of treatment T₅ (The light intensity is 21 μmol/(m²·s), and the spectrum is red: blue light=1.4:1, single power 16 W, length 1080 mm, two rows side by side at the top 30 cm of the blueberry plant, and one row of lights at the bottom (along the blueberry basin). was the highest, which was significantly higher than that of the control. The comprehensive score of treatment T₄ was the highest. Treatment T₄ had the best effect on improving the fruit quality of blueberry, that is side by side at the distance from the 30 cm at the top of the blueberry plant, two rows of lamps with a light intensity of 21 μmol/(m²·s), and a spectrum of red light: blue light=1.4:1, single power 16 W, length 1080 mm.

Key words: blueberry, red light, blue light, fruit quality

PEI Jiabo, LIU Hui, ZHONG Linbing, LUO Huifeng, LIU Yushan, RUAN Ruoxin, ZHANG Chen, CHEN Li, XI Dujun. Effects of Light Quality on Fruit Quality of Blueberry[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(2): 64-68.

Figures/Tables 6

References 27

[1]	顾姻, 贺善安. 蓝浆果与蔓越橘[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001:15.
[2]	AYAZ F A, KADIOGLU A, BERTOFT E, et al. Effect of fruit maturation on sugar and organic acid composition in two blueberries (Vaccinium arctostaphylos and V. myrtillus) native to Turkey[J]. New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 2001, 29:137-141.
[3]	DE SOUZA V R, PEREIRA P A, DA SILVA T L, et al. Determination of the bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity and chemical composition of Brazilian blackberry, red raspberry, strawberry, blueberry and sweet cherry fruits[J]. Food chemistry, 2014, 156:362-368. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.125 pmid: 24629981
[4]	ZIFKIN M, JIN A, OZGA J, et al. Gene expression and metabolite profiling of developing highbush blueberry fruit indicates transcriptional regulation of flavonoid metabolism and activation of abscisic acid metabolism[J]. Plant physiology, 2012, 158(1):200-224. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.180950 pmid: 22086422
[5]	杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量、品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(1):36-46.
[6]	许莉, 刘世琦, 齐连东, 等. 不同光质对叶用莴苣光合作用及叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007(1):96-100.
[7]	陈祥伟, 刘世琦, 冯磊, 等. 不同LED光源对乌塌菜光合特性及品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(S1):243-248. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2014.S1.047
[8]	闫萌萌, 王铭伦, 王洪波, 等. 光质对花生幼苗根系生长与根系活力的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(8):17-20.
[9]	岳静, 潘远智, 鲜小林, 等. 光质和B₉对杜鹃花观赏性状及生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(1):77-84.
[10]	江明艳, 潘远智. 不同光质对盆栽一品红光合特性及生长的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2006(2):338-343.
[11]	LI C X, CHANG S X, KHALIL-UR-REHMAN M, et al. Effect of irradiating the leaf abaxial surface with supplemental light-emitting diode lights on grape photosynthesis[J]. Australian journal of grape and wine research, 2017, 23(1):58-65.
[12]	刘明, 赵琦, 王小菁, 等. 植物的光受体及其调控机制的研究[J]. 生物学通报, 2005(5):10-12.
[13]	魏胜林, 王家保, 李春保. 蓝光和红光对菊花生长和开花的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 1998(2):100-101.
[14]	王佳淇, 何莹钰, 韦晓桐, 等. ED补光组合对大棚越橘生长发育的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6):1183-1193. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0707
[15]	DONG F, WANG C, SUN X, et al. Sugar metabolic changes in protein expression associated with different light quality combinations in tomato fruit[J]. Plant growth regulation, 2019, 88(3): 1-16.
[16]	韦继光, 于虹, 曾其龙, 等. 蓝莓光合作用研究进展[J]. 中国果树, 2014(6):67-72.
[17]	康华靖, 余宏傲, 叶朝军, 等. 温州地区主栽蓝莓品种叶片饱和光强的研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2018, 26(4):399-406.
[18]	李根柱, 张自川, 王贺新, 等. 南高丛蓝莓6个品种的光合特性[J]. 中国南方果树, 2014, 43(2):17-21.
[19]	刘兆玲, 温国胜, 胡莉. 3个蓝莓品种光合特性的比较研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2011, 40(5):59-61.
[20]	吴思政, 聂东伶, 梁文斌, 等. 4个蓝莓品种光合特性的比较[J]. 经济林研究, 2015, 33(3):1-6.
[21]	付晟宏, 朱玉杰, 冯国红. 基于Stacking框架的蓝莓硬度预测可溶性固形物含量及维生素C模型构建[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2023, 14:137-143.
[22]	楼同济. 三个越橘正反交组合果实糖酸组分遗传规律研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2023:8-9.
[23]	刘禹姗. 越橘VcCOMT40和VcCCoAOMT20基因的功能研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2021:20-22.
[24]	雷银慧, 李雯雯, 周涛, 等. 不同生育期杏果实动态及黄酮醇含量变化[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2022, 45(6):457-461.
[25]	许大全, 高伟, 阮军. 光质对植物生长发育的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(8):1217-1234.
[26]	ZORATTI L, SARALA M, CARVALHO E, et al. Monochromatic light increases anthocyanin content during fruit development in bilberry[J]. BMC plant biology, 2014, 14:377. doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0377-1 pmid: 25511869
[27]	孙山, 李鹏民, 刘庆忠, 等. 高灌蓝莓光合作用对若干环境因子的响应[J]. 园艺学报, 2007(1):67-70.

处理	单果重/g	纵径/mm	横径/mm	硬度/(kg/cm²)
T1	4.44±0.74a	15.51±0.86a	21.91±1.53a	5.73±1.80a
T2	4.75±0.82a	15.96±0.83a	22.06±1.43a	5.50±0.83a
T3	4.64±0.81a	15.59±1.15a	22.02±1.14a	5.35±1.41a
T4	4.41±0.51a	15.31±0.55a	21.37±0.98a	5.90±1.00a
T5	4.66±0.83a	15.64±1.23a	21.90±1.36a	5.73±0.99a

处理	单果重/g	纵径/mm	横径/mm	硬度/(kg/cm²)
T1	4.44±0.74a	15.51±0.86a	21.91±1.53a	5.73±1.80a
T2	4.75±0.82a	15.96±0.83a	22.06±1.43a	5.50±0.83a
T3	4.64±0.81a	15.59±1.15a	22.02±1.14a	5.35±1.41a
T4	4.41±0.51a	15.31±0.55a	21.37±0.98a	5.90±1.00a
T5	4.66±0.83a	15.64±1.23a	21.90±1.36a	5.73±0.99a

处理	蔗糖	果糖	葡萄糖	总糖	可溶性固形物
T1	0.31±0.01c	3.25±0.02d	4.57±0.09b	8.12±0.08d	10.68±1.73a
T2	0.32±0.02c	3.47±0.03c	4.71±0.03b	8.50±0.01c	11.71±0.51a
T3	0.33±0.00c	3.54±0.00c	4.77±0.15b	8.64±0.15c	11.30±1.76a
T4	0.35±0.01b	3.85±0.07b	5.17±0.05a	9.37±0.07b	11.95±2.01a
T5	0.40±0.00a	4.03±0.02a	5.36±0.02a	9.79±0.02a	11.56±1.83a

处理	蔗糖	果糖	葡萄糖	总糖	可溶性固形物
T1	0.31±0.01c	3.25±0.02d	4.57±0.09b	8.12±0.08d	10.68±1.73a
T2	0.32±0.02c	3.47±0.03c	4.71±0.03b	8.50±0.01c	11.71±0.51a
T3	0.33±0.00c	3.54±0.00c	4.77±0.15b	8.64±0.15c	11.30±1.76a
T4	0.35±0.01b	3.85±0.07b	5.17±0.05a	9.37±0.07b	11.95±2.01a
T5	0.40±0.00a	4.03±0.02a	5.36±0.02a	9.79±0.02a	11.56±1.83a

处理	奎尼酸/(mg/g)	莽草酸/(mg/g)	苹果酸/(mg/g)	柠檬酸/(mg/g)	总酸/(mg/g)	固酸比	糖酸比
T1	0.75±0.03a	0.012±0.00a	0.119±0.00a	7.50±0.03a	8.38±0.06a	14.32±0.96b	9.69±0.14e
T2	0.47±0.01c	0.009±0.00b	0.108±0.01ab	5.36±0.13c	5.95±0.14c	19.52±1.31ab	14.29±0.34c
T3	0.54±0.01b	0.008±0.00bc	0.118±0.00a	5.76±0.10b	6.42±0.11b	16.08±1.57b	13.46±0.46d
T4	0.31±0.00d	0.006±0.00d	0.102±0.00b	4.04±0.05e	4.46±0.05e	25.36±4.32a	21.02±0.11a
T5	0.44±0.02c	0.007±0.00cd	0.098±0.01b	4.84±0.04d	5.39±0.05d	20.10±1.73ab	18.17±0.12b