
Journal of Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 46-53.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0202
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xingfu(
), YANG Junzhang, GAO Xiaodong, YU Zhi, LUO Ming, XU Zhangqiang(
)
Received:2024-11-14
Revised:2025-04-20
Online:2026-02-12
Published:2026-02-12
WANG Xingfu, YANG Junzhang, GAO Xiaodong, YU Zhi, LUO Ming, XU Zhangqiang. Effect of Potassium Application Rate on Yield and Quality of Cigar Filler Tobacco in Suijiang of Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(2): 46-53.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://nxxb.caass.org.cn/EN/10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2024-0202
| 处理 | 复合肥 | 硝酸钾 | 硫酸钾 | 钙镁磷肥 | 有机肥 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 纯养分 | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 (K2O) | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 (P2O5) | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 (N+P2O5+K2O) | 肥料施入量 | ||||||||
| N | P2O5 | K2O | N | K2O | |||||||||||||
| CK | 99.00 | 135.00 | 198.00 | 900.00 | 5.40 | 18.00 | 600.00 | 5.20 | 150.00 | 4.80 | 600.00 | 225.00 | 4500.00 | ||||
| T1 | 99.00 | 135.00 | 198.00 | 900.00 | 5.40 | 18.00 | 600.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.80 | 600.00 | 225.00 | 4500.00 | ||||
| T2 | 99.00 | 135.00 | 198.00 | 900.00 | 5.40 | 18.00 | 600.00 | 10.80 | 315.00 | 4.80 | 600.00 | 225.00 | 4500.00 | ||||
| 处理 | 复合肥 | 硝酸钾 | 硫酸钾 | 钙镁磷肥 | 有机肥 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 纯养分 | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 (K2O) | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 (P2O5) | 肥料施入量 | 纯养分 (N+P2O5+K2O) | 肥料施入量 | ||||||||
| N | P2O5 | K2O | N | K2O | |||||||||||||
| CK | 99.00 | 135.00 | 198.00 | 900.00 | 5.40 | 18.00 | 600.00 | 5.20 | 150.00 | 4.80 | 600.00 | 225.00 | 4500.00 | ||||
| T1 | 99.00 | 135.00 | 198.00 | 900.00 | 5.40 | 18.00 | 600.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.80 | 600.00 | 225.00 | 4500.00 | ||||
| T2 | 99.00 | 135.00 | 198.00 | 900.00 | 5.40 | 18.00 | 600.00 | 10.80 | 315.00 | 4.80 | 600.00 | 225.00 | 4500.00 | ||||
| 处理 | 株型 | 叶形 | 叶色 | 茎叶角度/° | 主脉粗细 | 田间整齐度 | 成熟特性 | 生长势 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 苗期 | 栽后25 d | 栽后50 d | ||||||||
| CK | 塔形 | 长椭圆 | 绿色 | 45 | 较粗 | 较整齐 | 叶片绿色变淡,主脉变白,叶尖翻卷 | 强 | 较弱 | 弱 |
| T1 | 塔形 | 长椭圆 | 绿色 | 45 | 较粗 | 较整齐 | 叶片绿色变淡,主脉变白,叶尖翻卷 | 强 | 弱 | 弱 |
| T2 | 塔形 | 长椭圆 | 绿色 | 45 | 较粗 | 较整齐 | 叶片绿色变淡,主脉变白,叶尖翻卷 | 强 | 较弱 | 较弱 |
| 处理 | 株型 | 叶形 | 叶色 | 茎叶角度/° | 主脉粗细 | 田间整齐度 | 成熟特性 | 生长势 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 苗期 | 栽后25 d | 栽后50 d | ||||||||
| CK | 塔形 | 长椭圆 | 绿色 | 45 | 较粗 | 较整齐 | 叶片绿色变淡,主脉变白,叶尖翻卷 | 强 | 较弱 | 弱 |
| T1 | 塔形 | 长椭圆 | 绿色 | 45 | 较粗 | 较整齐 | 叶片绿色变淡,主脉变白,叶尖翻卷 | 强 | 弱 | 弱 |
| T2 | 塔形 | 长椭圆 | 绿色 | 45 | 较粗 | 较整齐 | 叶片绿色变淡,主脉变白,叶尖翻卷 | 强 | 较弱 | 较弱 |
| 处理 | 花叶病 | 气候性斑点病 | 马铃薯Y病毒病 | 野火病 | 蚀粉病 | 赤星病 | 蚀纹病 | 青枯病 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | ||||||||
| CK | 16.0 | 11.0 | 34.0 | 16.8 | 31.7 | 23.7 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | |||||||
| T1 | 19.7 | 14.0 | 45.0 | 17.0 | 36.0 | 20.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| T2 | 19.3 | 13.0 | 30.0 | 18.3 | 27.7 | 20.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||||
| 处理 | 花叶病 | 气候性斑点病 | 马铃薯Y病毒病 | 野火病 | 蚀粉病 | 赤星病 | 蚀纹病 | 青枯病 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | 发病率/% | 病指 | ||||||||
| CK | 16.0 | 11.0 | 34.0 | 16.8 | 31.7 | 23.7 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | |||||||
| T1 | 19.7 | 14.0 | 45.0 | 17.0 | 36.0 | 20.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| T2 | 19.3 | 13.0 | 30.0 | 18.3 | 27.7 | 20.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||||
| 部位 | 处理 | 一级/% | 二级/% | 三级/% | 末级/% | 废烟/% | 晾制后烟叶产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上部叶 | CK | 0.00b | 2.34c | 27.34b | 42.99b | 27.34a | 336.14b |
| T1 | 0.00b | 10.73a | 24.61c | 49.21a | 15.45c | 325.36c | |
| T2 | 1.02a | 4.74b | 41.10a | 31.37c | 21.77b | 406.18a | |
| 中部叶 | CK | 1.45b | 14.47a | 52.37b | 18.82c | 12.89a | 402.18b |
| T1 | 1.46b | 10.39c | 55.84a | 25.32b | 6.98c | 374.16c | |
| T2 | 12.53a | 10.66b | 33.96c | 34.07a | 8.78b | 420.18a | |
| 下部叶 | CK | 1.12c | 34.01a | 40.41c | 14.52c | 9.95b | 448.20a |
| T1 | 1.16b | 8.23c | 57.07a | 20.05b | 13.50a | 406.40c | |
| T2 | 8.22a | 9.98b | 42.11b | 35.86a | 3.84c | 332.19b |
| 部位 | 处理 | 一级/% | 二级/% | 三级/% | 末级/% | 废烟/% | 晾制后烟叶产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上部叶 | CK | 0.00b | 2.34c | 27.34b | 42.99b | 27.34a | 336.14b |
| T1 | 0.00b | 10.73a | 24.61c | 49.21a | 15.45c | 325.36c | |
| T2 | 1.02a | 4.74b | 41.10a | 31.37c | 21.77b | 406.18a | |
| 中部叶 | CK | 1.45b | 14.47a | 52.37b | 18.82c | 12.89a | 402.18b |
| T1 | 1.46b | 10.39c | 55.84a | 25.32b | 6.98c | 374.16c | |
| T2 | 12.53a | 10.66b | 33.96c | 34.07a | 8.78b | 420.18a | |
| 下部叶 | CK | 1.12c | 34.01a | 40.41c | 14.52c | 9.95b | 448.20a |
| T1 | 1.16b | 8.23c | 57.07a | 20.05b | 13.50a | 406.40c | |
| T2 | 8.22a | 9.98b | 42.11b | 35.86a | 3.84c | 332.19b |
| 生育期 | 处理 | 鲜重/(g/株) | 干重/(g/株) | 含水率/% | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上部叶 | 中部叶 | 下部叶 | 根 | 茎 | 全株 | 上部叶 | 中部叶 | 下部叶 | 根 | 茎 | 全株 | ||||
| 现蕾期 | CK | 295.9a | 57.2b | 281.2b | 634.4a | 47.7a | 18.0b | 39.5ab | 104.1a | 83.8a | |||||
| T1 | 280.0a | 56.8b | 277.8b | 614.8a | 46.7a | 17.9b | 36.3b | 102.0a | 83.2a | ||||||
| T2 | 346.0a | 73.9a | 335.8a | 755.7a | 50.7a | 23.9a | 48.2a | 122.8a | 83.8a | ||||||
| 成熟期 | CK | 305.4a | 192.1a | 101.4a | 159.5a | 407.7a | 1166.1a | 45.3a | 30.6a | 15.6a | 40.31a | 70.3a | 202.1a | 82.7a | |
| T1 | 161.0b | 143.1a | 96.5a | 134.9a | 402.3a | 937.9a | 29.6a | 26.5a | 14.8a | 40.0a | 68.8a | 179.5a | 80.9b | ||
| T2 | 272.3ab | 226.5a | 100.2a | 169.8a | 479.8a | 1248.8a | 46.0a | 41.5a | 16.7a | 48.3a | 83.8a | 236.2a | 81.1b | ||
| 生育期 | 处理 | 鲜重/(g/株) | 干重/(g/株) | 含水率/% | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上部叶 | 中部叶 | 下部叶 | 根 | 茎 | 全株 | 上部叶 | 中部叶 | 下部叶 | 根 | 茎 | 全株 | ||||
| 现蕾期 | CK | 295.9a | 57.2b | 281.2b | 634.4a | 47.7a | 18.0b | 39.5ab | 104.1a | 83.8a | |||||
| T1 | 280.0a | 56.8b | 277.8b | 614.8a | 46.7a | 17.9b | 36.3b | 102.0a | 83.2a | ||||||
| T2 | 346.0a | 73.9a | 335.8a | 755.7a | 50.7a | 23.9a | 48.2a | 122.8a | 83.8a | ||||||
| 成熟期 | CK | 305.4a | 192.1a | 101.4a | 159.5a | 407.7a | 1166.1a | 45.3a | 30.6a | 15.6a | 40.31a | 70.3a | 202.1a | 82.7a | |
| T1 | 161.0b | 143.1a | 96.5a | 134.9a | 402.3a | 937.9a | 29.6a | 26.5a | 14.8a | 40.0a | 68.8a | 179.5a | 80.9b | ||
| T2 | 272.3ab | 226.5a | 100.2a | 169.8a | 479.8a | 1248.8a | 46.0a | 41.5a | 16.7a | 48.3a | 83.8a | 236.2a | 81.1b | ||
| 处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 总植物碱/% | 水溶性氯/% | 氧化钾/% | 淀粉/% | 钾氯比 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.68a | 0.62a | 3.63b | 3.02c | 0.34a | 4.32a | 0.80b | 13.24a | 0.23a | 1.20a |
| T1 | 0.50b | 0.26b | 3.75a | 3.71b | 0.30b | 3.66c | 0.88a | 12.33c | 0.13b | 1.01b |
| T2 | 0.48b | 0.29b | 3.75a | 3.94a | 0.30b | 3.81b | 0.88a | 12.65b | 0.12b | 0.95c |
| 尼加拉瓜 | 0.55±0.16 | — | 4.23±0.65 | 3.22±1.90 | 0.80±0.48 | 3.78±0.77 | — | 4.73±1.60 | 0.17±0.08 | 1.31±0.34 |
| 中国海南 | 0.84±0.28 | — | 4.70±1.21 | 4.05±1.84 | 1.61±1.19 | 5.38±0.40 | — | 3.34±0.34 | 0.21±0.15 | 1.16±0.66 |
| 处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总氮/% | 总植物碱/% | 水溶性氯/% | 氧化钾/% | 淀粉/% | 钾氯比 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.68a | 0.62a | 3.63b | 3.02c | 0.34a | 4.32a | 0.80b | 13.24a | 0.23a | 1.20a |
| T1 | 0.50b | 0.26b | 3.75a | 3.71b | 0.30b | 3.66c | 0.88a | 12.33c | 0.13b | 1.01b |
| T2 | 0.48b | 0.29b | 3.75a | 3.94a | 0.30b | 3.81b | 0.88a | 12.65b | 0.12b | 0.95c |
| 尼加拉瓜 | 0.55±0.16 | — | 4.23±0.65 | 3.22±1.90 | 0.80±0.48 | 3.78±0.77 | — | 4.73±1.60 | 0.17±0.08 | 1.31±0.34 |
| 中国海南 | 0.84±0.28 | — | 4.70±1.21 | 4.05±1.84 | 1.61±1.19 | 5.38±0.40 | — | 3.34±0.34 | 0.21±0.15 | 1.16±0.66 |
| [1] |
王卫峰, 胡亚杰, 张丰收, 等. 不同移栽期对烟叶主要矿质营养元素的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2016, 22(6):120-123.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
沈方科. 李婷. 王蕾. 等. 钾素营养对烟株氮代谢及烟叶品质形成的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(9):18.
|
| [4] |
孙力, 李明, 张强, 等. 钾素水平对烟叶化学成分和感官评吸质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(24):13213.
|
| [5] |
黄莺. 周梅, 黄河. 等. 基因型对烟草钾素营养的响应能力及筛选研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2004(2):34.
|
| [6] |
谭军, 蒋美红, 李卓璘, 等. 钾素对烤烟产质量影响及提钾措施的研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(6):44-47.
|
| [7] |
信俊峰. 米易植烟区烤烟钾肥适用性和提钾技术研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012.
|
| [8] |
贺治慧. 钾肥施用量和基追比对烤烟生长的影响[D]. 延安: 延安大学, 2018.
|
| [9] |
化党领, 曹荣, 魏修彬, 等. 不同氮磷钾施肥量对烤烟农艺性状及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(4):53-58.
|
| [10] |
王俊. 钾对烟碱类物质的积累和它们生物合成相关基因表达的影响[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2015.
|
| [11] |
徐祥玉, 樊俊, 王瑞, 等. 雪茄烟田间生长期干物质及氮、磷、钾累积规律分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(16):18-23.
|
| [12] |
刘利平, 王剑, 汪健, 等. 氮磷钾比对茄衣品种产质量的影响[J]. 农村实用技术, 2024(3):87-89.
|
| [13] |
樊俊, 王瑞, 徐祥玉, 等. 土壤养分及烟叶矿质元素对雪茄烟叶、烟灰色度值的影响[J]. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(9):5-10.
|
| [14] |
钟德卫, 张连英, 邓长香, 等. 基于GIS的金沙江流域耕地地力评价——以云南省绥江县为例[A].//中国农业资源与区划学会.2015年中国农业资源与区划学会学术年会论文集[C]. 2015:160-167.
|
| [15] |
朱勋田, 李峰, 杨军章, 等. 不同移栽期对昭通金沙江流域雪茄烟茄芯烟叶产质量影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2023, 35(9):9-14.
|
| [16] |
朱勋田, 李峰, 杨军章, 等. 不同种植密度对昭通金沙江流域茄芯烟叶产质量影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(20):31-36.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0680 |
| [17] |
王瑞新. 烟草化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003:170-174,258-274.
|
| [18] |
陈明灿, 李友军, 孔祥生, 等. 不同施钾量对烟草生育及产、质的影响[J]. 洛阳农业高等专科学校学报, 2002(4):241-242.
|
| [19] |
李军华, 唐杰, 梁坤, 等. 印尼与国内雪茄烟叶主要化学成分差异分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2015, 56(7):1080-1083.
|
| [20] |
刘国祥, 李媛, 戴培刚, 等. 雪茄烟新品种雪雅香1号的选育及特征特性[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2024, 30(1):129-134.
|
| [21] |
乔保明, 吴创, 田煜利, 等. 钾肥用量对雪茄烟品种BES NO H382品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(4):134-137.
|
| [1] | GE Lijiao, QIU Liang, CHENG Yujing, WANG Xiaoqiu, ZHAI Caijiao, WANG Xiaolong. Effects of Plant and Row Spacing on Main Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of ‘Bairizi’ Radish [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(2): 16-22. |
| [2] | YU Zihan, HAN Xi, WU Xiaoling, XIAO Guangli, WANG Ying, CHEN Yuhong. Research on Characteristics of Cadmium Translocation and Accumulation in Different Rice Cultivars in Southeastern Sichuan Region [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2026, 16(1): 48-56. |
| [3] | HAN Mingming, LYU Lianjie, LI Wenqian, ZHANG Haijun. Effects of Irrigation Methods and Fertilizer Treatments on Growth Development and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(8): 1-5. |
| [4] | WANG Jinxiu, LIU Jiabin, LIN Qi, LIU Yiguo, ZHOU Yuan, DUAN Wenping, GENG Xinghua, LI Lingyan, SHI Changhai. Effects of Sowing Date on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of Quinoa [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(7): 1-7. |
| [5] | SUN Xu, CHEN Yuezhen, CHEN Chen, WANG Lixiang, WEI Yongju, SUN Yuehua, LI Yapeng, LIU Peizhuo, WANG Guanglong, XIONG Aisheng. Comparative Analysis of Agronomic Characters, Photosynthetic Parameters and Quality Characters of Celery in Autumn and Winter in Huai’an Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(6): 65-70. |
| [6] | QIN Huawei, GAO Junjie, WANG Ting, HAN Long, LIU Zhongliang, CHEN Zhen, YAN Weiqiang, GU Duanyin. Effects of N P K Fertilizers Combined Application on Yield and Quality of Chinese Chive [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(6): 71-76. |
| [7] | ZHANG Peng, YANG Xukun, CHEN Lu, WANG Wenzhi, MI Yanhua, LIU Zhenhuan, LI Maoxuan, SU Wen, WANG Xiangquan, YANG Yanxiong, GUO Lujun. Study on Effects of Organic and Conventional Planting Modes on Quality and Economic Benefits of Rice in Yunnan [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 12-19. |
| [8] | HU Yong, CHEN Shihong, NIE Zhongyang, YE Zhaochun, LIU Hongfeng, SONG Yiyang, WANG Bo. Effects of Weed Control Under Different Weed Growth Patterns in Tobacco Field and Its Effects on Agronomic Traits of Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(5): 20-23. |
| [9] | LOU Ling, YUAN Hangjie, WANG Jingwen, WANG Zhong, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Reduced Fertilization on Vegetable Yield and Soil Nutrients in Phosphorus and Potassium-Rich Vegetable Land [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(3): 19-23. |
| [10] | LIU Wei, BAO Jiajing, LIU Yanli. Effects of Meteorological Conditions on Sunflower Quality in Hetao Irrigation Area [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(3): 82-92. |
| [11] | CHEN Xiaoyan, ZHANG Lifan, LI Jianyong, LIU Hehu, LI Genze, LIU Cuicui, ZHANG Yunyun, YANG Guoan, WANG Xueming, HE Qing, ZHOU Shan, ZHU Xuan, ZHAO Kaiqin. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application Rate on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Rapeseed Under Rice-oilseed Rape Rotation Model in Erhai Lake Basin [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(11): 28-34. |
| [12] | LI Mingyan, SHI Lei, XU Weizhou, HAN Xia, QIAO Yu, BU Yaojun. Effects of Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application on Agronomic Characteristics and Quality of Silage Corn in Yuyang District [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2025, 15(10): 1-9. |
| [13] | ZHANG Xiaomei, ZHAO Rong, WANG Lisheng, LI Xiaozhu, LV Minghui, GAO Yimei. Supply and Demand Analysis and Benefit Evaluation of Agricultural Meteorological Services in China [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(8): 72-80. |
| [14] | CHEN Shuwei, ZHENG Weicai, LI Yunzhe, LUO Min, WANG Hongchang, MO Jianqiang, ZHENG Zhibo. Variety Selection of Purple-leaf Rice in Application of "Paddy Field Painting" [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(6): 93-100. |
| [15] | LI Yanlan, PU Guangfa, ZHANG Na, XU Xuezhong, HU Xinzhou, CHAI Mengting, ZHANG Xuesong, LIU Jianjian, LI Xiang, CHEN Mengli, ZHANG Bin, REN Jingmei, YANG Jincheng. Correlation Analysis Between Yield and Agronomic Traits of Low Density Planted Fresh Faba Bean Varieties [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(3): 28-33. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||