Research on Characteristics of Cadmium Translocation and Accumulation in Different Rice Cultivars in Southeastern Sichuan Region

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0182

Abstract

Abstract:

The characteristics of cadmium (Cd) translocation and accumulation in different rice cultivars in the southeast Sichuan were investigated to provide theoretical references for the safe production of rice in regional mild Cd-contaminated paddy fields. Eight local staple rice cultivars in Longchang City, Sichuan Province, were selected as experimental materials to determine the agronomic traits and Cd content of each part of ricethrough field plot test methods, the Cd accumulation and translocation characteristics of each cultivar of rice were analyzed, to filter out the suitable rice cultivars with low Cd accumulation. The results showed that the agronomic traits of the eight rice cultivars differed significantly, and all of them were within the theoretical yield range of the corresponding cultivars. The accumulation capacity of Cd in different parts of rice was ranked as grain>leaf>straw>root, with the exception of ‘Neixiangyou 3’, ‘Neixiangyou 5’ and ‘Taiyou 2903’. Only ‘Taiyou 2903’ was below the standard limit of Cd content (0.20 mg/kg) in grains, which complied with the requirement set in the National Food Standards (GB 2762-2022) among the eight cultivars, and the BCF grains and TF grains/leaves of this cultivar were lower than those of other rice cultivars. The transfer factor pattern was TF leaf/straw > TF grain/leaf > TF straw/root, except for ‘Neixiangyou 5’ and ‘Neixiangyou 8’. Correlation analysis suggested a highly significant positive correlation between Cd content in rice grain and straw (P<0.01), and the Cd content in rice grain was positively correlated with TF straw/root and TF grain/leaf (P<0.05), respectively. Therefore, it was recommended to popularize the cultivation of ‘Taiyou 2903’ in mild Cd-contaminated areas, and the yield can be improved by rational matching of fertilizers and other measures.

Key words: mild Cd contaminated soil, rice cultivars, cadmium content, accumulation characteristics, transfer coefficient, accumulation coefficient, agronomic traits, cluster analysis

YU Zihan, HAN Xi, WU Xiaoling, XIAO Guangli, WANG Ying, CHEN Yuhong. Research on Characteristics of Cadmium Translocation and Accumulation in Different Rice Cultivars in Southeastern Sichuan Region[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(1): 48-56.

Figures/Tables 8

References 39

[1]	陈卫平, 杨阳, 谢天, 等. 中国农田土壤重金属污染防治挑战与对策[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(2):261-272.
[2]	张璐瑶, 赵科理, 傅伟军. 电子垃圾拆解区土壤-农作物系统中镉元素的空间分布特征及其风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(9):4432-4440.
[3]	徐双圆, 朱家辉, 王栋茹, 等. 植物套作系统修复镉污染农田土壤的效应——以苏南地区为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024, 44(6):3289-3300.
[4]	DENG S W, YU J, WANG Y T, et al. Distribution, transfer, and time-dependent variation of Cd in soil-rice system: a case study in the Chengdu plain, Southwest China[J]. Soil & tillage research, 2019, 195:104367.
[5]	HOU R, WANG L, O’CONNOR D, et al. Natural field freeze-thaw process leads to different performances of soil amendments towards Cd immobilization and enrichment[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 831:154880. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154880 URL
[6]	TAN X, ZHANG Y J, REN M. Effects of soil amendments on Cd and As mobility in the soil-rice system and their distribution in the grain[J]. Science of the total environment, 2023, 903:166608. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166608 URL
[7]	环境保护部, 国土资源部. 全国土壤污染状况调查公报[R]. 北京: 环境保护部国土资源部, 2014.
[8]	REN S, SONG C, YE S, et al. The spatiotemporal variation in heavy metals in China's farmland soil over the past 20 years: A meta-analysis[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 806:150322. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150322 URL
[9]	和君强, 贺前锋, 刘代欢, 等. 土壤镉食品卫生安全阈值景影响因素及预测模型——以长沙某地水稻土为例[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(5):1181-1194.
[10]	倪中应, 章明奎, 王京文, 等. 水稻不同生育期镉吸收与积累特征研究[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(3):49-54. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19010012
[11]	邹家素, 李晓, 万伟, 等. 重庆市某典型区域土壤和水稻中重金属含量跟踪验证研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(9):91-96.
[12]	LIU H T, JIAO Q J, FAN L N, et al. Integrated physio-biochemical and transcriptomic analysis revealed mechanism underlying of Si-mediated alleviation to cadmium toxicity in wheat[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2023, 452:131366. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131366 URL
[13]	项佳敏, 谢国雄, 章明奎. 镉低积累品种与调理剂降低黑色岩系农田水稻镉吸收的效果[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(7):12-16.
[14]	林小兵, 陈国钧, 周利军, 等. 南方典型稻田土壤-水稻系统环境质量评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(16):6973-6979.
[15]	喻华, 秦鱼生, 陈琨, 等. 水稻土镉形态分布特征及其生物效应研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(2):452-457.
[16]	章飞翔, 陈新友, 董力军, 等. 酸性土壤背景下不同品种水稻对镉的吸收差异分析[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2023, 50(2):319-325.
[17]	黄雁飞, 黄玉溢, 陈桂芬, 等. 桂西北岩溶区大田条件下不同水稻品种的镉累积特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(8):1929-1937.
[18]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
[19]	环境保护部. HJ 803-2016,土壤和沉积物12种金属元素的测定王水提取-电感耦合等离子体质谱法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2016.
[20]	谢燕湘, 郭志忠, 李兆敏, 等. 南方某市2012年市售大米镉污染状况及膳食暴露评估[J]. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2014, 20(1):5-6.
[21]	PÁL M, HORVÁTH E, JANDA T, et al. Physiological changes and defense mechanisms induced by cadmium stress in maize[J]. Journal of plant nutrition and soil science, 2006, 169(2):239-246. doi: 10.1002/jpln.v169:2 URL
[22]	王刚, 孙梦飞, 钟雪梅, 等. 镉胁迫下不同水稻品种镉的累积与产量差异比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(17):76-81. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17010090
[23]	LIU J G, QIAN M, CAI G L, et al. Uptake and translocation of Cd in different rice cultivars and the relation with Cd accumulatio in rice grain[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2007, 143(1/2):443-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.057 URL
[24]	LIU J G, CAO C X, WONG M H, et al. Variations between rice cultivars in iron and manganese plaque on roots and the relation with plant cadmium uptake[J]. Journal of environmental sciences, 2021, 22(7):1067-1072. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60218-7 URL
[25]	陈巧茂, 张玉盛, 黄澳琪, 等. 水稻镉污染防治及营养调控研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(16):118-123. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0189
[26]	FAN J Y, JIANG J Q, ZHANG L D, et al. Response of alkaline functional fertilizer on Cd absorption and transportation in soil-rice system[J]. Ecological indicators, 2022, 145:109584. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109584 URL
[27]	李文博, 廖启林, 范健, 等. 江苏太湖地区水稻全株Cd、Hg、Pb分布富集特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2025, 44(2):330-341.
[28]	郭超, 王萍, 姚茂明, 等. 贵州省山丘区谷地及河流阶地稻田耕层土壤重金属含量田块分异研究[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2021, 40(1):22-27.
[29]	林承奇, 蔡宇豪, 胡恭任, 等. 闽西南土壤-水稻系统重金属生物可给性及健康风险[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(1):359-367.
[30]	刘侯俊, 梁吉哲, 韩晓日, 等. 东北地区不同水稻品种对Cd的累积特性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(2):220-227.
[31]	江川, 朱业宝, 陈立喆, 等. 不同基因型水稻糙米对镉、铅的吸收特性[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(5):509-515.
[32]	王成尘, 田稳, 向萍, 等. 土壤-水稻/小麦重金属吸收机制与安全调控[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(2):794-807.
[33]	龚伟群, 李恋卿, 潘根兴. 杂交水稻对Cd的吸收与籽粒积累:土壤和品种的交互影响[J]. 环境科学, 2006, 27(8):1647-1653.
[34]	杜瑞英, 文典, 赵迪, 等. Cd、Pb和As在不同品种水稻籽粒中的富集特征研究[J]. 生物技术进展, 2016, 6(2):85-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2341.2016.02.02
[35]	张标金, 罗林广, 魏益华, 等. 不同基因型水稻镉积累动态差异分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(9):25-30. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-2566
[36]	吕本春, 杨志新, 付利波, 等. 水稻品种对镉砷累积的差异研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(2):224-233.
[37]	WANG F J, TAN H F, HUANG L H, et al. Application of exogenous salicylic acid reduces Cd toxicity and Cd accumulation in rice[J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2021, 207:111198. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111198 URL
[38]	ZHANG J Y, ZHOU H, GU J F, et al. Effects of nano-Fe₃O₄-modified biochar on iron plaque formation and Cd accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Environmental pollution, 2020, 260:113970. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113970 URL
[39]	冯爱煊, 贺红周, 李娜, 等. 基于多目标元素的重金属低累积水稻品种筛选及其吸收转运特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(6):988-1000.

水稻品种	株高/cm	产量/(kg/hm²)	穗粒数/粒	结实率/%	千粒重/g
R1	108.3±1.2 b	7915±206.09 ab	188±14 b	80.4±0.5 a	23.9±0.2 c
R2	115.9±2.0 a	7585±257.10 bc	166±17 c	71.7±0.5 d	25.4±0.4 c
R3	118.7±0.9 a	7710±347.38 bc	174±23 bc	78.0±0.4 b	24.2±0.5 c
R4	102.7±2.0 bc	7685±203.16 bc	173±14 bc	74.6±0.2 c	30.0±0.6 a
R5	106.9±2.4 b	6960±392.40 c	224±26 ab	75.0±0.9 c	29.0±0.6 ab
R6	95.0±1.5 d	8720±208.81 a	241±14 a	81.3±0.4 a	27.5±0.6 b
R7	97.3±2.6 d	6965±277.85 c	224±19 ab	73.7±1.5 cd	21.7±0.4 d
R8	102.5±1.5 c	8045±212.19 ab	196±14 b	74.7±1.0 c	27.6±1.1 b

水稻品种	株高/cm	产量/(kg/hm²)	穗粒数/粒	结实率/%	千粒重/g
R1	108.3±1.2 b	7915±206.09 ab	188±14 b	80.4±0.5 a	23.9±0.2 c
R2	115.9±2.0 a	7585±257.10 bc	166±17 c	71.7±0.5 d	25.4±0.4 c
R3	118.7±0.9 a	7710±347.38 bc	174±23 bc	78.0±0.4 b	24.2±0.5 c
R4	102.7±2.0 bc	7685±203.16 bc	173±14 bc	74.6±0.2 c	30.0±0.6 a
R5	106.9±2.4 b	6960±392.40 c	224±26 ab	75.0±0.9 c	29.0±0.6 ab
R6	95.0±1.5 d	8720±208.81 a	241±14 a	81.3±0.4 a	27.5±0.6 b
R7	97.3±2.6 d	6965±277.85 c	224±19 ab	73.7±1.5 cd	21.7±0.4 d
R8	102.5±1.5 c	8045±212.19 ab	196±14 b	74.7±1.0 c	27.6±1.1 b

指标		根Cd		秸秆Cd		叶片Cd		籽粒Cd		TF_秸秆/根		TF_{叶片/秸秆}		TF_{籽粒/叶片}		产量		穗粒
根Cd		1
秸秆Cd		0.573		1
叶片Cd		0.467		0.393		1
籽粒Cd		0.318		0.934^**		0.385		1
TF_秸秆/根		-0.108		0.612		-0.228		0.744^*		1
TF_{叶片/秸秆}		-0.533		-0.610		0.066		-0.457		-0.514		1
TF_{籽粒/叶片}		-0.066		0.626		-0.152		0.777^*		0.942^**		-0.547		1
产量		-0.687		-0.312		-0.224		-0.159		0.011		0.651		-0.043		1
穗粒		0.283		-0.330		0.257		-0.365		-0.749^*		0.442		-0.567		0.055		1
结实率	-0.472		-0.637		-0.091		-0.504		-0.426		0.665		-0.295		0.652		0.339		1
千粒重	-0.476		-0.175		0.330		0.031		-0.023		0.571		-0.172		0.227		0.019		-0.050	1

指标		根Cd		秸秆Cd		叶片Cd		籽粒Cd		TF_秸秆/根		TF_{叶片/秸秆}		TF_{籽粒/叶片}		产量		穗粒
根Cd		1
秸秆Cd		0.573		1
叶片Cd		0.467		0.393		1
籽粒Cd		0.318		0.934^**		0.385		1
TF_秸秆/根		-0.108		0.612		-0.228		0.744^*		1
TF_{叶片/秸秆}		-0.533		-0.610		0.066		-0.457		-0.514		1
TF_{籽粒/叶片}		-0.066		0.626		-0.152		0.777^*		0.942^**		-0.547		1
产量		-0.687		-0.312		-0.224		-0.159		0.011		0.651		-0.043		1
穗粒		0.283		-0.330		0.257		-0.365		-0.749^*		0.442		-0.567		0.055		1
结实率	-0.472		-0.637		-0.091		-0.504		-0.426		0.665		-0.295		0.652		0.339		1
千粒重	-0.476		-0.175		0.330		0.031		-0.023		0.571		-0.172		0.227		0.019		-0.050	1