
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 1-7.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0006
FU Hua(
), LI Meng, LIU Xingzhou, MA Guimei, WANG Pei, ZHANG Jian(
), ZHOU Yanhu
Received:2025-01-10
Revised:2025-03-03
Online:2026-05-20
Published:2026-05-15
CLC Number:
FU Hua, LI Meng, LIU Xingzhou, MA Guimei, WANG Pei, ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Yanhu. Research on Multi-Scale Correlation Analysis and Comprehensive Classification of Maize Agronomic Traits[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(5): 1-7.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2025-0006
| 性质 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 极差 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生育期/d | 104.59 | 97.90 | 6.69 | 100.19 | 1.81 | 1.80 |
| 株高/cm | 278.60 | 240.84 | 37.77 | 260.19 | 8.34 | 3.20 |
| 穗位高/cm | 104.74 | 86.93 | 17.80 | 98.92 | 5.18 | 5.23 |
| 穗长/cm | 17.71 | 15.06 | 2.65 | 16.79 | 0.71 | 4.23 |
| 穗粗/cm | 4.94 | 4.53 | 0.41 | 4.73 | 0.14 | 2.96 |
| 秃尖/cm | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 17.11 |
| 穗行数/行 | 19.05 | 14.53 | 4.52 | 15.66 | 1.05 | 6.70 |
| 行粒数/粒 | 34.15 | 28.60 | 5.54 | 31.82 | 1.66 | 5.22 |
| 出籽率/% | 88.36 | 84.04 | 4.33 | 87.13 | 1.23 | 1.41 |
| 千粒重/g | 356.35 | 303.02 | 53.34 | 329.08 | 18.06 | 5.49 |
| 空秆率/% | 4.50 | 0.27 | 4.23 | 1.34 | 1.20 | 89.55 |
| 倒伏(折)率/% | 5.87 | 0.17 | 5.70 | 2.17 | 1.68 | 77.42 |
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 10325.1 | 7198.95 | 3126.15 | 8707.8 | 66.17 | 0.76 |
| 性质 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 极差 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生育期/d | 104.59 | 97.90 | 6.69 | 100.19 | 1.81 | 1.80 |
| 株高/cm | 278.60 | 240.84 | 37.77 | 260.19 | 8.34 | 3.20 |
| 穗位高/cm | 104.74 | 86.93 | 17.80 | 98.92 | 5.18 | 5.23 |
| 穗长/cm | 17.71 | 15.06 | 2.65 | 16.79 | 0.71 | 4.23 |
| 穗粗/cm | 4.94 | 4.53 | 0.41 | 4.73 | 0.14 | 2.96 |
| 秃尖/cm | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 17.11 |
| 穗行数/行 | 19.05 | 14.53 | 4.52 | 15.66 | 1.05 | 6.70 |
| 行粒数/粒 | 34.15 | 28.60 | 5.54 | 31.82 | 1.66 | 5.22 |
| 出籽率/% | 88.36 | 84.04 | 4.33 | 87.13 | 1.23 | 1.41 |
| 千粒重/g | 356.35 | 303.02 | 53.34 | 329.08 | 18.06 | 5.49 |
| 空秆率/% | 4.50 | 0.27 | 4.23 | 1.34 | 1.20 | 89.55 |
| 倒伏(折)率/% | 5.87 | 0.17 | 5.70 | 2.17 | 1.68 | 77.42 |
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 10325.1 | 7198.95 | 3126.15 | 8707.8 | 66.17 | 0.76 |
| 生育期/d | 株高 | 穗位高/cm | 穗长 | 穗粗/cm | 秃尖/cm | 穗行数/行 | 行粒数/粒 | 出籽率/% | 千粒重/g | 空秆率/% | 倒伏(折)率/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | -0.439 | |||||||||||
| 穗位高 | -0.061 | 0.382 | ||||||||||
| 穗长 | -0.047 | 0.377 | 0.212 | |||||||||
| 穗粗 | 0.181 | 0.059 | 0.184 | 0.380 | ||||||||
| 秃尖 | -0.120 | -0.063 | -0.190 | -0.385 | -0.656* | |||||||
| 穗行数 | -0.218 | 0.039 | 0.396 | 0.308 | 0.002 | -0.360 | ||||||
| 行粒数 | -0.029 | 0.187 | 0.126 | 0.430 | 0.820** | -0.291 | -0.309 | |||||
| 出籽率 | 0.169 | -0.071 | 0.004 | -0.116 | 0.618* | -0.271 | -0.611* | 0.696** | ||||
| 千粒重 | 0.524 | 0.020 | 0.274 | 0.528 | 0.403 | -0.608* | 0.429 | -0.014 | -0.158 | |||
| 空秆率 | 0.560* | -0.363 | -0.130 | -0.349 | -0.191 | -0.354 | 0.125 | -0.617* | -0.157 | 0.461 | ||
| 倒伏(折)率 | -0.162 | 0.048 | 0.614* | -0.333 | -0.072 | 0.006 | 0.070 | -0.116 | 0.217 | -0.143 | 0.059 | |
| 产量 | 0.175 | 0.230 | 0.399 | 0.626* | 0.869** | -0.558* | 0.029 | 0.836** | 0.573* | 0.423 | -0.348 | 0.005 |
| 生育期/d | 株高 | 穗位高/cm | 穗长 | 穗粗/cm | 秃尖/cm | 穗行数/行 | 行粒数/粒 | 出籽率/% | 千粒重/g | 空秆率/% | 倒伏(折)率/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 | -0.439 | |||||||||||
| 穗位高 | -0.061 | 0.382 | ||||||||||
| 穗长 | -0.047 | 0.377 | 0.212 | |||||||||
| 穗粗 | 0.181 | 0.059 | 0.184 | 0.380 | ||||||||
| 秃尖 | -0.120 | -0.063 | -0.190 | -0.385 | -0.656* | |||||||
| 穗行数 | -0.218 | 0.039 | 0.396 | 0.308 | 0.002 | -0.360 | ||||||
| 行粒数 | -0.029 | 0.187 | 0.126 | 0.430 | 0.820** | -0.291 | -0.309 | |||||
| 出籽率 | 0.169 | -0.071 | 0.004 | -0.116 | 0.618* | -0.271 | -0.611* | 0.696** | ||||
| 千粒重 | 0.524 | 0.020 | 0.274 | 0.528 | 0.403 | -0.608* | 0.429 | -0.014 | -0.158 | |||
| 空秆率 | 0.560* | -0.363 | -0.130 | -0.349 | -0.191 | -0.354 | 0.125 | -0.617* | -0.157 | 0.461 | ||
| 倒伏(折)率 | -0.162 | 0.048 | 0.614* | -0.333 | -0.072 | 0.006 | 0.070 | -0.116 | 0.217 | -0.143 | 0.059 | |
| 产量 | 0.175 | 0.230 | 0.399 | 0.626* | 0.869** | -0.558* | 0.029 | 0.836** | 0.573* | 0.423 | -0.348 | 0.005 |
| 性状名称 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 | 主成分5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生育期 | 0.037 | -0.485 | -0.018 | -0.140 | 1.114 |
| 株高 | -0.049 | -0.063 | 0.102 | 0.788 | -0.122 |
| 穗位高 | 0.038 | 0.147 | 0.731 | 0.711 | 0.107 |
| 穗长 | 0.183 | 0.227 | -0.470 | 0.550 | 0.135 |
| 穗粗 | 0.940 | 0.242 | 0.012 | -0.118 | 0.000 |
| 秃尖 | -0.598 | -0.883 | 0.000 | 0.372 | 0.171 |
| 穗行数 | -0.273 | 1.030 | 0.121 | 0.077 | -0.351 |
| 行粒数 | 0.909 | -0.226 | -0.119 | 0.166 | -0.093 |
| 出籽率 | 0.913 | -0.364 | 0.241 | -0.265 | 0.005 |
| 千粒重 | 0.044 | 0.402 | -0.084 | 0.123 | 0.651 |
| 空秆率 | -0.275 | 0.331 | 0.126 | -0.570 | 0.453 |
| 倒伏(折)率 | 0.054 | 0.100 | 0.887 | 0.164 | -0.233 |
| 产量 | 0.818 | 0.043 | 0.059 | 0.296 | 0.175 |
| 特征值 | 4.193 | 2.800 | 2.396 | 2.090 | 0.837 |
| 贡献率/% | 29.948 | 19.999 | 17.112 | 14.927 | 5.976 |
| 性状名称 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 | 主成分5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生育期 | 0.037 | -0.485 | -0.018 | -0.140 | 1.114 |
| 株高 | -0.049 | -0.063 | 0.102 | 0.788 | -0.122 |
| 穗位高 | 0.038 | 0.147 | 0.731 | 0.711 | 0.107 |
| 穗长 | 0.183 | 0.227 | -0.470 | 0.550 | 0.135 |
| 穗粗 | 0.940 | 0.242 | 0.012 | -0.118 | 0.000 |
| 秃尖 | -0.598 | -0.883 | 0.000 | 0.372 | 0.171 |
| 穗行数 | -0.273 | 1.030 | 0.121 | 0.077 | -0.351 |
| 行粒数 | 0.909 | -0.226 | -0.119 | 0.166 | -0.093 |
| 出籽率 | 0.913 | -0.364 | 0.241 | -0.265 | 0.005 |
| 千粒重 | 0.044 | 0.402 | -0.084 | 0.123 | 0.651 |
| 空秆率 | -0.275 | 0.331 | 0.126 | -0.570 | 0.453 |
| 倒伏(折)率 | 0.054 | 0.100 | 0.887 | 0.164 | -0.233 |
| 产量 | 0.818 | 0.043 | 0.059 | 0.296 | 0.175 |
| 特征值 | 4.193 | 2.800 | 2.396 | 2.090 | 0.837 |
| 贡献率/% | 29.948 | 19.999 | 17.112 | 14.927 | 5.976 |
| 性状 | I | II |
|---|---|---|
| 生育期/d | 100.54 | 99.88 |
| 株高/cm | 262.09 | 258.56 |
| 穗位高/cm | 99.89 | 98.09 |
| 穗长/cm | 17.21 | 16.42 |
| 穗粗/cm | 4.87 | 4.61 |
| 秃尖/cm | 0.67 | 0.84 |
| 穗行数/行 | 15.64 | 15.66 |
| 行粒数/粒 | 33.19 | 30.65 |
| 出籽率/% | 87.79 | 86.56 |
| 千粒重/g | 339.49 | 320.16 |
| 空秆率/% | 1.06 | 1.57 |
| 倒伏(折)率/% | 1.90 | 2.40 |
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 9643.3 | 7901.7 |
| 性状 | I | II |
|---|---|---|
| 生育期/d | 100.54 | 99.88 |
| 株高/cm | 262.09 | 258.56 |
| 穗位高/cm | 99.89 | 98.09 |
| 穗长/cm | 17.21 | 16.42 |
| 穗粗/cm | 4.87 | 4.61 |
| 秃尖/cm | 0.67 | 0.84 |
| 穗行数/行 | 15.64 | 15.66 |
| 行粒数/粒 | 33.19 | 30.65 |
| 出籽率/% | 87.79 | 86.56 |
| 千粒重/g | 339.49 | 320.16 |
| 空秆率/% | 1.06 | 1.57 |
| 倒伏(折)率/% | 1.90 | 2.40 |
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 9643.3 | 7901.7 |
| 年份 | 关联度 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.6477 | 11 |
| 2012 | 0.8116 | 5 |
| 2013 | 0.7298 | 7 |
| 2014 | 0.6738 | 10 |
| 2015 | 0.7718 | 6 |
| 2016 | 0.8173 | 4 |
| 2017 | 0.8329 | 2 |
| 2018 | 0.6392 | 12 |
| 2019 | 0.8299 | 3 |
| 2020 | 0.7198 | 8 |
| 2021 | 0.6273 | 13 |
| 2022 | 0.6993 | 9 |
| 2023 | 0.8750 | 1 |
| 年份 | 关联度 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.6477 | 11 |
| 2012 | 0.8116 | 5 |
| 2013 | 0.7298 | 7 |
| 2014 | 0.6738 | 10 |
| 2015 | 0.7718 | 6 |
| 2016 | 0.8173 | 4 |
| 2017 | 0.8329 | 2 |
| 2018 | 0.6392 | 12 |
| 2019 | 0.8299 | 3 |
| 2020 | 0.7198 | 8 |
| 2021 | 0.6273 | 13 |
| 2022 | 0.6993 | 9 |
| 2023 | 0.8750 | 1 |
| [1] |
王俊花, 闫建宾, 王瑞钢. 基于主成分、聚类和灰色关联度分析的超甜玉米杂交组合综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(5):1108-1114.
|
| [2] |
程昕昕, 吴翔, 熊风, 等. 子粒发育过程中糖分转化量对Sh2甜玉米种子活力的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(5):81-86.
|
| [3] |
张振良, 黄小兰, 薛林, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的甜糯玉米新组合育种潜力评价[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(2):19-25.
|
| [4] |
贺礼英, 尹成杰, 黄守程, 等. 菜用大豆主要农艺性状的相关性、聚类及主成分分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(1):50-57.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.01.07 |
| [5] |
杜世坤, 赵宝勰, 赵振宁, 等. 间作用大豆亲本的相关性、主成分及聚类分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(1):266-275.
|
| [6] |
李晔, 郑瑛, 陈荣丽, 等. 93份甜玉米种质材料的相关性与聚类分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(2):647-655.
|
| [7] |
付华, 李猛, 刘兴舟, 等. 2011-2021年安徽省区域试验高密度组参试玉米品种产量及相关性状演变分析[J]. 农业工程, 2023, 13(10):128-133.
|
| [8] |
张中伟, 杨海龙, 付俊, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的玉米品种的综合评价[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022(6):30-35.
|
| [9] |
周玉芝, 段会军, 周进宝, 等. 河北省玉米品种农艺性状聚类分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(4):56-59.
|
| [10] |
刘宝林. 在役输气管道对其上方土壤温度及玉米产量和农艺性状的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.
|
| [11] |
裴志超, 佟国香, 周继华, 等. 北京市甜玉米新品种形态产量和品质指标差异及其相关性分析[J]. 中国种业, 2018(8):46-51.
|
| [12] |
李楠楠, 杜晓宇, 韩玉林, 等. 中国四大冬小麦主产区品种农艺性状的综合性分析[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(12):94-101.
|
| [13] |
王平喜, 周一帆, 索秋生, 等. 基于玉米永久性F2群体株型性状的灰色关联度分析及通径分析[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(6):1-6.
|
| [14] |
田龙, 韩媛芬, 丁维汉. 陕西省玉米品种农艺性状与产量相关性研究[J]. 陕西农林科学, 2017, 63(6):1-4.
|
| [15] |
谭静, 陈洪梅, 韩学莉, 等. 玉米杂交种产量与产量构成因素的相关和通径分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2009(S2):155-158.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2009.S2.034 |
| [16] |
李志华, 王玉文, 李会霞, 等. 27个玉米杂交种比较试验[J]. 山西农业科学, 2012(8):825-828.
|
| [17] |
朱正梅, 赵军华, 楼肖成, 等. 浙江省区试中42个普通玉米农艺性状与产量的通径分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2015(9):1366-1367,1489.
|
| [18] |
张正, 董春林, 杨睿, 等. 不同类型玉米品种产量与穗部性状的相关性分析[J]. 中国种业, 2022(2):80-84.
|
| [19] |
陈冰洁, 吕莹莹, 张恩盈, 等. 鲜食型糯玉米新品种主要农艺性状的相关和主成分分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(7):16-20.
|
| [20] |
魏常敏, 周文伟, 许卫猛, 等. 基于主成分和灰色关联度分析的鲜食糯玉米组合综合评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(7):9-13.
|
| [21] |
张先亮, 吴占清, 霍治邦, 等. 西瓜新品种的灰色关联度多维综合评估[J]. 山西农业科学, 2014, 42(10):1067-1070.
|
| [22] |
叶梅荣, 周玉丽, 黄守程, 等. 不同产地马齿苋中矿质元素含量相关性分析[J]. 安徽科技学院学报, 2019, 33(2):24-28.
|
| [23] |
杨婷婷, 崔金凤, 吴文革, 等. 21个杂交水稻品种主要农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析[J]. 安徽科技学院学报, 2015, 29(3):1-5.
|
| [1] | FENG Pengfei, SHEN Chenglong, JIANG Huizhong. GIS-based Suitability Evaluation and Analysis of Agricultural Land in Pingyin County [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(5): 43-50. |
| [2] | YANG Hongtao, YANG Yanlin, HE Jiawei, YANG Zhengsong, SU Zechun, YU Ying. Correlation and Path Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits in Blueberry Hybrid F1 Generation [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(3): 33-39. |
| [3] | GAO Qiqing, LIU Huosheng, ZHANG Shengchao, LI Chuxiong. Study on Warming Effect of Plastic Film Mulching and Safe Sowing Period of Early Spring Corn [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(3): 95-100. |
| [4] | CHEN Lan, WANG Chengbao, YANG Sicun, LUO Zhuzhu, HUO Lin, WEN Meijuan. Construction of Evaluation Index System for Reasonable Plough Layer of Irrigated Land in Yellow River Irrigation District Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(1): 24-32. |
| [5] | YU Zihan, HAN Xi, WU Xiaoling, XIAO Guangli, WANG Ying, CHEN Yuhong. Research on Characteristics of Cadmium Translocation and Accumulation in Different Rice Cultivars in Southeastern Sichuan Region [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(1): 48-56. |
| [6] | WEN Xiaoxia, LI Xiaoyu, LI Qing’en, YIN Huihui, YANG Zhongxu. Analysis of High and Stable Yield and Related Traits of New Cotton Variety ‘Liaomian 21’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 1-5. |
| [7] | ZHOU Zhongwen, QI Yue, LIU Ying, LEI Jun. Effects of Sowing Schedule Adjustment on Yield and Quality of Spring Maize in Semi-arid Zone of Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 6-13. |
| [8] | TANG Min, HUANG Jian, LU Weipeng, ZHANG Hong, WANG Zhushi, MA Zhanfeng, YANG Xikun, XIAO Fei. Differences in Color Value and SPAD of Tobacco Leaves with Different Ripeness and Their Effects on Quality of Cured Tobacco Leaves [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 69-76. |
| [9] | MAO Zhaoqing, ZHANG Xiaojiao, YUAN Yuan, YAN Wenguang, WAN Siqi, LI Chunlin, LU Yan, DONG Xiaobo. Comparative Advantage Analysis of Corn Planting Regions in Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 84-92. |
| [10] | HOU Yilong, MA Ruiqi, LI Zheng, SHI Wuliang, LI Bin, ZHANG Shengwu, CAO Ning, CUI Jinhu, ZHANG Yubin. Hotspots and Prospect of Minimum Data Set (MDS) in Soil Quality Assessment Based on Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 48-61. |
| [11] | ZHU Yuqing, LI Huazhao. Study on Light-temperature Model of Rice in Yutai and Yield Forecast [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(4): 83-91. |
| [12] | LU Gangbin, E Shengzhe, YUAN Jinhua, ZHANG Peng, LIU Yana, ZHAO Xiaolong. Research on Migration and Safety Threshold of Available Heavy Metals in Soil and Crop Systems [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(3): 24-35. |
| [13] | WU Fang, GONG Jia, ZHANG Ziqiang, ZHANG Wen, YUAN Changhong. Technology and Application of Climatic Quality Evaluation for Hairy Crabs [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(11): 81-86. |
| [14] | LI Mingyan, SHI Lei, XU Weizhou, HAN Xia, QIAO Yu, BU Yaojun. Effects of Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application on Agronomic Characteristics and Quality of Silage Corn in Yuyang District [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(10): 1-9. |
| [15] | YAN Feng, DONG Yang, ZHAO Fuyang, HOU Xiaomin, LI Qingquan, SUN Haoyue, DI Guili. Effects of Different Additives on Silage Quality of Broomcorn Millet Straw [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(10): 65-79. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||