Journal of Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (7): 38-43.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2022-0091
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Peng(), KE Meifu(), YANG Jiahao
Received:
2022-07-26
Revised:
2023-02-02
Online:
2023-07-20
Published:
2023-07-18
ZHAO Peng, KE Meifu, YANG Jiahao. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Different Organic Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 38-43.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2022-0091
处理编号 | 烟草专用肥 | 蚯蚓粪 | 油饼 | 酒糟 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1(CK) | 900 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 855(较常规用量减少5%) | 3000 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 810(较常规用量减少10%) | 3000 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 765(较常规用量减少15%) | 3000 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 855(较常规用量减少5%) | 0 | 750 | 0 |
6 | 810(较常规用量减少10%) | 0 | 750 | 0 |
7 | 765(较常规用量减少15%) | 0 | 750 | 0 |
8 | 855(较常规用量减少5%) | 0 | 0 | 750 |
9 | 810(较常规用量减少10%) | 0 | 0 | 750 |
10 | 765(较常规用量减少15%) | 0 | 0 | 750 |
处理编号 | 烟草专用肥 | 蚯蚓粪 | 油饼 | 酒糟 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1(CK) | 900 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 855(较常规用量减少5%) | 3000 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 810(较常规用量减少10%) | 3000 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 765(较常规用量减少15%) | 3000 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 855(较常规用量减少5%) | 0 | 750 | 0 |
6 | 810(较常规用量减少10%) | 0 | 750 | 0 |
7 | 765(较常规用量减少15%) | 0 | 750 | 0 |
8 | 855(较常规用量减少5%) | 0 | 0 | 750 |
9 | 810(较常规用量减少10%) | 0 | 0 | 750 |
10 | 765(较常规用量减少15%) | 0 | 0 | 750 |
差异来源 | df | 株高 | 茎围 | 节距 | 有效叶数 | 最大叶面积 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | ||||||
区组间 | 2 | 5.33 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.26 | 0.72 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 1.23 | 0.32 | 0.67 | 1.14 | 0.34 | 0.0001 | 0.71 | 0.51 | ||||
有机肥间 | 2 | 159.24 | 14.91 | 0.0002 | 8.41 | 23.30 | <0.0001 | 0.22 | 1.70 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.0005 | 3.84 | 0.04 | ||||
化肥减施量间 | 2 | 256.41 | 24.00 | <0.0001 | 7.91 | 21.92 | <0.0001 | 0.39 | 3.05 | 0.08 | 6.22 | 10.67 | 0.0011 | 0.0015 | 12.75 | 0.0005 | ||||
互作间 | 4 | 17.73 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 0.94 | 1.31 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 2.10 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.94 | 0.0005 | 1.96 | 0.15 |
差异来源 | df | 株高 | 茎围 | 节距 | 有效叶数 | 最大叶面积 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | ||||||
区组间 | 2 | 5.33 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.26 | 0.72 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 1.23 | 0.32 | 0.67 | 1.14 | 0.34 | 0.0001 | 0.71 | 0.51 | ||||
有机肥间 | 2 | 159.24 | 14.91 | 0.0002 | 8.41 | 23.30 | <0.0001 | 0.22 | 1.70 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.0005 | 3.84 | 0.04 | ||||
化肥减施量间 | 2 | 256.41 | 24.00 | <0.0001 | 7.91 | 21.92 | <0.0001 | 0.39 | 3.05 | 0.08 | 6.22 | 10.67 | 0.0011 | 0.0015 | 12.75 | 0.0005 | ||||
互作间 | 4 | 17.73 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 0.94 | 1.31 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 2.10 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.94 | 0.0005 | 1.96 | 0.15 |
主处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 有效叶数/片 | 最大叶面积/m2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
蚯蚓粪 | 127.97C | 11.41A | 6.10A | 19.78A | 0.14AB |
油饼 | 131.13B | 10.71B | 6.08A | 19.67A | 0.15A |
酒糟 | 133.91A | 10.04C | 5.90A | 19.56A | 0.14B |
化肥减施5% | 135.30A | 11.36A | 6.16A | 20.33A | 0.14B |
化肥减施10% | 129.49B | 10.78B | 6.06AB | 19.44B | 0.15A |
化肥减施15% | 128.22B | 10.03C | 5.87B | 19.22B | 0.14B |
主处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 有效叶数/片 | 最大叶面积/m2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
蚯蚓粪 | 127.97C | 11.41A | 6.10A | 19.78A | 0.14AB |
油饼 | 131.13B | 10.71B | 6.08A | 19.67A | 0.15A |
酒糟 | 133.91A | 10.04C | 5.90A | 19.56A | 0.14B |
化肥减施5% | 135.30A | 11.36A | 6.16A | 20.33A | 0.14B |
化肥减施10% | 129.49B | 10.78B | 6.06AB | 19.44B | 0.15A |
化肥减施15% | 128.22B | 10.03C | 5.87B | 19.22B | 0.14B |
差异来源 | df | 产量 | 产值 | 均价 | 上等烟比例 | 下等烟比例 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | ||||||
区组间 | 2 | 46.74 | 2.20 | 0.14 | 52565.14 | 2.21 | 0.14 | 1.32 | 2.17 | 0.15 | 7.74 | 1.49 | 0.25 | 0.70 | 1.72 | 0.21 | ||||
有机肥间 | 2 | 79.73 | 3.76 | 0.05 | 103594.12 | 4.35 | 0.03 | 1.61 | 2.64 | 0.10 | 24.50 | 4.73 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.84 | ||||
化肥减施量间 | 2 | 571.23 | 26.90 | <0.0001 | 471392.32 | 19.82 | <0.0001 | 1.02 | 1.68 | 0.22 | 79.90 | 15.42 | 0.0002 | 0.28 | 0.69 | 0.52 | ||||
互作间 | 4 | 22.70 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 57184.94 | 1.20 | 0.35 | 1.93 | 1.58 | 0.23 | 10.93 | 1.06 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
差异来源 | df | 产量 | 产值 | 均价 | 上等烟比例 | 下等烟比例 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | SS | F | P | ||||||
区组间 | 2 | 46.74 | 2.20 | 0.14 | 52565.14 | 2.21 | 0.14 | 1.32 | 2.17 | 0.15 | 7.74 | 1.49 | 0.25 | 0.70 | 1.72 | 0.21 | ||||
有机肥间 | 2 | 79.73 | 3.76 | 0.05 | 103594.12 | 4.35 | 0.03 | 1.61 | 2.64 | 0.10 | 24.50 | 4.73 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.84 | ||||
化肥减施量间 | 2 | 571.23 | 26.90 | <0.0001 | 471392.32 | 19.82 | <0.0001 | 1.02 | 1.68 | 0.22 | 79.90 | 15.42 | 0.0002 | 0.28 | 0.69 | 0.52 | ||||
互作间 | 4 | 22.70 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 57184.94 | 1.20 | 0.35 | 1.93 | 1.58 | 0.23 | 10.93 | 1.06 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
主处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% | 下等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
蚯蚓粪 | 2050.35A | 47567.10A | 23.21A | 46.69A | 2.04A |
油饼 | 2049.30A | 46536.00AB | 22.69A | 45.77AB | 1.93A |
酒糟 | 1995.15B | 45294.45B | 22.69A | 44.38B | 2.04A |
化肥减施5% | 2122.50A | 49078.95A | 23.12A | 47.87A | 1.90A |
化肥减施10% | 2016.75B | 46037.55B | 22.82A | 45.27B | 2.14A |
化肥减施15% | 1955.40C | 44281.05C | 22.65A | 43.70B | 1.98A |
主处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% | 下等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
蚯蚓粪 | 2050.35A | 47567.10A | 23.21A | 46.69A | 2.04A |
油饼 | 2049.30A | 46536.00AB | 22.69A | 45.77AB | 1.93A |
酒糟 | 1995.15B | 45294.45B | 22.69A | 44.38B | 2.04A |
化肥减施5% | 2122.50A | 49078.95A | 23.12A | 47.87A | 1.90A |
化肥减施10% | 2016.75B | 46037.55B | 22.82A | 45.27B | 2.14A |
化肥减施15% | 1955.40C | 44281.05C | 22.65A | 43.70B | 1.98A |
处理 编号 | 株高 | 茎围 | 节距 | 有效叶数 | 最大叶面积 | 农艺性状评价 综合指数 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数值/ cm | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/cm | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/cm | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/片 | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/m2 | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值 | 排序 | ||||||
1 | 129.20CD | 2 | -0.56 | 11.13BCD | 5 | 0.52 | 5.57B | 1 | -1.90 | 19.67AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.14CDE | 3 | -0.62 | -0.06 | 7 | |||||
2 | 133.23ABC | 4 | 1.04 | 12.03A | 6 | 1.10 | 6.17A | 2 | 0.47 | 20.33A | 2 | 0.32 | 0.16A | 5 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1 | |||||
3 | 125.53D | 1 | -1.36 | 11.57AB | 6 | 1.10 | 6.10A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.67AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.14BCD | 4 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 3 | |||||
4 | 125.13D | 1 | -1.36 | 10.63CDE | 4 | -0.06 | 6.03A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.13DE | 2 | -1.31 | -0.36 | 9 | |||||
5 | 135.13A | 4 | 1.04 | 11.27ABC | 6 | 1.10 | 6.10A | 2 | 0.47 | 20.33A | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15AB | 5 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1 | |||||
6 | 129.10CD | 2 | -0.56 | 10.50CDE | 4 | -0.06 | 6.03A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15ABC | 5 | 0.76 | 0.30 | 5 | |||||
7 | 129.17CD | 2 | -0.56 | 10.37DE | 3 | -0.64 | 6.10A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15ABC | 5 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 6 | |||||
8 | 137.53A | 4 | 1.04 | 10.77CDE | 4 | -0.06 | 6.20A | 2 | 0.47 | 20.33A | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15ABC | 5 | 0.76 | 0.38 | 4 | |||||
9 | 133.83AB | 4 | 1.04 | 10.27E | 2 | -1.21 | 6.03A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.14BCD | 4 | 0.07 | -0.17 | 8 | |||||
10 | 130.37BC | 3 | 0.24 | 9.10F | 1 | -1.79 | 5.47B | 1 | -1.90 | 19.00B | 1 | -2.85 | 0.13E | 1 | -2.00 | -2.07 | 10 | |||||
权重 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
处理 编号 | 株高 | 茎围 | 节距 | 有效叶数 | 最大叶面积 | 农艺性状评价 综合指数 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数值/ cm | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/cm | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/cm | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/片 | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值/m2 | 赋值 | 标准化 | 数值 | 排序 | ||||||
1 | 129.20CD | 2 | -0.56 | 11.13BCD | 5 | 0.52 | 5.57B | 1 | -1.90 | 19.67AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.14CDE | 3 | -0.62 | -0.06 | 7 | |||||
2 | 133.23ABC | 4 | 1.04 | 12.03A | 6 | 1.10 | 6.17A | 2 | 0.47 | 20.33A | 2 | 0.32 | 0.16A | 5 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1 | |||||
3 | 125.53D | 1 | -1.36 | 11.57AB | 6 | 1.10 | 6.10A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.67AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.14BCD | 4 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 3 | |||||
4 | 125.13D | 1 | -1.36 | 10.63CDE | 4 | -0.06 | 6.03A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.13DE | 2 | -1.31 | -0.36 | 9 | |||||
5 | 135.13A | 4 | 1.04 | 11.27ABC | 6 | 1.10 | 6.10A | 2 | 0.47 | 20.33A | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15AB | 5 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1 | |||||
6 | 129.10CD | 2 | -0.56 | 10.50CDE | 4 | -0.06 | 6.03A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15ABC | 5 | 0.76 | 0.30 | 5 | |||||
7 | 129.17CD | 2 | -0.56 | 10.37DE | 3 | -0.64 | 6.10A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15ABC | 5 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 6 | |||||
8 | 137.53A | 4 | 1.04 | 10.77CDE | 4 | -0.06 | 6.20A | 2 | 0.47 | 20.33A | 2 | 0.32 | 0.15ABC | 5 | 0.76 | 0.38 | 4 | |||||
9 | 133.83AB | 4 | 1.04 | 10.27E | 2 | -1.21 | 6.03A | 2 | 0.47 | 19.33AB | 2 | 0.32 | 0.14BCD | 4 | 0.07 | -0.17 | 8 | |||||
10 | 130.37BC | 3 | 0.24 | 9.10F | 1 | -1.79 | 5.47B | 1 | -1.90 | 19.00B | 1 | -2.85 | 0.13E | 1 | -2.00 | -2.07 | 10 | |||||
权重 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
处理编号 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% | 下等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2080.95ABC | 46832.55BCD | 22.50B | 46.77AB | 1.80A |
2 | 2146.05A | 49869.45A | 23.24AB | 48.01A | 2.13A |
3 | 2034.45CD | 48160.20ABC | 23.67A | 47.47AB | 1.97A |
4 | 1970.40DE | 44671.65ED | 22.71AB | 44.60BC | 2.03A |
5 | 2137.50AB | 49265.55AB | 23.05AB | 48.77A | 1.73A |
6 | 2055.45BC | 46290.45BCD | 22.52B | 44.93BC | 2.07A |
7 | 1954.95DE | 44052.00ED | 22.52B | 43.60C | 2.00A |
8 | 2083.95ABC | 48101.85ABC | 23.08AB | 46.83AB | 1.83A |
9 | 1960.35DE | 43662.00E | 22.26B | 43.40C | 2.40A |
10 | 1941.00E | 44119.50ED | 22.73AB | 42.89C | 1.90A |
处理编号 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% | 下等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2080.95ABC | 46832.55BCD | 22.50B | 46.77AB | 1.80A |
2 | 2146.05A | 49869.45A | 23.24AB | 48.01A | 2.13A |
3 | 2034.45CD | 48160.20ABC | 23.67A | 47.47AB | 1.97A |
4 | 1970.40DE | 44671.65ED | 22.71AB | 44.60BC | 2.03A |
5 | 2137.50AB | 49265.55AB | 23.05AB | 48.77A | 1.73A |
6 | 2055.45BC | 46290.45BCD | 22.52B | 44.93BC | 2.07A |
7 | 1954.95DE | 44052.00ED | 22.52B | 43.60C | 2.00A |
8 | 2083.95ABC | 48101.85ABC | 23.08AB | 46.83AB | 1.83A |
9 | 1960.35DE | 43662.00E | 22.26B | 43.40C | 2.40A |
10 | 1941.00E | 44119.50ED | 22.73AB | 42.89C | 1.90A |
[1] |
中国农业科学院烟草研究所. 中国烟草栽培学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2005.
|
[2] |
李燕青, 李壮, 赵秉强. 有机无机结合施肥制度研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2017, 7(7):22-30.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17020011 |
[3] |
邵孝侯, 刘旭, 周永波, 等. 生物有机肥改良连作土壤及烤烟生长发育的效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(2):65-67.
|
[4] |
刘魁, 杨亚丽, 杨继周, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对田烟根际土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(10):2191-2196.
|
[5] |
赵力光, 唐兴莹, 汤利, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对植烟土壤微生物区系的影响及其与烤烟青枯病的关系[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 33(4):744-750.
|
[6] |
李司童, 毛凯伦, 韦成才, 等. 蚯蚓粪肥替代部分化肥对连作烟田土壤肥力的影响及评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(S1):238-245.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2018.S1.038 |
[7] |
韩锦峰, 郭培国. 氮素用量、形态、种类对烤烟生长发育及产量品质影响的研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 1999(3):5-8.
|
[8] |
王李芳, 王毅, 罗定林, 等. 酒糟有机肥对烟叶质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 6:157-158,173.
|
[9] |
石贤吉, 代超, 闫寒, 等. 饼肥与化肥不同配比对烤烟产量及质量的影响[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2017, 39(3):39-43,49.
|
[10] |
任杰, 柯美福, 饶智, 等. 陕南山地烟田不同植烟年限土壤养分的变化[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2015, 21(1):68-71.
|
[11] |
赵鹏, 李小芳, 柯美福, 等. 安康烤烟绿色栽培技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022(12):230-233.
|
[12] |
崔鸣, 赵兴喜, 陈和润, 等. 饼肥不同用量对烤烟产量和品质影响效应试验[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2013, 59(2):92-93.
|
[13] |
赵鹏, 薛峰, 朱峰, 等. 安康低海拔区域烤烟水肥一体化下氮肥减施效应研究[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(10):30-35.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190900198 |
[14] |
国家烟草专卖局. YC/T 142—2010,烟草农艺性状调查测量方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.
|
[15] |
国家烟草专卖局. GB 2635—1992,烤烟[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1992:491-500.
|
[16] |
胡小平, 王长发. SAS基础及统计实例教程[M]. 西安: 地图出版社, 2001:82,88.
|
[17] |
张云伟, 徐智, 汤利, 等. 不同有机肥对烤烟根际土壤微生物的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(9):2551-2556.
|
[18] |
卢钰升, 顾文杰, 李集勤, 等. 化肥有机替代对烤烟产质量、土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(16):22-27.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19040052 |
[19] |
程亚倩, 周洁, 李司童, 等. 蚯蚓粪肥对陕西烟区烤烟生长及品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(2):347-356.
|
[20] |
赵鹏博, 郑璞帆, 李司童, 等. 蚯蚓粪与酒糟不同配比对土壤理化性质及烤烟品质的影响初探[J]. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(3):676-682.
|
[1] | LIU Li, CHAI Min, HAN Wei, QIE Qiyang, FENG Xiaolong, NA Dongchen, ZHOU Yuancheng, CAO Yanling, WANG Yiling. 99 Tartary BuckwheatVarieties: Evaluation of Main Agronomic Traits and Variety Screening [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 25-31. |
[2] | SU Guijun, LOU Ling, LI Dan, HE Linhai, WANG Jingwen, SHEN Jianguo, ZHANG Zhouna. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Base Application on the Yield of Greenhouse Pakchoi and Soil Nutrient Content [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(7): 44-47. |
[3] | WANG Ping, XIE Chengjun, SUN Zhenrong, CHEN Juan, WANG Lei, PENG Wenjing. Effects of Planting Density and Fertilization Amount on Growth and Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Cool Irrigation Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(6): 17-24. |
[4] | TANG Hongjie, WANG Peng, JIAO Shengqun, LI Jihui, WEI Ping, LIU Yushan. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Peach Yield and Quality and Soil Fertility [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(6): 55-59. |
[5] | SUN Xingquan, HUANG Heming, LIU Hong, XU Shanhe, LIU Yinan, LU Ping, YUAN Xiutang, ZHENG Wu, WANG Zhushi. Effects of Adding Humic Acid on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Under Flood Irrigation Condition [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2023, 13(5): 28-34. |
[6] | LI Yuexian, ZHOU Yingchun, SONG Jiming, ZHANG Linhui, SHEN Shaobin, JIANG Tailing, DUAN Chunfang, LIU Qian, XIONG Xiankun, YAN Wei, LIU Guanghua. The Response of Agronomic Traits and Quality of Cassava to Different Altitude Gradients [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 18-24. |
[7] | ZHAO Yue, HUANG Nan, LIU Jipei. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Fertilizer of Silicon-Calcium-Potassium-Magnesium on Watermelon Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 37-41. |
[8] | ZHANG Zhengyang, GUO Shanhu, ZHANG Jintao, MEN Sirun, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei, ZHAO Xuetong. The Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Growth and Yield and Quality of ‘Yunyan 87’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): 47-53. |
[9] | YANG Fang, LIANG Haiyan, LIN Fengxian, SONG Xiaoqiang, DENG Yarui, LI Hai. The Agronomic Traits of 24 Broomcorn Millet Materials: Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 27-34. |
[10] | GUO Shanhu, ZHOU Zonggui, LIU Min, PAN Wenzheng, ZHANG Lifang, ZHAO Xuetong, ZHANG Qi, XIAO Yongfei. Effects of Soil Improvement Materials on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(8): 62-67. |
[11] | PAN Wenzheng, WANG Bin, ZHANG Qi, MAO Minglin, LI Cheng, ZI Wenlin. Rape Clubroot in Anning: Biocontrol Techniques [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 17-20. |
[12] | LI Jiqin, YUAN Qinghua, LIU Yang, WEN Zhiqiang, QIU Chunren, ZHANG Haixia, MA Zhuwen. Selection and Suitability Evaluation of Eight Introduced Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties in Shaoguan Ecological Tobacco Areas [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): 38-44. |
[13] | CAI Tao. Variation Characteristics of Climate Suitability Factors for Flue-cured Tobacco Cultivation in Sanmenxia City [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 66-73. |
[14] | HE Jixian, GU Huizhan, YU Xiao, CHEN Liping, YU Yaoying, JIANG Hao. Changes of Functional Traits of Flue-cured Tobacco: Influence on Nicotine Content [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(5): 30-36. |
[15] | LI Wenqing, ZHENG Chaoyuan, KE Yuqin, CHEN Shunhui, GUO Jinping, LI Chunying. Effects of Magnesium Fertilizer Application on Soil Magnesium Supply and Growth and Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 33-40. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||