Evaluation of Control Efficiency of Insecticides Against Bemisia tabaci of Facility Tomato

doi:10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2023-0273

Abstract

Abstract:

To screen the highly control insecticides against Bemisia tabaci of facility tomato, six insecticides were selected to test by spraying method in this study, and the control efficiency of different insecticides against Bemisia tabaci and yield of tomato were investigated and compared. The results showed that all the insecticides had the inhibitory effects against Bemisia tabaci, among which 22.4% spirotetramat SC and 22% sulfoxaflor SC exhibited the better control efficiency. After 7 days of application, their control efficiency exceeded 84%, which was 30% higher than the yield of CK. These two insecticides had no adverse impacts on crops and environment, which were suggested to be used alternately in production to achieve effective prevention and control purposes.

Key words: Bemisia tabaci, facility tomato, control efficiency, insecticides, yield, environmental safety

JIAO Yuxia, CAO Zeng, ZUO Xiufeng, WANG Xianghui, HU Yinghua. Evaluation of Control Efficiency of Insecticides Against Bemisia tabaci of Facility Tomato[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2024, 14(6): 1-4.

Figures/Tables 3

References 22

[1]	REN S X, WANG Z Z, QIU B L, et al. The pest status of Bemisia tabaci in China and non chemical control strategies[J]. Insect science, 2001, 8(3):279-288.
[2]	褚栋, 张友军. 近10年我国烟粉虱发生为害及防治研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5):51-55.
[3]	罗晨, 姚远, 王戎疆, 等. 利用mtDNA COI基因序列鉴定我国烟粉虱的生物型[J]. 昆虫学报, 2002, 45(6):759-763.
[4]	LIU S, DE BARROPJ, XU J, et al. A symmetric mating interactions drive widespread invasion and displacement in a whitefly[J]. Science, 2007, 318(5857):1769-1772.
[5]	CHU D, ZHANG Y J, BROWNJ K, et al. The introduction of the exotic Q biotype of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) from the Mediterranean region into China on ornamental crops[J]. Florida entomologist, 2006, 89(2):168-174.
[6]	褚栋, 潘慧鹏, 国栋, 等. Q型烟粉虱在中国的人侵生态过程及机制[J]. 昆虫学报, 2012, 55(12):1399-1405.
[7]	李会远. 番茄黄化曲叶病毒病的发生与防治[C]// 辽宁省植物保护学会,辽宁省昆虫学会2011年学术交流研讨会(西安)论文集,2011:125.
[8]	杨悦俭, 周国治, 王荣青, 等. 抗番茄黄化曲叶病毒病品种种植中的问题与对策[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2011(21):1-4.
[9]	吴篆芳, 曹坳程, 郑建秋, 等. 番茄黄化曲叶病毒病研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2013(1):18-26.
[10]	柳洋. 中国烟粉虱生物型分布、带毒率及抗药性监测[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2015.
[11]	刘永光, 魏家鹏, 乔宁, 等. 番茄褪绿病毒在山东暴发及其防治措施[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2014(5):67-69.
[12]	周涛, 杨普云, 赵汝娜, 等, 警惕番茄褪绿病毒在我国的传播和危害[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(5):196-199.
[13]	杨鑫, 谢文, 王少丽, 等, 北京、山东和湖南地区烟粉虱抗药性及CYP4v2和CYP6CX1 mRNA水平表达量分析[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(4):70-75.
[14]	阮赞誉, 曹怡, 陆志杰, 等. 不同杀虫剂对温室烟粉虱的防效研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(13):92+123.
[15]	李秋荣, 咸文荣. 4种杀虫剂对设施辣椒烟粉虱的田间防效评价[J]. 青海农林科技, 2022(2):69-72.
[16]	王欣蕊. 6种药剂对设施蔬菜烟粉虱的田间防效试验[J]. 蔬菜, 2022(10):53-55.
[17]	师文娟, 廖道华, 杨芳, 等. 螺虫乙酯的合成[J]. 农药, 2010, 49(4):250-251+263.
[18]	孔月, 刘定蓉, 徐英, 等. 氟啶虫胺腈研究开发现状与展望[J]. 山东化工, 2021, 50(13):70-72.
[19]	WANG Z Y, YAN H F, YANG Y H, et al. Biotype and insecticide resistance status of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci from China[J]. Pest management science, 2010, 66(12):1360-1366.
[20]	LUOC, JONES C M, DEVINEG, et al. Insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci biotype Q (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from China[J]. Crop protection, 2010, 29(5):429-434.
[21]	HOROWITZ A R, KONTSEDALOV S, KHASDAN V, et al. Biotypes B and Q of Bemisia tabaci and their relevance to neonicotinoid and pyriproxyfen resistance[J]. Archives insect biochemistry and physiology, 2005, 58(4):216-225.
[22]	DENNEHY T J, DEGAIN B A, HARPOLDV S, et al. New challenges to management of whitefly resistance 1o insecticidesin Arizona[R]. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Vegetable Report, 2005, 31:144.

处理	供试药剂	生产厂家	制剂用量
A	22%氟啶虫胺腈SC	美国陶氏益农公司	225 mL/hm²
B	22.4%螺虫乙酯SC	拜尔股份公司	375 mL/hm²
C	50%噻虫胺WG	陕西汤普森生物科技公司	225 g/hm²
D	1.8%阿维菌素EC	先正达（中国）投资有限公司	225 g/hm²
E	25%吡蚜酮SC	江苏克胜集团股份有限公司	375 mL/hm²
F	2.5%高效氯氟氰菊酯EW	山东邹平农药有限公司	450 g/hm²
G	CK	-	-

处理	供试药剂	生产厂家	制剂用量
A	22%氟啶虫胺腈SC	美国陶氏益农公司	225 mL/hm²
B	22.4%螺虫乙酯SC	拜尔股份公司	375 mL/hm²
C	50%噻虫胺WG	陕西汤普森生物科技公司	225 g/hm²
D	1.8%阿维菌素EC	先正达（中国）投资有限公司	225 g/hm²
E	25%吡蚜酮SC	江苏克胜集团股份有限公司	375 mL/hm²
F	2.5%高效氯氟氰菊酯EW	山东邹平农药有限公司	450 g/hm²
G	CK	-	-

处理	药前	虫口减退率/%			防控效果/%
处理	虫数/头	药后1 d	药后3 d	药后7 d	药后1 d	药后3 d	药后7 d
A	77.33	63.65±0.63a	71.94±2.08a	84.51±0.18ab	65.25±0.80a	72.56±1.79a	84.51±0.04a
B	83.33	64.70±1.16a	72.77±0.98a	87.10±1.36a	66.26±1.14a	73.34±0.91a	87.12±1.33a
C	79.00	60.39±2.98a	68.84±1.62a	77.23±0.35bc	62.16±2.80a	69.47±1.81a	77.23±0.34b
D	74.33	48.88±2.98b	56.78±3.60b	70.60±1.48c	51.16±2.33b	57.63±3.83b	70.63±1.35b
E	85.33	46.17±2.20b	52.95±1.91b	55.69±1.77d	49.08±2.00b	53.94±1.88b	55.62±2.26c
F	75.00	47.45±4.51b	51.02±4.38b	54.02±5.33d	49.79±4.29b	51.98±4.66b	54.13±4.92c
G	78.33	-4.63	-2.16	-0.05	-	-	-

处理	药前	虫口减退率/%			防控效果/%
处理	虫数/头	药后1 d	药后3 d	药后7 d	药后1 d	药后3 d	药后7 d
A	77.33	63.65±0.63a	71.94±2.08a	84.51±0.18ab	65.25±0.80a	72.56±1.79a	84.51±0.04a
B	83.33	64.70±1.16a	72.77±0.98a	87.10±1.36a	66.26±1.14a	73.34±0.91a	87.12±1.33a
C	79.00	60.39±2.98a	68.84±1.62a	77.23±0.35bc	62.16±2.80a	69.47±1.81a	77.23±0.34b
D	74.33	48.88±2.98b	56.78±3.60b	70.60±1.48c	51.16±2.33b	57.63±3.83b	70.63±1.35b
E	85.33	46.17±2.20b	52.95±1.91b	55.69±1.77d	49.08±2.00b	53.94±1.88b	55.62±2.26c
F	75.00	47.45±4.51b	51.02±4.38b	54.02±5.33d	49.79±4.29b	51.98±4.66b	54.13±4.92c
G	78.33	-4.63	-2.16	-0.05	-	-	-

处理	小区产量/(kg/20 m²)	折合产量/(kg/hm²)	增产率/%
A	125.85±1.20ab	62958.13±602.50ab	30.48
B	130.95±3.53a	65509.40±1766.62a	35.77
C	119.20±2.18bc	59631.47±1091.30bc	23.59
D	116.71±1.75c	58385.85±873.33c	21.00
E	108.95±2.28d	54503.91±1139.63d	12.96
F	108.68±1.33d	54367.17±665.64d	12.68
G	96.45±2.83e	48250.78±1417.69e	-