欢迎访问《农学学报》,

农学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (10): 29-32.doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas19040014

所属专题: 食用菌 食用菌

• 林学 园艺 园林 食用菌 • 上一篇    下一篇

芦笋秸秆栽培秀珍菇试验

曲玲, 万鲁长, 任海霞, 郭惠东, 任鹏飞   

  1. 山东省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业废弃物基质化利用重点实验室/山东省植物营养与肥料重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-12 修回日期:2019-05-28 接受日期:2019-06-11 出版日期:2019-10-22 发布日期:2019-10-22
  • 通讯作者: 任鹏飞 E-mail:3107262138@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家食用菌产业技术体系“济南实验站”(CARS-24);山东省现代农业产业技术体系食用菌创新团队建设项目“食用菌栽培岗位”(SDAIT- 07-01)。

Cultivating Pleurotus cornucopiae in Asparagus Straw

  • Received:2019-04-12 Revised:2019-05-28 Accepted:2019-06-11 Online:2019-10-22 Published:2019-10-22

摘要: 以芦笋秸秆为栽培基质与玉米芯、木屑、麸皮等材料经科学配制进行秀珍菇栽培试验,对不同配方的菌丝生长速度、生物学效率、投入产出比、经济效益等指标进行统计分析。结果表明:不同配方的秀珍菇长势良好,在笋秸秆含量为80%的情况下,基质透气性好,菌丝生长速度快,随着培养料中玉米芯含量的增加,基质透气性差,菌丝生长速度较缓慢。从秀珍菇的产量来看,配方5的产量最高,生物学效率为70.52%,配方1的产量最低,生物学效率为60.54%,综合经济效益分析,配方1的投入产出比最高,投入产出比为1:5.45,成本较配方5降低约23.97%。

关键词: 混种, 混种, 龙葵, 番茄, 茄子, 生理生化特性, 镉含量

Abstract: To solve the issue of large consumption of woods or introduction of cottonseed hulls from other provinces for cultivating rare edible fungus Pleurotus cornucopiae, an experiment of cultivating P. cornucopiae in asparagus straw matrix mixed with corncob, sawdust, wheat brans and so on was carried out; the growth speed, biological efficiency, input-output ratio and economic benefit of hyphae in the matrixes of different formulas were statistically analyzed. According to the experiment results, P. cornucopiae in matrixes with different formulas grew well; when asparagus straw content was 80%, the ventilation of the matrix was good and hyphae grew fast; with the increase of corncob in the matrix, the ventilation became worse and hyphae grew slower. In view of the output of P. cornucopiae, for the matrix with 70% corncob, 10% sawdust, 13% wheat bran, 3% soybean meal, 3% lime and 1% plaster (formula 5), the output was the highest and biological efficiency was 70.52%; for the matrix with 80% asparagus straws, 13% wheat bran, 3% soybean meal, 3% lime and 1% plaster (formula 1), the output was the lowest and biological efficiency was 60.54%. According to comprehensive analysis of the economic benefit, the input-output ratio of formula 1 was the highest: 1:5.45, and its cost was about 23.97% lower than that of formula 5.