Journal of Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 13-17.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0195
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Jianhui1(), ZHU Feng2, KE Meifu2()
Received:
2023-08-29
Revised:
2024-01-06
Online:
2024-06-19
Published:
2024-06-19
CHEN Jianhui, ZHU Feng, KE Meifu. Effects of Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer Ratio on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Ankang Area[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(6): 13-17.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0195
处理 | 烟草专用肥(10-12-23) | 硫酸铵(21-0-0) | 硝酸钾钙(13.5-0-46) | 钙镁磷肥(0-12-0) | 硫酸钾(0-0-50) | 铵态氮/硝态氮 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 975 | 0 | 0 | 244.5 | 39.0 | 6:4 |
T1 | 0 | 139.5 | 505.5 | 1219.5 | 22.5 | 3:7 |
T2 | 0 | 232.5 | 361.5 | 1219.5 | 154.5 | 5:5 |
T3 | 0 | 325.5 | 216.0 | 1219.5 | 289.5 | 7:3 |
处理 | 烟草专用肥(10-12-23) | 硫酸铵(21-0-0) | 硝酸钾钙(13.5-0-46) | 钙镁磷肥(0-12-0) | 硫酸钾(0-0-50) | 铵态氮/硝态氮 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 975 | 0 | 0 | 244.5 | 39.0 | 6:4 |
T1 | 0 | 139.5 | 505.5 | 1219.5 | 22.5 | 3:7 |
T2 | 0 | 232.5 | 361.5 | 1219.5 | 154.5 | 5:5 |
T3 | 0 | 325.5 | 216.0 | 1219.5 | 289.5 | 7:3 |
处理 | 移栽期 | 团棵期 | 进入旺长时间 | 初花期 | 中心花开放期 | 打顶时间 | 脚叶成熟期 | 顶叶成熟期 | 初烤—终烤期/d | 大田生育期/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 4.23 | 6.10 | 6.19 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.29 | 58 | 129 |
T2 | 4.23 | 6.7 | 6.17 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.27 | 56 | 127 |
CK | 4.23 | 6.12 | 6.20 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.27 | 56 | 127 |
T3 | 4.23 | 6.7 | 6.17 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.29 | 58 | 129 |
处理 | 移栽期 | 团棵期 | 进入旺长时间 | 初花期 | 中心花开放期 | 打顶时间 | 脚叶成熟期 | 顶叶成熟期 | 初烤—终烤期/d | 大田生育期/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 4.23 | 6.10 | 6.19 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.29 | 58 | 129 |
T2 | 4.23 | 6.7 | 6.17 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.27 | 56 | 127 |
CK | 4.23 | 6.12 | 6.20 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.27 | 56 | 127 |
T3 | 4.23 | 6.7 | 6.17 | 6.25 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 6.29 | 8.29 | 58 | 129 |
处理 | 下部叶/cm | 中部叶/cm | 上部叶/cm | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | |||||||
T1 | 46.8 | 23.8 | 50.7 | 20.2 | 17.8 | 6.1 | 43.8 | 13 | 7.04 | 3.11 | ||
T2 | 50.1 | 24.4 | 52.2 | 19.4 | 19.2 | 7.9 | 46.1 | 13.8 | 8.64 | 3.22 | ||
CK | 49.4 | 23.8 | 51.9 | 19.2 | 19.1 | 8.4 | 44.2 | 13.8 | 9.1 | 3.2 | ||
T3 | 50.7 | 25.3 | 53.7 | 20.3 | 18.9 | 7 | 45.9 | 14 | 8.9 | 3.39 |
处理 | 下部叶/cm | 中部叶/cm | 上部叶/cm | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | |||||||
T1 | 46.8 | 23.8 | 50.7 | 20.2 | 17.8 | 6.1 | 43.8 | 13 | 7.04 | 3.11 | ||
T2 | 50.1 | 24.4 | 52.2 | 19.4 | 19.2 | 7.9 | 46.1 | 13.8 | 8.64 | 3.22 | ||
CK | 49.4 | 23.8 | 51.9 | 19.2 | 19.1 | 8.4 | 44.2 | 13.8 | 9.1 | 3.2 | ||
T3 | 50.7 | 25.3 | 53.7 | 20.3 | 18.9 | 7 | 45.9 | 14 | 8.9 | 3.39 |
处理 | 下部叶 | 中部叶 | 上部叶 | 株高 | 茎围 | 节距 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | ||||||
T1 | 75.1±3.5 | 34.8±2.1 | 77.6±3.7 | 28.5±2.6 | 63.1±3.1 | 24.1±1.5 | 163.6±2.3 | 10.34±0.48 | 5.14±0.15 | ||
T2 | 76.0±2.7 | 34.6±2.3 | 78.1±3.0 | 29.5±0.8 | 63.8±1.4 | 23.1±0.9 | 166.4±1.8 | 10.57±0.31 | 5.25±0.18 | ||
CK | 77.5±2.8 | 37.3±1.5 | 79.9±1.8 | 34.5±2.4 | 65.3±2.8 | 25.6±1.4 | 165.8±4.9 | 10.64±0.61 | 5.11±0.23 | ||
T3 | 79.4±2.6 | 38.0±1.8 | 81.3±2.4 | 30.1±1.6 | 75.1±1.6 | 24.0±1.2 | 167.2±1.5 | 10.58±0.33 | 5.16±0.10 |
处理 | 下部叶 | 中部叶 | 上部叶 | 株高 | 茎围 | 节距 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | 长 | 宽 | ||||||
T1 | 75.1±3.5 | 34.8±2.1 | 77.6±3.7 | 28.5±2.6 | 63.1±3.1 | 24.1±1.5 | 163.6±2.3 | 10.34±0.48 | 5.14±0.15 | ||
T2 | 76.0±2.7 | 34.6±2.3 | 78.1±3.0 | 29.5±0.8 | 63.8±1.4 | 23.1±0.9 | 166.4±1.8 | 10.57±0.31 | 5.25±0.18 | ||
CK | 77.5±2.8 | 37.3±1.5 | 79.9±1.8 | 34.5±2.4 | 65.3±2.8 | 25.6±1.4 | 165.8±4.9 | 10.64±0.61 | 5.11±0.23 | ||
T3 | 79.4±2.6 | 38.0±1.8 | 81.3±2.4 | 30.1±1.6 | 75.1±1.6 | 24.0±1.2 | 167.2±1.5 | 10.58±0.33 | 5.16±0.10 |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 均价/(元/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1618.95 | 27943.05 | 28.86 | 17.26 |
T2 | 1620.6 | 28668.45 | 29.77 | 17.69 |
CK | 1630.95 | 28786.2 | 30.33 | 17.65 |
T3 | 1638.3 | 29047.05 | 30.17 | 17.73 |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 上等烟比例/% | 均价/(元/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1618.95 | 27943.05 | 28.86 | 17.26 |
T2 | 1620.6 | 28668.45 | 29.77 | 17.69 |
CK | 1630.95 | 28786.2 | 30.33 | 17.65 |
T3 | 1638.3 | 29047.05 | 30.17 | 17.73 |
处理 | 还原糖/% | 总糖/% | 总植物碱/% | 总氮/% | 淀粉/% | 两糖比 | 糖碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 21.1 | 24.8 | 1.31 | 1.74 | 4.24 | 0.85 | 16.11 |
T2 | 21.8 | 25.1 | 1.27 | 1.70 | 4.96 | 0.87 | 17.17 |
CK | 14.2 | 17.9 | 2.07 | 1.99 | 1.57 | 0.79 | 6.86 |
T3 | 13.0 | 15.4 | 2.18 | 2.07 | 1.65 | 0.84 | 5.96 |
质量目标 | 24±4.0 | — | 2.1±0.4 | — | — | ≥0.80 | 12±4.0 |
处理 | 还原糖/% | 总糖/% | 总植物碱/% | 总氮/% | 淀粉/% | 两糖比 | 糖碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 21.1 | 24.8 | 1.31 | 1.74 | 4.24 | 0.85 | 16.11 |
T2 | 21.8 | 25.1 | 1.27 | 1.70 | 4.96 | 0.87 | 17.17 |
CK | 14.2 | 17.9 | 2.07 | 1.99 | 1.57 | 0.79 | 6.86 |
T3 | 13.0 | 15.4 | 2.18 | 2.07 | 1.65 | 0.84 | 5.96 |
质量目标 | 24±4.0 | — | 2.1±0.4 | — | — | ≥0.80 | 12±4.0 |
处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 余味 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 燃烧性 | 灰色 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 10.67 | 15.58 | 18.33 | 12.67 | 8.67 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 71.9 |
T2 | 10.83 | 15.75 | 18.75 | 13.00 | 8.83 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 73.2 |
CK | 10.42 | 15.50 | 18.17 | 12.25 | 8.50 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 70.8 |
T3 | 10.17 | 15.42 | 18.00 | 11.92 | 8.33 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 69.8 |
处理 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 余味 | 杂气 | 刺激性 | 燃烧性 | 灰色 | 得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 10.67 | 15.58 | 18.33 | 12.67 | 8.67 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 71.9 |
T2 | 10.83 | 15.75 | 18.75 | 13.00 | 8.83 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 73.2 |
CK | 10.42 | 15.50 | 18.17 | 12.25 | 8.50 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 70.8 |
T3 | 10.17 | 15.42 | 18.00 | 11.92 | 8.33 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 69.8 |
[1] |
史宏志, 韩锦峰. 烤烟碳氮代谢几个问题的探讨[J]. 烟草科技, 1998, 31(2):34-36.
|
[2] |
张涵, 祖庆学, 聂忠扬, 等. 铵态氮/硝态氮配比对烤烟生长以及碳氮代谢和水溶性氮含量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(7):73-77.
|
[3] |
杨宇虹, 赵正雄, 李春俭, 等. 不同氮形态和氮水平对水田与旱地烤烟烟叶糖含量及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(6):1386-139.
|
[4] |
邢瑶, 马兴华. 氮素形态对植物生长影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2015, 17(2):10-117.
|
[5] |
宋文静, 宋科, 董建新, 等. 铵硝混合营养对烟草苗期氮代谢酶及内源生长素的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(8):100-104.
|
[6] |
宋科, 梁洪波, 徐旭光, 等. 不同铵硝配比对烤烟根系形态及氮磷钾吸收的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2017, 38(2):8-13.
|
[7] |
程培军, 翟文汇, 张翔, 等. 不同氮形态和施用空间分布对烤烟效应及土壤氮素的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(9):97-101.
|
[8] |
朱陆伟, 周昌敏, 白翠华, 等. 荔枝在不同温度和氮素形态下的氮、磷吸收动力学特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(5):869-878.
|
[9] |
万淑红, 田应兵, 许昌雨, 等. 氮素调控对水稻黄华占生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(6):68-72.
|
[10] |
叶超, 林卿, 付兵, 等. 硝态氮与铵态氮配比对烤烟生长及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(2):29-33.
|
[11] |
凌寿方, 李德强. 铵态氮与硝态氮不同配比对烟叶产量和质量的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2006(8):50-52.
|
[12] |
王利超, 王涵, 朴世领, 等. 铵硝氮配比对烤烟生长生理及产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(12):136-144.
|
[13] |
郭晓惠, 金亚波, 韦建玉, 等. 不同形态氮配施对烤烟碳氮代谢及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(03):1055-1057,1245.
|
[14] |
王蒙, 王喜枝, 刘世亮, 等. 铵态氮/硝态氮配比对豫中烟区烤烟生长及品质调控研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(4):37-42.
|
[15] |
刘挺. 不同形态氮肥配比对会理烤烟生长发育和品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2018(5):49-52.
|
[16] |
高加明, 张继光, 任晓红, 等. 不同氮素配比对烤烟生长发育和养分累积及上部烟叶化学成分的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(12):94-99.
|
[17] |
祖庆学, 聂忠扬, 林松, 等. 铵态氮和硝态氮配比对烤烟生长及离子平衡的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(3):154-158.
|
[18] |
江峰. 调控技术对烤烟烟碱积累和分配的研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2007.
|
[19] |
马兴华, 徐经年, 祖朝龙, 等. 氮肥形态配比对烤烟中性致香成分含量及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报2017, 33(17):44-48.
|
[1] | LI Caibin, ZHANG Jiuquan, HE Yi. Effects of Biochar Application to Three Types of Soils on the Uptake of Nitrogen and Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(9): 54-62. |
[2] | ZHAO Peng, KE Meifu, YANG Jiahao. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Different Organic Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 38-43. |
[3] | SUN Xingquan, HUANG Heming, LIU Hong, XU Shanhe, LIU Yinan, LU Ping, YUAN Xiutang, ZHENG Wu, WANG Zhushi. Effects of Adding Humic Acid on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Under Flood Irrigation Condition [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(5): 28-34. |
[4] | ZHANG Mingfa, ZHANG Sheng, YUAN Xiaokang, CHAO Jin, TIAN Maocheng, TIAN Yongmei, MA Lin, QIN Lang, LU Kuidong, PENG Yu, KONG Fanyu, TIAN Feng. Effects of Meteorological Factors at Different Transplanting Dates on the Agronomic Characters of Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘HN2146’ in Xiangxi Mountainous Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(10): 70-76. |
[5] | ZHANG Zhengyang, GUO Shanhu, ZHANG Jintao, MEN Sirun, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei, ZHAO Xuetong. The Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Growth and Yield and Quality of ‘Yunyan 87’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 47-53. |
[6] | GUO Shanhu, ZHOU Zonggui, LIU Min, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Lifang, ZHAO Xuetong, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei. Effects of Soil Improvement Materials on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 62-67. |
[7] | LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, LIU Yang, WEN Zhiqiang, QIU Chunren, ZHANG Haixia, MA Zhuwen. Selection and Suitability Evaluation of Eight Introduced Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Shaoguan Ecological Tobacco Areas [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 38-44. |
[8] | CAI Tao. Variation Characteristics of Climate Suitability Factors for Flue-cured Tobacco Cultivation in Sanmenxia City [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 66-73. |
[9] | HE Jixian, GU Huizhan, YU Xiao, CHEN Liping, YU Yaoying, JIANG Hao. Changes of Functional Traits of Flue-cured Tobacco: Influence on Nicotine Content [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(5): 30-36. |
[10] | LI Wenqing, ZHENG Chaoyuan, KE Yuqin, CHEN Shunhui, GUO Jinping, LI Chunying. Effects of Magnesium Fertilizer Application on Soil Magnesium Supply and Growth and Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 33-40. |
[11] | XIE Jin, HUANG Hao, GAO Renji, HUANG Lei, GUAN Luohao, LU Chao, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. The Application of Site Precise Direct Allocation Mode in the Process of Tobacco Leaf Allocation [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 41-46. |
[12] | ZHANG Ting, WANG Hongyi, LIAO Xiaoling, LIU Jun, XIAO Shaohong, CHEN Hui, WANG Kang. Color Change of Flue-cured Tobacco During Short-term Storage [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 36-39. |
[13] | LI Xianfu, YANG Hui, AN Xueqin, WANG Chenzijun, DAI Xiumei, ZHANG Jiankui. Identification of Characteristics and SSR Molecular Markers of A New Flue-cured Tobacco Strain ‘Shiliuyan’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(1): 28-34. |
[14] | Zhang Zhiling, Fang Quanxiang, Lin Zubin, Lin Haibin, Chen Qingwen, Lin Long, Chen Xingfeng. Characteristics of Main Chemical Components of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves in Fujian Tobacco-growing Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(7): 60-64. |
[15] | Xia Rongshuai, Xia Xianren, Zhang Xiaolong, Zhang Jungang, Zhou Yusi, Yang Sen, Liu Guangwei, Yang Meili, Qian Jin, Pan Yihong, Wang Quanzhen. The Adaptability of Different Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in the Western Tobacco Area of Xuanwei [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2021, 11(7): 65-71. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||