
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (10): 37-44.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0167
Previous Articles Next Articles
KANG Pingde(
), YANG Shaohua, QI Shuwei, XU Tiancai, CHENG Yuanhui, YANG Liyun, YUAN Huijuan, CHEN Cui(
)
Received:2024-08-15
Revised:2025-02-17
Online:2025-10-20
Published:2025-10-17
KANG Pingde, YANG Shaohua, QI Shuwei, XU Tiancai, CHENG Yuanhui, YANG Liyun, YUAN Huijuan, CHEN Cui. Study on Application Rates of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer in Aconitum georgei Comber. Cultivation Based on ‘3414’ Experiment[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(10): 37-44.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0167
| 试验处理 | N编码 | P编码 | K编码 | N施用量/(kg/hm2) | P施用量/(kg/hm2) | K施用量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| N0P2K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N1P2K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 69.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P0K2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 138.0 | 0.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P1K2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 138.0 | 60.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P2K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P3K2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 138.0 | 180.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P2K0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 0.0 |
| N2P2K1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 117.0 |
| N2P2K3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 351.0 |
| N3P2K2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 207.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N1P1K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 69.0 | 60.0 | 234.0 |
| N1P2K1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 69.0 | 120.0 | 117.0 |
| N2P1K1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 138.0 | 60.0 | 117.0 |
| 试验处理 | N编码 | P编码 | K编码 | N施用量/(kg/hm2) | P施用量/(kg/hm2) | K施用量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| N0P2K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N1P2K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 69.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P0K2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 138.0 | 0.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P1K2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 138.0 | 60.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P2K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P3K2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 138.0 | 180.0 | 234.0 |
| N2P2K0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 0.0 |
| N2P2K1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 117.0 |
| N2P2K3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 138.0 | 120.0 | 351.0 |
| N3P2K2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 207.0 | 120.0 | 234.0 |
| N1P1K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 69.0 | 60.0 | 234.0 |
| N1P2K1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 69.0 | 120.0 | 117.0 |
| N2P1K1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 138.0 | 60.0 | 117.0 |
| 处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 块根增殖倍数/倍 | 块根重/(g/个) |
|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0K0 | 3612.82±467.64 f | 1.20±0.05 b | 10.78±1.00 d |
| N0P2K2 | 4145.11±106.11 ef | 1.33±0.11 abc | 11.28±0.82 cd |
| N1P2K2 | 4939.97±327.65 bcde | 1.35±0.11 abc | 13.25±1.33 abc |
| N2P0K2 | 4684.80±492.19 cde | 1.29±0.09 abc | 13.15±1.80 abc |
| N2P1K2 | 5128.41±415.19 bcde | 1.32±0.13 abc | 13.97±0.81 ab |
| N2P2K2 | 6008.69±766.78 ab | 1.40±0.11 abc | 15.40±0.95 a |
| N2P3K2 | 6007.70±810.83 ab | 1.43±0.14 ab | 15.08±0.51 ab |
| N2P2K0 | 5560.92±481.95 abcd | 1.40±0.11 abc | 14.29±0.68 ab |
| N2P2K1 | 5707.17±533.26 abc | 1.43±0.15 ab | 14.41±1.38 ab |
| N2P2K3 | 6512.39±718.94 a | 1.51±0.07 a | 15.55±1.97 a |
| N3P2K2 | 5352.83±126.02 bcd | 1.34±0.12 abc | 14.43±1.11 ab |
| N1P1K2 | 4581.14±658.20 def | 1.29±0.08 bc | 12.86±2.23 bcd |
| N1P2K1 | 4793.78±925.06 cde | 1.28±0.13 bc | 13.39±1.18 abc |
| N2P1K1 | 5597.59±430.24 abcd | 1.44±0.12 ab | 14.03±0.58 ab |
| 处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 块根增殖倍数/倍 | 块根重/(g/个) |
|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0K0 | 3612.82±467.64 f | 1.20±0.05 b | 10.78±1.00 d |
| N0P2K2 | 4145.11±106.11 ef | 1.33±0.11 abc | 11.28±0.82 cd |
| N1P2K2 | 4939.97±327.65 bcde | 1.35±0.11 abc | 13.25±1.33 abc |
| N2P0K2 | 4684.80±492.19 cde | 1.29±0.09 abc | 13.15±1.80 abc |
| N2P1K2 | 5128.41±415.19 bcde | 1.32±0.13 abc | 13.97±0.81 ab |
| N2P2K2 | 6008.69±766.78 ab | 1.40±0.11 abc | 15.40±0.95 a |
| N2P3K2 | 6007.70±810.83 ab | 1.43±0.14 ab | 15.08±0.51 ab |
| N2P2K0 | 5560.92±481.95 abcd | 1.40±0.11 abc | 14.29±0.68 ab |
| N2P2K1 | 5707.17±533.26 abc | 1.43±0.15 ab | 14.41±1.38 ab |
| N2P2K3 | 6512.39±718.94 a | 1.51±0.07 a | 15.55±1.97 a |
| N3P2K2 | 5352.83±126.02 bcd | 1.34±0.12 abc | 14.43±1.11 ab |
| N1P1K2 | 4581.14±658.20 def | 1.29±0.08 bc | 12.86±2.23 bcd |
| N1P2K1 | 4793.78±925.06 cde | 1.28±0.13 bc | 13.39±1.18 abc |
| N2P1K1 | 5597.59±430.24 abcd | 1.44±0.12 ab | 14.03±0.58 ab |
| 处理 | 水平 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 相对产量/% | 减产率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0K0 | 0 | 3612.82 | 60.13 | 39.87 |
| N0P2K2 | N0 | 4145.11 | 68.99 | 31.01 |
| N2P0K2 | P0 | 4684.80 | 77.97 | 22.03 |
| N2P2K0 | K0 | 5560.92 | 92.55 | 7.45 |
| N2P2K2 | N2P2K2 | 6008.69 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| 处理 | 水平 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 相对产量/% | 减产率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0K0 | 0 | 3612.82 | 60.13 | 39.87 |
| N0P2K2 | N0 | 4145.11 | 68.99 | 31.01 |
| N2P0K2 | P0 | 4684.80 | 77.97 | 22.03 |
| N2P2K0 | K0 | 5560.92 | 92.55 | 7.45 |
| N2P2K2 | N2P2K2 | 6008.69 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| 因素 | 肥料效应函数 | R2 | P | 显著性检验 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N肥 | Y=4045.19-1557.23N-362.68N2 | 0.891 | 0.331 | >0.05 |
| P肥 | Y=4618.90+18.35P-111.15P2 | 0.966 | 0.257 | >0.05 |
| K肥 | Y=5563.27+47.51K+89.36K2 | 1.000 | 0.014 | <0.05 |
| NP肥 | Y=2391.15+1819.69N+923.06P-342.99N2-45.07P2-164.70NP | 0.932 | 0.162 | >0.05 |
| NK肥 | Y=3666.30+1815.66N-527.92K-313.50N2+366.06K2-212.82NK | 0.980 | 0.05 | >0.05 |
| PK肥 | Y=6412.36-355.41P-929.55K+89.33P2+33.87K2+347.00PK | 0.976 | 0.06 | >0.05 |
| NPK肥 | Y=3611.094+2418.32N-378.296N2-80.234P-80.368P2-1179.697K+213.203K2-204.452NP-198.34NK+602.621PK | 0.982 | 0.015 | <0.05 |
| 因素 | 肥料效应函数 | R2 | P | 显著性检验 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N肥 | Y=4045.19-1557.23N-362.68N2 | 0.891 | 0.331 | >0.05 |
| P肥 | Y=4618.90+18.35P-111.15P2 | 0.966 | 0.257 | >0.05 |
| K肥 | Y=5563.27+47.51K+89.36K2 | 1.000 | 0.014 | <0.05 |
| NP肥 | Y=2391.15+1819.69N+923.06P-342.99N2-45.07P2-164.70NP | 0.932 | 0.162 | >0.05 |
| NK肥 | Y=3666.30+1815.66N-527.92K-313.50N2+366.06K2-212.82NK | 0.980 | 0.05 | >0.05 |
| PK肥 | Y=6412.36-355.41P-929.55K+89.33P2+33.87K2+347.00PK | 0.976 | 0.06 | >0.05 |
| NPK肥 | Y=3611.094+2418.32N-378.296N2-80.234P-80.368P2-1179.697K+213.203K2-204.452NP-198.34NK+602.621PK | 0.982 | 0.015 | <0.05 |
| 项目 | 氮肥 | 磷肥 | 钾肥 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 次数 | 频率/% | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 次数 | 频率/% | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 次数 | 频率/% | |||
| 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 10.81 | 0.00 | 4 | 10.81 | 0.00 | 4 | 10.81 | ||
| 1 | 69.00 | 9 | 24.32 | 60.00 | 9 | 24.32 | 117.00 | 9 | 24.32 | ||
| 2 | 138.00 | 21 | 56.76 | 120.00 | 22 | 56.76 | 234.00 | 22 | 56.76 | ||
| 3 | 207.00 | 3 | 8.11 | 180.00 | 2 | 5.40 | 351.00 | 2 | 5.40 | ||
| 合计 | 37 | 100.00 | 37 | 100.00 | 37 | 100.00 | |||||
| xi均值 | 111.89 | 95.68 | 186.57 | ||||||||
| 标准差(s) | 54.79 | 45.74 | 89.19 | ||||||||
| 均数标准差 | 9.01 | 7.52 | 14.67 | ||||||||
| 95%置信区间 | 99.66~127.21 | 80.94~110.42 | 157.82~215.32 | ||||||||
| 项目 | 氮肥 | 磷肥 | 钾肥 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 次数 | 频率/% | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 次数 | 频率/% | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 次数 | 频率/% | |||
| 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 10.81 | 0.00 | 4 | 10.81 | 0.00 | 4 | 10.81 | ||
| 1 | 69.00 | 9 | 24.32 | 60.00 | 9 | 24.32 | 117.00 | 9 | 24.32 | ||
| 2 | 138.00 | 21 | 56.76 | 120.00 | 22 | 56.76 | 234.00 | 22 | 56.76 | ||
| 3 | 207.00 | 3 | 8.11 | 180.00 | 2 | 5.40 | 351.00 | 2 | 5.40 | ||
| 合计 | 37 | 100.00 | 37 | 100.00 | 37 | 100.00 | |||||
| xi均值 | 111.89 | 95.68 | 186.57 | ||||||||
| 标准差(s) | 54.79 | 45.74 | 89.19 | ||||||||
| 均数标准差 | 9.01 | 7.52 | 14.67 | ||||||||
| 95%置信区间 | 99.66~127.21 | 80.94~110.42 | 157.82~215.32 | ||||||||
| [1] |
中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
|
| [2] |
关克俭. 中国植物志(第27卷)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979.
|
| [3] |
中国科学院昆明植物研究所. 云南植物志 第十一卷 种子植物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.
|
| [4] |
龚云麒, 张伟, 朱泽. HPLC测定长喙乌头中草乌甲素的含量[J]. 云南中医学院学报, 2011, 34(6):24-27.
|
| [5] |
龚福永, 马晓霞, 张彬若, 等. 长喙乌头化学成分研究[J]. 中药材, 2019, 42(09):2062-2065.
|
| [6] |
黄茜, 孙明丽, 李腾飞, 等. 乌头生物碱镇痛作用及机制研究进展[J]. 神经药理学报, 2017, 7(3):21-32.
|
| [7] |
付彬彬, 龚云麒, 周剑, 刘建文, 刘军锋. 草乌甲素闪式提取工艺优化及热稳定性研究[J]. 云南化工, 2022, 49(12):40-43.
|
| [8] |
doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(21)60050-X pmid: 34247774 |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
赫伟. 草乌甲素原料植物资源筛选研究[D]. 昆明: 云南中医学院, 2014.12.
|
| [11] |
张伟, 杨兆祥, 龚云麒, 等. 长喙乌头化学成分研究[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2011, 23(B12):4-8,85.
|
| [12] |
赫伟, 马晓霞, 张彬若, 等. HPLC法同时测定长喙乌头中3种主要二萜类生物碱含量[J]. 药物分析杂志, 2015, 35(10):1829-1832.
|
| [13] |
杨俐苹, 白由路, 王贺, 等. 测土配方施肥指标体系建立中“3414”试验方案应用探讨[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(4):1018-1023.
|
| [14] |
王圣瑞, 陈新平, 高祥照, 等. “3414”肥料试验模型拟合的探讨[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(4):409-413.
|
| [15] |
康平德, 陈翠, 程远辉, 等. 基于“3414”方案的云木香产量与质量研究初报[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(8):112-117.
|
| [16] |
刘华, 李明, 田永强, 等. 基于“3414”试验的黄芩氮磷钾肥推荐施肥量研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(11):26-30.
|
| [17] |
金冬雪, 孙迪, 樊桓均, 等. 基于“3414”施肥方案的二年生桔梗主要性状的综合评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2):156-161.
|
| [18] |
宋希梅, 朱永全, 卢迎春, 等. 基于“3414”的三七氮磷钾施肥量研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(1):16-25.
|
| [19] |
齐浩, 陈垣, 郭凤霞, 等. 唐古特大黄“3414”施肥效果及推荐施肥量研究[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 24(9):19-29.
|
| [20] |
李旦旦, 邱浩, 崔浪军, 等. 不同氮磷钾配比对乌头生长及黑顺片品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(10):177-183.
|
| [21] |
张汉卿, 卢明, 邓燕, 等. 香水菠萝氮磷钾施肥效应和适宜施用量研究[J/OL]. 热带作物学报: 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(6):1619-1624.
|
| [22] |
李娟茹, 孙明清, 张辉, 等. 不同磷肥用量及施用方式对土壤有效磷分布和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(9):28-32.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190800153 |
| [23] |
谭海燕, 马芳, 杨从林, 等. 长期减量施肥对设施耕地土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(2):39-44.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20191100284 |
| [1] | QIU Kaili, MENG Aoxue, YANG Qirui, GENG Sainan, WANG Yilun. Effects of Novel Urea on Yield and Nitrogen Fertilizer Efficiency of High-yield Summer Maize [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 44-49. |
| [2] | ZHOU Zhongwen, QI Yue, LIU Ying, LEI Jun. Effects of Sowing Schedule Adjustment on Yield and Quality of Spring Maize in Semi-arid Zone of Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 6-13. |
| [3] | WANG Jianfeng, LI Yue. Meta Analysis of Effect of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield and Thousand Grain Weight of Flax [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 71-79. |
| [4] | WU Dan, TANG Lina, WANG Jing, MENG Yuanyan, ZHANG Xiaolong, LIU Li, WU Dong, HUANG Guoyan, ZHANG Xiuying, CAI Rongjing, XU Liuxing. Influence of Climatic Factors on Yield and Nutrition of Zhaotong Apples [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(9): 84-91. |
| [5] | HAN Mingming, LYU Lianjie, LI Wenqian, ZHANG Haijun. Effects of Irrigation Methods and Fertilizer Treatments on Growth Development and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 1-5. |
| [6] | ZHANG Junli, WANG Yao, XIA Qiongmei, ZHU Haiping, LONG Ruiping, LI Guiyong, DENG Anfeng, DU CHenqing, YANG Congdang. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Operation on Yield and Yield Components of ‘Chaoyou 1000’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 23-29. |
| [7] | ZHAO Shihua, YANG Ning, HAO Ranran, HAN Qing, ZHAO Huixia, CHU Yanshi, SUN Weixiang, ZHAO Zuosheng, LONG Qiyuan, LONG Qijian. Effect of Animal Manure on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Overwintering Eggplant [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 64-68. |
| [8] | WANG Jinxiu, LIU Jiabin, LIN Qi, LIU Yiguo, ZHOU Yuan, DUAN Wenping, GENG Xinghua, LI Lingyan, SHI Changhai. Effects of Sowing Date on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of Quinoa [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 1-7. |
| [9] | MENG Zhanying, WANG Yuhong, GUO Dang, TIAN Wenzhong, LI Junhong, LI Fang, LYU Junjie. Effect of Nitrogen Application Rate on Summer Maize Yield Under Different Densities [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 23-27. |
| [10] | YIN Xuelian, WANG Xing, GUO Pingping, YANG Huan. Climatic Characteristics of Summer High Temperature Weather in Middle of Hexi Corridor and Its Effects on Maize Production [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 65-73. |
| [11] | FU Huijuan, YI Jun, SHAO Baolin, ZENG Shuocheng, ZHANG Haiting, LI Qiyong, ZHANG Hong, LI Xingyue. Impact of Dazomet Fumigation and Fosthiazate Hole Application on Potato Cyst Nematode Infestation and Potato Yield [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 8-14. |
| [12] | QIN Huawei, GAO Junjie, WANG Ting, HAN Long, LIU Zhongliang, CHEN Zhen, YAN Weiqiang, GU Duanyin. Effects of N P K Fertilizers Combined Application on Yield and Quality of Chinese Chive [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(6): 71-76. |
| [13] | QU Yang, MA Wen, LIU Xiaoting, XUE Yuying, YU Longhui, YAN Junping, WANG Kezhen. Effects of Sowing Depth and Seed Coating on Seedling Growth, Photosynthetic Performance, Yield and Quality of Summer Soybean [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 1-6. |
| [14] | JIN Hailei, ZHANG Huiyu, ZHANG Zhifang, XU Guoju, WANG Liangfa. Analysis of High Yield, Stable Yield and Adaptability of New National Approval Maize Variety ‘Xundan 996’ [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 7-11. |
| [15] | ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jingdu, XIN Haibin, LIU Cuilian, XU Ruiheng, FAN Xiaokai, WANG Ying. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer on Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice Under Side Deep Nitrogen Reduction Fertilization [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(4): 7-12. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||