Effect of Waterlogging Degree on Cotton Seedling Growth and Physiological Change

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas15110014

Abstract

Abstract: In order to clarify the adaptability of cotton after waterlogging stres. cotton morphology, production and physiological changes at the seedling stage under different flooding degree were studied by using a pot experiment. The results showed that after flooding, cotton production, the rate of bolls per plant, boll weight, plant height, number of leaves and dry matter accumulation of per plant reduced, while Lint percentage did not change; with the flooding time increasing, various indicators continued reducing. after flooding 20d, leaf SPAD value declined rapidly, cotton lint yield decreased by more than 80%, even total crop failure. Overall, flooding 15d could be considered the critical time of cotton to adapt waterlogging stress during seedling stage , so cotton can resuming growing through cultural technique measure before the critical time.

CLC Number:

S562

郑曙峰,王维,刘小玲,吴文革,陈敏 and 阚画春. Effect of Waterlogging Degree on Cotton Seedling Growth and Physiological Change[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2016, 6(2): 33-38.

References

[1]李慧伶,王修贵,程伦国,等.多阶段受涝渍综合影响的农田排水指标试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2005,24(4):1-4.
[2] 张培通,徐立华,杨长琴,等.涝渍对棉花产量及其构成的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2008,24(6):785-791.
[3] Christianson J A,Llewellyn D J,Dennis E S,et al.Global gene expression responses to waterlogging in roots and leaves of cotton [J].Plant cell physiology,2010,51(1):21-37.
[4] 董合忠,李维江,唐薇,等.干旱和淹水对棉苗某些生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2003,23 (10):1695-1699.
[5] 汪天,王素平,郭世荣,等.植物低氧胁迫伤害与适应机理的研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2006,26 (4):847-853.
[6] 罗振,董合忠,李维江,等.盐渍和涝渍对棉苗生长和叶片某些生理性状的复合效应[J].棉花学报,2008,20(3):203-206.
[7] 赵可夫.植物对水涝胁迫的适应[J].生物学通报,2003,38(12):11-14.
[8] 尹冬梅,管志勇,陈素梅,等.菊花及其近缘种属植物耐涝评价体系建立及耐涝性鉴定[J].植物遗传资源学报,2009,10(3):399-404.
[9] 中国农业科学院棉花研究所.中国棉花栽培学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2013.3.
[10] 刘凯文,朱建强,吴启侠.蕾铃期涝渍相随对棉花叶片光合作用与产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2010,29(1):23-24.
[11] 宋学贞,杨国正,罗振,等.花铃期淹水对棉花生长、生理和产量的影响[J].中国棉花,2012,39(9):5-8.
[12] 孙红春,任新茂,李存东,等.水分胁迫对棉花不同部位主茎叶14C同化、分配的影响[J].棉花学报,2011,23(3):47-252.
[13] 刘晓忠,李建坤,王志霞,等.涝渍逆境下玉米叶片超氧物歧化酶和过氧化氢酶活性与抗涝性的关系[J].华北农学报,1995,10(3):29-32.
[14]Kumutha D,Ezhilmathi K,Sairam R K,et al. Waterlogging induced oxidative stress and antioxidant activity in pigeonpea genotypes[J].Biologial Plantarum,2009,53(1):75-84.
[15] 刘凯文,苏荣瑞,朱建强,等.棉花苗期叶片关键生理指标对涝渍胁迫的响应[J].中国农业气象,2012,33(3):442-447.
[16] 罗新宁,陈冰,张巨松,等.南疆棉花生物量积累对氮肥的响应[J].新疆农业大学学报,2008,31(3):62-64.
[17] 杨云.蕾花期涝渍胁迫后棉花恢复生长的生理机制研究[D].南京农业大学,2011.6.
[18] 张寄阳,刘祖贵,段爱旺,等.棉花对水分胁迫及复水的生理生态响应[J].棉花学报,2006,18(6):398-399.
[19] 梁哲军,陶洪斌,赵海祯,等.苗期土壤渍水对棉花恢复生长及光合生理的影响[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(9):1830-1836.
[20] 吕军.渍水对冬小麦生长的危害及其生理效应[J].植物生理学通报,1994,20(3):221-226.
[21] 秦洪文,刘云峰,王德炉,等.水淹对水芹(Oenanthe javanica)生长的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2009,28(3):193-197.
[22] 王文泉,郑永战,梅鸿献,等.不同耐渍基因型芝麻在厌氧胁迫下根系的生理与结构变化[J].植物遗传资源学报,2003,4(3):214-219.
[23] 徐道青,郑曙峰,王维,等.棉花涝害胁迫研究综述[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(27):1-4.