Journal of Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (5): 28-34.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2022-0060
Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Xingquan1(), HUANG Heming2, LIU Hong3, XU Shanhe2, LIU Yinan3, LU Ping2, YUAN Xiutang2, ZHENG Wu1, WANG Zhushi1()
Received:
2022-05-23
Revised:
2022-08-17
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-05-16
SUN Xingquan, HUANG Heming, LIU Hong, XU Shanhe, LIU Yinan, LU Ping, YUAN Xiutang, ZHENG Wu, WANG Zhushi. Effects of Adding Humic Acid on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Under Flood Irrigation Condition[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(5): 28-34.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2022-0060
拐点值 | 抛物线型 | S型 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 氮碱比 | 糖碱比 | 氯离子/% | 钾离子/% | 钾氯比 | ||
x1 | 10.0 | 11.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.55 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
x2 | 20.0 | 19.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.95 | 8.5 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 8.0 | |
x3 | 28.0 | 20.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 1.05 | 9.5 | 0.8 | — | — | |
x4 | 35.0 | 27.0 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 1.45 | 15.0 | 1.2 | — | — | |
权重/% | 10.00 | 9.55 | 9.98 | 12.27 | 10.82 | 12.79 | 12.23 | 10.57 | 11.78 |
拐点值 | 抛物线型 | S型 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 氮碱比 | 糖碱比 | 氯离子/% | 钾离子/% | 钾氯比 | ||
x1 | 10.0 | 11.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.55 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
x2 | 20.0 | 19.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.95 | 8.5 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 8.0 | |
x3 | 28.0 | 20.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 1.05 | 9.5 | 0.8 | — | — | |
x4 | 35.0 | 27.0 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 1.45 | 15.0 | 1.2 | — | — | |
权重/% | 10.00 | 9.55 | 9.98 | 12.27 | 10.82 | 12.79 | 12.23 | 10.57 | 11.78 |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 增施成本/(元/hm2) | 增施净效益/(元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 2392.5d | 52743.23d | — | 0.00c |
H1 | 2456.0d | 55617.24cd | 1035.0 | 1839.00bc |
H2 | 2539.0c | 57837.44bc | 2070.0 | 3024.21ab |
H3 | 2638.5ab | 59585.61ab | 3105.0 | 3737.37ab |
H4 | 2688.0a | 61793.16a | 4140.0 | 4909.92a |
H5 | 2639.5ab | 61961.53a | 5175.0 | 4043.29ab |
H6 | 2570.5bc | 58179.48abc | 6210.0 | -773.75c |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 增施成本/(元/hm2) | 增施净效益/(元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 2392.5d | 52743.23d | — | 0.00c |
H1 | 2456.0d | 55617.24cd | 1035.0 | 1839.00bc |
H2 | 2539.0c | 57837.44bc | 2070.0 | 3024.21ab |
H3 | 2638.5ab | 59585.61ab | 3105.0 | 3737.37ab |
H4 | 2688.0a | 61793.16a | 4140.0 | 4909.92a |
H5 | 2639.5ab | 61961.53a | 5175.0 | 4043.29ab |
H6 | 2570.5bc | 58179.48abc | 6210.0 | -773.75c |
经济指标 | 回归方程 | 判定系数R2 | F值 | 最优增施量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
产量 | y=0.617x-0.0003x2+2363.548 | 0.839 | 46.773** | 924.56 |
产值 | y=18.761x-0.010x2+52177.756 | 0.712 | 22.271** | 935.94 |
增施净效益 | y=14.161x-0.010x2-565.476 | 0.586 | 12.738** | 706.46 |
经济指标 | 回归方程 | 判定系数R2 | F值 | 最优增施量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
产量 | y=0.617x-0.0003x2+2363.548 | 0.839 | 46.773** | 924.56 |
产值 | y=18.761x-0.010x2+52177.756 | 0.712 | 22.271** | 935.94 |
增施净效益 | y=14.161x-0.010x2-565.476 | 0.586 | 12.738** | 706.46 |
处理 | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 钾离子/% | 氯离子/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | 协调性指数(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 1.66c | 1.44c | 36.50b | 28.13a | 2.33a | 1.25a | 25.43a | 1.16a | 1.96d | 0.41c |
H1 | 1.77bc | 1.75b | 41.37a | 29.80a | 2.43a | 0.65bc | 23.97a | 1.01b | 3.80ab | 0.57ab |
H2 | 1.73c | 1.77b | 41.63a | 31.17a | 2.25a | 0.75bc | 23.49a | 0.98b | 3.09bc | 0.54b |
H3 | 1.80bc | 1.79b | 42.13a | 30.07a | 2.42a | 0.56c | 23.60a | 1.00b | 4.30a | 0.59ab |
H4 | 1.95ab | 1.97ab | 39.00ab | 27.67a | 2.43a | 0.76bc | 19.80b | 0.99b | 3.22bc | 0.62ab |
H5 | 2.04a | 2.06a | 40.83ab | 28.60a | 2.54a | 0.75bc | 19.84b | 0.99b | 3.40abc | 0.63a |
H6 | 1.93ab | 2.04a | 36.70b | 27.63a | 2.47a | 0.94b | 18.10b | 0.95b | 2.63cd | 0.56ab |
处理 | 总氮/% | 烟碱/% | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 钾离子/% | 氯离子/% | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 | 协调性指数(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 1.66c | 1.44c | 36.50b | 28.13a | 2.33a | 1.25a | 25.43a | 1.16a | 1.96d | 0.41c |
H1 | 1.77bc | 1.75b | 41.37a | 29.80a | 2.43a | 0.65bc | 23.97a | 1.01b | 3.80ab | 0.57ab |
H2 | 1.73c | 1.77b | 41.63a | 31.17a | 2.25a | 0.75bc | 23.49a | 0.98b | 3.09bc | 0.54b |
H3 | 1.80bc | 1.79b | 42.13a | 30.07a | 2.42a | 0.56c | 23.60a | 1.00b | 4.30a | 0.59ab |
H4 | 1.95ab | 1.97ab | 39.00ab | 27.67a | 2.43a | 0.76bc | 19.80b | 0.99b | 3.22bc | 0.62ab |
H5 | 2.04a | 2.06a | 40.83ab | 28.60a | 2.54a | 0.75bc | 19.84b | 0.99b | 3.40abc | 0.63a |
H6 | 1.93ab | 2.04a | 36.70b | 27.63a | 2.47a | 0.94b | 18.10b | 0.95b | 2.63cd | 0.56ab |
处理 | 酮类 | 醇类 | 酯(内酯)类 | 醛类 | 酚类 | 酸类 | 杂环类 | 新植二烯 | 总量1(除新植二烯) | 总量2(含新植二烯) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 29.56b | 23.48d | 13.80bc | 6.77a | 1.88a | 3.89d | 2.95a | 341.45bc | 82.32c | 423.77b |
H1 | 31.83ab | 26.05cd | 14.46bc | 6.52a | 1.94a | 4.56cd | 3.51a | 368.18a | 88.86bc | 457.04a |
H2 | 32.62ab | 30.87abc | 17.25b | 5.81a | 1.95a | 5.87bcd | 3.67a | 372.40a | 98.04b | 470.44a |
H3 | 33.59ab | 29.80bc | 16.58bc | 6.15a | 1.93a | 6.53bcd | 3.72a | 376.53a | 98.31b | 474.84a |
H4 | 32.94ab | 29.14bc | 13.68c | 6.18a | 2.12a | 6.99bc | 3.57a | 354.22abc | 94.62b | 448.84ab |
H5 | 34.82ab | 35.14a | 21.50a | 5.65a | 2.28a | 8.47b | 3.42a | 334.73c | 111.27a | 446.00ab |
H6 | 35.86a | 33.24ab | 20.67a | 5.95a | 2.57a | 11.48a | 3.75a | 358.73abc | 113.51a | 472.24a |
处理 | 酮类 | 醇类 | 酯(内酯)类 | 醛类 | 酚类 | 酸类 | 杂环类 | 新植二烯 | 总量1(除新植二烯) | 总量2(含新植二烯) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 29.56b | 23.48d | 13.80bc | 6.77a | 1.88a | 3.89d | 2.95a | 341.45bc | 82.32c | 423.77b |
H1 | 31.83ab | 26.05cd | 14.46bc | 6.52a | 1.94a | 4.56cd | 3.51a | 368.18a | 88.86bc | 457.04a |
H2 | 32.62ab | 30.87abc | 17.25b | 5.81a | 1.95a | 5.87bcd | 3.67a | 372.40a | 98.04b | 470.44a |
H3 | 33.59ab | 29.80bc | 16.58bc | 6.15a | 1.93a | 6.53bcd | 3.72a | 376.53a | 98.31b | 474.84a |
H4 | 32.94ab | 29.14bc | 13.68c | 6.18a | 2.12a | 6.99bc | 3.57a | 354.22abc | 94.62b | 448.84ab |
H5 | 34.82ab | 35.14a | 21.50a | 5.65a | 2.28a | 8.47b | 3.42a | 334.73c | 111.27a | 446.00ab |
H6 | 35.86a | 33.24ab | 20.67a | 5.95a | 2.57a | 11.48a | 3.75a | 358.73abc | 113.51a | 472.24a |
处理 | 新植二烯/酮类 | 新植二烯/醇类 | 新植二烯/酯(内酯)类 | 新植二烯/醛类 | 新植二烯/酚类 | 新植二烯/酸类 | 新植二烯/杂环类 | 新植二烯/总量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 11.58a | 14.64a | 25.35a | 50.50a | 185.63a | 95.53a | 121.02a | 4.15a |
H1 | 11.64a | 14.21ab | 25.47a | 56.68a | 196.15a | 86.62ab | 109.21a | 4.14a |
H2 | 11.53a | 12.11bc | 21.78ab | 64.64a | 191.97a | 63.63abc | 102.84a | 3.80a |
H3 | 11.28a | 12.72abc | 22.91a | 61.67a | 197.17a | 60.14bc | 104.24a | 3.84a |
H4 | 10.82a | 12.22bc | 25.98a | 57.51a | 168.22a | 51.84bc | 99.46a | 3.75a |
H5 | 9.66a | 9.54d | 15.70c | 60.73a | 149.78a | 40.49c | 102.17a | 3.02b |
H6 | 10.06a | 10.89cd | 17.39bc | 61.25a | 146.03a | 32.02c | 96.12a | 3.16b |
处理 | 新植二烯/酮类 | 新植二烯/醇类 | 新植二烯/酯(内酯)类 | 新植二烯/醛类 | 新植二烯/酚类 | 新植二烯/酸类 | 新植二烯/杂环类 | 新植二烯/总量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 11.58a | 14.64a | 25.35a | 50.50a | 185.63a | 95.53a | 121.02a | 4.15a |
H1 | 11.64a | 14.21ab | 25.47a | 56.68a | 196.15a | 86.62ab | 109.21a | 4.14a |
H2 | 11.53a | 12.11bc | 21.78ab | 64.64a | 191.97a | 63.63abc | 102.84a | 3.80a |
H3 | 11.28a | 12.72abc | 22.91a | 61.67a | 197.17a | 60.14bc | 104.24a | 3.84a |
H4 | 10.82a | 12.22bc | 25.98a | 57.51a | 168.22a | 51.84bc | 99.46a | 3.75a |
H5 | 9.66a | 9.54d | 15.70c | 60.73a | 149.78a | 40.49c | 102.17a | 3.02b |
H6 | 10.06a | 10.89cd | 17.39bc | 61.25a | 146.03a | 32.02c | 96.12a | 3.16b |
处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 浓度 | 燃烧性 | 综合得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.20a |
H1 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.28a |
H2 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.37a |
H3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.39a |
H4 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.24a |
H5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.14ab |
H6 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 6.94b |
处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 浓度 | 燃烧性 | 综合得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H0(CK) | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.20a |
H1 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.28a |
H2 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.37a |
H3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.39a |
H4 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.24a |
H5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.14ab |
H6 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 6.94b |
[1] |
谢湛, 邵孝侯, 段卫东, 等. 烤烟水肥一体化技术研究与应用进展[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(2):235-242.
|
[2] |
王燕, 彭劼. 不同水利措施对烤烟生长的影响及其经济效益分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(9):122-125.
|
[3] |
周国柱, 陈英顺, 张永红. 烤烟灌溉与排水[J]. 烟草科技, 2003(9):46-48.
|
[4] |
张水勤, 袁亮, 林治安, 等. 腐植酸促进植物生长的机理研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4):1065-1076.
|
[5] |
薛超群, 奚家勤, 王建伟, 等. 腐殖酸用量对土壤微生物数量和烟叶香气品质的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2014(3):71-75.
|
[6] |
李志鹏, 刘浩, 于晓娜, 等. 黄腐酸对植烟土壤改良及烟叶品质的影响研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(4):914-920.
|
[7] |
黄元炯, 张毅, 张翔, 等. 腐殖酸和饼肥对土壤微生物和烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2008, 14(S1):25-28.
|
[8] |
叶协锋, 凌爱芬, 张斌, 等. 腐殖酸对烤烟土壤性状及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(5):170-173.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2009.05.035 |
[9] |
李强, 周冀衡, 杨荣生, 等. 曲靖烤烟主要化学成分及其协调性空间分布[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(4):862-869.
|
[10] |
董高峰, 张强, 孙力, 等. 云南不同产区烤烟致香物质含量分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(12):2045-2050.
|
[11] |
王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏. 中国烟草种植区划[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010:4-5.
|
[12] |
靳志丽, 刘国顺, 聂新柏. 腐殖酸对土壤环境和烤烟矿质吸收影响的研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2002(3):15-18.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
韩秋静, 赵世民, 马君红, 等. 秸秆还田对洛阳植烟区黄土质褐土碳库及烟叶经济性状的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(7):18-26.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
谷海红, 李志宏, 李天福, 等. 不同来源氮素在烤烟体内的累积分配及对烟叶品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(1):183-190.
|
[18] |
杨苹, 程智敏, 向金友, 等. 不同灌水处理对烤烟生长发育的影响研究[J]. 天津农业科学, 2015, 21(7):132-136.
|
[19] |
张翔, 范艺宽, 黄元炯, 等. 烤烟吸收氯的主要来源及其在体内分布的研究[J]. 土壤肥料, 2006(2):62-64.
|
[20] |
廖宗文, 毛小云, 刘可星. 重视有机营养研究与有机碳肥创新-关于植物营养经典理论的现代思考[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6):1694-1698.
|
[21] |
李军, 袁亮, 赵秉强, 等. 腐植酸尿素对玉米生长及肥料氮利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2):524-530.
|
[22] |
doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8 URL |
[23] |
范文思, 岳东林, 凌爱芬, 等. 腐熟农家肥用量对土壤养分和烤烟品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2018, 39(5):71-78.
|
[24] |
张吉立, 孙海人, 孟蕾, 等. 腐殖酸对重茬烤烟氮积累及产量与质量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(3):79-84.
|
[25] |
敖金成, 王俊科, 罗华元, 等. 腐殖酸肥对烤后烟叶内在品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(11):101-107.
|
[26] |
刘世亮, 杜君, 化党领, 等. 不同有机酸对烤烟品质和产值的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(5):851-858.
|
[27] |
韩富根, 沈铮, 李元实, 等. 施氮量对烤烟经济性状、化学成分及香气质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2009, 15(5):38-42.
|
[28] |
邓小华, 周冀衡, 陈新联, 等. 烟叶质量评价指标间的相关性研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2008, 14(2):1-8.
|
[29] |
王鹏泽, 来苗, 陶陶, 等. 不同香型烤烟主要香味物质成分与香韵指标的关系研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2015, 17(3):126-135.
|
[30] |
陈思昂, 张环纬, 陈彪, 等. 不同部位烤烟挥发性有机酸含量与烟叶品质的关系分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(2):54-62.
|
[31] |
周芳芳, 张晓龙, 詹军, 等. 典型清香型烤烟产地间致香物质含量及组成差异分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2016, 22(2):34-42.
|
[32] |
杨虹琦, 周冀衡, 杨述元, 等. 不同产区烤烟中主要潜香型物质对评吸质量的影响研究[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 31(1):11-14.
|
[1] | CUI Zhaoyun, ZOU Junli, YANG Rongguang, SHI Zhaopeng. The Effects of Staged Sowing on Yield and Quality of Summer Maize [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(5): 1-9. |
[2] | CHAI Guaiqiang, MASHU Haoyang, LI Lin, DUAN Yizhong, HUO Yanbo, KANG Furen. Screening the Optimum Ratio of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium for Protein Mulberry (Morus alba L.) in Wind-sand Grassland Area of Northern Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(5): 35-43. |
[3] | SUN Lili. Effects of Compound Microbial Agents on the Growth of Watermelon and the Control of Root-Knot Nematode [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(5): 71-75. |
[4] | CHEN Lulu, SUN Zhe, TIAN Changgeng, LIU Shanggang, ZHAO Fengling, ZHENG Jianli. Storage Conditions of Different Types of Sweet Potato Varieties: Effects on Appearance and Quality Traits [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(5): 76-81. |
[5] | ZHANG Yunhong, MAO Jiawei, LIU Xiaoqi, LI Bingqi, YUAN Tianyou, XU Qihao, QIAN Kai. Application Effects of Wheat Specific Humic Acid Fertilizer and Its Reduction on Wheat in Fluvo-aquic Soil Area in North Henan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(4): 1-8. |
[6] | YANG Xiaojun. Effects of Exogenous Pb and As on Growth Quality and Pb and As Accumulation of Highland Barley [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(4): 25-31. |
[7] | GU Duanyin, JIAO Juan, YAN Weiqiang, CHEN Zhen, LIU Zhongliang, GAO Junjie. Effects of Spraying Different Foliar Fertilizers on the Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(4): 79-83. |
[8] | GUO Can, LIN Kaiqin, GAO Xiubing, GUO Yan, QIAO Dahe, YAO Jianmei, YANG Chun, LI Yan, ZHANG Xiaoqin. Adaptability, Yield and Quality Characteristics of Introduced Tea Plant Cultivars in Guiyang [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(4): 84-92. |
[9] | LI Zhikun, SHI Ping, JIANG Wenwu, HU Fengling. Effects of Different Nitrogen Management on Yield and Quality of New Weak Gluten Wheat Variety ‘Wanximai 0638’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(3): 30-34. |
[10] | JIN Lulu, XU Min, WANG Zisheng. Defoliation & Ripping Agent: Effect on Cotton Yield and Application Analysis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(3): 35-39. |
[11] | XU Chen, LIU Shuguang, LIU Huijun, YIN Baoquan, MA Yunfei, ZHANG Mei. Effects of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Carrot Growth and Quality Under Tape for Direct Sowing Mode [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(2): 33-36. |
[12] | YUE Huanfang, LI Chao, AN Shunwei, MENG Fanyu, HU Xiaoyi, ZHANG Haifang, ZHANG Ningning, WANG Meng. Multi-factor Irrigation Scheme of Cherry Tomato Based on Substrate Moisture [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(2): 43-49. |
[13] | MENG Rui, GONG Weiming, CAO Ni, SU Hengshan. Screening of Rootstock Varieties for Watermelon in Jiangsu [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(2): 50-54. |
[14] | LI Yuexian, ZHOU Yingchun, SONG Jiming, ZHANG Linhui, SHEN Shaobin, JIANG Tailing, DUAN Chunfang, LIU Qian, XIONG Xiankun, YAN Wei, LIU Guanghua. The Response of Agronomic Traits and Quality of Cassava to Different Altitude Gradients [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 18-24. |
[15] | ZHAO Yue, HUANG Nan, LIU Jipei. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Fertilizer of Silicon-Calcium-Potassium-Magnesium on Watermelon Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 37-41. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||